Category: Uncategorized

  • Reed Smith, Wolf Theiss, and CMS Advise on EUR 103 Million Refinancing of Business Park Sofia

    Reed Smith, Wolf Theiss, and CMS Advise on EUR 103 Million Refinancing of Business Park Sofia

    Reed Smith and Wolf Theiss have advised Arco Capital Corporation Ltd. (Arco Capital), a Cayman-based fund, in connection with the EUR 103 million refinancing of Business Park Sofia (BPS), the largest office park in Southeastern Europe, with UniCredit Bank Austria AG and UniCredit Bulbank AD, which were advised by CMS. The transaction closed in June 2015.

    Arco Capital is engaged in mid-market commercial, infrastructure, and real estate lending and acquisition activities primarily in emerging markets.

    UniCredit Bank Austria AG and UniCredit Bulbank AD jointly underwrote a EUR 103.3 million senior facility to refinance BPS, with Arco Capital acting as fund sponsor. The facility is being jointly provided by UniCredit Bank Austria AG and UniCredit Bulbank AD as mandated lead arrangers and underwriters. UniCredit Bulbank AD is acting as facility and security agent, account bank, and hedge provider of this transaction.

    The BPS office complex consists of fourteen Class A modern buildings, located in a prime location for business in Sofia. The total built-up area is 187,000 square meters and is fully leased to more than 150 international tenants with — in the office park — more than 11,000 employees. The business park comprises more than fifty percent of Sofia’s central business district currently leased Class A office space. Also, further development of buildings and infrastructure within the park is under consideration.

    According to Francesco Piovanetti, Chief Executive Officer of Arco Capital Corporation, “Arco Capital Corporation, Business Park Sofia and UniCredit have had a longstanding relationship and we are pleased to continue this cooperation. The consolidation of numerous legacy facilities into one master facility, combined with the addition of a strong partner in UniCredit, further enhances BPS’s operational and financial standing. The transaction will increase our leading position in the Sofia institutional office market and solidify our overall flawless financial performance. This is another fine example of how UniCredit is the only pan-CEE financier with the foresight and shrewdness to finance distinctive projects like BPS; only a limited number of sophisticated financiers are able to capitalize in opportunities like this.” 

    Lukasz Motyl, Head of Real Estate CEE, added: “We are very pleased to have worked with our partner to support the financing of what is the premier office park in Southeastern Europe. We are very happy that we had a chance to expand our lending relationship with BPS, and its fund sponsor Arco Capital Corporation Ltd., and are looking forward to continue supporting them as they grow their business not only at BPS, but also in the CEE region. The financing of BPS at current time is also a very good example that with appropriate expertise and local know how – in this case provided by UniCredit Bulbank‘s Real Estate Financing team – it is always a good time to finance long term sustainable projects backed by reputable Sponsors.” 

    The Reed Smith banking and finance team advising Arco Capital was led by Partner Leon Stephenson, who described the matter as “one of the largest real estate financing deals that has ever been completed in Bulgaria.” Stephenson was supported by Senior Associate Iva Philipova, and Associate Helena Clarke. The firm also worked closely with Wolf Theiss as Bulgarian counsel, Appleby as Cayman counsel, and Vassallo as Maltese counsel to refinance the borrower’s existing indebtedness which consisted of three separate financings, including a loan which was part of the Deco 14 – Pan Europe 5 securitization. 

    The banking and finance team of Wolf Theiss Sofia was led by Partner Katerina Kraeva and Senior Associate Rebeka Kleytman and supported by Senior Associates Julia Haralampieva and Atanas Mihaylov, Associate Vessela Dimitrova, and Paralegals Radoslav Nikolov and Ivan Genchev.

    The CMS team advising UniCredit included Sofia-based Partner Gentscho Pavlov, Attorney Dimitar Zwiatkow, and Associates Ivan Gergov and Marin Drinov, Vienna-based Partner Gunther Hanslik, and Prague-based Partner Ana Radnev.

    Image Source: businesspark-sofia.com

     

  • Allen & Overy Advises Grupa Lotos and Lotos Asfalt on EFRA Project in Gdansk

    Allen & Overy Advises Grupa Lotos and Lotos Asfalt on EFRA Project in Gdansk

    Allen & Overy has advised Grupa Lotos and Lotos Asfalt on the preparation, financing, and implementation of the ‘”EFRA – Effective Refining” project, which consists of the construction and operation of a delayed coking unit with auxiliary infrastructure in the immediate vicinity of the Grupa Lotos refinery in Gdansk. Clifford Chance advised a consortium of financial institutions on the financing.

    According to Allen & Overy, “the implementation of the EFRA Project will considerably improve the quality of crude oil processing.” The firm explains that, as a result, the share of heavy products in the overall production will decrease, and the Lotos Group will focus on producing middle distillates and relatively limited production of coke, which will result in the improvement of the refining margin by some USD 2/bbl. The Lotos Group estimates the total value of the EFRA Project to be approximately PLN 2.5 billion, including the cost of servicing the financing of the EFRA Project during the construction phase and the banks’ requirement to maintain reserve term deposits. According to the Lotos Group’s plans, the issuance funds will co-finance the project up to PLN 530-650 million. The project is to end in 2018.

    Allen & Overy supported Grupa Lotos and Lotos Asfalt during the stage of work on the optimal legal, organisational, and contractual structure for the project. In the next phase, the firm’s advice included preparing and negotiating project agreements relating to, among others, the construction of project installations, feedstock supply and sale of the final product, and then negotiating and signing the finance documents with financial institutions ensuring debt financing for the project.  

    Allen & Overy’s work was coordinated by Partner Tomasz Kawczynski, who commented: ‘’The EFRA – Effective Refining project supplements the Programme 10+ recently implemented by the Gdansk Refinery. In our opinion, the EFRA Project is one of the most complicated transactions we have seen in Poland in recent years.” Advice concerning the finance documents and project documents was managed by Allen & Overy Senior Associate Agnieszka Lipska and Counsel Kamil Jankielewicz, respectively. The Allen & Overy Warsaw team also included Counsel Bartosz Jagodzinski, Senior Associate Jerzy Zdrojewski, Associate Lukasz Lech, and Lukasz Blaszczak and Natalia Ornass.

    The English law work at Allen & Overy was managed by London-based Partners Nigel Pritchard and Andrew Castle, supported by Senior Associate Kyle Sanderson.

    Clifford Chance advised the consortium of financial institutions made up of Bank Gospodarstwa Krajowego, Bank Millennium, Bank Polska Kasa Opieki, Bank Zachodni WBK, Powszechna Kasa Oszczednosci Bank Polski, Societe Generale, Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen, and Powszechny Zak?ad Ubezpieczen na Zycie on the financing, and introduced and agreed with the borrower’s counter-parties amendment of more than 10 project agreements (such as an EPC contract, EPCM contract, technology transfer agreements, heavy residue supply agreement, off-take agreements, a tolling agreement, and an O&M agreement) in order to mitigate the risk arising in connection with the project for the borrower and the financing parties and thus for the project to meet bankability requirements.

    The Clifford Chance Partner responsible for handling the project was Andrzej Stosio, assisted by, among others, Counsels Marcin Bejm and Irena Floras and Associates Katarzyna Jakubiak, Pawe? Piotrowski, Dominik K?pinski, and Przemyslaw Karolak.

    Stosio, commenting on the project, said: “EFRA was an interesting project from the point of view of the financing structure. The work entailed negotiation of agreements to provide long-term financing for Lotos Asfalt, largely according to the project finance model. Some elements of the EFRA project are part of the existing refinery and of the new Grupa LOTOS installations intended to be built on the site, which had to be incorporated both into the financing and project documentation with regard to the existing and future interdependence of the Lotos Asfalt and Grupa LOTOS installations.”

    Irena Floras, Counsel responsible for the financial aspects, added that: “the project was unique due to the combination of financing according to the project finance model and elements of corporate financing, due to the fact that Lotos Asfalt was not acting as an SPV – for many years it has been a leading producer of asphalt in Europe. This combination required that an original and inventive approach be taken towards the legal solutions. The financial documentation was drawn up in a way that safeguarded against the risks that are typical for project finance deals but also took into account the existing asphalt operations of Lotos Asfalt.”

    Finally, Counsel Marcin Bejm, who was responsible for structuring the project, added: “structuring a project involving amending project agreements, devising a risk allocation model, and introducing contractual mechanisms to mitigate those risks was a major challenge. To ensure project bankability we had to deal with the limitations that arose among other things due to the decision that the project would not be handled by way of general contracting, the technological links between the new plant and the refinery, the project’s dependence on outside tolling services, and the storing of end products together with the products of other producers.”

     

  • EPAM Obtains Pre-Closing Clearance for XPO Logistics Purchase of Norbert Dentressangle Shares

    EPAM Obtains Pre-Closing Clearance for XPO Logistics Purchase of Norbert Dentressangle Shares

    The Antitrust practice team of Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners has obtained pre-closing clearance of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia for XPO Logistics’ purchase of shares in Norbert Dentressangle SA.

    XPO Logistics announced its acquisition of a controlling stake in the French company Norbert Dentressangle SA in June, 2015. Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners reports that it “was able to secure a positive decision from the FAS in record-breaking time.” 

    Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners’ Partner Arkady Krasnikhin supervised the work of Counsel Anna Numerova and Senior Associate Elena Kazak on the matter.

     

  • Schoenherr Supports Finance Ministry’s Negotiating Group on HETA Agreement with Bavaria

    Schoenherr Supports Finance Ministry’s Negotiating Group on HETA Agreement with Bavaria

    Schoenherr provided support to the negotiating group established by Austria’s Federal Ministry of Finance for the talks that have led to the successful conclusion of a political agreement in principle between the Republic of Austria and the German state of Bavaria that aims at settling all legal disputes concerning HETA. (reported on by CEE Legal Matters on June 30 2015)

    In talks held in camera, Austria and Bavaria reached an agreement in principle with the goal of terminating the legal disputes regarding HETA’s predecessor, Hypo Alpe-Adria-Bank International AG. At their government meetings held on July 7, 2015, Austria’s federal government and the Bavarian state government approved a political agreement in principle at the recommendation of their respective finance ministers, Hans Jorg Schelling and Markus Soder. On the Austrian side, an independent expert commission headed by Irmgard Griss will now assist the process until the conclusion of the formal settlements, with the country’s parliament set to pass the required legal basis this autumn.

    Background: Various HETA-related lawsuits involving claims with dispute values in the billions of Euros are pending between HETA Asset Resolution AG, Bayerische Landesbank (BayernLB), and the Republic of Austria, including one in the Regional Court of Munich I, which resulted in an award in favor of BayernLB of EUR 1.03 billion and CHF 1.29 billion, plus interest, as reported by CEE Legal Matters on May 11, 2015. Previous attempts to reach a friendly settlement of the disputes had failed. Austrian Finance Minister Hans Jorg Schelling has made a new attempt that – under the leadership of the negotiating team – led to the successful conclusion of the respective agreement in principle.

    Schoenherr Partner Wolfgang Holler, who led the firm’s team providing legal assistance to the negotiating team of the Austrian Finance Ministry along with fellow Partner Sascha Hodl, explained that: “We appreciate the trust that was placed in us and are proud to have been able to make a contribution within such a complex situation. This agreement in principle provides the basis for a comprehensive resolution of this matter.” 

    Hodl added that: “The settlement of open issues, as the pre-closing in the sale of Hypo’s SEE network which took place last week or the just-reached conclusion of an agreement in principle with Bavaria, is essential for a proper and efficient run down of HETA.”

    HETA is the legal successor to Hypo Alpe-Adria-Bank International AG and has been a run-down entity according to Austria’s Federal Law for the Creation of a Run-down Unit (“GSA”) since October 30, 2014 following the so-called “Hypo Act” of the Austrian National Council in July, 2014.

    Schoenherr advised HETA in the bundling of its SEE banking and leasing network in Southeastern Europe into a SEE holding (now: Hypo Group Alpe Adria AG) that holds an Austrian banking license, as well as on the sale of this SEE banking and leasing network to the US-based fund Advent International and the European Bank for Recovery and Development (EBRD) (reported on by CEE Legal Matters on January 2, 2015). In spring 2015, Schoenherr also assisted HETA in the implementation of the first resolution pursuant to the European framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions (reported on by CEE Legal Matters on March 2, 2015) (which was implemented in Austria in January 2015).

     

  • Goltsblat BLP Again Successful for IKEA in Dispute

    Goltsblat BLP Again Successful for IKEA in Dispute

    On July 2, lawyers from Goltsblat BLP, the Russian practice of Berwin Leighton Paisner, won another case for IKEA in the court of appeal regarding claims made by Khimki Collective Agricultural Enterprise (“CAE Khimki”).

    Within the scope of this case, the appellant was claiming a land plot owned by IKEA, as well as demolition of 17 real estate properties located thereon. It took almost a year for the appellate court to reconsider the case. Finally, the second instance court confirmed the conclusions of the first instance court stating that the claims by CAE Khimki were unjustified.

    In 2014 Goltsblat BLP won another case for IKEA, again involving CAE Khimki. In that previous case, CAE Khimki challenged IKEA’s title to the land plot (reported on by CEE Legal Matters on July 23, 2014) – land that belonged to the former collective farm “Put k Kommunizmu” (“Road to Communism”) and filed a “no-title” lawsuit, obviously intending to circumvent the expired statute of limitations. Referring to a certificate of title to land of the former collective farm dating back to 1993, CAE Khimki tried to prove its own title to IKEA’s site, which currently accommodates two major business centres. Eventually, with support from Goltsblat BLP lawyers, IKEA succeeded in defending its interests in court, while CAE Khimki’s claims were dismissed in full. 

    Referring to this most recent case, a Goltsblat BLP press release summaries, briefly: “History repeats itself.”

    The firm’s team was led by Ivan Veselov.

    Image Source: Ken Wolter / Shutterstock.com

     

  • Baker & McKenzie, Havel Holasek, and Schoenherr Advise on VB-Leasing Sale of Slovak Business

    Baker & McKenzie, Havel Holasek, and Schoenherr Advise on VB-Leasing Sale of Slovak Business

    Schoenherr has advised VB-Leasing International (VBLI) on the sale of VB Leasing Slovakia to CSOB Leasing and on the replacement of 100% of the shareholder funding at par (including accrued interest) by the KBC Group. KCB and CSOB Leasing were advised by Havel, Holasek & Partners on Slovak matters and by Baker & McKenzie on Austrian law.

    VBLI is a joint venture between Osterreichische Volksbanken-AG (OVAG) and Germany’s VR-Leasing AG. CSOB Leasing is a subsidiary of Belgium’s KBC Group. OVAG and VR-Leasing-AG started the sales process for VBLI in 2013. With total assets of approximately EUR 170 million, VB Leasing Slovakia is one of the leading leasing companies in the Slovak market. The relevant agreement was executed on July 1, 2015 and the sale of the remaining subsidiaries of VBLI remains ongoing.

    The Schoenherr team was led by Vienna-based Partners Thomas Kulnigg and Sascha Hodl, primarily assisted by Attorney at law Clemens Rainer, with Bratislava-based Partner Sona Hekelova handling the Slovak law aspects of the transaction. Ithuba Capital and Deloitte also advised on the seller side. 

    KBC and CSOB Leasing were advised by Havel, Holasek & Partners (Slovakia) and Baker & McKenzie Diwok Hermann Petsche Rechtsanwalte (Austria).

    The Baker & McKenzie team was led by new Partner (promotion covered by CEE Legal Matters on June 26, 2015) Wendelin Ettmayer, who was assisted by Junior Associate Stephanie Sauer.

    From Havel Holasek & Partners, Partner Martin Jurecko and Associate Kamila Turcanova assisted CSOB on the deal. 

     

  • Buzescu Ca Successful for Statkraft Markets in Claim Brought by Transelectrica

    Buzescu Ca Successful for Statkraft Markets in Claim Brought by Transelectrica

    Buzescu Ca has obtained a victory for Statkraft Markets in a case regarding a claim filed by Transelectrica, the Romanian electricity system and transmission operator re claims for charges for cross-border electricity trading.

    The Bucharest Sector 1 Court rejected the claim as “unfounded” on June 25 with an appeal term of 15 days. 

    Statkraft Markets is a member of the Statkraft Group, a leading company in hydropower internationally and Europe’s largest generator of renewable energy. The Group produces hydropower, wind power, gas-fired power and district heating and is a global player in energy market operations. Statkraft has 3700 employees in more than 20 countries. 

    Buzescu Ca describes the matters as “a precedent setting case regarding the charges applicable in Romania for cross-border electricity trading.”

     

  • Cobalt Advises Hanza Holding on Estonian Elements of Metalliset Acquisition

    Cobalt Advises Hanza Holding on Estonian Elements of Metalliset Acquisition

    Cobalt Legal — working together with Lindahl and Castren & Snellman — advised Hanza Holding AB on Estonian aspects of its July 1, 2015 acquisition of all outstanding shares in Metalliset Oy, a provider of high quality mechanical manufacturing that has approximately 500 employees in Finland, Estonia, the Czech Republic, and China.

    The total purchase price is reported to be in the range of EUR 7.5 million, of which a substantial part consists of new shares in Hanza. 

    Hanza Holding is a NASDAQ OMX Stockholm-listed industrial business partner within manufacturing operating in Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Poland, Slovakia, and China. 

    Metalliset is the parent company of an international manufacturing group with a turnover of approximately EUR 40 million and an EBITDA of approximately EUR 4.8 million. The board of directors intends to carry out an issue of new shares to the current shareholders of Metalliset, corresponding to approximately 15 % of the total shares in HANZA, in connection with the acquisition. Further, a fully guaranteed rights issue of 50 MSEK (approximately EUR 5.3 million) will be carried out in order to finance the acquisition and capitalize the new group.    

     

  • JPM Advises on Srbijagas Split

    JPM Advises on Srbijagas Split

    JPM Jankovic Popovic Mitic is advising the Serbian state-owned gas distribution company JP Srbijagas on the separation of its activities.

    According to the firm, the Serbian Republic was obligated by the Agreement on Energy Community to separate the activity of transport and distribution of natural gas from that of production, supply, and storage of natural gas. The first step in the process was announced recently with the Government of the Republic of Serbia approving the incorporation acts of two subsidiaries of Srbijagas — Transportgas and Distribucijagas — which, according to JPM, will perform the activities of transportation of natural gas and distribution of natural gas, respectively.

    The JPM team assisting Srbijagas on the matter consisted of Senior Partner Jelena Gazivoda and Partners Nikola Djordjevic, Uros Markovic, and Nikola Vukotic.

     

  • The Expat On the Ground Interview: Matthew Keats, Managing Partner at Linklaters

    Matthew Keats, the Managing Partner of Linklaters’ Moscow office and head of the firm’s Energy and Infrastructure practice in Moscow, is among the most experienced and best known oil, gas, and petrochemicals lawyers in Russia, and he has advised on almost every leading deal in the Russian energy and natural resources market in the past five years. 

    CEELM:

    How did you get to your current role in Moscow?

    M.K.: After 15 years based in London, I was asked whether I would be willing to move to a position that had become available in our Moscow office. I jumped at the chance to come to Moscow. My practice has always focused on the oil and gas sector. Russia is without doubt the center of that world and the scale and value of Russian deals frequently dwarfs those in other markets. By 2010 the project finance market in Russia was also developing rapidly and, as a project finance specialist, I was keen to help build out our capability in Moscow.??

    CEELM:

    Was it always your goal to work abroad?

    M.K.: Always. And in part that is why I joined Linklaters. I was always very focused on wanting to work on transactions and for clients across the globe. I regard myself as having been hugely fortunate to be able to realize that ambition. Other than a brief six-month stint in our New York office (in those days we were based in the iconic Lipstick building), although my work required me to travel extensively, I had never had the opportunity to work overseas on a permanent basis. At various points in my professional career I have been fortunate enough to work for extended periods in each of India and North Africa and developed deep relationships with clients and lawyers in those jurisdictions. Each time I regarded it as a tremendous privilege to be welcomed into worlds that were fundamentally different from my own. So when the chance came to be in Moscow for at least a five-year period I saw that as a huge opportunity.

    CEELM:

    Have you found Moscow to be particularly challenging city to live and work in?

    M.K.: The greatest challenge remains the language barrier and I have simply not invested enough time to overcome that hurdle. My failure to pick up Russian will remain my greatest regret about my time in Moscow. Moscow is changing rapidly, however, and you can navigate yourself around Moscow these days in English. Even the Metro now has signs in English, which wasn’t the case when I first arrived and an understanding of the Cyrillic alphabet was essential to be able to use the Metro. 

    That said one observation from the past two to three years is that clients in Moscow increasingly prefer to use their native tongue for meetings. Understandably people prefer to use their first language for difficult meetings or negotiations. So whilst Moscow is becoming an easier city to live in day by day for expats I think the expectation increasingly from clients is that they would prefer to speak Russian where they can and I anticipate that bi-lingual lawyers will become the norm.??

    CEELM:

    In light of the Western sanctions against Russia, is this an awkward or difficult time to be an English lawyer on the ground in Moscow? 

    M.K.: Without question the last 12 months have been particularly challenging for everyone in the market. The perfect storm of the imposition of sanctions, ruble devaluation, high interest rates, and the oil price falling off a cliff has had a profound impact on investor confidence in Russia. Inevitably there has been a significant reduction in new money deals and international trade flows.?However there is still work for us to do. The market has not closed completely. We have all had to become sanctions experts in a short space of time, and we are working with clients on a daily basis to help them navigate their way through an increasingly complex sanctions-constrained environment. Our clients have assets and investments in Russia that they need to continue to manage. And there are new opportunities emerging all the time. Funding and investment is coming from new sources, particularly Asia and the Middle East. With a strong international network we have been able to support new entrants looking at Russia as a potential market.?The key is to remain flexible in what is an extremely dynamic and fluid environment.?

    If the question is asking whether I have sensed any anti-Western sentiment in Moscow since the onset of sanctions the answer is not at all. The people I interact with on a daily basis are committed to maintaining an open and constructive dialogue. No-one wants to see the rebuilding of an Iron Curtain.

    CEELM:

    There are obviously many differences between the Russian and UK legal markets. What idiosyncrasies or unique challenges involved with the practice of law in Russia stand out the most?

    M.K.: The three differences I would point out now for any expat coming into the market would be, first, that many clients in this jurisdiction have extremely high expectations in terms of speed of deal execution. Particularly for deals that have a political element the expectation is that transactions will be completed at breakneck speed.?Second, the involvement of procurement teams when clients are sourcing legal services is universal. 

    This is also true in Russia where many of the state-owned organizations have implemented extremely burdensome and, at times, bureaucratic procurement processes. These are hugely time-consuming and manpower-intensive exercises but unavoidable if you want to be considered for work from those institutions which represent some of the key players in the market. And third, in some cases, but not across the board, there can be a lack of appreciation of quality in terms of the legal work product and therefore lowest price will often win in competitive tenders. This makes winning work from certain clients and in certain sectors extremely challenging for the higher-end firms.??

    CEELM:

    What particular value do you think a senior expatriate lawyer adds – both to the firm and to your clients? 

    M.K.: Senior expatriates should bring with them a wealth of experience from working for clients and on transactions across the globe. While local expertise is essential, this international experience can be invaluable in terms of helping to find solutions to issues – solutions that might never have been seen before in this jurisdiction. We need to remember that the legal market in Russia is still young and is evolving all the time. Therefore an ability to bring experience from outside this jurisdiction can be hugely beneficial both within the firm and for clients alike. Expatriates should also help to ensure that best and consistent practice from across the globe is brought to bear locally. It is absolutely essential that our clients feel that they receive consistently high-quality advice and work product whether they are speaking to our lawyers in New York, London, Moscow or Beijing. 

    And finally, the value of the network cannot be underestimated. A senior expatriate should be able to connect people (again, both internally and clients) around the world. During my five years here I have frequently been asked “who should I speak to [in Paris Dispute Resolution/Shanghai corporate] about this…?”??

    CEELM:

    Other than Russia, which CEE country do you enjoy the most?

    M.K.: I have had very little opportunity to see much of the CEE during the past five years. But I did have the chance to visit Budapest twice for work recently and was reminded what a beautiful city it is. The last time I visited Hungary was at the end of the 80s with a backpack. My recent experience was slightly more upmarket!?

    CEELM:

    After many years in Russia, you’re preparing to relocate back to the UK. What one place in Moscow – a restaurant or a tourist attraction, or anything, really – will you miss the most?

    M.K.: Honestly, what I will miss most is the team we have here in Moscow. Our lawyers are some of the brightest in the Linklaters network. They are also great fun and have the ability to make me laugh however tough a day I am having. I will miss them hugely. Fortunately, although I will be based in London I will remain very involved in the Russia market and our Moscow office. So while I will be seeing less of the team it is definitely not goodbye!?

    What I will also miss is the view from my apartment. I have been lucky enough to live right in the very centre of the city and have views of the Kremlin, the imposing Church of Christ the Savior and Gorky Park from my eighth-floor apartment. As a teenager growing up in Europe in the midst of the Cold War never did I imagine that one day I would be living in the heart of Moscow.

    This Article was originally published in Issue 2.2. of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.