Category: Austria

  • Herbst Kinsky Advises FinTech Start-up FINcredible on Acquisition of Stake by KSV1870

    Herbst Kinsky Advises FinTech Start-up FINcredible on Acquisition of Stake by KSV1870

    Herbst Kinsky has advised Viennese FinTech start-up FINcredible GmbH on the acquisition by credit protection association KSV1870 of a 25.1% stake in the company for an undisclosed sum.

    “For FINcredible, KSV1870 is an optimal strategic fit that generates high added value for the clients of both companies,” commented Herbst Kinsky Partner Philipp Kinsky, who led his firm’s team on the deal. “We look forward to this milestone with FINcredible and hope that their decision to start strategic support early on will also serve as a role model for other Fintechs in Austria.”

    In addition to Kinsky, the Herbst Kinsky team consisted of Associates Carl Walderdorff and Georg Durstberger.

    Herbst Kinsky did not reply to our inquiry on the matter.  

  • Dorda Advises German Scooter Sharing Company on Entrance into Austria

    Dorda Advises German Scooter Sharing Company on Entrance into Austria

    Dorda has advised Berlin-based electric scooter sharing company Emmy on its expansion into Austria.

    Emmy was founded in 2015 with only 150 scooters. It now provides around 2000 scooters that can be located and rented via an app in Berlin, Hamburg, Munich, Dusseldorf, and Vienna. According to Dorda, more Austrian cities will follow. “We believe in the future of urban mobility without owning a vehicle,” said Emmy Co-Founder Valerian Seither. 

    The Dorda team was led by Partners Bernhard Rieder and Axel Anderl, Senior Associates Nino Tlapak, Julia Berent, and Lisa Kulmer, and Associates Elisabeth Reiner and Alexandra Ciarnau.  

  • Binder Groesswang and Wolf Theiss Advise on Mutuares’ Offer for Q Logistics to OBB

    Binder Groesswang and Wolf Theiss Advise on Mutuares’ Offer for Q Logistics to OBB

    Binder Groesswang has advised industrial holding company Mutares SE & Co. KGaA on a notarized, binding offer to acquire the business of Q Logistics GmbH, a logistics subsidiary of Osterreichische Bundesbahnen-Holding Aktiengesellschaft. Wolf Theiss advised OBB on the transaction.

    Binder Groesswang reports that “the transaction still requires corresponding board resolutions on the part of the seller, which are expected to take place by the end of the month at the latest, as well as the acceptance by the seller of the notarized, binding offer.”

    Mutares focuses on acquisitions of corporate spin-offs with operational improvement potential. Q Logistics is a provider of cross-border transport logistics and warehousing services with a nationwide network in Austria. 

    The Binder Groesswang team included Partner Thomas Schirmer and Senior Associate Wolfgang Guggenberger.

    The Wolf Theiss team included Partners Dieter Spranz, Matthias Unterrieder, Kurt Retter, Georg Kresbach, and Karl Binder, Counsels Clara Gordon, Carolin Ziegler, Wolfram Schachinger, and Jochen Anweiler, Senior Associate Paulina Pomorski, and Associates Thomas Malle, Manuela Regner, Paul Berger, Lisa Babler, Georg Knafl, Bernhardt Schmidt, and Hanna Gerstner

    Editor’s Note: After this article was published Schoenherr announced that it had also advised the management board of OBB Holding on the sale of Q Logistics to Mutares SE & Co. According to the firm, it “accompanied the OBB holding company in the preparation of various options for action and supported the decision-making process of the Management Board for sale through a Business Judgment Opinion.”

    The Schoenherr team was headed by Partner Wolfgang Holler and included Partners Miriam Simsa and Hanno Wollmann, Attorney at Law Marco Thorbauer, and Associates Philipp Wetter and Clemens Stegner.  

  • Wolf Theiss Advises Erste Group on EUR 100 Million S Immo Bond Issuance

    Wolf Theiss Advises Erste Group on EUR 100 Million S Immo Bond Issuance

    Wolf Theiss has advised Erste Group Bank AG in its capacity as sole book-runner and sole lead manager of S Immo AG’s EUR 100 million, 2%, 10-year bond issuance. Cerha Hempel reportedly advised S Immo.

    S Immo is a real estate investment company headquartered in Vienna and focused on investments in Austria, Germany, and CEE.

    The target group of the bond issuance were private investors and institutional investors in Austria. The bonds are listed on the Official Market of the Vienna Stock Exchange in the Corporates Prime Segment. The issue price of the bonds is 101.13% (corresponding to a re-offer yield of 1.875%).

    According to Wolf Theiss, “the transaction was announced on October 7, 2019 and, due to a denomination of EUR 500 each, [the bonds were] primarily aimed at Austrian retail investors, but [they] were also placed with institutional investors. Due to high demand, the subscription period was closed early.”

    “In addition,” Wolf Theiss reports, “the issuer invited the holders of the 4.5% S Immo Bond 2014-2021 … to submit bids to repurchase or exchange Notes of the S IMMO Bond 2014-2021 in bonds of S Immo bond 2019-2029 subject to a conversion and repurchase memorandum.”

    The Wolf Theiss team was led by Partner Alexander Haas and included Associates Nikolaus Dinhof and Sebastian Prakljacic.

  • Cerha Hempel Successful for Austrian Power Grid in EU General Court

    Cerha Hempel Successful for Austrian Power Grid in EU General Court

    Cerha Hempel has successfully represented Austrian Power Grid AG, Austria’s transmission system operator, before the EU General Court, in its challenge to the order by the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators that the German-Austria electricity price zone be separated.

    According to Cerha Hempel, after hearing the evidence, the EU-General Court — a court of first instance — found that ACER lacked jurisdiction in the matter and annulled its order.

    The Cerha Hempel team was led by Partners Hans Kristoferitsch and Stefan Huber.

  • Schoenherr Advises Black Toro Capital on Joint Venture with KTM

    Schoenherr Advises Black Toro Capital on Joint Venture with KTM

    Schoenherr and Pastor & M.Monche Abogados have advised Black Toro Capital, the owner of the Spanish motorcycle manufacturer GasGas, on a joint venture with Austria’s KTM Industries AG.

    Closing remains contingent on the approval of the antitrust authorities.

    According to Schoenherr, Black Toro Capital focuses on investing in existing mid-size companies in Spain, which have the “potential for accelerated growth and development.” This also includes the Spanish motorcycle manufacturer GasGas, known for producing racing machines for use at an “elite level in the trial and enduro segment of motocross.”

    KTM specializes in the production of premium motorcycles and e-mobility in the sector. According to Schoenherr’s press release, the alliance with KTM aims to further establish GasGas on the international market by developing new models of off-road motorbikes.

    As a result of the joint venture, GasGas will be the third brand in the KTM distribution network alongside KTM and Husqvarna. The manufacture of GasGas products and Torrot electric vehicles will continue as part of the joint venture in Girona, Spain. 

    The Schoenherr team advising Black Toro Capital on Austrian law matters consisted of Partner Sascha Hodl, Counsel Maximilian Lang, and Associate Leon Scheicher.

    The Pastor & M.Monche Abogados team advising Black Toro on Spanish matters included Partners Rafael Martinez-Monche Zaragoza and Ignacio Pastor Gimenez-Salinas.

  • Deskovic and Solt Lead Team Move from Benn-Ibler to Taylor Wessing in Vienna

    Deskovic and Solt Lead Team Move from Benn-Ibler to Taylor Wessing in Vienna

    The Vienna office of Taylor Wessing has announced that it will be joined by current Benn-Ibler Partners Ivo Deskovic and Peter Solt, along with another five lawyers and three assistants, at the beginning of next year.

    “We are proud that with Ivo Deskovic and Peter Solt we were able to win over two such renowned experts,” commented Taylor Wessing CEE Managing Partner Raimund Cancola. “With them and their team, we are substantially strengthening two areas of law that are of great importance to us. We are very much looking forward to the opportunities that the new constellation will open up for us.”

    Deskovic and Solt have worked together for many years — first at Vienna’s Weiss-Tessbach, then (via merger) with DLA Piper, before moving to Benn-Ibler in 2010.

    According to Taylor Wessing, “with more than 25 years of experience, Deskovic is one of the leading players on the Austrian legal market. Specializing in dispute resolution, and in particular large-scale proceedings, Deskovic and his team have already handled numerous cases, some of them of international renown, including investor litigation for a well- known Austrian private bank. Deskovic and his team of lawyers will complement the team around Taylor Wessing Partner Wolfgang Kapek, CEE Head of Dispute Resolution. [Deskovic] will also contribute his many years of experience as a party representative and arbitrator in international business arbitration proceedings.”

    According to Deskovic, “Taylor Wessing has already been strong in the area of litigation – in Austria, but also across domestic borders. Just think of Germany, where the firm supports VW in defending against consumer lawsuits in the diesel affair. Together we can achieve a lot, I am looking forward to the challenge!”

    Taylor Wessing describes Solt, who joins Taylor Wessing’s Real Estate team, as having “many years of experience, most of them in energy and real estate law and related financing mandates.” According to the firm, “among other things, he specializes in real estate transactions and has recently assisted in the realization of property development and investment projects for residential properties. His aim is also to make use of his experience in the construction and marketing of large commercial properties — areas in which Taylor Wessing has traditionally been active and will now be increasingly so.”

    “I am delighted to be able to bring my experience back to a large international team, particularly in CEE,” Solt commented. “Strategically, I now also have the opportunity to combine the core competence of Taylor Wessing in the Focus Sector Technology with Real Estate and thus promote advice in the future business field PropTech.”

    The news that Solt and Deskovic would be joining Taylor Wessing in Austria follows only a few weeks after the firm’s announcement that pharmaceutical law expert Barbora Dubanska had joined it as CEE Co-Head Life Sciences (as reported by CEE Legal Matters on October 9, 2019).

  • Electric Filling Station: No Operation of Electricity Company

    In its decision of 18 September 2019, the Austrian Higher Administrative Court (“VwGH“) found that the operation of an electric filling station does not constitute the operation of an electricity company and is thus subject to the rules of the Austrian Trade Act (“GewO“).1

    Applicability of the GewO

    In general, the GewO applies to commercial activities that are conducted independently, regularly and for purposes of achieving an income.2 Such activities typically require a trade licence. Furthermore, the construction and operation of a plant, which is locally bound and not only temporarily used for commercial purposes, generally requires a plant permit, if the plant is suitable to affect certain protected goods.3

    However, certain activities are explicitly excluded from the scope of application of the GewO and thus do not require a trade licence or a plant permit. Under Section 2 (1) (20) GewO, the activity of operating an electricity company (Betrieb eines Elektrizitätsunternehmens) pursuant to Section 7 (11) of the Austrian Electricity Act (“ElWOG“) is excluded from the GewO.

    The VwGH had to assess whether selling electricity by means of an electric filling station for cars and the construction of such a station constitute the operation of an electricity company and are excluded from the scope of application of the GewO.

    The case at hand

    An applicant filed for a plant permit for the construction and operation of an electric filling station with the competent authority. The authority had doubts regarding the applicability of the GewO to this station and finally determined that it does not apply.4 The authority essentially reasoned that the applicant is an electricity company, which is excluded from the scope of the GewO. The applicant filed an appeal with the Carinthian Administrative Court on the grounds that the activity does not fall under the definition of operating an electricity company. The court ruled in favour of the applicant and found that the GewO applies. The authority filed an appeal against the decision to the VwGH (Amtsrevision).

    Reasoning of the VwGH

    The exemption from the GewO only applies to the operation of an electricity company, which is defined in Section 7 (11) ElWOG as:

    “A natural person, legal entity or private partnership that performs at least one of the functions of (i) production, (ii) transmission, (iii) distribution, (iv) delivery or (v) purchase of electricity and the commercial, technical and maintenance activities connected therewith with the intention to make profit and excluding end-users.”

    The VwGH found that electric filling stations cannot be subsumed under the definition of an electricity company inter alia for the following reasons:

    • First, it is irrelevant whether the operating company (also) produces electricity, like the applicant in this case, because the relevant activity only refers to the sale of electricity at an electric filling station.
    • The operator of the electric filling station does not produce, transmit or distribute electricity. Also, the relevant activity only includes the sale and not the purchase of electricity.
    • The sale of electricity is not explicitly listed as a function of an electricity company in Section 7 (11) ElWOG. However, it had to be assessed whether the sale of electricity falls under the function of delivery (Lieferung), which is defined as making electricity available.5 The delivery of electricity usually refers to activities within or connected with the electricity grid. Connecting a car to the electric filling station in order to charge it does not constitute grid access to the distribution system. Moreover, the delivery of electricity pursuant to Section 7 (45) ElWOG is subject to various rules (e.g. change of supplier) that show that “making electricity available” refers to the supply of electricity to customers for a certain duration, i.e. supplying a household with electricity.
    • The VwGH ruled that the sale of electricity by means of an electric filling station for cars is not included in the definition of electricity companies. Therefore, the exemption under Section 2 (1) (20) GewO does not apply.

    Comment

    In conclusion, the rules of the GewO on trade licences and plant permits apply to the construction and operation of electric filling stations.

    The question of whether the GewO applies to such stations has long been unclear, because there was no case law and the legal literature was divergent. In light of the current awareness of climate protection, the construction and operation of electric filling stations will most likely become even more important. Therefore, this decision on the legal qualification of electric filling stations is highly relevant and the legal clarity will certainly be welcomed by market participants and authorities. However, it remains to be seen whether applying the rules of the GewO will also have negative consequences on these stations, in particular because the requirements for plants will need to be met.

     

    1 VwGH 18 September 2019, Ro 2018/04/0010.

    2 Section 1 (1) and (2) GewO.

    3 Section 74 GewO.

    4 Section 348 (1) GewO.

    5 Section 7 (45) GewO.

    By Nina Zafoschnig, Associate, Schoenherr

  • Dorda Launches New Construction Group

    Dorda Launches New Construction Group

    Dorda has launched a new Construction Group, co-led by Partner Stefan Artner and Counsel Gunnar Pickl.

    The group will also involve Partner Bernhard Muller and attorneys Philip Exenberger, Marie-Luise Pugl, and Magdalena Brandstette. According to Dorda, the group offers “comprehensive advice and support in all legal aspects of any kind of construction projects such as buildings, underground construction, and plants.”

    Gunnar Pickl, the co-head of the Construction Group, commented: “Construction projects take place against the background of very diverse requirements and fields of law. The experts of the Dorda Construction Group have excellent knowledge and many years of experience in the relevant fields and are familiar with the peculiarities of the construction industry. This enables us to offer the necessary legal expertise from a single source in this highly complex field.”

  • Schoenherr Assists with First-Ever Digital Foundation of LLC in Austria

    Schoenherr Assists with First-Ever Digital Foundation of LLC in Austria

    Schoenherr has helped found SASR Alpha Fifty-Seventh Investment Management GmbH — the first limited liability company in Austria ever founded by digital means.

    The legal basis for digital foundation of a company in Austria, Schoenherr reports, is the country’s Electronic Notarial Forming Law, which came into force on January 1 of this year.  According to Schoenherr, “the founding steps were carried out by videoconference and confirmed by qualified electronic signature. As a result, limited liability companies can now be established independently of the physical whereabouts of the persons involved.”

    “The possibility of digitally establishing GmbHs is a first, important step in the digitization of Austrian company law,” explained Schoenherr Partner Thomas Kulnigg, who led the firm’s team. “Although some steps can still be optimized, conducting foundations and other corporate actions digitally will soon be completely normal.”

    SASR Alpha Fifty-Seventh Investment Management GmbH was registered in Austria’s Commercial Register on October 16, 2019.