Category: Austria

  • The impact of the 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive

    The 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive1 (“AMLD“) to amend the current EU Anti-Money Laundering (“AML“) regime must be transposed into national law by 10 January 2020. The approach of the EU is clear: AML prevention will be strengthened and AML requirements in the financial sector will rise.

    Credit institutions dealing with business relationships and transactions involving high-risk third countries2 (like Bosnia Herzegovina) or having establishments in these countries may be particularly affected. It is also to be expected that the Commission’s list of high-risk third countries will soon change, as the Council recently rejected a proposal that would have included, among others, Saudi Arabia, Panama and the US Virgin Islands.3

    1. IMPLEMENTATION IN AUSTRIA

    The AMLD leads to considerable amendments in the Austrian Financial Markets Anti-Money Laundering Act (“FM-AMLA“) and the Beneficial Owners Register Act (“BORA“) which will affect the financial sector and include the following:

    •  Regulation of service providers in relation to virtual currencies
    • Limitation of business relationships or transactions involving high-risk third countries
    • Public access to the Register of Beneficial Owners

    1.1. Regulation of service providers in relation to virtual currencies

    Since 1 August 2019, the FM-AMLA covers service providers in relation to virtual currencies (“Service Providers“), which include persons providing

    1. services to safeguard private cryptographic keys on behalf of customers, to hold, store and transfer virtual currencies (“custodian wallet provider”);
    2. services to exchange or transfer virtual currencies; or
    3. financial services for the issuance and sale of virtual currencies.

    The latter especially could have a considerable impact, as “financial services” are not defined in the FM-AMLA and could be interpreted broadly.

    Service Providers must comply i.a. with the customer due diligence measures stipulated by the FM-AMLA and must be registered with the Financial Market Authority (the registration duty applies as of 10 January 2020). The inclusion of Service Providers in the Austrian AML regime could thus particularly affect credit institutions, but also start-ups dealing with or providing services in connection with virtual currencies, like Bitcoin.

    1.2. Limitation of business relationships or transactions involving high-risk third countries

    As of 10 January 2020, enhanced due diligence measures must be applied if a high-risk third country is involved in business relationships or transactions. According to the preparatory documents of the FM-AMLA it shall thus be irrelevant if the customer, its beneficial owner or representative is established in a high-risk third country; enhanced due diligence measures must already be applied if such a country is involved in any form. If, for example, an Austrian company receives payments from Bosnia Herzegovina via its Austrian bank account, this could already trigger enhanced due diligence measures for the bank.

    Furthermore, the enhanced due diligence measures in the FM-AMLA will be specified and include i.a.

    1. obtaining additional information on the source of funds and source of wealth of the customer and the beneficial owner(s);
    2. enhanced monitoring of the business relationship by increasing the number and timing of controls applied and selecting patterns of transactions that require further examination; and
    3. approval of the senior management for the establishment or continuation of the business relationship, which must be adequately specific (no “general approval”).

    Moreover, the FM-AMLA will allow the Austrian Finance Minister to issue very restrictive measures like (i) prohibiting Austrian credit institutions from establishing branches or representative offices in high-risk third countries or (ii) requiring credit institutions to review and amend (or if necessary terminate) correspondent relationships with respondent institutions in high-risk third countries.

    1.3. Public access to the Register of Beneficial Owners

    As of 10 January 2020, the BORA will provide the possibility of public access to the Register of Beneficial Owners. Therefore, basically anyone can access certain information in the register, like the name and nationality of the beneficial owner or the nature and extent of the beneficial interest.

    2. IMPACTS AND TO-DO’S

    The AML regulations are still expanding and increasing compliance needs. Therefore, companies in the financial sector are well advised to observe these developments – in particular regarding high-risk third countries – and to continually adapt their internal AML measures to stay compliant.

    By Dr. Michael Lindtner, Associate, Schoenherr

  • Eisenberger & Herzog Advises Allianz Capital Partners on Investment in Broadband Expansion

    Eisenberger & Herzog Advises Allianz Capital Partners on Investment in Broadband Expansion

    Eisenberger & Herzog has advised Allianz Capital Partners on the acquisition of a 75% stake in Niederosterreichische Glasfaserinfrastruktur from Breitband Holding, controlled by the Province of Lower Austria. The investment is approximately EUR 300 million. CMS advised NoGIG on the deal.

    The transaction is expected to close before the end of this year. Construction is scheduled to start in 2020.

    NoGIG builds and operates a new fiber-to-the-home optical fiber network in rural regions of Lower Austria, with a focus on municipalities with less than 5,000 inhabitants. 

    The Eisenberger & Herzogteam included Partners Michael Strenitz, Ulrike Sehrschon, and Clemens Lanschutzer, and Associates Mathias Eberle and Isolde Klinger.

    The CMS team was led by Partners Thomas Hamerl and Clemens Grossmayer.

  • Wolf Theiss and Clifford Chance Advise Managers on Hypo Noe Pfandbriefe Benchmark Issue

    Wolf Theiss and Clifford Chance Advise Managers on Hypo Noe Pfandbriefe Benchmark Issue

    Wolf Theiss has advised DekaBank, DZ Bank AG, Erste Group, LBBW, UniCredit Bank, and Hypo Noe as managers on the Hypo Noe’s successful EUR 500 million public-sector Pfandbriefe benchmark issue. Clifford Chance advised the banks on German law aspects.

    The Public Pfandbriefe, which has  an Aa1 rating from Moody’s, is structured with a soft-bullet repayment structure and has a term of seven years. The coupon is 0.01% per annum (mid-swap +8 basis points).

    The Wolf Theiss team included Partner Claus Schneider, Counsel Eva Stadler, and Associate Nikolaus Dinhof.

    The Clifford Chance team included Partner Sebastian Maerker and Lawyer Erazem Bohinc.

  • CMS Advises ALPLA on Joint Venture for Recycled Plastics in Thailand

    CMS Advises ALPLA on Joint Venture for Recycled Plastics in Thailand

    CMS has advised ALPLA on its entrance into a joint venture with Thailand’s PTT Global Chemical Public Company to manufacture and sell mechanically recycled plastics from used packaging materials.

    The joint venture that will manufacture and sell mechanically recycled plastics, specifically recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) and recycled high density polyethylene (rHDPE) from used packaging materials. According to CMS, “the formation of the joint venture is subject to customary regulatory approvals such as merger control clearances; it is expected that the transaction will be completed by the end of 2019/Q1 2020.” 

    According to CMS, ALPLA has “around 20,800 employees worldwide produc[ing] custom-made packaging systems, bottles, closures and moulded parts at 178 sites across 46 countries.” According to the firm, “the high-quality packaging is used in a wide range of areas, including food and drink, cosmetics and care products, household detergents, washing and cleaning agents, pharmaceutical products, engine oils and lubricants.” 

    ALPLA already operates several of its own recycling plants: PET Recycling Team with a site in both Austria and Poland, and in the form of a joint venture in Mexico. The company has been cooperating with Germany’s Texplast on PET recycling since July 2018. 

    The CMS team was led by Vienna-based Partner Alexander Rakosi and included Partner Dieter Zandler and Associates Oliver Werner, Ruth Bittner, and Marlene Wimmer-Nistelberger, in addition to lawyers from CMS’s competition teams in China and Turkey.

     

  • Brandl & Talos and Herbst Kinsky Advises Series D Investors on Financing Round for Themis Bioscience

    Brandl & Talos and Herbst Kinsky Advises Series D Investors on Financing Round for Themis Bioscience

    Brandl & Talos has advised an investor consortium of Farallon Capital, Adjuvant Capital, Global Health Investment Fund, Hadean Ventures, Omnes Capital, Ventech, Wellington Partners Life Sciences, and High-Tech Grunderfonds.on Themis Bioscience’s EUR 40 million Series D financing round. Herbst Kinsky advised Themis Bioscience, and Baker McKenzie advised another investor, MSD, on the deal.

    According to Brandl & Talos, the funds are intended to finance a study for a vaccine against the Chikungunya virus, a tropical disease transmitted by mosquitoes, and to develop a new vaccine for oncology and infectious diseases.

    The Brandl & Talos team was led by Partner Roman Rericha and Attorney-at-Law Markus Arzt, supported by Attorney Sabine Konrad and Associate Christina Bernhart.

    The Baker McKenzie team was led by Partner Eva-Maria Segur-Cabanac. 

    The Herbst Kinsky team was led by Attorney-at Law Florian Steinhart, supported by Associates Magdalena Wagner and Alexander Holler. 

    Herbst Kinsky also advised Themis Bioscience on its Series C financing round back in 2018 (as reported by CEE Legal Matters on January 16, 2018) and on its Series B financing round back in 2015 (as reported on December 6, 2016).

  • Wolf Theiss Advises Kuehne + Nagel on Acquisition of Austrian Logistics Company

    Wolf Theiss Advises Kuehne + Nagel on Acquisition of Austrian Logistics Company

    Wolf Theiss has advised the Swiss Kuehne + Nagel logistics group on its July 15 acquisition of Jobstl.

    According to Wolf Theiss, “through the takeover of the Styrian family business Jobstl, Kühne + Nagel complements the regional service offer and continues to expand its business with Austria’s neighboring countries.”

    The Wolf Theiss team was led by Partner Christian Mikosch and included Partners Matthias Unterrieder, Hartwig Kienast, and Roland Marko, Counsel Jochen Anweiler, and Associate Clemens Pretscher.

    Wolf Theiss did not reply to our inquiries.

  • Dorda Advises Too Good To Go App on Market Entry in Austria

    Dorda Advises Too Good To Go App on Market Entry in Austria

    Dorda has advised Denmark’s Too Good To Go tech start-up on the launch of its operations in Austria.

    Too Good To Go was founded in 2015 and is now active in 12 countries. According to Dorda, “Too Good To Go offers a sustainable solution against the waste of food. The TGTG App allows businesses such as bakeries, restaurants, cafes, hotels, and supermarkets to sell surplus food to self-collecting customers at a substantially reduced price.” The company works with more than 27,000 partner companies worldwide which sell food surpluses at reduced prices via the App. 

    The Dorda team was led by Managing Partner Axel Anderl and included Partners Thomas Angermair and Paul Doralt, Senior Associates Lisa Kulmer, Julia Berent, and Christian Schoeller, and  Associates Alexandra Ciarnau and Dominik Widl.

  • Wolf Theiss, Freshfields, and White & Case Advise on Raiffeisen Note Issuance

    Wolf Theiss, Freshfields, and White & Case Advise on Raiffeisen Note Issuance

    Wolf Theiss has advised Raiffeisen Bank International AG as issuer of EUR 500 million Tier 2 Notes and on a tender offer for the repurchase of EUR 500 million Subordinated Callable Fixed Rate Reset Notes due February 2025. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Germany advised RBI in connection with the tender offer and White & Case Frankfurt, acted as the legal advisor to joint lead managers RBI, BNP Paribas, Citi Bank, UBS, and Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

    According to Wolf Theiss, on September 3, 2019, “Raiffeisen Bank International AG decided to invite the holders of its EUR 500,000,000 Subordinated Callable Fixed Rate Reset Notes due February 2025 (ISIN: XS1034950672) issued on 21 February 2014, to make offers to RBI for the repurchase such notes. Furthermore, RBI issued and successfully placed EUR 500,000,000 Tier 2 Notes due 2030, under its EUR 25,000,000,000 Debt Issuance Programme. This is RBI’s first public benchmark Tier 2 offering since more than five years. This time, the transaction included the issuance of Subordinated Callable Fixed-to-Fixed Rate Reset Notes in the denomination of EUR 100,000 each. The Notes are issued for a ten year and six months term with maturity in March, 2030 and a coupon of 1.5% per annum until the First Call Date. The Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.”

    The Wolf Theiss Debt Capital Markets Team was led by Partner Alexander Haas, supported by Counsel Christine Siegl and Associates Nevena Skocic and Nikolaus Dinhof.

  • New rules for Digital Content & Sale of Goods

    General information: Consumer Protection is one of the strategic goals of the EU. The Sale of Goods Directive and the Digital Content Directive entered into force on 11 June 2019 to provide European consumers a high level of protection and legal certainty as well as create common warranty rules in the EU. By 1 July 2021, Member States are obliged to adopt necessary regulations into their national laws to comply with these Directives, which will apply from 1 January 2022.

    The Directives were drafted by different working groups, as can be seen from the fact that different terminology has been used where the intended meaning is the same. For instance, the Sale of Goods Directive uses the phrase “…between a consumer and a seller…” while the Digital Content Directive uses “… the trader supplies … to the consumer…”. Despite the wording, this does not of course mean that the Sale of Goods Directive also applies between consumers. It will therefore always be necessary to consider both Directives when interpreting certain terminology.

    2. Scope of the Directives (Article 3 of the Directives)

    The Sale of Goods Directive will apply to sales contractsbetween a consumer and a seller for goods, including goods with a digital element (e.g. Smart TVs, smart fridges or smart watches), regardless whether the contract is concluded physically in shops or online. Contracts for the supply of goods to be manufactured or produced also will be considered as a sales contract pursuant to this Directive.

    The Digital Content Directive will apply to any contract(e.g. sale or lease contract) where the trader supplies digital content (e.g. movies, photos, e-books) or digital services (e.g. apps, cloud storage, streaming services) to the consumer, even where the digital content or service is developed in accordance with the consumer’s specifications. Remarkably, the Digital Content Directive may also apply when the consumer does not pay for the service but provides its personal data in return for the digital content or service as a “payment”, except where the personal data is exclusively processed for the purpose of supplying the digital content/service or for allowing the trader to comply with its legal obligations.

    Since the Sale of Goods Directive – due to the definition of “goods” – does not apply to immovable property, this means that in future three different warranty regulations must be observed in Austria for (i) goods under the Sale of Goods Directive, (ii) digital content or digital service under the Digital Content Directive, and (iii) inter alia immovable property under the current Austrian Civil Code.

    3. Level of harmonisation

    It is questionable whether the desired full harmonisation will be achieved; there are numerous opening clauses which Member States can use. It remains to be seen how the Member States will implement the Directives and which opening clauses will be used; and it is still unclear how the new warranty regulations will impact the business environment and if and how consumers will benefit from them. It seems traders will continue to face differing consumer protection rules in the EU.

    By Wolfgang Tichy, Partner and Serap Aydin, Attorney at Law, Schoenherr

  • New rules for Digital Content & Sale of Goods (2)

    General information: Consumer Protection is one of the strategic goals of the EU. The Sale of Goods Directive and the Digital Content Directive entered into force on 11 June 2019 to provide European consumers a high level of protection and legal certainty as well as create common warranty rules in the EU. By 1 July 2021, Member States are obliged to adopt necessary regulations into their national laws to comply with these Directives, which will apply from 1 January 2022.

    The Directives were drafted by different working groups, as can be seen from the fact that different terminology has been used where the intended meaning is the same. For instance, the Sale of Goods Directive uses the phrase “…between a consumer and a seller…” while the Digital Content Directive uses “… the trader supplies … to the consumer…”. Despite the wording, this does not of course mean that the Sale of Goods Directive also applies between consumers. It will therefore always be necessary to consider both Directives when interpreting certain terminology.

    2. Scope of the Directives (Article 3 of the Directives)

    The Sale of Goods Directive will apply to sales contractsbetween a consumer and a seller for goods, including goods with a digital element (e.g. Smart TVs, smart fridges or smart watches), regardless whether the contract is concluded physically in shops or online. Contracts for the supply of goods to be manufactured or produced also will be considered as a sales contract pursuant to this Directive.

    The Digital Content Directive will apply to any contract(e.g. sale or lease contract) where the trader supplies digital content (e.g. movies, photos, e-books) or digital services (e.g. apps, cloud storage, streaming services) to the consumer, even where the digital content or service is developed in accordance with the consumer’s specifications. Remarkably, the Digital Content Directive may also apply when the consumer does not pay for the service but provides its personal data in return for the digital content or service as a “payment”, except where the personal data is exclusively processed for the purpose of supplying the digital content/service or for allowing the trader to comply with its legal obligations.

    Since the Sale of Goods Directive – due to the definition of “goods” – does not apply to immovable property, this means that in future three different warranty regulations must be observed in Austria for (i) goods under the Sale of Goods Directive, (ii) digital content or digital service under the Digital Content Directive, and (iii) inter alia immovable property under the current Austrian Civil Code.

    3. Level of harmonisation

    It is questionable whether the desired full harmonisation will be achieved; there are numerous opening clauses which Member States can use. It remains to be seen how the Member States will implement the Directives and which opening clauses will be used; and it is still unclear how the new warranty regulations will impact the business environment and if and how consumers will benefit from them. It seems traders will continue to face differing consumer protection rules in the EU.

    By Wolfgang Tichy, Partner and Serap Aydin, Attorney at Law, Schoenherr