Category: Uncategorized

  • EPAM Draft Law on Mortgage Securities Enacted

    EPAM Draft Law on Mortgage Securities Enacted

    Egorov, Puginsky, Afanasiev & Partners has announced that it developed a draft law on Mortgage Securities that recently came into force in Russia. According to the firm, on January 10, 2016, “Federal Law of 30.12.2015 ? 461-FZ ‘On Amendments to Article 17 of the Federal Law’ On the Securities Market and the Federal Law ‘On Mortgage Securities’”, drafted by a team from the firm at the initiative of the Agency for Housing Mortgage Lending became effective.

    The firm reports that the law will “encourage the further development of mortgage lending and, consequently, will increase housing affordability.”

    The EPAM team was led by Partner Dmitry Glazounov, and consisted of Senior Lawyer Oleg Ushakov and Lawyers Maria Kondratska, Alexander Filchukov, and Gilan Kharaeva.

  • Asters Promotes Voznyuk to Partner

    Asters Promotes Voznyuk to Partner

    The Asters Law Firm has announced that lawyer Oleksandr Voznyuk has been appointed Partner in the firm’s Competition and Antitrust practice.

    Voznyuk joined Asters as Counsel in March 2012 after 16 years at the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine — 7 of which were spent as AMC Commissioner. According to Asters, at the AMC Voznyuk “played an important role in development of Ukraine’s modern competition laws and shaping enforcement practices, investigated high-profile cartel and abuse cases.” 

    Voznyuk’s expertise encompasses a variety of competition law issues, including cartels, abuse of dominance, restrictive and discriminatory practices, unfair competition, and procedural aspects of AMC activity, as well as public procurement issues. The firm reports that his “notable representations” include ACNielsen, BSH, Bunge, HIPP, Kronospan, Nissan, Oschadbank, Philip Morris, Siemens, and Ukrtelecom.

    Remarking on the developments, Asters Partner and Head of Competition and Antitrust Igor Svechkar said: “Oleksandr Voznyuk is highly respected in the market, an outstanding expert who contributed a lot to the success of our practice. Oleksandr’s appointment will help manage the practice group and streamline work more efficiently and also open further strategic opportunities for both the Competition and Antitrust practice and for the firm”.

  • BSWW Legal & Tax Advises Immobel on Sale of Okraglak Project

    BSWW Legal & Tax Advises Immobel on Sale of Okraglak Project

    BSWW Legal & Tax has advised the Immobel developer of office and housing projects in Poland, Belgium, and Luxembourg, on the sale of the Okraglak project, consisting of two office buildings (“Okraglak” and “Kwadraciak”) with a total leasable area of approximately 8.000 square meters, located in the centre of Poznan. The project was sold to what BSWW describes as “a renowned, London-based investor.”

    The BSWW team was led by Managing Partner Marek Wojnar supported by Partner Marta Kosiedowska and Advocate Trainee Mateusz Prokopiuk.

    Image Source: immobel.be

  • TGS Assists on Clear Channel’s Offering of Senior Notes

    TGS Assists on Clear Channel’s Offering of Senior Notes

    Tark Grunte Sutkiene’s Latvia office has assisted Clear Channel International B.V. with its initial offering of USD 225 million aggregate principal amount of 8.75% Senior Notes due 2020. The Notes were priced at 99.012% of par and were issued under an indenture dated as of December 16, 2015.

    Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. is one of the world’s largest outdoor advertising companies with more than 640,000 displays in over 40 countries across five continents. Clear Channel International B.V., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc., is a leading international outdoor advertising company with operations primarily in Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and Singapore.

    Tark Grunte Sutkiene’s team was led by Partner Andra Rubene, supported by Associate Rudolfs Vilsons.

  • BDK Promotes Jankov to Partner

    BDK Promotes Jankov to Partner

    Citing her “client management skills and ability to provide highly competent legal advice,” BDK has promoted Serbian lawyer Ana Jankov, who heads the firm’s Employment practice, to Partner.

    Jankov joined BDK’s employment practice as Senior Associate in January 2013, after spending 4 years with PricewaterhouseCoopers Legal and another two with Karanovic & Nikolic. At BDK, she advises on complex white collar agreements, sensitive terminations, incentives, industrial disputes, and other contentious matters, as well as on issue such as privacy and data protection at the work place and flexible working arrangements. She co-heads the firm’s Data Protection team, focusing on issues arising in the employment context.

    Jankov holds a 2007 LLB from the Law School of the University of Novi Sad. 

  • Akin Gump Advises Sistema on Sale of Stake in Detsky Mir

    Akin Gump Advises Sistema on Sale of Stake in Detsky Mir

    Akin Gump has advised Sistema JSFC, a publicly traded diversified holding company in Russia and the CIS, on the sale by subsidiary CJSC DM Finance of a 23.1% stake in JSC Detsky Mir Group to the Russia-China Investment Fund for RUB 9.75 billion (USD 133.56 million). The Russian-China Investment Fund was advised by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius.

    Detsky Mir Group owns the Detsky Mir and ELC (Early Learning Centre) brands and is Russia’s largest retailer of children’s goods. At the end of 2015, the Detsky Mir Group’s retail network consisted of 425 stores.

    The Akin Gump team advising Sistema JSFC was led by Moscow Corporate Partner Vladimir Kouznetsov, supported by Counsels Anna Semashko and Olga Te.

    Editorial Note: After this article was published, Morgan Lewis informed us that its team advising the Russian-China Investment Fund was led by Moscow-based Partners Brian Zimbler and Roman Dashko, supported by Moscow-based Senior Associates Anastasia Dergacheva and Valentina Semenikhina and London-based Associate Jayne McGlynn. 

  • Finney Joins Novalia in Prague

    Finney Joins Novalia in Prague

    After fifteen years spent in the Prague offices of two international law firms, American lawyer Bill Finney has joined the joined the Novalia law firm in Prague.

    Finney, who spent 12 years at Giese & Partner and then two years at Wolf Theiss, both in Prague, before joining Novalia in January, 2016, specializes in cross border finance, real estate, and merger and acquisition transactions. He graduated from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1991.

    “I was drawn to Novalia not only because the firm has interesting clients and I believed my commercial law background would be a good fit,” Finney said, “but also because Novalia is designed as an open platform where all attorneys are partners and work on a project basis. I see this way of providing legal services as innovative and forward-looking. Clients receive better service and the office operates with much greater efficiency. That’s why the offer for me to join Novalia was extremely interesting.”

    Finney’s new colleagues believe Finney will be a good fit as well. “Novalia’s focus is on innovative businesses, which often means that the the client is international or the deal has cross-border elements,” said Jakub Cisar, Novalia’s co-founder. “Bill will strengthen our international law and English language capacity thanks to his background and years of experience in international transactions.” 

  • Klavins Ellex and White & Case Advise on Largest Nordic Property Deal in Years

    Klavins Ellex and White & Case Advise on Largest Nordic Property Deal in Years

    Klavins Ellex and White & Case have advised Blackstone Real Estate Partners Europe IV on its all-cash acquisition of real estate portfolios from 10 funds managed by Norwegian Obligo Investment Management AS.

    The portfolio of residential and commercial property in Norway, Sweden, Finland, Latvia, Germany, and the US includes shopping centers, hotels, and apartments. Klavins Ellex describes the deal as “the largest property deal of the Nordic region since 2008.”The White & Case team advising Blackstone consisted of London-based Partner David Cox, Helsinki-based Partner Timo Airisto, Paris-based Partner Franck Peter, Warsaw-based Local Partner Maciej Zalewski, Bratislava-based Tax Consultant Tomas Cibula, and Associates James Golunski (London), Maris Fagerstrom-Ryder, Kati Punakallio, Aatos Solhagen (all Helsinki), Katarzyna Czwartosz, Michael Plich, Jacek Polewski (all Warsaw), Anne Sauvebois-Brunel, Julien Etchegaray (both Paris), Kristina Klenova, and Radoslav Palka (both Bratislava), as well as Trainee Solicitor Victoria Sharp (London).

    Klavins Ellex advised Blackstone with respect to the acquisition of the real estate portfolio in Latvia. The firm’s team was led by Partner Ilga Gudrenika-Krebs and Senior Attorney Maris Brizgo.

    Editorial Note: After this article was published, the BA-HR law firm in Norway informed CEE Legal Matters that it was lead transaction counsel on Blackstone’s acquisition of the 10 real estate funds managed by Obligo Investment Management AS, with a total property value of around NOK 22 billion (approximately EUR 2.2 billion). The firm also reported that, in addition to the property portfolio acquisition, Blackstone invested NOK 250 million (approximately EUR 25.8 million) for a 34% stake in Obligo. 

    According to the firm, due diligence and local law matters were handled by — in addition to White & Case and Klavins Ellex — Simpson Thacher Bartlett, Wigge & Partners, and Hengeler Mueller.

    The BA-HR transaction team was led by Partners Lars Sande and Stig Bech. Real Estate Partner Anne Sofie Bjorkholt was involved in the due diligence and Partner Peter Hammerich advised on Blackstone’s investment in Obligo.

  • The NBU Cancelled Prohibition on Assignment of Foreign Currency Loans but Introduced Additional Requirements

    The NBU Cancelled Prohibition on Assignment of Foreign Currency Loans but Introduced Additional Requirements

    Beginning from 11 January 2016, registration of the assignments of foreign currency loans received by Ukrainian borrowers is again allowed based on resolution no.996 of 30 December 2015 of the National Bank of Ukraine (the “NBU”). Wolf Theiss, as a member of the Ukrainian Venture Capital and Private Equity Association (UVCA) and under the auspices of UVCA, was advocating and lobbying the NBU to make this move.

    Now, the NBU will register assignments of foreign currency loans received by Ukrainian borrowers, subject, however, to additional requirements and verifications by the NBU as well as by Ukrainian servicing banks. 

    Specifically, servicing banks are now required to check whether the underlying financing transactions may result in the risky bank activities that would threaten the interest of the bank depositors or other creditors. 

    For this purpose, banks are authorized to examine transactional documents, information about the client, other participants to the transaction and their activities, as well as to request the clients (borrowers) to provide the corresponding documents and information. Clients (borrowers) must provide such additional documents within a scope and deadlines required by the bank. 

    Furthermore, banks are obligated to verify whether the documents submitted by the client are valid as well as check their compliance with applicable legal requirements. Based on these checks, a servicing bank prepares a substantiated conclusion on whether a particular financing transaction constitutes any risky activities that may threaten the interest of the bank’s depositors or other creditors. Presently, it is not clear how banks will draw such a conclusion and what documents they may want to see for this purpose. The list of risky activities enacted by the NBU in 2015 includes, among others, indirect lending to the persons related to the bank. So, it cannot be excluded that a bank may request documents on the lender’s beneficial ownership to confirm that the parties’ beneficial owners are unrelated to the one of the bank. 

    Transaction subject to special interest 

    The NBU has introduced a list of financing transactions the registration of which will require submission of additional documents, such as: (i) amendments to the loan agreement related to the change of a finance party (i.e. assignment), (ii) registration of the loan agreement if the initial registration was cancelled and registration of the loan agreement whereunder a disbursement was made to a Ukrainian borrower without its registration by the NBU; (iii) export – financing transactions pursuant to the terms of which, the disbursement by a foreign lender is made outside of Ukraine, i.e. without the transfer of funds to a borrower’s account in a servicing bank, and (iv) financial transaction involving a public individual or his/her relative or a loan agreement for the issuance of a loan in the amount exceeding USD 500,000/its equivalent to an individual who is a Ukrainian citizen. 

    Such additional documents are also outlined in the regulation. However, for some of these transactions the borrower may also be required to provide documents which are defined rather broadly such as, for instance, the documents confirming business purpose of the transaction. Obviously, the bank will exercise discretion in determining whether the documents are sufficient for this purpose. 

    The registration of the financing agreements (or amendment thereto) in the above cases is subject to the consideration of the documents by the NBU (upon transfer of their copies by the servicing bank) and taking a decision with respect to the risky activities. Such decision shall be issued by the NBU within 30 calendar days after receipt of the documents. 

    Extended deadlines 

    The terms for the consideration of the documents by the servicing bank have been extended from 4 to 7 business days. The NBU is now required to review the documents also within 7 business days which term does not include the above mentioned 30-day term for the issuance of the decision by the NBU concerning the risky activities. 

    * * * 

    Historically, the assignment of cross border loans was restricted (effectively prohibited) by the NBU in August 2015 as a declared measure to ensure stability of the currency exchange market of Ukraine. Many business organizations and associations, including the Ukrainian Venture Capital and Private Equity Association (UVCA) and European Business Association were lobbying NBU to cancel the restriction as fully ineffective and interfering with private relationship of the contractual parties. We are pleased to inform that the lobbying actions of UVCA were organized by Wolf Theiss.   

    By Taras Dumych, Partner, and Oksana Volynets, Senior Associate, Wolf Theiss

  • Know Your Rights – In Interviews

    Know your rights In an Interview

    The headline attracts your interest, doesn’t it? Many executives, and partners in law firms too, are accustomed to directing their subordinates, instruct reporters to send them a draft of their articles before publication. Most reporters will reject that request and additionally will get the impression that the partner treated them like an employee requiring approval.

    At least in democratic countries, journalists have no obligation to share their final stories with you – so please don’t ask them to. But you have some other rights – or tricks – that can help to balance the article in your direction. 

    Request questions in advance

    Journalists who are working for major news organizations will not share their specific questions with you prior to an interview – such “hard news” reporters regard their questions as confidential until the moment they’re asked and fear that sharing them will tilt the balance of power too much in your favour.  But, they are usually willing to share the general premises of their stories. So, you can ask for those – to be well prepared and able to answer every question in detail. 

    Other reporters, including those working for smaller news organizations or B2B-publications like a trade publication – are often willing to share their questions in advance, they simply don’t care. In either case reporters are entitled to ask unscripted follow-up questions, so prepare for the interview!

    Offer to fact-check

    Offering to “fact-check” a story is different than requesting to see a story prior to publication. Whereas asking a journalist to see an article in advance suggests a controlling executive, offering to see an article’s key facts, in particular complicated legal issues, is usually regarded as helpful. If reporters take you up on your offer, they might email you the entire story – I would bet they will. If so, be careful in offering to change more than the key facts – but you can add that you would interpret some facts slightly different. 

    Tape the interview

    Although it can create a defensive environment before you even begin – you may consider audio taping your raw interviews with reporters in certain circumstances, especially those you expect to become hostile. Reporters who know you’re taping them care to avoid misquoting. And if you’re misquoted anyway, you can release the raw tape to the public. Many countries require you to notify the other party that you’re recording – you know all about that. Just tell the reporters they’ll be recorded. 

    Limit the time

    Limiting the time of an interview can prevent it from turning into a harmful fishing in the dark. If you have your doubts, tell the reporter you’d love to talk but only have a 15-minute-window available. Make sure you set the time limit when you are arranging, not conducting the interview – otherwise it will look too defensive. 

    In General 

    Make these procedures the exception to the rule than your standard operating procedure. Your goal is to forge productive relationships with journalists, not to view them as the enemy. 

    Keep in mind, they are out for a story, but they don’t represent other parties’ interests. At least most of the time. 


    Georg BaldaufGeorg Baldauf, Founder of Greenberg Advisory, spent 15 years in communications, campaigning, and the media. In the past he worked as the PR Manager of international law firm Wolf Theiss. Previously he had led WPP’s Ogilvy PR Team in Vienna and worked also on an EAME level, advising clients from different sectors, like finance, industry, and politics – campaigning in national elections. He is now focusing on litigation and finance PR. As a qualified communication specialist, he is also working towards finishing his legal degree.