On October 20, 2014, Poland’s Alior Bank acquired 97.9% of Meritum Bank from the EBRD, Innova Capital, and WCP Cooperatief, for a total of approximately EUR 84.5 million.
Greenberg Traurig handled the acquisition and advised on all aspects, including financing for the deal through an issuance of new shares. The sellers were advised by Weil.
We reached out to Slawomir Tomkiewicz, the Head of Legal at Alior Bank, with several questions about the deal and his selection of Greenberg Traurig as external counsel.
CEELM:
Alior acquired 97.9% of Meritum from two private equity funds — Innova Capital (49.9%) and WCP Cooperatief (24.1%)) — and the EBRD (23.9%). Who owns the other 2.1% of the shares and why were they not purchased by Alior as well?
S.T.: For some historical reasons the rest of the shares are dispersed among 12 different entities, both legal and physical persons, domiciled both in Poland and abroad. It would be difficult to contact and negotiate with all of them at the same time. The sale process was initiated by the three main shareholders mentioned in your questions and for the sake of effectiveness we decided to focus on negotiations only with them. On the other hand the purchased stake gives Alior Bank a vast majority and the right to easily and smoothly proceed with further steps of planned integration. Of course Alior Bank is also interested in purchasing the shares belonging to those minority shareholders.
CEELM:
Were each of the three existing shareholders approached individually, or were they approached collectively? If collectively, did that (four parties) add complexity to the deal?
S.T.: Generally the selling shareholders were approached collectively, which helped a lot to negotiate and conclude the Share Purchase Agreement in a relatively short period of time. It would not have been possible if the selling shareholders had not employed one renowned investment bank as their financial advisor and one international legal firm (Weil) as their legal counsel. The coordinating role of Innova as the main selling shareholder is also worth mentioning and appreciating. Of course it is always a bit more difficult to find a compromise between four parties than it is between one seller and one buyer, but on the other hand it is nothing very unusual in M&A transactions practice.
CEELM:
According to reports, approximately half of the purchase price will be paid to Innova and WCP Cooperatief in the form of 2.355 million new shares issued by Alior Bank. Why was the deal structured in this manner?
S.T.: It is connected with a few different and complex circumstances, among which I can mention the expectations of the Polish Financial Supervision Commission as well as the capital position and current ownership structure of Alior Bank.
CEELM:
Why did you retain Greenberg Traurig for its assistance in the matter?
GT is almost a first choice legal firm for M&A processes in Poland. We worked with them on a few other deals in the past and really appreciate their impressive experience in these kinds of transactions. That brand guarantees the highest quality of services.
CEELM:
How were the responsibilities divided between the Alior Bank in-house legal team and the Greenberg Traurig team on the deal? How much was done internally, how much did you externalize, and in what areas?
S.T.: Our internal legal team conducted only its own due diligence process. All transaction-related matters, especially the negotiations, were outsourced to GT. Of course I personally consulted the Management Board of Alior Bank on all crucial documents that had to be signed by Alior Bank, but all of them were also reviewed by GT.
CEELM:
Is Greenberg Traurig representing you in the merger clearance process as well, or is that being handled by a different firm?
S.T.: It is our intention to continue the co-operation with GT both at the stage of obtaining necessary administrative approvals and also then, during the further integration with Meritum Bank.