Category: Uncategorized

  • CMS Advises Lama Energy on Acquisition of Digi CZ from RCS & RDS

    CMS has advised the Lama Energy Group on the acquisition of Digi Czech Republic, from RCS & RDS, a major telecommunication operator in South-Eastern Europe head-quartered in Romania. RCS & RDS was represented by PeliFilip and PRK Partners. The transaction was completed on April 21st, 2015, and the transaction value was not disclosed.

    The Lama Energy Group is a privately-owned Czech investment group engaged primarily in the exploration, production, and sale of oil & gas and production and sale of utilities.  Czech subsidiaries of Lama include Lama Energy (supply of gas and electricity to households and corporations), Lama Gas & Oil (extraction of gas and oil from deposits in the Czech Republic), Lama Mobile (mobile virtual operator in Vodafone network), and the Teplarna Otrokovice and Teplarna Kyjov heating plants. A significant part of the group’s revenues is generated from trading in oil commodities and oil processing in North America. Gross revenues of Lama for 2014 exceeded CZK 30 billion (EUR 1.1 billion).

    Digi CZ is a leading Czech operator of satellite TV broadcasting, and currently provides a basic programming package which includes the exclusive live broadcasts of the English Premier League and Italian Serie A football matches as well as events such as WTA women’s tennis tournaments.

    The CMS team advising Lama Energy on the deal was led by Prague-based Partner Lukas Janicek. In addition to CMS, Lama was supported in this transaction by UniCredit (M&A) and Asteon (business). Senior acquisition debt was provided by the Prague branch of Commerzbank. 

    The PeliFilip team advising RCS & RDS was led by Partner Alexandru Birsan, assisted by Associate Olga Nita. 

     

  • Ongoing Privatisation in Croatia

    Ongoing Privatisation in Croatia

    As is the trend in former Yugoslavia countries in the past years, Croatia is embarking on a path where privatisation of state companies is imperative for further development of state economy and infrastructure. Even though each country in the region has pursued a different path toward democracy and a free market economy, all relevant countries have a similar blueprint when it comes to the process of privatisation.

    Recently, Croatia ensued a new phase of privatisation on a rather large scale. Although it is not proceeding as planned and the Croatian government is no doubt ruing its own particular lack of fortune after the country’s latest failed privatisation sales, the commitment to restructuring and privatisation is still there. Stable economy, EU membership, strategic location, infrastructure and human capital represent some of the major advantages which Croatia offers to an investor. Key sectors, as defined by the Agency for Investments and Competitiveness (Agencija za investicije i konkurentnost) are: tourism, information computer technology, automotive, food, pharmaceutical, logistics, metal and textile. Also, due to Croatia’s EU Accession which took place on July 1st 2013, there is no need for product double testing or custom clearances between EU countries and Croatia. 

    Legal basis for privatisation of companies in Croatia is provided by National Property Management Act (Zakon o upravljanju i raspolaganju imovinom u vlasnistvu Republike Hrvatske; NN st. 94/2013), which is relatively young, as it was adopted and entered into force in 2013. It predicts the following methods of privatization:

    • Public offer of shares,
    • Public auction of shares,  
    • Public call for offers,
    • Public offer of shares on organized markets 
    • Acceptance of the offer in the process of takeover,
    • Minority shareholders squeeze-out,
    • Public call for capital increase,
    • Direct sale.

    The above mentioned methods may be combined with the procedures of restructuring and capital increase of the companies.

    Two additional legal acts are also imperative in the privatisation of companies: Strategy on property management for 2013 – 2017 (Strategija upravljanja i raspolaganja imovinom u vlasnistvu Republike Hrvatske za razdoblje od 2013. do 2017. godine), adopted by the Croatian Parliament, and Plan on property management 2015 (Plan upravljanja imovinom u vlasnistvu RH za 2015. godinu), adopted individually for each specific year. The above mentioned documents are very important as they divide companies into groups based on categories, which are designed to show and predict the possibility of commencing the process of privatisation. That being said, Strategy on property management determines guidelines for the process of selling companies and Plan on property management further analyses and breaks down the possibility of selling companies, where the decision to privatize a specific company shall be adopted by a specific decision of the Government.

    So far, a synonym for Croatia’s privatisation story has been Croatian fertilizer firm Petrokemija. The sale of Petrokemija was supposed to show that Croatia was fully committed to restructuring and privatisation. On March 12th 2014 the deadline for binding offers to buy a controlling stake has passed without any concrete bids from the trinity of preferred bidders – Borealis from Austria, Nitrogenmuvek from Hungary and Agrofert from the Czech Republic, while other attempts at full-scale privatisation date back all the way to 1998. As a result, Croatia is stuck with a firm whose Yugoslav-era industrial facilities are in desperate need of investment to be competitive and meet the exacting environmental standards laid down by the EU. As privatisation of Petrokemija has not moved along as predicted, the Croatian government is now saddled with a company that for much of the recent past has been a drain on the state’s finances.

    National office for managing state property (Drzavni ured za upravljanje drzavnom imovinom) was concentrating most of its attention towards the monetization of highways. A concession model of monetization was expected, meaning that the state was planning to delegate highways to a concessionaire which will in return for a payment of lump sum estimated at € 2.4 to € 3.2 billion to the government manage and maintain them for a span of 30-50 years. The procedure was lately stopped by the Government, in part due to a huge opposition of the public opinion. At the moment, the Government, although the sources are still unofficial, is planning a completely different approach, with an IPO where the 51% of the company would be offered to the Croatian pension funds, the employees and the Croatian citizens.

    Airports of Split, Dubrovnik, Zagreb, Osijek, Pula, Rijeka and Zadar are not predicted for any financial restructuring, privatisation or sale. However, on October 9th 2014 the government adopted a decision to re-launch the privatisation of Croatia Airlines. The state currently holds 90 % of the national carrier, valued at € 50 million. After securing approval from the Croatian Competition Agency (Agencija za zastitu trzisnog natjecanja) in June 2013, the company began implementing the € 259 million restructuring plan, scheduled to last until the end of 2015. The plan includes further redundancy measures and the closure of retail units abroad in 2015. In 2015 it is not realistic to expect any interest or even offers from European airlines but certain interest is shown by the Asian airlines, namely Hainan Group and All Nippon Airways. The Croatian government has declared that Croatian Airlines can be owned by a majority only by a legal or natural person based in EU, other co-owners located outside the EU cannot own more than 49 % of equity share. 

    Also, in December 2013 the sale of government’s 99.13% stake in Croatian Postal Bank (Hrvatska Postanska Banka) failed after the only binding bid filed by Erste Bank was rejected due to the low offering price. However, the bank is imperatively inserted in the Plan on property management 2015 in which it is predicted, firstly, its restructuring and the sale of the shares by public tender afterwards.

    Even though experts predict no major completions of privatisation in 2015 due to parliamentary and presidential elections, here are some numbers, which could prove otherwise. More than 90 companies are expected to be privatised in 2015 and 16 companies where state own more than 50 % of shares are ready to be sold. 

    There are 27 companies of strategic importance for the state, namely HEP Group (Hrvatska Elektroprivreda d.d.), JANAF (Jadranski naftovod d.d.), Plinacro d.o.o., Hrvatske Sume d.o.o., Croatian Lottery (Hrvatska Lutrija d.o.o.), Croatian Railways (HZ Infrastruktura d.o.o.), Hrvatske Vode, etc., where no privatisation is expected. There are 26 companies of special strategic importance, namely ACI d.d., Croatia Airlines d.d., Jadrolinija, Zagreb Airport (Zracna luka Zagreb), Croatia banka d.d., Croatian Postal Bank (Hrvatska Postanska banka d.d.), The People’s Newspaper (Narodne novine d.d.), Croatian Railways (HZ Cargo d.o.o.), Brijuni Rivijera d.o.o., Zadar Airport (Zracna luka Zadar), Split Airport (Zracna luka Split), etc., in which the state owns more than 55 % of all shares, where the government will decide whether privatisation will start or not and another 6 companies with special importance where the state owns less than 50 % of shares. 

    There are 558 companies with no strategic importance where the restructuring agency is making all the decisions regarding privatisation. Of those, 507 companies are owned by the state with more than 50 % of all shares. 

    To conclude, no major breakthroughs are expected in 2015 but still, fortune could smile on Croatia and its privatisation plan.

    By Branko Ilic Partner, ODI Law Firm

  • Addleshaw Goddard Advises Tate & Lyle on Re-alignment of European Joint Venture

    As part of a wider restructuring announced this week, Addleshaw Goddard has advised Tate & Lyle on the re-alignment of Eaststarch, its European joint venture with Archer Daniels Midland.

    The re-alignment involves Tate & Lyle’s assumption of full ownership of a plant in Slovakia and its divestment of interest in three corn wet mills in Bulgaria, Turkey, and Hungary, thereby substantially reducing its commodities business in Europe. The transaction, which is subject to regulatory clearances and is due to complete in the summer, will also see Tate & Lyle receive EUR 240 million in cash on completion.

    The Addleshaw Goddard team was led by Corporate Partner, Andrew Rosling, the head of the firm’s Retail & Consumer sector, who was supported by Louise Pritchard and Steve Conyers. Competition Partner Bruce Kilpatrick advised on competition issues and Jenny Te and Rob Garwood on commercial agreements. The firm worked with “best friends” Loyens Loeff and Noerr in various jurisdictions.

    Rosling, commenting on the deal, said: “This is an important deal for Tate & Lyle and we are delighted to have supported them in re-shaping their operations in Europe.”

    Robert Gibber, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Tate & Lyle said: “The re-alignment of the Eaststarch joint venture represents an important step in the transition of Tate & Lyle to a global Speciality Food Ingredients business.

  • New Partner at Dvorak Hager & Partners

    Slovakian lawyer Annamaria Tothova has been promoted to Partner at Dvorak Hager & Partners.

    Tothova, who has been with Dvorak Hager & Partners since 2006, specializes in environmental law, infrastructure project regulation, waste and packaging management, and has additional expertise in construction law and real estate law, energy law, and other regulated activities. Before joining Dvorak Hager & Partners, Tothova worked for the office of Haslinger / Nagele & Partner Rechtsanwalte. 

    Partner Bernhard Lager, who manages the firm’s Bratislava office, claims that, “Annamaria clearly ranks among leading experts in environmental and energy law,” and Partner Stanislav Dvorak adds: “It is great that the new role of Annamaria reflects the strengthening of our practice in these fields and the importance of the Slovak part of our team.”

  • ODI and RPPP Advise on Financial Restructuring of Perutnina Ptuj

    ODI has advised a consortium of 8 banks on a EUR 100 million out-of-court financial restructuring of Slovenian poultry production company Perutnina Ptuj — which was represented by Rojs, Peljhan Prelesnik & partners.

    The Perutnina Ptuj Group consists of 18 subsidiaries in six countries (Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Romania, and Austria) and has more than 3,600 employees and 500 contractors.

    According to an ODI press release, “the restructuring process started in 2013 and consisted of two phases. In the first one, a short-term MRA was concluded while in the second one a long-term MRA rescheduling the maturity of the loans until 2020 was concluded. It also envisages a capital increase by a long-term strategic partner and improvement of the capital adequacy of Perutnina Ptuj. ODI advised the bank consortium on all legal aspects of the transaction, drafted the MRA and all ancillary documentation.”

    The ODI team advising the bank consortium was led by Managing Partner Uros Ilic, assisted by Senior Associates Katarina Skrbec and Lea Pecek. The Rojs, Peljhan, Prelesnik & partners team was led by Senior Partner Grega Peljhan.

  • Magnusson Advises Immofinanz on Shopping Center Commercialization

    Magnusson has advised the Austrian investor and developer Immofinanz Group on commercialization of the retail space of the Tarasy Zamkowe Shopping Center in Lublin, Poland, and advised on negotiations of its lease agreements with tenants. Tarasy Zamkowe, which opened on March 4, 2015, encompasses 38,000 square meters, with space for 150 stores, cafes, restaurants, and entertainment premises. The Immofinanz Group’s investment amounts to approximately PLN 480 million (EUR 120 million).

    According to a Magnusson statement, “the Immofinanz Group is one of the leading property companies in Europe [with] activities … focused in the office, retail and logistics asset classes of the core markets in Austria, Germany, the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, and Russia.”

    Magnusson’s team included Partner Agnieszka Pytlas-Skwierczynska and Associate Norbert Gawor.

  • New Managing Partner for Freshfields in Russia

    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has appointed Igor Gerber as its new Moscow office managing partner. The appointment, effective from May 1, is set to run for a three year term. Gerber succeeds Mikhail Loktionov, who has served two terms in the role. Loktionov will remain head of the firm’s Russian finance and capital markets practice.  

    Gerber, who became a Partner at Freshfields in 2008, specializes in corporate law, including M&A and joint ventures. He is a graduate of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations international law department and holds a Master of Laws from the Goethe Universitat, in Frankfurt am Main. Commenting on his appointment, he said, “I am delighted to take on the role of office managing partner. With over twenty years presence in the city our Moscow office has exceptional understanding and knowledge of the Russian market and a solid client base of both domestic and international firms across a broad strata of industry. I’m honored to be asked to help continue to help develop and consolidate our excellent market position.”

    Loktionov said: “In handing over the role of office managing partner to Igor I know that we certainly have the best man for the job in place to take the office forward in the coming years. These are undoubtedly challenging times for the Russian economy and our clients are facing new and unique challenges in a complex market. I am confident that under Igor’s leadership our Moscow office, supported by the international Freshfields network, will continue to deliver both exceptional client service and first class counsel wherever and whenever our clients need it.”

    Freshfields recently announced the promotion of Moscow-based finance lawyer Anna Nersesian to Partner in the firm’s Russian finance practice (Originally covered by CEE Legal Matters on March 17,2015), also effective as of May 1, and the firm has also hired two new senior dispute resolution lawyers, Alexey Yadykin and Fedor Belkyh, to replace the team led by former Moscow disputes head Maxim Kulkov that left to set up the new KK&P Trial Lawyers litigation boutique.

  • Selih & partnerji and Jadek & Pensa Advise on Podravka Acquisition of Zito

    Selih & partnerji has advised Podravka on its acquisition of 183,386 shares of the Zito food production company from a consortium of sellers consisting of Slovenski drzavni holding, Modra zavarovalnica, KD Kapital, KD Skladi, Adriatic Slovenica, and NLB Skladi. The sellers were represented by Jadek & Pensa. Podravka agreed to pay EUR 180.1 per share for their acquisition of 51.55% of the company’s shares, making the total acquisition amount EUR 33,027,818.

    Following the completed transfer of shares, Podravka reportedly intends to publish a take-over bid for the take-over of the remaining shares, in accordance with the Slovenian Takeovers Act.

    According to a formal assessment conducted by the consortium of sellers, the acquisition will allow Zito to grow and develop outside Slovenia. The company has a portfolio of widely-recognized brands in Slovenia, including the umbrella brand Zito (primarily flour and bakery products), Zlato polje (rice, pasta, and mill products), Maestro (seasonings), 1001 Cvet (teas), Natura (cereals), Gorenjka (chocolate), and Sumi (candy). The annual revenue of the Podravka Group after the takeover of Zito will be about HRK 4.5 billion.

  • Baker & McKenzie Advises Uniwheels on Warsaw IPO

    Baker & McKenzie is advising Uniwheels AG in connection with its initial public offering on the Warsaw Stock Exchange.

    Uniwheels is one of the largest wheel suppliers to the automotive industry in Europe and is a leading European manufacturer of alloy wheels in the accessories market. The company owns two major production plants in Poland and one in Germany. 

    The prospectus was published on April 13, 2015. The IPO consists of 2,400,000 newly issued company shares as well as 2,400,000 shares offered by the current sole shareholder Uniwheels Holding (Malta) Ltd. At present, Uniwheels Holding (Malta) Ltd. is the sole company shareholder and possesses 10,000,000 shares, representing 100 per cent of capital and 100 per cent of voting rights. Company founder and chief executive officer Ralf Schmid holds 92 per cent of voting rights in Uniwheels Holding (Malta) Ltd., and Michael Schmid hold the remaining eight per cent. The offering will consist of a public offering to retail and institutional investors in Poland and a private placement for institutional investors outside the United States (excluding Poland) in reliance on Regulation S of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933. There will be no public offering outside of Poland. Uniwheels plans to use its net proceeds of the offering to partly finance construction of its new production facility in Poland.

    Frankfurt-based Baker & McKenzie Partner Christoph Wolf and Warsaw-based Partner Jakub Celinski led the firm’s team on the matter, supported in particular by Frankfurt-based Senior Counsel Tilman Wink and Warsaw-based Senior Associate Piotr Kowalik.

    Dom Maklerski mBanku S.A. is acting as global coordinator, joint bookrunner and joint offering agent, mCorporate Finance S.A. is acting as manager, mBank S.A. is acting as underwriter, and Bank Zachodni WBK S.A. is acting as joint bookrunner, joint offering agent, and underwriter.

    Editorial Note: White & Case has confirmed that it advised Dom Maklerski mBanku, acting as the Global Coordinator, Joint Bookrunner and Joint Offering Agent, mBank, acting as the Underwriter, and Bank Zachodni WBK, acting as the Joint Bookrunner, Joint Offering Agent and Underwriter, on the deal. The firm’s team consisted of lawyers from the Firm’s capital markets practice in Warsaw, Frankfurt and London, including Warsaw-based Partner Marcin Studniarek, Local Partner Rafal Kaminski, and Associate Monika Duzynska, Frankfurt-based Partner Benedikt Gillessen and Associate Katharina Thumeyer, and London-based Partner Doron Loewinger.

  • CMS Cameron McKenna Represents mBank in Trademark Dispute

    CMS Cameron McKenna in Kyiv has successfully represented mBank in a trademark dispute against Bank Mykhailivsky in the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine.  

    Bank Mykhailivsky — one of the largest Ukrainian banks — sought to have mBank’s registered trademarks ruled invalid in Ukraine due to alleged nonuse. However, the Ukrainian commercial courts in all three instances upheld mBank defense that setting up a local branch was not required to prove the “use of trademarks” under Ukrainian law, and that rendering bank services in Ukraine by use of bank cards issued in Poland was sufficient.

    The CMS Cameron McKenna team was led by Partners Olexander Martinenko and Malgorzata Chrusciak, assisted by Associates Sergiy Gryshko and Associate Volodymyr Kolvakh. Martinenko commented: “We are delighted with the outcome of this non-trivial case. It not only demonstrates our potent Ukrainian litigation capability, but also witnesses that Ukrainian courts have experts to deal with technically and legally complicated cases.”