Category: Uncategorized

  • JPM Provides Legal Support to Construction of IKEA Store

    JPM has advised the Swedish furniture producer IKEA on “all administrative and legal matters” related to the expected autumn commencement of construction of the first IKEA store in Serbia, which will be located at Bubanj potok, in Belgrade.

    The Permit to start the construction was delivered on June 10 (in what JPM describes as “in a record time of only 2 days after request submission”), to the Property Manager SEE, Vladislav Lalic, by Zorana Mihajlovic, the Vice President of the Government of Serbia and the Minister of Traffic, Construction and Infrastructure. JPM will continue to provide advice to IKEA throughout the construction tendering process, execution of work, and day-to-day running of the store.

    According to JPM, the total investment of Swedish company will reach EUR 70 million and completion of work and opening of the store is anticipated to occur a year after the construction begins — thus, for the end of 2016. The store will cover 38,900 square meters, be surrounded by 1,400 parking places, and will offer 9,200 products, including furniture and other household accessories. 

    The firm also reports that IKEA plans to construct 4 more department stores in Serbia: another one in Belgrade, along with ones in Nis, Novi Sad and in central Serbia. The value of the company’s overall investment into Serbia is expected to reach EUR 300 million.

    Image Source: ikea.com
  • Herguner, Clifford Chance, and Verdi Advise on Istanbul–Izmir Motorway Project Financing

    Herguner has advised the Borrower and the Sponsors on the for the USD 5 billion dollar financing of the build operate transfer (BOT) model project for Turkey’s 433 km Gebze-Izmir motorway. Clifford Chance Europe, and the Verdi Law Firm advised the Lenders on the refinancing of the USD 2 billion credit previously extended for the project, which are reported to include the overseas branches of Akbank TAS, Finansbank A.S., Garanti Bank A.S., Turkey Is Bankasi A.S., Vakiflar Bankasi T.A.O., Ziraat Bankasi A.S., Turkey Halk Bankasi A.S., Yapi ve Kredi Bank A.S., and Deutsche Bank AG’s London branch. The key finance documents were signed on June 5, 2015.  

    The total project cost is estimated at more than USD 7 billion. The borrower is Otoyol Yatirim ve Isletme Anonim Sirketi (“Otoyol”), which is a special purpose project company with shareholders consisting four Turkish companies and one Italian company. According to a Herguner press release, “the project has many challenging qualities, especially in terms of having a syndication of 9 banks [consisting] of 8 Turkish banks’ overseas branches and an international bank, having the involvement of the Turkish Treasury and the General Directorate of Highways, [the] size of the Project, refinancing of the already disbursed amounts as well as additional financing of such a large loan amount.”

    Feridun Bilgin, the Turkish Minister of Transport, Maritime Affairs, and Communication, announced that the Gebze-Orhangzi-Izmir motorway project is the largest Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) project in infrastructure financing in Turkey’s history.  The freeway will connect Istanbul and Izmir through the cities of Yalova, Bursa, Balikesir, and Manisa, as an extension of the North-South Europe Freeway (more commonly referred to as the TEM Freeway), which suffers from some of the heaviest traffic in Turkey. The USD 5 billion dollar agreement that finances the extension of the 433 kilometer long highway is recorded as the largest credit agreement in Turkish infrastructure history. 

    Image source: otoyolas.com.tr
  • Thommessen, Borenius, and Tark Grunte Sutkiene Advise on Nelja Energia Green Bond Issuance

    Borenius in Estonia and Latvia and Tark Grunte Sutkiene in Lithuania — both working with the Thommessen law firm in Norway as the main advisor — have assisted Estonian Nelja Energia on a successfully completed EUR 50 million bond issue to be listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange.

    Nelja Energia is a leading Baltic renewable energy producer and the bonds were mainly subscribed by institutional investors from Scandinavia, United Kingdom, and the Baltics. According to a Nelja Energia press release, this was the first green bond issue in the Baltics.

    Although all the proceeds are not traceable to specific projects, the Bond conforms with the Green Bond Principles (GBP), which define such bonds as enabling capital-raising and investment for new and existing projects with environmental benefits. The core business area of Nelja Energia is the development and operation of renewable energy projects in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. The company is based on Nordic and Estonian capital and is dedicated to the realization of environmental benefits, through low-carbon electricity. Nelja Energia has wind farms in Estonia and Lithuania with a total capacity of 220 MW. Since its inception, the company has invested over EUR 400 million in the Baltics. Nelja Energia generated 495 GWh of electricity in 2014.

    Kalle Kiigske, the CFO of Nelja Energia, commented: “This bond issue is part of our long-term strategy to finance our continuous growth and it enabled us to present ourselves as the largest wind energy company in the Baltics to investors in Scandinavia and elsewhere in Europe.”

    Proceeds from the issue will mainly be used to finance new investments in renewable energy projects in Latvia and Lithuania. The issued bond matures in 6 years and Swedbank Norway was the arranger of the bond.

    The Thommessen team working on the matter was headed by Partner Einar Grette, assisted by Managing Associate Heidi Dillevig and Associate Marit Liland Fredriksen. From the Borenius Tallinn office, Partners Aivar Taro and Kristel Raidla-Talur led the team, and, from Riga, the team was led by Partner Gatis Flinters. The TGS lawyers working on the matter in Lithuania were led by Partner Marius Matonis, assisted by Senior Associate Aurimas Pauliukevicius.

  • Pepeliaev Group Successful in Representation of Zapolyarneft Before Russian Constitutional Court

    The Pepeliaev Group has reported that on June 2, 2015, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation ruled in favor of the firm’s client, Zapolyarneft, on an appeal of a lower court decision regarding the proportionality of penalties levied against the company for an oil spill.

    According to the Pepeliaev Group, Zapolyarneft moved quickly to initiate a recovery and cleaning operation, “eliminating a significant portion of the negative effects of [an] oil spill, which occurred due to technological failure.”

    The firm also reported that uncertainty regarding the applicable standards led to Zapolyarneft being charged with the same penalty as if it had made no recovery attempts. The Pepeliaev Group argued that this penalty actively created a disincentive for recovery operations, while the government authorities argued — and the lower court agreed — that neither the degree of contamination, nor the results of rehabilitation work, would operate to diminish the fixed fee for the violation.

    The Constitutional Court upheld the Pepeliev Group’s argument that the appealed norms were unconstitutionally vague, and conflicted with “the prevailing understanding of the legal system of redress and accountability principles.”

    “From a legal perspective, the Constitutional Court handed down a deep sound and informed decision,” said Sergey Pepeliaev, the Managing Partner of the firm. “The applicant in the case — the oil company — and we as representatives held a common position that this case is important not only as property interest. [It is] much more important for the law to promote the restoration of the forest ecosystem, [which the original decision did not do]. In addition, general legal principles of proportionality and responsibility should be respected in all areas, including environmental violations.”

    The firm’s team was led by Pepeliaev and Partner Roman Bevzenko, the firm’s Head of Special Projects. Lawyer Peter Popov prepared the complaint.

    Image Source: gazprom-neft.com
  • New Legal Recruitment Firm in CEE

    A new legal recruitment firm has appeared on the Central European market: Prodigy Talent Management Solutions is offering talent management, executive search consulting, and personnel training solutions throughout the region.

    Prodigy’s Founder and Managing Director, Ronald Stevens, is an American lawyer who, prior to relocating to Europe, worked in the US as a Project Attorney with Faegre & Benson, Mayer Brown, and Alston & Bird, among others as well as multi-national corporations. For the past 5 years he has worked with several of the leading legal recruiting agencies in the region.

    Stevens’ commented: “All of us at Prodigy are very eager and excited to offer a fresh new alternative to the traditional model of talent management consulting and executive search services throughout CEE, DACH and beyond. We take great pride in our business approach which is highly individualized and client centric, and in lieu of outdated CV databases we utilize sophisticated research methodologies as well as draw upon our existing network of legal and business professionals currently active in the region.”

  • Setting Up a Pre-harvest Financing Framework in Serbia

    Setting Up a Pre-harvest Financing Framework in Serbia

    Over the last 10 years, considerable legislative efforts have been made towards creating a favourable framework for financing agribusiness and agricultural production in Serbia. The latest piece of legislation in that sector is a law on secured pre-harvest financing.

    Looking back, in 2005 Serbia introduced the national strategy on agricultural development (the Strategy), which outlined obstacles and set goals with regard to financing agribusiness and agricultural production. At that time, the main problems were a lack of:

    • short-term financing which would bridge the gap between selling newly harvested agricultural products and collecting the purchase price;
    • mid-term financing for investing in working capital (as such investments cannot be financed by the yield of a single production cycle);
    • long-term financing for purchasing agricultural land.

    In other words, the main issue was a lack of easily accessible financing for inputs, production and the accompanying support operations required for agricultural production. The Strategy aimed to expand the market in which financing was accessible to include all participants in the agricultural production cycle.

    However, rather than following the approach outlined in the Strategy, the Serbian state adopted a different approach to solving the problem of financing agribusiness and agricultural production. Specifically, the state was directly involved in financing agricultural production (for example, by granting subsidised loans and interest rate subsidies), while at the same time creating optimal conditions for the financing of agricultural production by developing the existing legal framework. 

    In 2009 Serbia enacted the law on public warehouses for agricultural products, which was a milestone from a legal framework development perspective. This piece of legislation introduced a rather safe and simple system for pledging existing agricultural products, allowing them to be used as collateral when obtaining financing for agribusiness and agricultural production. In that way, a new avenue for financing agricultural production was created.

    The next big step in creating a favourable legal framework for financing agribusiness and agricultural production in Serbia was the law on secured pre-harvest financing (the Law). During the drafting of the Law, all major agrarian business stakeholders in Serbia (that is, banks, insurance companies and agribusiness companies) were involved in providing input, which was used as the starting point for drafting certain solutions introduced by the Law.

    The Law aims to finance pre-harvest production, specifically financing the inputs required for agricultural products, with a loan tenor that corresponds to the term of the entire crop cycle. In summary, the main focus of the Law is to help farmers access pre-harvest financing in order to bridge the funding gap between investing in agricultural production and collecting the price upon sale of the newly harvested agricultural products.

    The Law not only governs contracts on agricultural pre-harvest financing, but also the registration of such agreements, the settlement of creditors’ claims under the agreement (by using future agricultural products as a form of loan security without taking them into possession) and special rights and obligations of the contracting parties in agricultural financing. Specifically, the Law introduces distinct financing/enforcement mechanisms, custom-made for the Serbian market model.

    The financing mechanism set in the Law allows the contracting parties to regulate their mutual rights and obligations relating to the financing of agricultural production by concluding an agricultural financing agreement. Since these agreements are subject to specific provisions (for example, exclusion of force majeure) prescribed by the Law, financing is provided in a more favourable and secured legal framework. These agreements contain mandatory elements and are entered into a registry of financing contracts run by the Serbian Business Registers Agency.

    Besides this mechanism, the Law also introduces a simple, quick and reliable system of enforcement, incorporating new solutions for overcoming impediments encountered in practice when pledging future agricultural products. Under the general legal regime (that is, Serbia’s civil law rules), future agricultural products can be pledged but also mortgaged at the same time. However, the way in which these two liens affect each other is unregulated. As such, the Law contains a set of rules to regulate these transactions. 

    In addition, while enforcement mechanisms introduced by the Law are based on the standard pledge model under Serbia’s civil law rules, certain parts of the registration and enforcement procedures have been altered and specifically tailored to meet the particular needs of participants in the agricultural production financing process. 

    At the moment there are number of financing options offered to the agricultural sector, namely by banks (and affiliated leasing companies), state funds and major agribusiness companies. However, the availability of financing options offered by banks (and affiliated leasing companies) is significantly constrained due to a combination of legal, economic, institutional and behavioural factors, which usually perceive the creditworthiness of borrowers from the agricultural sector as weaker than those in other sectors. In that regard, the Serbian market still lacks banking facilities for agricultural production. Instead, big agribusiness companies are the key figures in financing agricultural production.

    In conclusion, the impact of the Law should be twofold. Specifically, financing/enforcement mechanisms provided by the Law should help to provide financing both to small agricultural producers and big agribusiness companies. Therefore, as financing becomes accessible to all participants in the agricultural production cycle, the Law will not only provide cheaper and more accessible financing for agricultural production (primarily for small agricultural producers), but will also support market development.

    The Law was adopted in November 2014 and it should come into effect from 1 June 2015. Although the practical and market effects of the Law are yet to be seen, it is reasonable to expect further development of the financial market in Serbia and especially the market segment dealing with the financing of agricultural production. 

    By Darko Jovanovic, Partner, and Stefan Antonic, Associate, Karanovic & Nikolic

  • Brandl & Talos Advises Hallmann Holding on Increase of Stake in C-Quadrat

    Brandl & Talos has advised the investor and real estate developer Hallmann Holding International Investment on the increase of its stake in the listed company C-Quadrat Investment AG to 10.01% of the voting shares and the share capital. The purchase price was not published.

    Hillman Holding is based in Austria, where it is involved in the development and adaptation of high-quality real-estate projects. C_Quadrat is Austria’s largest independent fund house, best known for its computer-driven fund of funds.

    B&T Partner Thomas Talos advised Hallmann Holding International Investment on corporate matters, while Partner Ernst Brandl led the firm’s regulatory team.

    Image Source: hallmannholding.com
  • New Coordinator of Shipping & Insurance at Vilau

    Vilau | Associates has expanded its team of senior litigators with the addition of Mircea Dobrita, who joined the firm on May 15th, 2015. Dobrita, who will coordinate the firm’s Shipping and Insurance practice, moves to Vilau | Associates from Musat & Asociatii, where he spent the last 3.5 years.

    He specializes in civil and commercial disputes and insolvency matters, particularly related to civil, tax, insurance, admiralty law, disputes between professionals, debt recovery and enforcement proceedings.

    In addition to his litigation experience, Dobrita has handled legal advice related mandates including corporate changes and restructuring, mergers, spin-offs, and acquisitions, including measures specific to reorganization, winding-up, and liquidation customary for insolvency proceedings.

    “The activity of our dispute and arbitration practice has continuously increased in the recent period and having Mircea on board will not only consolidate the litigation team, but will also enable us to develop areas of practice in which Mircea has already excelled, namely admiralty and insurance law,” said Dragos Vilau, Managing Partner of Vilau | Associates. “Mircea is joining our team just a few months after Marius Barladeanu (reported on by CEE Legal Matters on November 6, 2014), the coordinator of our real estate and construction practice and who has worked closely with Mircea in the past. I am positive that his expertise and trustworthiness will contribute to the success of Vilau | Associates.

    Dobrita graduated from the Faculty of Law of Bucharest University in 1996. Before joining Vilau | Associates, he was part of the litigation team at Musat & Asociatii, acting as Managing Associate. From 1999-2011 he was a Managing Partner of his own law firm, Dobrita & Associates.

  • Lavrynovych & Partners Vindicates Zelenyi Gai’s Interests in Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal

    Lavrynovych & Partners has successfully defended the interests of Zelenyi Gai LLC, a hotel and restaurant business, in a court dispute with Prosecutor’s Office of Kyiv and the Kyiv City State Administration at the Kyiv Commercial Court of Appeal.

    According to a L&P summary, the case revolved around the Prosecutor’s Office claim that a previous decision of Kyiv City State Administration, which involved a transfer of land in the city center to Zelenyi Gai for the reconstruction and maintenance of a restaurant, was illegal. L&P reports that it “managed to prove the legality of its client’s actions, and as a result the Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Kyiv Commercial Court and denied the claim of Prosecutor’s Office.”

    The firm’s team included Associate Partner Andriy Moroz and Associate Inna Rudnyck.

    Image Source: booking.com
  • Hedman Partners Advises Monese on Raising USD 1.8 Million

    Hedman Partners has advised Monese, a London-based financial technology startup, on raising a USD 1.8 million investment from Seedcamp (Europe’s leading acceleration fund), the Estonian early stage VC fund SmartCap, Spotify advisor and investor Shakil Khan, and a selected group of other business angels and private investors from Estonia and abroad.

    Monese is a soon-to-launch U.K./European mobile banking service for expats and immigrants across Europe.

    The firm’s team included Partners Dmitri Tsimpoaka and Merlin Salvik.

    Image Source: monese.com