Category: Interviews

  • The CEELMDirect Profile Pick: An Interview with Victor Gugushev of Gugushev & Partners

    CEELMDirect Profile Pick: A series of interviews with partners and firms with profiles on the new CEELMDirect online legal directory. Today’s interview: Victor Gugushev, Senior Partner at the Gugushev & Partners Law Office in Bulgaria.

    CEELMDirect: According to an article on your profile on the CEELMDirect legal directory, you were just made Senior Partner at Gugushev & Partners this past January. Congratulations! What does this promotion mean to you personally? 

    Gugushev: Thank you, David! Indeed, I highly appreciate this promotion as it’s a recognition of my experience, expertise, and most importantly my work’s added value to the development of the firm in the past 15 years. I’m deeply honored and looking forward to continuing serving our clients with excellence and growing together!  

    CEELMDirect: Why did you decide to claim your profile on the CEELMDirect website and then upgrade it to Premium status?

    Gugushev: CEELMDirect is a great initiative, as such a platform focusing on the legal excellence and market developments in the CEE specifically is long overdue. We highly appreciate the different features and opportunities the directory provides including upgrading to a Premium profile for a competitive price vis-à-vis the business development outreach it provides. 

    CEELMDirect: What single element of your profile on the CEELMDirect website are you proudest of?

    Gugushev: The law is a living and briefing thing and the way it’s constantly evolving so legal experts should too. At least that’s how I see it and thus, I’m always striving to expand my expertise and knowledge. I just recently completed Entrepreneurship Program at Columbia Business School at Columbia University, where I gained vital insights from leading international practitioners in this area which I’m sure would have a strong impact on our legal collaboration with our clients from the start-up community.

    CEELMDirect: According to the CEELMDirect Activity Rankings function, Gugushev & Partners has had more thought leadership articles published on the CEE Legal Matters website than any other Bulgarian law firm. Why does your firm prioritize thought leadership in that way, and why do you value the publishing opportunities of the CEELM platform so highly?

    Gugushev: We at Gugushev & Partners Law Office strongly believe that part of our profession and calling as lawyers is to pay our due in the process of raising the public awareness and understanding of various legal matters and constant legislative developments which affect them, their business, and their livelihood in one way or another. Throughout the years, CEE Legal Matters has emerged as the leading legal information portal in the CEE region, a one-stop-shop for all you need to know if want to enter and start doing business in the CEE region and as we want our thought leadership articles to have an actual impact and reaching most people, this is the right place to publish them!  

    CEELMDirect: Great. Thank you, Victor, and have a great summer!

  • The CEELMDirect Profile Pick: An Interview with Gergely Szabo of Ban, S. Szabo, Rausch & Partners

    CEELMDirect Profile Pick: A series of interviews with partners and firms with profiles on the new CEELM Direct online legal directory. Today’s interview: Gergely Szabo, Partner at the Ban, S. Szabo, Rausch & Partners Law Office in Budapest.

    CEELMDirect: Hi Gergely. According to an article on your profile on CEELM Direct, you were made Partner at Ban, S. Szabo Rausch & Partners in January 2021. What did that promotion mean to you personally? 

    Szabo: The promotion was a confirmation for me that all my efforts are serving the best interests of our clients and our firm. I consider that the trust of my partners helps me to further develop both professionally and personally. The future of our firm is bright and I will do my best to be an integral part of it. 

    CEELMDirect: Why did you decide to claim your profile on the CEELM Direct website and then upgrade it to Premium status? 

    Szabo: I considered that the CEELM Direct website would be a good opportunity to promote myself and our firm. I am still confident that I made the right choice and by upgrading to Premium, it would be easier to find my profile.

    CEELMDirect: What single element of your profile on the CEELM Direct website are you proudest of?

    Szabo:  I would highlight my experience in regulatory matters. 

    CEELMDirect: Also on your profile is a thought leadership article you contributed to the CEELM website. What is the value, in your opinion, to spending the time to research, write, and publish such articles? 

    Szabo: The subject of my article – FDI – is a hot topic in Hungary and I really enjoyed the opportunity to share my thoughts about it. Furthermore, the CEELM website has great traffic and many decision-makers read the articles. Furthermore, it is an honor on its own to publish along with some of my highest-regarded peers. All these aspects helped me to write my article and consider the relevant time as well spent. I would strongly recommend all lawyers to take the opportunity and publish on the CEELM website.

    CEELMDirect: Thanks so much, Gergely, and we look forward to seeing more of your articles soon!

  • On a New Adventure: Patricia Gannon Announces Platforum 9

    CEE Legal Matters readers will likely be familiar with Patricia Gannon as one of the founders of Karanovic & Partners. Since her withdrawal from the firm (reported by CEE Legal Matters on September 21, 2020), Gannon ran her own “holistic strategic advisory business” (as reported on October 12, 2020) and, recently, she announced she is working on a new social media app for lawyers – Platforum 9. We caught up with her to learn more about her new project.

    CEELM: Let’s start with a bit of catch-up – what have you been up to these past couple of years?

    Gannon: As you know, I was a founder of Karanovic Nikolic, now Karanovic & Partners, over 20 years ago. My role as a foreign lawyer was more focused on actually building the practice and developing it across borders and internationally. I have been around but more focused on ensuring a smooth transition as I exited the firm nearly two years ago to pursue my independent career. It was important that younger partners had an opportunity to do what I did in their own way, so I took the back seat for a while.

    CEELM: Speaking of your individual career, what has been your focus with Gannon Advisory and what have been some of the biggest highlights/wins for you?

    Gannon: To be honest, after an intensive 20 years building a law firm with almost 200 people in seven markets, I felt I needed a time out to decide what I really wanted to do next. Although I had offers from a number of firms and businesses, I knew I did not want to go back to that pace of life again. So I didn’t! I found a new purpose in my life and it’s an exciting transition, even more international and connected than before – and I love it!

    The Gannon Advisory consultancy is a broad-based holistic advisory business that generally services law firms on their strategy, leadership, and business generation and development. I saw a gap in the market where small and mid-sized firms do not fully know what to focus on for the future growth of their business. I am happy to be able to assist firms in defining their future development and then actually coaching them in its implementation. It was a good reality check for me as I recalled the early days of development at my former firm. A time when everyone did everything and managed huge growth at the same time. Issues such as recruitment and retention of talent, development of leadership, quality control processes, and business generation are all being done by partners not trained in the matter. I enjoy engaging with young lawyers, helping them to understand themselves better, and seeing them develop their practice areas and client base.

    CEELM: What about Platforum 9 – what was your inspiration for it? 

    Gannon: As I had already left the firm, I discovered that I was working from home all the time and seriously missed the social dialogue with colleagues and peers. None of the networks or platforms I was involved with could properly cater to the way I wanted to be connected. I realized there must be a more efficient way for lawyers to connect with each other. Not just meeting up randomly at a live conference and hoping for some referral work. There seems to be no tool to assist them to maintain the connection they made. So now I am building a social media app for the legal profession, which will allow members to participate in live forums that cover their practice area or area of interest.

    This is the first global app of its type for lawyers of all types, and I am really excited by the response that I get from people all over the world willing to try it out and be part of designing it to make it as useful and fun as possible.

    CEELM: You mentioned connectivity. What other gaps do you see in the legal profession that require bridging?

    Gannon: I see huge generational gaps, where we still see old structures of management and organization dominating in a world they no longer fit into. Younger lawyers need more access to each other, to the topics that are relevant to their practice area, to develop their own client base within their firms, and to learn more about other legal systems and issues.

    CEELM: How will it work exactly?

    Gannon: Essentially, it’s a membership-based subscription model whereby individual lawyers join to connect with peers in their practice area or in any area of law they want to contribute to and learn about. Either desktop or mobile-based, you can actively participate in a live discussion or listen later, when it suits you. Third-party content from providers will be shared with the community as relevant.

    It will be moderated by excellent moderators who are properly trained and know the practice area well, which means that in a short but effective session you will learn something new and relevant to your practice. There are many additional features that I have in mind but, right now, I am looking for volunteers to help me beta test it.

    CEELM: Who’s your target audience with the app and how are you planning to reach it?

    Gannon: The target audience is broad, in that essentially all lawyers will be able to join, either from law firms, in-house, NGOs, legal tech, legal education, or policy. My hope, in particular, is that Platforum 9 will appeal to younger lawyers who do not have the same access to travel or meet each other internationally. I have soft-launched on LinkedIn recently and had so many views in the first week that I was encouraged. I will be using existing social media, personal connections, and international networks to reach target users.

    CEELM: What’s the game plan at the moment? At what stage are you with the app and what’s your current timeline?

    Gannon: I am currently fine-tuning the high-level features to be developed by the backend software developers. This will also be verified by the community that I am building, mostly through LinkedIn, so I hope your readers will reach out to me to get involved. It’s a super exciting opportunity to be part of something new in the profession.

    CEELM: How do you believe your experience will help you in launching a social media app?

    Gannon: My entire career has been about connecting the dots to develop business and individuals. In that way, I feel that this project is the culmination of my professional life. Of course, it’s at an entirely different level, which on some days seems overwhelming to me, but in its essence, it’s just a more impactful way to connect people. The beauty of having one career behind you is that, although you start something new, you are still not starting from the beginning. For me, it’s a continuation of my life’s work.

    CEELM: And what do you still see as the biggest challenges ahead?

    Gannon: There are so many challenges – some of which I can already imagine today and some, for sure, that I cannot yet anticipate. I am sure that social audio is not a simple tool to manage. My key feature is quality content. Platforms without quality content will fail in the long run. I am now searching for top-quality lawyers capable of moderating a forum. I need to motivate and train them so that they capture the essence of the subject in a meaningful yet interesting way, also involving others present in the session. I am working on this, currently, but if readers are interested in taking on this role for their practice area or topic they could also reach out to me.

    The whole project is a work in process but it’s going really well so I am happy so far. Make sure to watch this space…

  • London Calling: Interview with Vladimir Rangeloff, Managing Partner of Kambourov & Partners

    On April 5, 2022, leading lawyers from across all of CEE will be coming together for the Dealer’s Choice Conference and Deals of the Years Awards Banquet. Leading up to the event, we spoke with Vladimir Rangeloff of Kambourov & Partners to learn what they are looking forward to the most.

    CEELM: To start, it’s been quite a while since lawyers in the region have had a chance to get together in person for quite some time. What are you most excited about?

    Rangeloff: While I appreciate all the digital tools that made it possible to stay connected through these challenging times, I believe we all long for some live interaction and a sense of how events were before these past two years. I am truly excited to meet fellow lawyers from the region in person and enjoy wholesome live networking, which in my view always creates so many business opportunities and gives such invaluable insight into each other’s work and markets. I am looking forward to all the formal and informal discussions with colleagues!

    CEELM: Why did your firm find it important/useful to support this event?

    Rangeloff: We were glad to support it because we believe it is very valuable for the legal industry in our region. It celebrates the work of CEE lawyers in a very singular way, and we are thrilled that CEE Legal Matters (the only publication focusing exclusively on the CEE region) is hosting it for yet another year. The CEELM DOTY Awards Gala is more than a recognition of CEE firms – it is a possibility for CEE lawyers to learn more about each other’s work and recent developments in all jurisdictions in the region. In this sense, this event is the best way to personalize this knowledge and turn it into professional relationships.

    CEELM: Which of the sessions of the Dealer’s Choice conference are you looking forward to the most? Why?

    Rangeloff: All sessions are quite interesting, but the one that particularly caught my attention is “Improving the Pipeline: Creating and Expanding ILF-CEE Referral Relationships.” I see it as the start of a productive discussion for the legal community in our region and one that would hopefully tackle the new context of such relationships – the increasing importance of ECG for law firms. I look forward to sharing thoughts about what law firms in the region are doing in terms of culture, inclusion, and innovation, and to what extent these efforts impact relationships with ILF.

    CEELM: Would you like to place a bet on which one deal you believe will win the CEE (regional) DOTY award? Why would you bet on that one?

    Rangeloff: All shortlisted deals this year are quite interesting and competitive. So much so that it is genuinely hard to foresee the winner. I wish the best of luck to everyone!

    CEELM: On the lighter side, when was the last time you were in London, and what is one thing you’ll make sure to tick off while in town?

    Rangeloff: I believe the last time I was in London was in the summer of 2019 when the sale of the Bulgarian Telecommunications Company (Vivacom) was actively starting. This time around, I’d be sure to check in with colleagues, whom I haven’t seen since 2019 or before.

  • London Calling: Interview with Silvije Cipcic-Bragadin, Director of Cipcic-Bragadin Mesic and Associates

    On April 5, 2022, leading lawyers from across all of CEE will be coming together for the Dealer’s Choice Conference and Deals of the Years Awards Banquet. Leading up to the event, we spoke with Silvije Cipcic-Bragadin of Cipcic-Bragadin Mesic and Associates to learn what they are looking forward to the most.

    CEELM: To start, it’s been quite a while since lawyers in the region have had a chance to get together in person for quite some time. What are you most excited about?

    Cipcic-Bragadin: The Dealer’s Choice Awards and DOTY events are certainly one of the most interesting events in the legal landscape that bring lawyers from this region together. The fact that we didn’t have a chance to meet together during these strange times adds to the excitement. I really look forward to hanging out with
    colleagues, meet new people, and explore potential collaborations in one of my favorite cities.

    CEELM: Why did your firm find it important/useful to support this event?

    Cipcic-Bragadin: I find this event to be of great value to our business since it adds to our visibility in space and we usually make some good connections and friends. Informal gatherings are as useful as formal ones.

    CEELM: Which of the sessions of the Dealer’s Choice conference are you looking forward to the most? Why?

    Cipcic-Bragadin: Besides Gala dinner? My favorite part is probably the panel about building referrals. Our firm has around 85% of international clients and most of them came through referrals from international law firms. We are the #1 referred-to law firm in the Nextlaw Referral Network by Dentons for the Croatian market.  In recent years, we found that we are also able to refer clients to other colleagues and started building projects together. It’s always good to know colleagues who can handle international projects smoothly or that have specific knowledge about some sector.

    CEELM: Would you like to place a bet on which one deal you believe will win the CEE (regional) DOTY award? Why would you bet on that one?

    Cipcic-Bragadin: As being one of the jurors I have my favorites but I will refrain from specifying them here. Obviously, each firm and each deal are great and it was hard to choose out of so many equally good options.  Each one of them deserves the prize.

    CEELM: On the lighter side, when was the last time you were in London, and what is one thing you’ll make sure to tick off while in town?

    Cipcic-Bragadin: Last time I was in London was just before the pandemic started but I usually go there quite often since we have many clients and collaborate with many law firms that are UK-based. I will take this opportunity to meet them as well. After all, London is a special place for me since I’ve studied there.

  • London Calling: Interview with Gabor Bebok, Partner of Pontes Budapest

    On April 5, 2022, leading lawyers from across all of CEE will be coming together for the Dealer’s Choice Conference and Deals of the Years Awards Banquet. Leading up to the event, we spoke with Gabor Bebok of Pontes Budapest to learn what they are looking forward to the most.

    CEELM: To start, it’s been quite a while since lawyers in the region have had a chance to get together in person for quite some time. What are you most excited about?

    Bebok: Really, two years is a very long time and in this period Pontes never had the chance to organize any event neither in London nor in any of the CEE countries. Our last successful venue was the 2019 London City Break, where we were having really successful meetings with existing and potential future City partner law firms, during a three-day venue. The London City Breaks organized by Pontes now have a history going back to at least ten years and during this decade we always had it organized regularly once a year, usually in springtime. As a result, we have built solid and complex contacts and relations with top-tier London-based firms by now, especially with those who do not have an ongoing presence in the CEE region. These law firms along with Pontes firms have taken on many assignments both directly between them or along with other CEE countries and law firms based there.

    For Pontes, the Dealer’s Choice Conference and the DOTY Awards Gala is an excellent event full of challenges for us to make the most of all of the opportunities and to strengthen the existing bonds, but also to find new professional partnerships. All of it is enough to make us at Pontes really excited to have our representatives of seven CEE countries to be able to meet in London.

    CEELM: Why did your firm find it important/useful to support this event?

    Bebok: Based upon what we’ve just said you can tell that it is extremely important for Pontes to work along with London City firms. The lawyer colleagues we’ve met during our shared work make us realize how important these relationships are when we are building professional or marketing strategies.  The DCC and the DOTY Awards have always been labeled as “mandatory” or “never miss” from day one. Our Board at Pontes completely agreed that this is something we need to really focus on and take part in them with maximum effort. You could also say that the Conference and the Gala event was the highlight for our yearly marketing and professional strategy. It is of paramount importance for Pontes to make it a household name in London and that people realize the importance and the amount of work we are doing in the CEE region. On top of our attendance in person, we have also decided to be present as a Regional Sponsor of the event, so we can show important it is for us; both as a professional engagement and as an important emotional bond.

    CEELM: Which of the sessions of the Dealer’s Choice conference are you looking forward to the most? Why?

    Bebok: It is the “Improving the Pipeline: Creating and Expanding ILF-CEE Referral Relationships” panel.

    Truly, as I have said before, this is the very talk we were most looking forward to and focusing on. In our work at Pontes for professional and marketing strategy building we always need new input and inspiration. This session seems to be an excellent learning opportunity for us to help us in mastering new techniques in order for Pontes to find even better positions at all of the available markets. We expect that it will be helpful for us to be able to reach more potential clients and to make the best and most successful use of our already existing contacts. We are constantly striving to create value for all affected parties and partners.

    CEEELM: Would you like to place a bet on which one deal you believe will win the CEE (regional) DOTY award? Why would you bet on that one?

    Bebok: I may not go that far. Considering the high number of potential winners representing deals with high complexity and multidisciplinary nature, it seems fairly impossible even to place a bet on the final winner.

    CEELM: On the lighter side, when was the last time you were in London, and what is one thing you’ll make sure to tick off while in town?

    Bebok: I would definitely visit Tate Modern and its seasonal Beyond Borders exhibition on Surrealism. I was told by friends in Budapest that this is a fascinating and unique experience and worth seeing in London.  Also, If it is not too late to catch some tickets, the Hamilton Musical at Victoria Palace Theater is also on my agenda.  

  • London Calling: Interview with Oana Ijdelea, Managing Partner of Ijdelea & Associates

    On April 5, 2022, leading lawyers from across all of CEE will be coming together for the Dealer’s Choice Conference and Deals of the Years Awards Banquet. Leading up to the event, we spoke with Oana Ijdelea of Ijdelea & Associates to learn what they are looking forward to the most.

    CEELM: To start, it’s been quite a while since lawyers in the region have had a chance to get together in person for quite some time. What are you most excited about?

    Ijdelea: I really look forward to direct interaction with old colleagues and old friends. And the same goes when it comes to meeting new people.  

    CEELM: Why did your firm find it important/useful to support this event?

    Ijdelea: As winner of the 2018 DOTY for Romania I know how gratifying and empowering peer recognition is. The Award, which stands on my desk to this day is a gentle reminder of all this and it only came naturally to give back to the CEELegal community by supporting the event. On top of that, the work of the CEE Legal Matters team shows a shared ethos and therefore it is an event we trust.

    CEELM: Which of the sessions of the Dealer’s Choice conference are you looking forward to the most? Why?

    Ijdelea: The State of CEE will be most interesting in order to get a better understanding of the on-ground perspectives and challenges as the (almost) post-pandemic era is taken over by the tragedy in Ukraine and its worldwide reverberations.

    CEELM: Would you like to place a bet on which one deal you believe will win the CEE (regional) DOTY award? Why would you bet on that one?

    Ijdelea: This would not be a safe bet so I would rather not. As a Juror for Romania, I can say that a significant number of deals from the ballot were highly relevant in equally alike and unique criteria, and this made their ranking a challenging task. This I imagine goes for the other CEE jurisdictions as well.

    CEELM: On the lighter side, when was the last time you were in London, and what is one thing, you’ll make sure to tick off while in town?

    Ijdelea: I will not miss a stroll in Hyde Park in the company of a ham, pickle, and cheese sandwich, that’s for sure!

  • Flugger Marches On: Interview with General Counsel Torben Schwaner Dehlholm

    In the past year, Danish company Flugger has begun a significant expansion across Europe and Russian-speaking parts of the world. We reached out to Flugger General Counsel Torben Schwaner Dehlholm to learn more about the company’s business and expansion, as well as its M&A strategy and in-house legal dynamics.

    CEELM: Please tell our readers a bit about Flugger’s history and where the business is right now.

    Dehlholm: Flugger was established way back in 1783, and since the 1950s it has been owned by the Schnack family, operating successfully since then. It became publicly listed and entered into trade in the 1970s, but it still remains a family-controlled business – since the spring of 2021 with Sune Schnack as the CEO. Flugger has, historically, operated mainly in the Nordic region, but it has begun expanding out into other markets, including China and Eastern Europe. Most notably, with the recent [2020] acquisition of the Eskaro Group, we expanded into Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.

    Today, the Flugger Group has more than 2,600 employees. Flugger has production facilities in eight jurisdictions, more than 20 companies in 13 jurisdictions, and exports to more than 50 jurisdictions worldwide. Flugger successfully offers its products via e-commerce, DIY stores, and the Flugger Decor retail chain, with more than 400 stores.

    Also, Flugger is on a green journey – with the goal of overhauling our entire value chain, all the way from inventing products, through logistics lines, and up to selling the products. The idea is to comprehensively focus on an ecosystem of sustainable growth and development in every aspect of the business. This heavily impacts the tasks in our Legal & Compliance team.

    CEELM: We last talked in January 2020, when Flugger expanded with Unicell in Poland, and Flugger has since acquired both the Eskaro Group and e-commerce paint supply provider Malgodt. What did these transactions bring to the table?

    Dehlholm: We wanted to expand in order both to widen and increase our presence and focus on more locations. The directions in which Flugger is heading now, when it comes to new markets, is the furthering of both European and Russian operations and a focus on continuous growth, while at the same time developing all our present sales channels and developing new markets. Following our Eskaro expansion, which gave Flugger a foothold in the Russian-speaking markets, we plan to establish a strong local presence, but also to keep expanding the local business to adjacent markets.

    Now, from a legal perspective, I have to say that these expansions went off without a hitch. Not saying that each M&A transaction is not a massive task – but we had the legal foundation ready for the newly acquired companies. For the near eight years that I have been with Flugger, we have been working hard on establishing a Legal and Compliance setup, including using systems to foster a strong legal organizational foundation for the business to expand. All systems, processes, and policies we developed within our legal department are prepared to scale. An in-house legal function should always be prepared to support the goals of the business. In that regard our foremost objective is to have a strong legal and compliance set-up that never stops the business – but, to the contrary, provides a solid legal foundation on which the business can thrive. The legal and compliance function should never be solely a cost – it should be a strategic advantage of the business.

    While this was a lot of work, especially given Eskaro’s size, it was a quite controlled process, in which we used both our in-house lawyers and an excellent local law firm in each jurisdiction. Weronika Achramowicz, from Baker McKenzie Poland, was our highly skilled and valued legal partner, assisting with both the massive cross-border due diligence and the drafting of agreements.

    What is new for the legal and compliance team post-acquisition is that, even though we had a strong legal team [to assist] with this to-an-extent organic growth, we still needed some ‘boots on the ground’ so we now have team members both in Russia and Ukraine. This brought the total size of our legal team to eight, with a continuous evaluation of whether this is sufficient.

    The new jurisdictions we now cover directly are well-positioned to have a strong platform, and their quick integration into our legal processes is a good thing. Flugger and Eskaro can continue to focus on business operations knowing that a solid legal foundation is in place.

    CEELM: What would you say was the most complex legal element you had to explain or translate to management?

    Dehlholm: There were several interesting areas where careful threading was of the utmost importance. Besides the obvious goal of wanting to acquire a strong business, from a legal standpoint what we were most keen on pursuing was ensuring high levels of compliance, both with the regulatory framework and with our own code of conduct and social responsibility. It was my job to make sure that each new acquisition could adhere to the same requirements immediately, or as soon as possible. In addition, the new business should fit into our green strategy. Of course, there is a need to localize and zero-in these requirements to each local jurisdiction. Even with Flugger being a Denmark-listed group, room had to be made for specific local adjustments as well. There are, naturally, the bright-lines of what is legal and what is not, but different markets require different approaches in an effort to achieve this, given the various legal frameworks and historical approaches to work.

    To understand fully how something is done locally, and why, we had to understand the crux of our target’s business before we began transformational work. We had to, simply put, learn new things before we could impart our lessons to others.

    And, given the size of Flugger’s entire operation right now, we had our work cut out for us. The entire company did, but especially finance and legal, with global responsibility for the group.

    CEELM: As the company continues growing, how has your position as GC changed? In what directions do you see it evolving? And how has this impacted your day-to-day activities?

    Dehlholm: I have been with Flugger for close to eight years now. I first began as the sole lawyer in the group. We grew to a mid-sized legal team with an ever-growing number of responsibilities and jurisdictions. Today, we cover in the range of 20 to 35 different areas of law per jurisdiction – so that simply sums it up. And now more than ever, with all the expansions and acquisitions, the legal and compliance team is doing more and more work.

    Naturally, as things developed, my daily tasks changed too, and the role grew into a more strategy-oriented position. My job now is to see that all team members are performing their tasks up to par and that the business strategy of Flugger is legally sound and prudent. It has been extremely interesting and, honestly, quite challenging, exciting, and fun to be a part of this journey. Also, now, to be involved with the crafting of different go-to-market strategies as well as wider business strategies – it is a very dynamic position!

    The bottom line is that, from this position, I can and must make sure that every single business decision Flugger makes is supported by and built on top of a strong foundation and that each new contractual obligation that we undertake opens more options and poses no hindrances to present and future corporate operations.

    CEELM: What is Flugger’s strategy now? Where do you plan on expanding next?

    Dehlholm: You could sum it up in three broad directions. First, we seek to increase our presence in the e-commerce sector and be a much stronger player in that field. To that extent precisely we recently acquired Malgodt, a primarily online-operating Danish company.

    Second, our M&A strategy remains to keep growing both organically in the markets in which we already find ourselves, and to keep looking at other markets for potential openings. We wish to be quick on our feet, ready to explore any potential avenue for expansion that presents itself, and grow omnidirectionally.

    Finally, the dream is, as I mentioned earlier, to tailor all our operations to our green journey overhaul. To keep going in the right direction and continue with our efforts to usher in a more sustainable development environment.

    This Article was originally published in Issue 8.12 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Inside Out: Ignitis IPO

    On September 28, 2020, CEE Legal Matters reported on state-owned Ignitis Group’s initial public offering and admission to the Vilnius and London stock exchanges. We spoke with Walless Partner Joana Baublyte-Kulviete to learn more about the offering.

    CEELM: Let’s start with the very beginning. How did the firm first get involved in this deal? At what stage were you brought in and what was your mandate?

    Baublyte-Kulviete: We acted for the syndicate of international banks (joint global coordinators and joint bookrunners), comprising the Bank of America, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Swedbank, and UBS. We acted on the banks’ side so, naturally, we came into play a bit later in the process than the issuer’s counsels, who had helped the company to prepare for the IPO.

    CEELM: And how did you win the mandate? What do you believe it was about your firm that stood out over the competition?

    Baublyte-Kulviete: We got the mandate because of our experience in capital markets – there are only a few firms in the Baltics that match it. Also, we had acted on the previous bond issuances of the company.

    CEELM: Please give our readers a bit of context. What do you believe were the main driving forces for the IPO?

    Baublyte-Kulviete: The strategy of going public was in the issuer’s mind for some time and it had been preparing for it by conducting three issuances of Eurobonds for a combined value of approximately EUR 1 billion. At the same time, there had been an ongoing debate for a while on whether the state should consider listing state-owned enterprises, to give an impetus to the development of local capital markets. These two factors complemented each other.

    CEELM: What aspect, in particular, did you find to be most challenging in this IPO?

    Baublyte-Kulviete: The deal itself was very challenging and there were many aspects that have contributed to this. To mention just a few, from the legal perspective:

    First, the Ignitis Group was a leading utility and renewable energy company owned by the state, of strategic importance to national security – as such it was subject to a set of special laws and regulations that we had to consider in the IPO process.

    Second, the transaction structure combined global depositary receipts, institutional, and retail offerings with listings in Vilnius and London, and thus required a complex clearing and settlement structure with the chain of settlement agents involved. There had not been GDR issuances in Lithuania for more than 20 years and, clearly, there were no precedents that we could rely on.

    Third, Lithuanian company law posed additional challenges. The IPO process had to deal with the notarization and registration requirements of a capital increase, as well as with the inflexible regulations of authorized capital, the requirements for necessary reserves amassed by the issuer, and other regulations that invoked extensive discussions around the post-listing stabilization mechanics, to make it feasible.

    Fourth, prior to the IPO, the company squeezed-out and delisted two of its important subsidiaries, which caused complaints from investors followed by lawsuits. During the IPO the company achieved a settlement with the former minority shareholders of the subsidiaries, by offering them a preferential allocation of the IPO shares. Naturally, this added another layer of complexity to the deal.

    CEELM: On the flip side, what went rather smoothly relative to expectations?

    Baublyte-Kulviete: In what was at the time an already established COVID-19 environment, the deal was carried out completely remotely. Someone said afterward that it is surprising that you can do an IPO ‘out of your kitchen’ these days. In fact, remote working conditions ended up helping us be more efficient – we have saved the time normally used by traveling and meetings.

    CEELM: If you had to point to one, what would you say was the most important factor contributing to the success of the listing?

    Baublyte-Kulviete: I would say it must be the enthusiasm of all those involved, especially the issuer and the local teams of the banks and advisors – we all felt like we were doing something more than just this deal. In fact, this was the largest ever IPO from the Baltics and the first GDR offering from the Baltics after many years. Given the above-mentioned challenges, the advisors’ teams on both sides definitely played an important role, and I believe this enthusiasm added courage and motivation to search for solutions and go the extra mile.

    CEELM: You mentioned there had not been a GDR offering in years. Do you believe, after this deal, we can expect more? Why/why not?

    Baublyte-Kulviete: I would expect more IPOs by Baltic companies, but it is difficult to say whether they will be in the form of GDR offerings. There are few potential issuers of equal caliber and GDRs are not the only alternative. 

    CEELM: In your view, what is the significance of this deal for the Lithuanian market?

    Baublyte-Kulviete: The deal’s successful completion marked the achievement of the strategic aims set by the Republic of Lithuania (then the sole shareholder of the issuer), to provide the Ignitis Group with the funds to invest in strategically important power networks and expand green generation capacity within the wider region.

    Speaking about its significance for the capital markets, after this deal, the size and depth of Lithuania’s capital markets have increased. The deal size was EUR 450 million and the valuation of the company was EUR 1.7 billion. There may have been different views on the financial success of this IPO, especially immediately afterward, nevertheless, I think this deal was significant because of its retail offering, giving many retail investors the opportunity to invest.

    CEELM: What about the Baltic region as a whole?

    Baublyte-Kulviete: What was said about the significance for the Lithuanian market is relevant for the Baltics as well – it was a historic IPO on the Baltic scale.

    This Article was originally published in Issue 8.9 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Inside Out: Arkad’s Completion of the Balkan Stream Gas Pipeline in Bulgaria

    On December 31, 2020, CEE Legal Matters reported that CMS had advised contractor Arkad on the completion of the Balkan Stream Gas Pipeline project. We reached out to CMS Sofia Managing Partner Kostadin Sirleshtov for more information about the deal.

    CEELM: How did you and CMS become involved in the project?

    Kostadin: As with many matters, this one started as a very small corporate mandate directed into the registration of a branch in Bulgaria and general regulatory advice on public procurement matters. The client was referred to CMS Sofia by another CMS office. There wasn’t really a selection process as such, as the initial advice was a very small and basic one. It happened around 4 years ago when the client started looking at Bulgaria given the public procurement opportunities, which were appearing on the market.

    CEELM: What exactly was the initial mandate when you were retained for this project?

    Kostadin: The client wanted to know how the Bulgarian law treated foreign public procurement contractors, what the requirements for participation in public tenders were, and the like. The mandate was a general regulatory one, well before the start of the actual project. CMS Sofia was assisting the client with the understanding of the regulatory environment and the risk allocation in infrastructure public procurement projects in principle. We were also assisting with all the corporate law and employment legal advice that the client needed. Once the public procurement was launched, the team fully embraced the project and assisted in the successful completion of the tender process.

    CEELM: Who were the members of your team, and what were their responsibilities?

    Kostadin: Over the last four years, we had almost half of our CMS Sofia lawyers involved in one way or the other in the project. I was the one that picked up the initial referral for the client and, for four years now, I am leading and monitoring the project on our end. For the last two years, as the workload increased, we were asked to allocate a senior lawyer to work almost exclusively for the client. The client picked the most experienced and knowledgeable senior lawyer in the field of oil & gas with CMS Sofia – Denitsa Dudevska. I am quite confident in suggesting that Denitsa was the member of our team who was the largest contributor to the success of the project on our end. As the project required coordination with many other CMS offices, it was me and various Associates ensuring fluent communication and collaboration with other offices. CMS Sofia assisted a lot on various financial and employment matters, where the work was led by Senior Associate Borislava Piperkova. The tax-related questions and issues were addressed by our Head of Tax Senior Associate Alexander Rangelov. I will stop here just to avoid the risk of missing someone.

    CEELM: Describe the Balkan Stream project in as much detail as possible.

    Kostadin: The concept for the establishment of a gas distribution center on the territory of Bulgaria is based on the idea that significant natural gas quantities, from various sources, are entering the country through several real physical points, for further transportation. At the same time, a gas trading point/hub is also being established, where each market participant carries out transactions in natural gas on a market-based principle. The idea for the building of a regional gas center is supported by the strategic geographical location of Bulgaria, the well-developed existing gas transmission and storage infrastructure, and the interconnection projects with Turkey, Greece, and Serbia, as well as the completion of the connection with Romania.

    Specifically, the Balkan Stream project represents a complex, multicomponent, staged project for the modernization, rehabilitation, and expansion of the existing gas transmission infrastructure on the territory of Bulgaria, owned and operated by the combined gas operator Bulgartransgaz EAD.

    The project has been implemented in phases and includes: (i) modernizing and rehabilitating compressor stations; (ii) repairing and replacing gas pipeline sections following inspections; (iii) expanding and modernizing the existing gas transmission network; (iv) carrying out inspections to determine and characterize the gas pipelines’ condition; (v) and implementing systems for optimization of the management process of the network technical condition.

    The Balkan Stream project is an extension of TurkStream, which begins at the Russkaya compressor station near Anapa, in Russia, and crosses the Black Sea into Turkey. The extended 474-kilometer Balkan Stream pipeline runs from Bulgaria’s southern border with Turkey to its western frontier with Serbia. With the completion of the Balkan Stream Gas Pipeline project, the natural gas coming from TurkStream will now progress through Bulgaria into Serbia, Hungary, and Austria.

    CEELM: What is the current status of the pipeline?

    Kostadin: The project is now complete and the pipeline is operational.

    CEELM: What was the most challenging or frustrating part of the process? And why?

    Kostadin: Any project of this magnitude (exceeding EUR 1 billion in capital expenditures) exposes the stakeholders to many challenges. This project wasn’t any different. The initial main challenge was faced at the time of the actual tender and the following challenges and appeals. We managed to successfully overcome these just to face the next set of challenges, related to the construction process and short deadlines. Once we streamlined the construction process preparation, we were hit by COVID-19 and the impact on an international project of such magnitude was huge. CMS managed to assist with the justification and the achievement of as many as 5 force majeure certificates from Bulgarian authorities to justify the delays, which were attributable to the pandemic. As a result, no liquidated damages were imposed on the client by its customer.

    CEELM: Was there any part of the process that was unusually or unexpectedly smooth?

    Kostadin: The smoothness of the construction process (given the circumstances) was something that pleasantly surprised me. The project included many jurisdictions and many stakeholders, but I am happy to report that the efficiency of the project implementation was something that you don’t see in every project of such magnitude.

    CEELM: Did the final result match your initial mandate, or did it change somehow from what was initially anticipated?

    Kostadin: The final result had nothing to do with the initial mandate that we were provided with, but the final result was in full compliance with the objectives of the client and, therefore, I am happy that CMS Sofia and the rest of the CMS offices involved delivered the best quality legal advice and services required, in a timely manner.

    CEELM: What specific individuals at Arkad directed you, and how did you interact with them?

    Kostadin: The client’s team consisted of many individuals, but my direct contact was particularly with the Head of Legal, who was coordinating legal functions on the client’s end.

    CEELM: Quite a few firms were involved in this deal – CMS, ANG, Dentons, KPMG Legal, TBK, and Latham & Watkins. How difficult was it to coordinate/communicate between so many different teams?

    Kostadin: As the project was very complicated, including separate work-streams such as public procurement, construction, financing, and others, these law firms had different functions. CMS was in contact with most of the law firms involved – either directly, or through our client. The level of coordination demonstrated by the client was extraordinary and, given the professionalism of the law firms involved, this guaranteed the positive results that followed. At times, projects of this nature look chaotic and therefore require strong coordination efforts, but I do believe CMS had its fair share of contribution to the successful coordination of the entire process.

    CEELM: How would you describe the significance of the pipeline to the Balkans and CEE in general?

    Kostadin: Projects exceeding EUR 1 billion in the Balkans and CEE more often fail than get to the finish line. From a legal and project management point of view, the project is something that all law firms, consultants, and others should be proud of. Such success stories usually lead to a higher investment appetite and an increase in foreign investment for Bulgaria and for the region. The project will allow for greater access of natural gas to the Balkans and to CEE, and, together with the rest of the interconnections and the other pipelines that are in the works, will hopefully lead to a higher diversity of supply.

    This Article was originally published in Issue 8.6 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.