Category: Ukraine

  • Myths Shattered: 8 Misperceptions of Doing Business in Ukraine

    Foreign investors often have misperceptions about doing business in Ukraine. Below, I debunk the 5 most common myths, as well as 3 more that reflect the most recent improvements in the business climate.

    Myth 1 – It is hard to register a business in Ukraine

    On the contrary, with simple documents required everywhere in the West, you can register a business in less than a day in Ukraine. In fact, you can do it in just 2 hours at the notary’s office or even online. Obviously, you will need to have documents on the owner and the power of attorney for the representative who does the registration, but shareholders do not need to come to Ukraine. The most common business form is a limited liability company (LLC), but you can also register a branch, a partnership, or a corporation. Approximately 9,000 LLCs are incorporated every month in Ukraine. 

    Myth 2 – Shareholders’ agreements don’t work in Ukraine

    On the contrary, shareholders agreements (SHAs) were introduced into Ukrainian law two years ago and have now become very common. While the court practice has not formed yet, the SHA under Ukrainian law may include all of the common instruments that investors like under English law, such as options, tag along and drag along rights, deadlock resolution clauses, veto rights, and irrevocable powers of attorney. Moreover, the Ukrainian LLC Law provides a lot of flexibility to support the SHAs.  

    Myth 3 – Ukraine does not recognize foreign judgments

    Wrong. Ukraine is a party to the 1958 New York Arbitration Convention and it regularly enforces foreign arbitral awards. Moreover, Ukraine also recognizes foreign court judgements based on the principle of reciprocity, which in practice means that any foreign court judgment will be enforced unless the other country refused to recognize Ukrainian court decisions in the past. Even more so, Ukrainian courts grant interim measures in support of foreign arbitration. There is a wide array of interim measures, including attachments of assets and negative injunctions, that a court may grant. It may grant an interim measure as quickly as within 2 days.

    Myth 4 – Foreigners cannot do farming in Ukraine

    In reality, major foreign corporations farm more than 649,000 hectares of land in Ukraine. For instance, NCH from the U.S. farms a land bank of roughly 396,000 hectares, while SALIC from Saudi Arabia operates about 195,000 hectares. Besides, numerous small foreign farmers have built successful farming businesses in Ukraine. In addition to farming, major grain traders (the so-called ABCD) have large operations in Ukraine and actively invest in the storage and shipping infrastructure, such as silos and port terminals. Finally, several Ukrainian agricultural “blue chips” such as Astarta, Kernel and MHP are listed in Warsaw and London. 

    Myth 5 – Privatization is not happening in Ukraine

    This one is harder. Indeed, everyone is waiting for a dozen major state-owned companies to finally be privatized. However, during this summer alone, Ukraine privatized more than 140 small state companies and rundown real estate. Nearly 2,000 privatization auctions for small-scale assets were launched during the nine months of 2020 and resulted in roughly $60 million revenues. It is almost a fivefold increase compared to the respective period in 2019. This summer, a landmark hotel property (Dnipro Hotel) was sold via an electronic auction and most recently 6 spirit plants were put on sale.

    I am also happy that a few old bottlenecks were finally resolved in 2020. Here they are:

    Myth 6: Agricultural land in Ukraine is under the moratorium

    Of the 60 million hectares of land in Ukraine, 42.7 million (approx. 70%) are agricultural land. Until recently, Ukraine indeed prohibited the sale of most of the agricultural land (under the so-called land moratorium). However, in April 2020, the Ukrainian Parliament lifted the long-standing moratorium on private agricultural land sales, albeit with certain restrictions and limitations. Ukraine will launch its land market on July 1, 2021. These restrictions will be gradually lifted by 2024. While foreigners still cannot buy land, the land reform sparked a lot of interest among strategic investors, who bet that all restrictions will eventually be gone once the market stabilizes. 

    Myth 7: Concessions and private-public partnerships are not working in Ukraine

    Only in the last two years, two major concession projects were launched under the new Concessions Law, namely concessions of the Olvia and Kherson seaports. The tenders were transparent and compliant with the best industry practices. In total, Ukraine currently has 132 effective PPP projects. Furthermore, the Ukrainian Government announced future concessions of 1,500 kilometers of highway roads, three airports, three seaports, and seven railroad terminals. 

    Myth 8 – Gambling is prohibited in Ukraine

    Until August 2020, Ukraine had a total ban on gambling. However, the new Gambling Law introduced regulation of the gambling market and set requirements for its participants. It permitted gambling games in casinos, online casinos, offline and online betting, gambling at slot machine halls, and online poker gambling games. Obviously, a gambling operator must satisfy high license requirements for capital, shareholders, equipment, personnel, and location. Nonetheless, foreign gambling operators are already closely watching this market.

    By Mykola Stetsenko, Managing partner, Avellum

  • Former CMS Senior Partner Olexander Martinenko Joins Kinstellar in Kyiv

    Former CMS Senior Partner Olexander Martinenko has joined Kinstellar as Head of the firm’s Dispute Resolution and Commercial practices in Ukraine.

    Kinstellar describes Martinenko as a “highly acclaimed and recommended leading expert in dispute resolution, commercial, and competition, as well as in technology and energy matters. With nearly three decades of experience, he has advised a broad range of clients, including multi-national and local companies, state-owned enterprises, and international institutions and organizations on their business activities in Ukraine and abroad.”

    Kinstellar adds that “Olexander has developed a market-leading practice appearing as counsel and Ukrainian law expert witness in international commercial and investment arbitration proceedings and in foreign dispute resolution proceedings, as well as in the Ukrainian courts (including the Supreme Court of Ukraine). He also serves as a designated arbitrator and his name appears on the lists of recommended arbitrators with the International Arbitral Centre of the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber; the Singapore International Arbitration Centre; the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre; the South China International Economic, Trade Arbitration Commission/Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration; the Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Arbitration; and the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry.”

    Martinenko holds an LL.M. from Harvard, a Specialist in Law degree from the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, and an LL.D. from the Koretsky Institute of State and Law of National Academy of Science, Ukraine. Prior to joining Kinstellar, Martinenko spent 15 years with Baker McKenzie and over 13 years with CMS.

    “I am delighted to welcome Olexander to the Kinstellar Team!” commented Kinstellar Kyiv’s Managing Partner Patrik Bolf. “His impressive range of experience, sophisticated skill-set, and broad client relationships will enhance the value proposition we offer our clients in Ukraine and globally. The firm has tremendous confidence in our outstanding team in Kyiv, which is an integral part of our full-service regional offering to clients across the ten jurisdictions where we operate.”

  • Ukrainian Danevych.Law Integrates into CMS Family

    CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang has announced its merger with Ukraine’s Danevych.Law, with Founding Partner Borys Danevych becoming Partner and Head of Life Sciences at CMS.

    The merger will become effective on November 1, 2020, and Danevych.Law’s legal and administrative team, including Senior Associate Anastasiya Filipiuk, Associates Artem Grudinin and Anastasiya Maistruk, and Administrative Executive Iryna Tvardovska, will also be joining CMS. 

    “We are delighted to announce this strategic integration and to welcome Borys and his team to the firm,” commented CMS Kyiv Managing Partner Graham Conlon. “With Life Sciences increasingly attracting the global spotlight, this important expansion of the team demonstrates our on-going commitment to delivering advice to our clients. The breadth and depth of Borys’s experience, along with the expert support of his committed team, will strengthen and expand our life sciences offering.” 

    Before establishing his own firm in 2012, Danevych spent ten years at Paritet law firm. He received his Master’s degree from the University of Kyiv Mohyla Academy in 2006. According to CMS, “Borys brings more than 15 years of experience working with international pharmaceutical, biotech, research and development, and medical devices companies, as well as healthcare services and health technology organizations.” 

    “CMS has a very impressive global Life Sciences group and I see many opportunities to further develop our capabilities for clients in areas such as biotech, brand protection, and health tech,” said Borys Danevych. “I also see significant additional value in terms of being able to offer strong transactional, IP, Dispute Resolution, TMT, and Tax capability to our clients going forward. I am excited to join the firm – as are my colleagues from my previous firm. We look forward to working with the team both in Ukraine and across Europe.”

  • Sayenko Kharenko and DLA Piper Advise on Myrwayton Holding’s Sale of Ukrainian Railway Operator to Renaisco

    Sayenko Kharenko has advised Myrwayton Holding Limited on its sale of an unspecified railway operator to Renaisco, a subsidiary of Glencore Agriculture. DLA Piper advised the buyer on the deal.

    Financial details of the transaction were not disclosed.

    Glencore Agriculture, which operates in more than 35 countries, primarily focuses on the sourcing, handling, processing, and marketing of agricultural commodities and products.

    Sayenko Kharenko’s team included Partners Oleksandr Nikolaichyk and Vladimir Sayenko and Senior Associate Julia Kuyda, Associate Ilhar Hakhramanov, and Junior Associate Daria Karlenko.

    DLA Piper’s team was led by Partner Alla Kozachenko.

  • Vasil Kisil & Partners Successful for Rele in Dispute with Kyiv City Council

    Vasil Kisil & Partners has successfully represented the interests of the Rele construction company in a dispute with the Kyiv City Council over its failure to recognize Rele’s transfer of the right to use land.

    According to Vasil Kisil & Partners, “in 1997, [Rele] entered into a contract for the use of land for 49 years for the reconstruction of non-residential buildings in the historic center of Kyiv. In the same year, the reconstructed real estate was transferred from [Rele] to a new owner. However, for more than 20 years, the Kyiv City Council refused to recognize the termination of [Rele’s] right to use the land plot and considered Rele the user of the plot, resulting in a lawsuit.

    According to VKP, “courts of all instances accepted the firm’s argument “that together with the transfer of the real estate, the right to use the land also passes to the purchaser of real estate. It indicates a voluntary waiver of the previous user’s right to use the land. As this right passed to the purchaser of the real estate, the claim was satisfied in full.”

    The courts “confirmed the termination of Rele’s rights under the disputed contract and the lack of grounds for the Kyiv City Council and tax authorities to demand further payment from the client for the use of the land plot before the expiration of the contract,” Vasil Kisil & Partners reported.

    The Vasil Kisil & Partners team included Partner Oleg Kachmar, Counsel Yuriy Kolos, and Associate Dmytro Derkach.

  • Redcliffe Partners Advises Hurma System on Financing from Pragmatech Ventures

    Redcliffe Partners has advised Ukrainian HR tech product manufacturer Hurma System on seed financing from the European venture capital firm Pragmatech Ventures.

    Volodymyr Fedak, CEO and Founder of Hurma System, said that the company has ambitious plans with regard to further development of the product and entering new markets, and that “investments, as well as Pragmatech’s expertise, will help us move confidently on our chosen course.” According to Yevhen Sergeev, Founder and General Partner of Pragmatech Ventures, the HR technology market is extremely promising, and Yevhen is sure that “the Ukrainian product will be competitive and will find customers outside Ukraine.” 

    Hurma System is a Ukrainian start-up that specializes in the automation of HR and recruitment processes of businesses.

    Pragmatech Ventures is a European venture fund that invests in early-stage B2B SaaS and Marketplace projects in the CEE region and focuses on start-ups in the field of Enterprise Software, prioritizing HR Tech, BioTech, Property Tech, and Sales & Marketing Tech.

    The Redcliffe Partners team included Partner Zoryana Sozanska-Matviychuk, Counsel Maria Koval, and Junior Associate Vlad Zakon.

  • Sayenko Kharenko Advises Power Construction Corporation of China on Construction of Syvash Wind Farm

    Sayenko Kharenko has advised the Power Construction Corporation of China, Ltd., regarding the construction of the 245.7 MW Syvash Wind Farm in Ukraine.

    The firm’s team was supervised by Counsel Maryna Hritsyshyna and included Senior Associate Natalia Hutarevich.

  • Arzinger Helps Water Empire Ukraine Lift Procurement Ban

    Arzinger has successfully assisted with Water Empire Ukraine’s appeal of a decision of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine involving the company’s alleged market violations.

    According to Arzinger, Water Empire Ukraine, “deals in construction and reconstruction of fountains and fountain complexes.”

    Arzinger reported that, “the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine imposed a three-year restriction on public procurement and a fine of UAH 2.7 million on Water Empire Ukraine, based on the claim that the company committed market violations in the form of distortion.” According to the firm, “the appellate court ruled that the committee’s decision was ungrounded, and it ordered the restriction to be removed and fine to be canceled.”

    Arzinger’s team consisted of Founding Partner Serhiy Shklyar, Associate Svitlana Lapitska, and Junior Associate Anna Vyshnevska, among others.

  • Deal 5: Metro Cash & Carry’s Natalia Vasina on Energy Supplier Dispute

    On July 27, CEE Legal Matters reported that Integrites had helped Metro Cash & Carry Ukraine on a dispute involving a change of its energy supplier. CEEIHM spoke with Natalia Vasina, Legal Counsel at Metro Cash & Carry to learn more about the dispute.

    CEEIHM: Can you give our readers a bit of context for the case? What was it that brought about this claim?

    Natalia: Sure. The reason for filing a claim was the transition of Metro to a new electricity supplier on more favorable terms. In accordance with the terms of the concluded agreement, Metro notified the former electricity supplier of its intention to switch to a new one 21 calendar days before the transition, however, the former supplier considered such actions by Metro a violation of the terms of the agreement and filed a lawsuit against Metro.

    CEEIHM: What was the main claim against Metro Cash & Carry Ukraine?

    Natalia: The essence of the main claim against Metro was the recovery from Metro of a fine for early termination of the contract, as well as the recovery of losses (i.e., lost profits). 

    CEEIHM: What was the ultimate outcome of the dispute? Is the matter now fully resolved?

    Natalia: The courts of first and second instances completely rejected the claim of our former electricity supplier indicating that Metro did not violate the agreement. To date, the cassation proceedings have been opened, but we hope that the Court of Cassation will make a decision in favor of Metro.

    CEEIHM: What would you say was the most complicated aspect of this matter from a legal perspective?

    Natalia: Legislation in this area is quite complex and ambiguous, as the rules governing these issues have their own specifics and must be taken into account. At the same time, the terms of the agreement and their correct interpretation became decisive in our case.

    CEEIHM: How was the legal work split between your in-house legal team and Integrites and why did you pick this firm, in particular, to represent you in this case?

    Natalia: Integrites provided procedural support in this case and provided legal advice. As for the choice of this firm, we have repeatedly cooperated in other matters and are satisfied with the services provided.

    Originally reported by CEE In-House Matters.

  • Kinstellar Helps Turkey Wealth Fund Obtain Ukrainian Approval for Controlling Interest Acquisition in Turkcell

    Kinstellar has helped the Turkey Wealth Fund obtain merger control approval from the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine for the acquisition of a controlling interest in Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.

    According to Kinstellar, “the Turkey Wealth Fund is the wealth fund and strategic investment arm of the Republic of Turkey. The TWF was established in 2016 following the transfer of public shares of 20 companies in eight strategic sectors including Turkish Airlines, Ziraat Bank, Halkbank, VakifBank, Borsa Istanbul, BOTAS, TPAO, and Turksat, as well as two licenses and various real estate assets. The main objectives of TWF are to increase the value of the state-owned assets in its portfolio and to contribute to Turkey’s strategic investments.”

    Turkcell, an integrated telecoms and technology company, is described by Kinstellar as “one of Turkey’s most valuable assets and most recognizable brands.” According to the firm, “within its portfolio, Turkcell has an international mobile and fixed telecom business with more than 47 million customers, popular local OTT platforms such as BİP and TV+, as well as the TechFin subsidiaries Paycell and Financell. Turkcell continues to be the only company headquartered in Turkey that is dual-listed on both Borsa İstanbul and the New York Stock Exchange.”

    Kinstellar’s team included Managing Partner Olena Kuchynska and Associate Daryna Ushchapivska.