Category: Ukraine

  • Redcliffe Partners Scoops Up Albert Sych

    Former EY Partner and Law Leader for Ukraine Albert Sych has joined Redcliffe Partners.

    Sych has been with EY since 2004 when he joined as a Consultant. In 2005 he became a Senior Consultant and in 2007 a Manager. In 2009 he was appointed to M&A Law Leader for Ukraine, Manager, and to M&A Law Leader for Ukraine, Senior Manager in 2010. In 2011 he became Law Leader, Senior Manager. He made Partner in 2013.

    “With Albert’s arrival, our team continues to grow along with our client portfolio,” commented Redcliffe Partners Managing Partner Olexiy Soshenko. “Albert’s credentials, together with his experience working across a broad range of clients and industries, will further enhance our offering and capabilities already delivered by our truly devoted and experienced team. We are very pleased to welcome him aboard.”

    “I am excited to join the firm’s leading team and look forward to working with my future colleagues to help our clients in Ukraine and across the globe,” added Sych.

  • Vasil Kisil & Partners Successful in Court for Wikimedia Ukraine

    Vasil Kisil & Partners has successfully represented Wikimedia Ukraine in court in a dispute related to the recognition and refutation of a blog post as false.

    According to Vasil Kisil & Partners, in July 2020, Wikimedia Foundation company Wikimedia Ukraine published a blog post on the activities of Wikipedia Ukraine, a newly established organization with no legal connection to the Wikimedia Foundation.

    According to the firm, “the material was intended to explain that Wikipedia Ukraine was not authorized to use the Wikipedia trademark and violated the community rules, in particular, by offering to place articles on Wikipedia for pay, without labeling them as paid content.” Wikipedia Ukraine filed a claim against Wikimedia Ukraine asking the court to declare the post as false.

    The court found that “the statements made in the publication are true, due account should be taken of the local rules of Wikipedia.org, which set out terms and conditions of blocking the users and using the trademark Wikipedia, and electronic confirmations that the persons referred to in the publication were blocked,” the firm informed. “Therefore, the court dismissed the claim and awarded legal fees against Wikipedia Ukraine.”

    The Vasil Kisil & Partners team included Attorneys-at-Law Ilarion Tomarov and Daria Romashchenko.

  • For Foreign Investors: Peculiarities of Share Transfers in Ukraine

    As a rule, transactions with securities, including shares in joint stock companies, require the engagement of an investment firm, in particular a securities broker. At the same time, the Law of Ukraine “On Capital Markets and Organised Commodity Markets”, which entered into force on 1 July 2021, provides for several exceptions to this rule. Indeed, an investment firm engagement is not required for the transactions made outside of Ukraine.

    Thus, M&A transactions between foreigners in respect of the shares of Ukrainian joint stock companies should fall under the above exemption and, therefore, may be entered into without the engagement of an investment firm if made outside of Ukraine. 

    However, it is common to face resistance from the share custodians, procuring the share transfers, to complete such transactions if they are made without the securities brokers. They argue that if the instructions for debiting and crediting the shares are signed and submitted by the parties’ representatives in Ukraine, then the whole transaction is deemed to be made in Ukraine. Therefore, the exemption should not apply.

    In our view, the above position contradicts the basics of civil law, allowing the parties to designate the place of the transaction in the agreement. Moreover, under Ukrainian law, if the place of the transaction is not specified in the agreement, it is deemed to be made at the place of residence (for individuals) or the registered office (for legal entities) of the party offering to enter into the transaction. Additionally, the transfer of shares may not be treated as a separate transaction to the agreement itself.

    We recommend clarifying the position of a particular share custodian in advance to avoid unfortunate delays in the transaction’s completion and extra costs for the engagement of an investment firm. 

    The requirement to engage investment firms in the transactions with securities deviates from the best practices for private (unlisted) companies in the European Union. AVELLUM call upon both the government and the parliament of Ukraine to consider removing this requirement as obsolete or at least clarify it to avoid loose and non-unified application of the law as described above.

    By Oleksandr Volodin, Associate, and Iryna Fonotova, Associate, Avellum

  • Sayenko Kharenko Advises EBRD on Developing Online Courts in Ukraine

    Sayenko Kharenko has advised the EBRD on Ukrainian law aspects of a project launched to assist an online court development in Ukraine.

    According to the firm, “an online court is designated to increase access to justice for small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as to decrease the costs of the proceedings. The online court is expected to cover all stages, from preparing a claim to rendering a judgment. It will also propose alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.”

    The Sayenko Kharenko team included Partner Olexander Droug, Senior Associate Andriy Stetsenko, and Associate Dmytro Derkach.

  • Sayenko Kharenko Advises Yolo Group on Entering Ukrainian Market

    Sayenko Kharenko has provided legal advice to the Yolo Group on entering the Ukrainian market.

    Established in 2014, the Yolo Group is a gaming company focusing on gaming, fintech, blockchain, and other products and services. The company has offices in six countries.

    Sayenko Kharenko team was led by Partner Alina Plyushch and included Partner Oleksandr Nikolaichyk, Counsels Iryna Bakina and Oleg Klymchuk, Senior Associates Roman Drozhanskyi, Olga Kyriusha, and Anton Kerimov-Varanytskyi, and Associates Ivan Chopyk, Kateryna Mytsykova, Anastasiia Yermolenko, and Nadiia Radchenko.

  • Sayenko Kharenko Represents Akse Group and Greenhouses of Ukraine

    Sayenko Kharenko has successfully represented Akser Group LLC and Association Greenhouses of Ukraine in an anti-dumping investigation related to imports into Ukraine of heat insulation materials with origins in Belarus and Russia.

    According to Sayenko Kharenko, ”following the investigation results, Sayenko Kharenko’s international trade team has managed to prove a necessity to exclude mineral substrate for growing plants from the application of anti-dumping duties. Initially, the domestic industry has requested the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine to include the mineral substrate into the measure.”

    Sayenko Kharenko’s team included Partner Anzhela Makhinova, Associates Tetiana Tanchyn and Mariia Shulha, and Junior Associate Oleksandra Sandul.

  • Arzinger Successfully Represents Viacom in Unfair Competition Case

    Arzinger has successfully represented the interests of international media conglomerate Viacom in an unfair competition case.

    According to Arzinger, “On December 8, 2021, the Northern Commercial Court of Appeal upheld a previously adopted decision of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine in favor of Viacom. According to the decision of the court, “Dytiache Telebachennya Ltd. illegally uses the logos of the Niki Kids and Niki Junior channels, which are similar to the Nickelodeon, Nick Jr, Nick logos, which Viacom has previously started using. The infringer is ordered to stop the illegal use of logos and pay a fine.”

    Arzinger’s team included Partner Taras Kyslyy and Associates Svitlana Lapitska and Ihor Shyshko.

  • Asters Advises IFC on EUR 13.7 Million Financing for Kryvyi Rih

    Asters has advised the International Finance Corporation on a EUR 13.7 million financing to the city of Kryvyi Rih.

    According to the firm, the city of Kryvyi Rih has Ukraine’s largest industrial park and a population of nearly 630,000 people.

    “The investment consists of EUR 10.2 million of IFC own-account financing and EUR 3,5 million in blended finance through the Clean Technology Fund,” Asters informed. “The financing will be directed at upgrading the city’s transport system by purchasing 15 new tramcars and updating the existing ones as well as improving the environment by developing an urban transportation plan to promote the alternative transport types.”

    The Asters team consisted of Partner Iryna Pokanay, Counsel Gabriel Aslanian, and Associates Inna Bondarenko and Viktoria Zagreba.

  • Ukraine’s New Cutting-edge IT Law

    Ukrainian Government has pledged to bring economic opportunities for foreign investors by digitalising the country and liberalising business laws. A big part of this promise comes with a new law “On Stimulating Development of Digital Economy in Ukraine” (“Law”). Most provisions of the Law came into force on 14 August 2021, but the Law will be operative in 2022 once all regulations are in place.

    The cornerstone of the Law is a special legal and operational regime for IT companies incorporated in Ukraine (whether or not such companies have their principal place of business in Ukraine). This regime, called Diia City (“diia” stands for “action” in Ukrainian), guarantees certain legal, labour, and economic benefits for Diia City residents (“Resident”) and will remain in place for at least 25 years. Additionally, Ukrainian Parliament is considering tax legislation providing for certain tax benefits to the Residents.

    Who can qualify as Resident?

    To be become a Resident, an IT company incorporated in Ukraine will need to file an application with the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine and comply with the following criteria:

    • do business in one or more IT industries specified in the Law (g. programming, software design, information technology, data processing, cryptocurrency, etc.);
    • employ at least nine employees and/or contractors engaged under special gig-contracts (with average monthly remuneration of EUR1,200); and
    • make at least 90% of its net income in a designated IT industry (industries).

    The benefits of Diia City regime are not available for companies with a state-owned stake of at least 25%, Russian companies and Russian-owned companies, companies having tax debts in Ukraine, and companies under sanctions.

    Benefits for Residents

    Unlike other Ukrainian companies, the Residents can regulate relations with their employees in a more discretionary way. They will have a right to engage IT specialists and other contractors under civil-law gig-contracts that are not subject to the requirements of Ukrainian labour law. Meanwhile, such IT specialists and other contractors will be eligible for certain social benefits provided by the Law (for example, vacation and social security). Mostly, existing labour norms did not offer adequate protection to IT specialists. Nor did they give sufficient options for employers to enter into a tailored contract.

    Non-compete and non-disclosure agreements

    The Residents may enter into non-compete and non-disclosure agreements (“NDAs”) with their employees and contractors. The NDAs are exempt from general labour law and mean to give sufficient comfort to the Residents to protect their commercial secrets. The NDAs are exempt from mutual consideration requirement and may specify contractual fines for their violations. The non-competes are geographically restrictive, limited to 12 months after the termination of employment, need to be very specific, and require consideration to be valid.

    Previously, a Ukrainian court would refuse to enforce non-competes and non-solicitation agreements citing constitutional and antitrust grounds. NDAs were generally enforceable; however, it was hard to prove the fact of a bad faith disclosure.

    Shareholders’ agreements

    On the legal side, the Residents (limited or additional liability companies – “LLCs” and “ALCs”) can engage a legal entity as their external manager. Third parties (i.e. creditors or future investors) can become parties to shareholders’ agreements (“SHAs”). The SHAs are expressly permitted to be governed by foreign law if at least one shareholder of the company is a foreigner. This is particularly important considering that many Ukrainian businesses prefer to choose English law, but remained cautious, given the long-standing position of Ukrainian courts to invalidate such choice of law.

    New English law instruments

    The Law introduces a couple of helpful legal instruments into Ukrainian law that will be of particular use for IT businesses. We will briefly go through the novelties here.

    Representations & warranties

    A Ukrainian law governed contract can include representations and warranties, i.e. statements as to the validity of facts on which the parties rely when contracting. Such statements can cover issues of corporate approvals, debts, litigations, financial soundness of the company, etc. The Law permits to specify contractual amounts that the defaulting party will have to pay in case of a breach of such representations and warranties.

    Liquidated damages

    The parties can contractually agree on liability for breach of their obligations, e.g. as mentioned before a breach of an NDA can result in contractually set damages. Such contractual damages are not civil law fines or sanctions, meaning that the parties will not need to recourse to court remedies, prove causation or detrimental consequences as required by Ukrainian civil code. Under the Law, the court may limit the amount of damages if both parties share liability.

    Liquidation preferences

    Liquidation preference is a tool to ensure that in case of liquidation some investors of a company get their money back prior to other creditors, stockholders, and employees. Liquidation preference clauses are a market standard for venture capital firms who invest in IT start-ups. The Law permits the parties to negotiate liquidation preferences for creditors in case of the borrower’s bankruptcy making sure investors are properly protected.

    Option agreements

    Option agreements grant option holders the right to purchase part of company’s stock at a pre-determined price in the future. Option agreements have already been quite popular in Ukraine. However, the Law introduces formal requirements that option agreements should include certain mandatory clauses, like price, term, and option trigger events. The application of some of these requirements is yet to be clarified by Ukrainian courts. What’s more, option agreements pave the way for stock option plans for senior management – a lucrative tool of corporate governance.

    Convertible loan agreement

    The Law introduced convertible loan agreements (“CLAs”) into Ukrainian law. A CLA permits investors to convert the amount of the loan extended to a company into company’s shares rather than to require the company to pay back the money. Conversion option is usually exercised if the company is successful, which allows creditors not just to receive back their money, but to become shareholders of a successful venture and have the right to claim future dividends. A CLA is also a standard tool for IT companies and start-ups.

    The Law is an important signal to investors as well as a big step forward in Ukrainian business law. Without any doubt, it brings a number of important changes and will likely open up new opportunities for lawyers and businesses. However, only time will show the quality of those changes in practice.

    By Andriy Kornuta and Yaroslav Pavliuk, Associates, Avellum

  • Buyers Become More Demanding with Respect to Potential Targets, AVELLUM’s Survey Reveals

    AVELLUM for the second time researched how the coronavirus outbreak affected the plans of businesses to purchase or sell assets or companies in Ukraine in the next 6 to 12 months. We surveyed over 90 owners, top managers, and heads of legal departments of Ukrainian and international companies in 2021.

    Key findings from the report

    • In 2021, the share of companies intending to buy a business decreased from 50% to 37%. The percentage of companies planning to sell the business has not significantly changed (30%).
    • The number of companies planning to sell businesses due to the coronavirus has doubled (38% vs 18% in 2020). 50% of potential buyers are interested in buying specifically because of the pandemic. Sellers and buyers are taking the pandemic more seriously as an impact factor in M&A transactions.
    • Buyers are more demanding with respect to potential targets. They prefer comprehensive warranties as to the target (62%) and its full-scope due diligence (86%). There is a clear tendency towards creating conditions for the buyer’s market. 
    • 70% of respondents defined the current situation in Ukraine as satisfactory for buying or selling a business. One third believe that the current situation in Ukraine is favourable, and only 11% of the respondents view it as unfavourable for such transactions.
    • Sellers and buyers are unwilling to take risks in times of crisis. In 2021, the share of companies that believe that both parties need external advisors has nearly tripled (from 32% in 2020 to 85%). 
    • As in 2020, more than half of the companies for sale (60%) are willing to offer a discount due to the crisis. At the same time, the share of buyers expecting a discount has decreased from 94% to 56%. Now it almost matches sellers’ plans to offer a discount.

    For more information please visit AVELLUM website.

    By Avellum