Category: Ukraine

  • Currency Controls in Ukraine: Recent Developments

    Over the years Ukraine has been known as a country with restrictive currency control regulations. Historically, these have been aimed at limiting the flight of capital out of the country and maintaining the stability of Ukraine’s local currency, the hryvnia (UAH).

    Recent events related to the annexation of part of Ukraine’s territory and military activities in eastern regions of Ukraine put huge pressure on Ukraine’s economy and on the hryvnia. In response to these challenges (including currency market turbulence), in 2014 the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) tightened the currency control regime further by introducing so-called “temporary” currency control measures. 

    The NBU has issued a handful of resolutions almost every three months since then, extending the “temporary” restrictions, each time with certain modifications, including, most recently, NBU Resolution No. 342 dated June 7, 2016 (“Resolution No. 342”). As part of these measures, the NBU has imposed quite a few limitations on local currencymarket players, including limitations on the right of individuals to purchase foreign currency and withdraw funds from their bank accounts, shortening the maximum period for settlements under export and import operations of Ukrainian residents, and requiring banks to sell foreign currency proceeds received by their clients on the Ukrainian interbank market. At the same time, some of the NBU’s temporary measures have also impacted foreign lenders and other investors in Ukraine.

    Cross-Border Loans

    In March 2014, the NBU imposed an absolute prohibition on making early repayment of any amount under cross-border loan agreements. A few exceptions to this prohibition followed later on, primarily to allow prepayments to international financial institutions as well as of loans supported by foreign export credit agencies (ECA).

    In August 2015, the NBU introduced a ban on changes to lenders and/or borrowers under cross-border loan agreements. For some time, this prohibition hindered any restructuring efforts involving assignments or similar arrangements. In January 2016, this prohibition was replaced with a new cross-border loan-registration procedure involving additional scrutiny from servicing banks and the NBU. The new procedure has not yet been properly tested, but it is clear that registration with the NBU of new lenders/borrowers will now require additional time and effort.

    Repatriation of Dividends and Other Payments 

    Generally, since September 2014, the NBU has prohibited the payment of dividends out of Ukraine, the repatriation of proceeds from sale of equity interests in Ukrainian companies and debt securities of Ukrainian issuers. This has made it impossible for foreign investors to repatriate their investments out of Ukraine and has affected the structuring of M&A transactions in Ukraine. The NBU also restricted cross-border payments under most types of individual licenses issued by the NBU. 

    Move Towards Liberalization

    With signs that the hryvnia may be stabilizing, the NBU currently appears to be on the way to gradually easing these temporary restrictions. In particular, in May-July 2016 the market saw a series of NBU resolutions relaxing some of the restrictions. Most importantly, pursuant to Resolution No. 342, the NBU now allows foreign investors to repatriate dividends accrued in 2014 and 2015, subject to a monthly-capped amount. In addition, foreign currency proceeds under ECA-supported loan agreements and proceeds transferred into Ukraine as foreign investments have been exempted from the mandatory foreign-currency sale requirement. The foreign-currency sale requirement itself has now been reduced from 75% to 65%. The NBU has also extended the maximum term for settlements of export and import transactions from 90 to 120 days. 

    Although certain other temporary currency restrictions previously introduced by the NBU still remain in place, the signs of liberalization marked by recent NBU steps should add more freedom to cross-border transactions and have a positive effect on the business environment in Ukraine.

    By Glib Bondar, Partner, and Igor Lozenko, Counsel, Avellum

    This Article was originally published in Issue 3.4 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Recent Trends in the Ukrainian Energy Sector

    In 2015-2016 almost all energy related trends are driven by the Ukrainian government’s efforts to bring its legislation into compliance with the Third Energy Package, which the country is required to do as a member of the European Energy Community. Indeed, Ukraine is in the process of a large-scale reform of its energy sector.

    Implementation of the Gas Market Law

    In April 2015 the Ukrainian Parliament adopted the new Gas Market Law, which is a significant step for Ukraine in reforming its gas sector and making it compliant with the Third Energy Package. Although the law became effective on October 1, 2015, full implementation of the Gas Market Law is still pending. Adoption of the law triggered the development of a significant amount of secondary gas legislation, including the GTS Code, Gas Distribution System Code, and Gas Storages Code, all of which came into effect on January 1, 2016. Adoption of the Gas Market Law opened the market to many new participants both from abroad and within Ukraine. 

    As part of the Gas Market Law’s implementation, Ukraine is required to unbundle its NAK Naftogaz of Ukraine (“Naftogaz”) monopoly. On July 1, 2016, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (the CMU) approved a comprehensive plan for Naftogaz restructuring, which was developed based on consultations with the Secretariat of the Energy Community. According to this plan, by October 1, 2016, the CMU should establish the separate public JSC (joint stock company) Main Gas Pipelines of Ukraine (to be 100% owned by the State and managed by the Ministry of Energy), which eventually will function as the TSO (transmission system operator). The unbundling of Naftogaz has been delayed due to arbitrations between Naftogaz and Gazprom. Until these disputes are resolved the GTS will remain under the operation of Public JSC Ukrtransgas (established by Naftogaz). 

    The Political Situation in Ukraine Impacts the Country’s Gas Market 

    As a result of the political situation, Ukraine is trying to diversify its natural gas supply channels, and the country has managed to significantly increase its supply from other European countries. According to the data provided by Naftogaz, in 2013 Ukraine imported 92% of its gas from Russia, in 2014 74%, and in the first quarter of 2015 Ukraine imported 39% from Russia and 61% from the EU. In 2016 Ukraine is not importing gas from Russia at all. To change this trend Gazprom recently has been trying to offer Ukraine cheaper prices for gas than the rest of Europe.

    Independent Regulator

    Ukraine as a member of the European Energy Community needs to harmonize the powers and strengthen the independence of its energy regulator. The Ukrainian regulator – the Ministry of Energy – and the Secretariat of the European Energy Community jointly developed a draft law on the regulator, which is compliant with the Third Energy Package. There have been several failed attempts to adopt this draft law. Adoption of new legislation, which would strengthen the status of the regulator, is imperative for the purposes of liberalizing the electricity and gas markets in Ukraine, and the Parliament should focus on this initiative.

    Liberalization of Electricity Market

    Ukraine’s electricity market is functioning on the basis of the single-buyer model. Transition to a full-fledged liberalized electricity market is expected by mid 2017. However, the effective legislation is not fully compliant with EU rules. The Ministry of Energy, working together with the Secretariat of the Energy Community, prepared a draft Law on Electricity Market of Ukraine, which has been submitted to the Parliament and is expected to be adopted in 2016. Although the draft law is compliant with the Third Energy Package, some of its provisions are difficult to implement in Ukraine due to specifics of the country’s electricity market – in particular provisions on compensation of imbalances for solar- and wind-energy generation companies. Moreover, the draft law does not stipulate a clear mechanism for compensation of a “green” tariff. 

    Increase of Energy Prices

    In 2015-2016, under pressure from international financial institutions, Ukraine significantly increased utility costs for its population and made efforts to raise prices for energy resources to a market level. After increasing energy prices, the government changed the system of subsidies, which envisages that instead of going to Naftogaz they are paid directly to the population.

    By Armen Khachaturyan, Senior Partner, and Yaroslav Petrov, Counsel, Asters

    This Article was originally published in Issue 3.4 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Avellum Advises AGCO on Merger Control Clearance for Acquisition of Cimbria

    Avellum Advises AGCO on Merger Control Clearance for Acquisition of Cimbria

    Avellum has acted as Ukrainian legal counsel to AGCO in connection with its successful application for merger control clearance from the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine for its EUR 310 million acquisition of Cimbria. Herbert Smith Freehills acted as global legal advisor to AGCO.

    AGCO is a designer, manufacturer, and distributor of agricultural solutions, and it supports efficient farming through its full line of equipment and related services. AGCO products are sold through five core brands, Challenger®, Fendt®, GSI®, Massey Ferguson® and Valtra®, supported by Fuse® precision technologies and farm optimization services, all of which are distributed globally through a combination of approximately 3,000 independent dealers and distributors in more than 140 countries. Founded in 1990, AGCO is headquartered in Duluth, Georgia, in the United States.

    Founded in 1947, Cimbria — which is headquartered in Thisted, Denmark — is a manufacturer of products and solutions for the processing, handling, and storage of seed and grain, including the development, manufacture, and installation of individual machines, customized systems, and complete turnkey plants, as well as project management and process control consulting. Cimbria sales are concentrated in Western Europe with growing exposure to Eastern Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. 

    Avellum’s team was supervised by Managing Partner Mykola Stetsenko and Counsel Yuriy Nechayev, and was led by Associate Yaroslav Medvediev, supported by Associate Andriy Gumenchuk.

  • Ukrainian Arbitration Association Elects New President

    Ukrainian Arbitration Association Elects New President

    Integrites is reporting that on November 14, 2016, the General Meeting of Members of the Ukrainian Arbitration Association elected Integrites Partner Olena Perepelynska, the Head of the firm’s CIS Arbitration Practice) as its new President, succeeding outgoing UAA President Tatyana Slipachuk, Partner and Head of International Dispute Resolution at Sayenko Kharenko.

    The President of the UAA is elected for a four-year term.

    The Ukrainian Arbitration Association was founded in September 2012 by the initiative of the Ukrainian and foreign arbitration experts. The key goals of the UAA include, first of all, the promotion of Ukraine, and Kiev in particular, as the seat of arbitration, facilitation, and support of interest in international arbitration, extending knowledge and exchange of experience in cross-border dispute resolution, and enhancing cooperation and communications among international arbitration practitioners around the world.

    “It was a real challenge to set professional arbitration association and to be its first president,” said Tatyana Slipachuk, in a statement released by Integrites. “I would like to thank all my colleagues in Ukraine and abroad who continuously support UAA, and I do believe that only a joint effort could be successful. Despite my decision not to run for a new term I will remain with the UAA and I will do my best to promote international arbitration in Ukraine and Ukrainian arbitration lawyers abroad.”  

    New President Olena Perepelynska is one of the founding members of the Association and elected a member of the UAA Board both in 2012 and 2015. Throughout the past four years she was in charge of coordinating and implementing several UAA educational and legislative initiatives, including its annual Arbitration Schools, and for contributing to the creation of a draft law to improve the procedural legislation of Ukraine in support of arbitration, which currently awaits its first reading in the Ukrainian Parliament.

    “It is an honor to be chosen by my colleagues to serve as the second UAA President,” commented Perepelynska. “It is my sincere belief that UAA plays a central role in the development and promotion of arbitration in Ukraine. I also believe that Ukraine can become a more arbitration-friendly jurisdiction by improving its arbitration legislation, implementing best international practices into Ukrainian arbitration, and educating different groups of Ukrainian lawyers, both for counsel’s and arbitrators’ work. I will work hard to continue the success that my predecessor has achieved.” 

  • Lavrynovych & Partners Launches Credit Debt Restructuring Practice

    Lavrynovych & Partners Launches Credit Debt Restructuring Practice

    Lavrynovych & Partners has announced the launch of a new Credit Debt Restructuring practice at the firm.

    The new practice, which will be led by Olena Galiguzova, will combine legal and financial expertise. 

    According to Lavrynovych & Partners, “from now, we will become an even more reliable partner for companies who need professional support in restructuring loans. Our team will provide independent financial expertise and represent clients before creditors to reduce the financial burden on businesses. We will also provide the service of transforming debt into capital and optimizing its structure, sell non-core assets, etc.”

    The firm reports that Galiguzova has experience “in creating and developing the same direction for corporate clients, which she was leading for the past 5 years in UkrSibban” [and as] a Partner of the international financial group BNP Paribas. Prior to that, Ms. Galiguzova held senior positions in the banking sector and has thorough experience in project and structured financing of investment projects.”

  • Avellum and Linklaters Advise UniCredit Group on Disposal of Shares in Ukrsotsbank

    Avellum and Linklaters Advise UniCredit Group on Disposal of Shares in Ukrsotsbank

    Avellum has advised UniCredit Group (UCG) on Ukrainian law matters and Linklaters has advised UCG on English law matters in connection with the disposal of 99.9% shares in PJSC Ukrsotsbank in exchange for a 9.9% stake in ABH Holdings S.A.

    As a result of this deal, UCG became a minority shareholder of ABH Holdings S.A., an investment holding company of the banking group of Alfa-Group, headquartered in Luxembourg.

    Avellum describes PJSC Ukrsotsbank as “one of the largest multifunctional banks in Ukraine with the network of 237 retail branches,” and describes UCG as “a leading European commercial banking group with an international network spanning 50 markets.”

    The Avellum team working under the supervision of Managing Partner Mykola Stetsenko was led by Counsel Yuriy Nechayev and included Associate Andriy Romanchuk. Additionally, Senior Associate Vadim Medvedev advised on tax law matters, Associate Yaroslav Medvediev advised on antitrust matters, and Associate Yuriy Zaremba advised on real estate and labour law matters.

    The Linklaters team was led by Warsaw-based Partner Daniel Cousens and included London-based Associate Pavlos Kaimakliotis.

  • Eterna Law Announces Details of Scholarship Competition in Ukraine

    Eterna Law Announces Details of Scholarship Competition in Ukraine

    Eterna Law has announced its “P2P” program for law students, which the firm describes as a “first in Ukraine annual scholarship program for law students studying at Ukrainian universities.”

    According to Eterna Law, two successful winners will receive a monthly scholarship and the “mentorship support” of one of the firm’s partners during the academic year. They will also receive the “unique possibility” of an internship and employment with the firm. The selection process will involve more than 350 students from the 4th-6th courses of five Ukrainian leading universities: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Yaroslav Mudriy National Law University, Ivan Franko Lviv National University, Zaporizhzhya National University, and National University “Odessa Law Academy.”

    The final stage of the competition will be last until November 10th, at which point two finalists will be announced by the firm.

    Eterna Law claims to be “the only company in Ukraine that cooperates with all key legal faculties in the country,” and the firm reports that its lawyers “regularly carry out master classes and workshops for students.”

  • Vasil Kisil & Partners Successful for MIIT in Payment Dispute

    Vasil Kisil & Partners Successful for MIIT in Payment Dispute

    Vasil Kisil & Partners has successfully represented the MIIT telecommunication operator in a dispute related to the payment for telecommunication services (IP telephony).

    MIIT provides Internet, telephony, analog and digital interactive television, collocation, and mail domain support services.

    In this dispute, according to VKP, “all three levels of courts held that the telecommunication company’s claims relating to the payment for services were reasonable and thus recovered from the subscriber its debt, including penalties.” In doing so, according to a summary provided by the firm, “the courts did not accept the subscriber’s arguments … that it neither ordered nor consumed international telecommunication services to such an extent (international calls were made from the phone numbers assigned to such subscriber). Likewise, the courts dismissed an [argument] that there was unauthorized tampering with the equipment, since it is a subscriber’s responsibility to protect logins and passwords. Accordingly, it was the subscriber who bore all risks related to restricted information being used by third parties and all loss related thereto which could be inflicted either to it (as subscriber), the operator, or other persons. Thus,  unauthorized tampering with equipment is not a reason to release the subscriber from payment for the telecommunication services provided to it.”

    “Telecom fraud (fraud involving the misuse of telecommunication services by tampering with telecommunication equipment) is quite a widespread phenomenon in the modern technology world,” said Vasil Kisil & Partners Counsel Oleg Kachmar. “Subscribers usually refuse to pay bills resulting from unauthorized tampering with their telecommunication equipment. However, the court practice in similar cases in Ukraine shows that the subscriber is obliged to pay for the services, though he or she is not prevented from recovering the damage caused by person guilty in unauthorized tampering.”

    The VKP team consisted of Partner Alexander Borodkin, Counsel Oleg Kachmar, and Associate Yuriy Kolos.

  • Magnusson Announces New Team in Ukraine

    Magnusson Announces New Team in Ukraine

    Magnusson has announced that Oleksandr Liulkov has joined the firm with a team of five lawyers, including Partner Tetyana Proskurnya, and that he will be taking over as Managing Partner of the firm’s Kyiv office going forward.

    Liulkov, who was with Magnusson when the firm launched its operations in Kiev back in 2013, now returns to the firm. He has also worked for Andreas Neocleous and Co., Magisters, and Deloitte, among others, and most recently conducted his own practice. He focuses on banking and finance, corporate and M&A, dispute resolution, and tax.

    “I am very much looking forward to further development of Magnusson’s operations in Ukraine,” commented Liulkov. “Magnusson offers a unique platform for attracting business from the Baltic Sea Region countries to our country. We see positive signs of recovery on the Ukrainian market and will capitalize on this together with our colleagues in other offices.”

    New Magnusson Partner Tetyana Proskurnya, who joins with Liulkov, has been practicing law for over 10 years and specializes in dispute resolution, banking and finance, real estate, construction, securities, corporate and M&A. According to Magnusson, “she has extensive experience in advising on banking and finance, cross-border debt and equity transactions, restructurings, trade, and production.”

    “We warmly welcome Oleksandr and his team on board,” stated Senior Partner Per Magnusson. “Ukraine is important for Magnusson and we advise a number of international companies operating on this market. Oleksandr has already been a part of our firm in the past and we are delighted that our clients will benefit again from his experience, knowledge and dedication.”

  • KPD Consulting Advises on Heritage Protection Agreement for Building in Kyiv

    KPD Consulting Advises on Heritage Protection Agreement for Building in Kyiv

    KPD Consulting Law Firm has supported Euroventures-Austria-CA-Management Gesellschaft m.b.H. — the real estate subsidiary of Bank Austria Group — in the execution of the Heritage Protection Agreement with respect to a historical office building from the early 20th century located in the heart of Kyiv.

    The firm explained that the building owned by Euroventures-Austria-CA-Management Gesellschaft was constructed in 1911 and “falls into the category of so-called architectural monuments protected by the state as it represents the art-nouveau style in architecture.” By law, owners of such protected buildings must execute a “special agreement with Public Heritage Protection Authority in order to take obligations of keeping the building in good repair and of safe-keeping its initial appearance (facades) and even interiors.” The firm explained that before the preparation of the draft protection agreement between the authority and the owner there should be a special inspection of the asset identifying what parts of the building are to be restored in order to protect and maintain it properly.

    KPD guided the landlord of the building in this special inspection, starting from the collection of all documents evidencing the exceptional historical status of the building and filing the application with the Public Heritage Protection Authority, through the inspection, and concluding with the drafting, negotiation, and execution of the Heritage Protection Agreement between the owner of the building and the Public Heritage Protection Authority.

    “It was our true pleasure to handle this case related to the ‘pearl’ of Kiev architectural modern called also art nouveau,” commented KPD Partner Vladyslav Kysil, the Head of Real Estate and Construction at the firm. “Thanks to the Client this music in stone will sound for many years and will cause everyone walking down the street near Golden Gates — the Kiev Central Business District — to rejoice.” 

    The KPD team on the matter was led by Kysil, assisted by Associate Mykhailo Semka.