Category: Slovakia

  • Kinstellar and Allen & Overy Advise on Slovakian Power Plant Sale

    Kinstellar and Allen & Overy Advise on Slovakian Power Plant Sale

    Kinstellar has advised E.ON on its sale of the Malzenice power plant to Zapadoslovenska Energetika. Allen & Overy advised ZSE on the acquisition.

    The Malzenice power plant is a state-of-the art combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plant in Trnava Region, in Western Slovakia. The CCGT power plant started to produce electricity in 2010 with an installed output of 436 megawatts.

    Zapadoslovenska Energetika is a regional power producer and distributor that is 51% owned by the Slovak state.

    The Kinstellar team in Bratislava consisted of Parters Adam Hodon and Viliam Mysicka, Senior Associate Tomas Melisek, Associates Katarina Zemlova and Boris Stancl, and Junior Associate Andrea Snopekova.

    The A&O team consisted of Partner Martin Magal, Senior Associate Tomas Bury, and lawyer Drahomir Siroky.

  • Kinstellar and RR Legal Advise on Veolia Energie Acquisition of Slovak Heat & Power Producer

    Kinstellar and RR Legal Advise on Veolia Energie Acquisition of Slovak Heat & Power Producer

    Kinstellar has advised the Slovak branch of French energy giant Veolia Energie International on its acquisition of PPC Investments, which owns and operates a combined cycle natural gas-fired power plant near Bratislava, from Czech investment fund Avant Energy. Avant Energy was advised by RR Legal on the transaction, which was finalized in July 2018 following the approval of the Slovak Antimonopoly Office.

    According to Kinstellar, PPC Investments has operated a combined-cycle heat and power station in Bratislava since 1998 and is currently among the lead producers of power and heat in Slovakia, and Avant Energy received several offers from local and international investment groups before agreeing on terms with Veolia. Kinstellar reports that “the addition of PPC Investments’ gas-fired power plant to Veolia’s portfolio will contribute to the French company’s goals of producing clean energy for sustainable growth.”

    The Kinstellar team in Bratislava consisted of Partners Adam Hodon and Viliam Mysicka and Associates Vladimir Simkovic and Boris Stancl, among others.

  • A Brand New Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism for Resolving Domain Name (.sk) Disputes in Slovakia

    For a number of years, Slovakian courts struggled with domain name disputes. Because there was neither statutory legislation concerning the rights to domain names nor consistent case-law allowing for the formulation of principles for resolving disputes that arose involving them, different courts took different approaches regarding how to decide domain name cases. This made legal certainty and predictability extremely difficult for stakeholders in the country.

    This bleak situation was improved significantly last year, when an alternative dispute  mechanism (ADR) for resolving domain names disputes was approved by the Committee for the Administration of National .sk Domain and SK-NIC, the Slovakian Registry for the .sk country code top-level domain. This has resulted in a win-win situation, where the ADR regime filters the majority of cases that would otherwise end up before different Slovakian district courts, and the right-holders can rely on a more consistent approach to the assessment of their rights to Slovakian domain names.

    The arbitration center for alternative domain dispute resolution is part of the European Information Society Institute, which coordinates the experts tasked with deciding disputes in accordance with the ADR rules for the .sk domain.

    The ADR is a non-governmental platform for resolving domain names disputes. A right-holder claiming that its trademark, business name, goodwill, copyright, or other intellectual property rights (IPRs) to a certain Slovakian domain name have been infringed by a defendant may  opt for the ADR procedure. The most typical infringements committed with respect to domains are cybersquatting, typosquatting, and domain sniping.

    Requirements for the Initiation of .sk Domain Name Dispute Resolution

    Under the new ADR Rules, a domain name holder defendant may not avoid the ADR procedure if a right-holder decides to assert its alleged rights to the disputed domain in such a way. If the right-holder wins the ADR, the Slovakian Register (SK-NIC) will execute the decision (it may transfer the disputed domain to the right-holder or cancel the registration of the disputed domain).

    In order to succeed with its ADR action, the applicant right-holder must prove that: (i) the characters forming the defendant’s domain name are identical or similar to the protected IPRs of the right-holder; (ii) a likelihood of confusion exists between the defendant’s domain and the protected IPRs (this is not necessary if the applicant can prove that its right has a good reputation in the relevant part of the public – typically, this will improve the position of the owners of well-known brands); and (iii) the disputed domain name: (a) has been registered or acquired without the defendant having the right to do it (e.g., the defendant does not own a trademark) or a legitimate interest (e.g., the defendant is able to prove that the domain name was used fairly in connection with selling goods or services in good faith before receiving any notice regarding a dispute) in the domain or the applicant’s IPR; and at the same time (c) has not been registered, acquired, and used in good faith.

    Cases are decided by one or a panel of three ADR experts. If the applicant succeeds, the disputed domain may be transferred to the applicant (or a third person identified by the applicant) or cancelled. 

    The practical advantage of the ADR is the fact that the expert’s opinion is “self-enforceable” through SK-NIC as a top-level domain authority and no court enforcement is needed. In addition, the losing party has the right to bring the case before the national court. (However, in the majority of cases no further court actions will arise after the ADR).

    The ADR proceeding is conducted entirely via electronic means and takes three to four months. For an additional charge, complainants may also opt for the fast-track 30-day proceeding. Each ADR decision is published online, so the public and stakeholders can follow the development of ADR case-law.

    Arrived in Modern Digital Economy

    The ADR procedure provides IP right holders with access to an extremely effective, practical, and time/cost saving mechanism for enforcement of their rights in Slovakia. In the context of a massively developing digital economy, having robust and effective ADR rules for resolving domain name disputes should be a must for every modern country.  

    By Jan Lazur, Partner, Zoltan Nagy, Associate, Taylor Wessing  

    This Article was originally published in Issue 5.5 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • The Buzz in Slovakia: Interview with Zuzana Simekova of Dentons

    The Buzz in Slovakia: Interview with Zuzana Simekova of Dentons

    Public protests that surrounded the February 2018 death of Slovakia journalist Jan Kuciak and his fiancee have somewhat abated, says Dentons Bratislava Partner Zuzana Simekova, but the controversy and ultimate consequences are still up in the air.

    “Things have calmed down somewhat at the moment, and the investigation is ongoing,” she says. “But there has been no information.”  At least in the short term, she says, she and her colleagues have not seen any direct impact on business and foreign investment. “Of course the death was a tragic effect that affected Slovakia, and the social pressure is clearly there,” she says. “But it did not have any real impact on business. It was kept separate. Maybe there was some attention to compliance, on transparency, but there has been no obvious effect on any business initiatives  People are paying attention, but there has been no real effect on the legislative or regulatory level. And no sign that potential investors are making decisions based on this.”

    Still, that doesn’t mean there won’t be any impact in the future. “Things in the market are going well,” Simekova says, “but there is a little bit of a waiting mode as to what’s going to happen. These recent events show that there is a major need for a change in the system of public administration and greater monitoring of the use of public resources, and there have been a number of initiatives announced — and the current President has announced that he won’t run for reelection next year — but what will actually happen and whether they will actually transform the system remains to be seen.” In other words, she says, “right now we are in limbo.”

    When asked for her personal opinion about the fall-out of Kuciak’s death, she pauses to think. “I would personally very much hope that this tragic event has opened the eyes and the minds of the people as to what can be changed in the future and how to make those changes,” she says. “There is a great level of frustration — on the one hand we would hope for the changes and the learning, but at the same time we are a bit worried under the current system — and the tragedy itself has clearly shown the depth of the problems. The questions are how much will changing it take, who can do it, where can it start. The question is whether there is sufficient will and ability.”

    Still, whether related to Kuciak’s death or not, Simekova says some change is already in the air, including pressure to reform the state administration “on the vertical as well as the horizontal level,” she says, “to ensure compliance and non-discriminatory rule.” Ultimately, she says, “there is a kind of common understanding that this is something that should take place.”

    Turning to actual rather than prospective legislative developments, Simekova counts off five recent changes of significance — “three of which are particularly relevant.” The first of the five she mentions is the recent implementation of the GDPR, which she says, like everywhere else, “of course kept all the lawyers in Slovakia very busy.” The second is recent changes to Slovakia’s Commercial Code designed to “address the needs of the business sector,” and which include, among other things, “the implementation of control over certain activities that were potentially problematic causing lot of legal uncertainty and endangering due enforcement of law, including mergers of debt-ridden companies.” She explains: “Now you need the approval of certain financial authorities for such mergers, providing much more of a guarantee that there is some oversight, some guarantees to the creditors that the debts will not disappear.”

    Unfortunately, she says, not all changes are positive — or possibly even ethical. “There has been a lot of conversation about debt of hospitals and other entities under the control of the State Ministry of Health,” Simekova says. “They can have massive debts, and this of course also affects the private companies who they owe.” Thus, she reports, “the Slovak government has proposed a restructuring of the situation, to lower the financial debts of hospitals. Discussions with the business community occurred this past spring and may continue, but for the time being no agreement was found. Although the government said they’d try to find a solution, nothing happened until now … apart from the parliament making an amendment on a relatively obscure and minor provision — radiation protection— which included an provision prohibiting the execution of debts on hospitals, meaning those debts are absolutely unenforcable against hospitals for at least a couple of years.” Simekova describes the move as brazen. “It was done indirectly, and essentially hidden so that people wouldn’t notice it.” As a result, she says, her firm has been consulting with many clients seeking to recover from the state’s hospital system. “This is a very difficult situation,” she says, though she declines at this point to predict what specific strategies they intend to pursue in opposition to the law.  

    Finally, she says, “one last thing that I can mention is never-ending controversy regarding food retailers, and the attempts to amend the law regulating unfair conditions in the food retail sector.” Simekova says, “this mainly relates to the conditions that are agreed upon between suppliers to the food retail chains and the chains themselves. So the regulators are seeing these chains as entities or entrepreneurs that may be imposing unfair conditions on suppliers based on their market power. They want to prevent the chains from abusing their market position in the food sector.” According to her, “it has sparked a lot of issues because you have food sector regulators who are generally responsible, then you have competition authorities stepping in, and so on. We had a law that was not particularly effective, and the government is now considering amending it again and putting it into practice.”

    Reflecting on these two last legislative developments, Simekova says, “it seems there is a bit more focus on the regulated sectors than we had before.” So, she says, “the changes that may come in the next few months relate to specific sectors rather than overall business.”

    Finally she’s asked whether, all together, she’s optimistic about developments in Slovakia. She laughs. “That’s the one million dollar question — it’s extremely difficult to say.” She pauses, then says, “I think now we have to wait to see. I personally do have some optimism, but we have to wait and see.

  • Guest Editorial: Where Has All The Work Ethic Gone?

    Some memories never fade away. I remember the first months of my trainee career at Allen & Overy’s newly opened Bratislava office as if they were yesterday. The year was 1998 and we had just moved into new office space. It felt way too big for the team of three lawyers, one PA, and one office manager.

    A few weeks in, and without much warning, we were asked to conduct simultaneous due diligence exercises over three state-owned banks that were being privatized. Our team had little to no experience handling such tasks. We could rely on only one native English speaker in our Prague office to help us transform our convoluted and verbose notes into a halfway-understandable report for the client. The hours were brutal. We started in one data room at 7 AM in the morning, moved to another midday, and returned to our office at around 10 PM to start drafting our reports. We rarely finished before 4 AM, went home for a quick nap, shower, and change of shirt, only for it to start all over again. When I wanted to see my then-girlfriend (now-wife), I could only offer her a short walk between the data room and our office. I remember she would bring me cookies for the road and worry about me. How she ever put up with me during those weeks remains a mystery to me.

    Despite all the personal inconvenience involved, there was not a shred of doubt in our team’s mind that the work we were doing was exciting and meaningful. For all the anxieties about our lack of experience and qualification, we felt an immense sense of pride and privilege to be involved in such projects. We wanted to emulate the cool professionalism, eloquence, and cosmopolitan attitude of our colleagues from other offices. 

    Almost two decades and quite a few all-nighters later, I try to put myself in the shoes of the new generation of lawyers, both at my firm and elsewhere. I wonder whether they feel the same sense of awe and excitement when they are faced with projects that are likely to spoil their work-life-balance plans for a couple of weeks. My conclusion is that, luckily, they do not succumb to such emotions as easily as my colleagues and I did. 

    Although at times I catch myself having some sympathy for the school of thought that proclaims the new generation of young lawyers to be a bunch of spoiled and ungrateful fools, overall I must admit that they seem to have it figured out much better and earlier than most of my generation did.  To them, to sacrifice one’s youth on the altar of billable hours targets, deadlines, and pursuit of clients’ rare praise is not a virtue, but a sign of desperation. Although they understand the importance of work, in particular of the meaningful type, they reject the slave (Slav?) mentality that will cause them to burn out before they turn 40 and, if they are women, force them to postpone or abandon plans to have a family.  

    Writing these words from the position of a managing partner and employer might seem heretical. But over the years, I have come to realize the truth behind the saying that any idiot can work 16 hours a day for months on end, but only smart people can consistently generate real added value working 8-10 hour days while keeping their weekends free. 

    It is true that I will be never able to guarantee to my colleagues that they will not end up stuck in a difficult and time-consuming project for a couple of weeks, perhaps months. But I would like to think that I lead by example in showing them that commitment does not have to be measured by the number of hours spent in the office. It takes energy and time to nurture social relationships, invest in physical well-being, and broaden one’s knowledge beyond what is directly work-relevant. I know it would be detrimental to the long term interests of the firm I represent if I would continuously seek to deprive my team of that time which they need to spend outside of the office. In this day and age it is very likely that I would not be able to get away with it in the first place. And that, I believe, is a very good thing.

    By Martin Magal, Managing Partner, Allen & Overy, Bratislava

    This Article was originally published in Issue 5.3 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Kinstellar Advises Nidec on Global Acquisition of Embraco

    Kinstellar has advised the Nidec Corporation, a Japanese manufacturer of electric motors, on Slovak law aspects of its acquisition of Brazilian compressor business Embraco from Whirlpool Corporation for US 1.08 billion in cash. Sidley Austin served as global legal counsel to the Nidec Corporation.

    Embraco, headquartered in Brazil, had been a Whirlpool majority-owned business unit since 1997. The business has manufacturing facilities in Brazil, Italy, China, Slovakia, and Mexico. Embraco also maintains commercial offices in the United States and Russia.

    The transaction, which is expected to be finalized in early 2019, remains subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions.

    The Kinstellar team was led by Partner Adam Hodon and included Senior Associate Tomas Melisek and Associates Katarina Zemlova and Andrea Snopekova. 

  • Upcoming Challenges for the Slovak Energy Market

    The Slovak energy market is in a state of transition. Energy security continues to be a key driver of the country’s energy policy. Long characterized by its reliance on gas from the Russian Federation, Slovakia continues to seek alternative sources to supply its energy needs. To a large extent, the solution has been to invest billions into nuclear power, while the development of renewable energy sources (RES) has so far been slow.

    Energy Dependence and Security

    In an attempt to address its long-term dependence on the supply of oil and gas from Russia, Slovakia has introduced reverse-flow transit pipelines with Austria and the Czech Republic to provide it with access to gas from Western Europe. However, despite these efforts, almost all gas in Slovakia continues to come from the Russian Federation. For the moment, Slovakia plans to diminish its dependency on Russia and increase its transit capacity by constructing a 164 km cross-border gas pipeline. This has been designated as a project of common interest by the European Commission, and was awarded EUR 108 million in EU subsidies. When implemented, the project will enable the transit of natural gas, including liquefied natural gas, from the Baltic Sea to South-Eastern Europe. 

    Slovakia has long benefited from its position as one of the main gas transit countries in Europe. However, this position could be jeopardized by the planned construction of the Nord Stream 2 project. If constructed, the new gas pipeline running across the Baltic Sea would allow Russia to supply Germany with 110 billion cubic meters of gas per year, significantly reducing the amount of gas transported to Western Europe through Slovakia. This could cause losses of up to EUR 700 million annually in transmission fees. 

    Nuclear Energy on the Rise

    Nuclear energy has so far been Slovakia’s chosen path to energy independence. While many countries are stepping away from nuclear energy, Slovakia has been significantly expanding its fleet of nuclear power plants. Currently, Mochovce and Jaslovske Bohunice, the two largest nuclear power plants, have installed capacity of approximately 2000 MW, which represents around 57% of Slovakia’s total energy generation (IEA figures for 2015). The Mochovce power plant is being expanded by almost 1000 MW, which should be completed by 2019. In addition, the country has been seriously considering the construction of additional reactors at Jaslovske Bohunice. 

    Continuous delays in the Mochovce expansion have resulted in a huge increase in project costs from the original EUR 2.8 billion to the currently estimated EUR 4.6 billion. Considering the current lower market power prices in the region, there are major concerns that the new units at Mochovce will not be able to operate profitably. 

    A Greener Horizon?

    Slovakia is increasingly considering green energy as an alternative to fossil fuels, and the share of renewable energy doubled from 6.4% in 2005 to 12.9% in 2015 (according to Eurostat SHARES). However, the percentage of power produced by new RES installations is still relatively low, and consequently there is limited diversification in the energy mix.  

    Hydro, biomass, and solar are the most frequently used RES, while geothermal energy is seen to offer potential for future development. On the other hand, wind is considered an unreliable source due to local environmental factors.

    Although it seems that Slovakia will have no trouble reaching the EU’s 20/20/20 targets, this is more due to its high share of energy from nuclear power and old hydropower plants, which together generate approximately 17% of the domestic installed capacity.  

     The slow development of the renewable energy sector can be attributed to wavering public and political support, strict legislation, and low transparency.  In 2016, out of concern over energy costs to consumers, the Slovak regulatory authority announced a reduction in feed-in tariffs for all RES for the period 2017-2021.

    This slow uptake on renewable energy should be addressed by the upcoming reform of Slovakia’s RES support scheme, which is expected to go before the parliament this summer.  The changes to the RES Act are expected to replace the current feed-in tariffs with capacity auctions and feed-in premiums.  

    This reform could give new impetus to investment in the renewable energy sector, but it is questionable whether this will materially contribute to greater energy independence.  

    By Petr Zakoucky, Partner, and Michal Pelikan, Associate, Dentons

    This Article was originally published in Issue 5.2 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • A&O’s Lucia Raimanova Part of First All-Woman Arbitral Tribunal at VIAC

    A&O’s Lucia Raimanova Part of First All-Woman Arbitral Tribunal at VIAC

    Allen & Overy’s Lucia Raimanova has been selected to form part of the first ever all-woman arbitral tribunal at the Vienna International Arbitration Centre.

    The VIAC is an international arbitration  institution with a particular stronghold in Central and Eastern Europe, but it also attracts parties from further afield, notably Africa and Oceania. The organization’s recently-released annual report shows that it began 43 new international arbitration and mediation cases in 2017 — and reports the formation of its first all-female tribunal.  

    Raimanova, a Counsel in Allen & Overy’s International Arbitration Group who relocated to Bratislava from London in June 2016 to lead the firm’s international arbitration practice within CEE, was nominated by the VIAC Board to the three-member panel on behalf of the respondent.  She and her co-arbitrator then agreed on the Chair of the Tribunal. 

    Raimanova commented: “Like many sectors, international arbitration struggles with retaining female talent in leading roles. Securing gender equality in arbitrator appointments is no easy task. There is still an insufficient pool of experienced female arbitrators and it does not help that arbitrators are often associated with an image of white-haired men. In this case, my co-arbitrator and I made sure we had an equally qualified male candidate for the role of the Chairman of the Tribunal but, as luck would have it, we ended up with a female candidate who is doing a wonderful job as Chairwoman.”

     

  • Allen & Overy Advises Slovak Investment Holding on Investment in GA Drilling

    Allen & Overy Advises Slovak Investment Holding on Investment in GA Drilling

    Allen & Overy has advised Slovak Investment Holding, a.s., managed by SZRB Asset Management, a.s., on its subscription as a lead investor in a Round B share offering for new shares in GA Drilling a.s., a company based in Slovakia that develops innovative technologies for well drilling. 

    According to Allen & Overy, the deal constitutes the first direct venture capital investment of a fund under the control of the Slovak Republic.

    The A&O team was led by Corporate Partner Martin Magal, who commented, “This transaction is a perfect example of public money being strategically used alongside private co-investments to enable the continuation of R&D activities in Slovakia and the subsequent commercial launch of game-changing drilling methods which can be used in a number of sectors, including oil & gas.”

    Magal was assisted by Allen & Overy Senior Associate Tomas Bury.

     

  • JSK and Vanko & Vankova Advise on Sale of Slovakian Cemex Subsidiaries

    JSK and Vanko & Vankova Advise on Sale of Slovakian Cemex Subsidiaries

    JSK has advised Cemex on the sale of two Slovak subsidiaries, Kamenolomy CMX s.r.o. and Cemex Aggregates Slovakia s.r.o., to CEMMAC a.s. The buyer was represented by Vanko & Vankova. 

    Cemex, which was founded in Mexico in 1906, is a provider of integrated construction solutions. The group currently operates in more than 50 countries and employs almost 43,000 people worldwide, including approximately 1,300 people in the Czech Republic. 

    The JSK team was led by Partner Tomas Dolezil in cooperation with Senior Associate Michal Jendzelovsky and Junior Associate Michaela Krajickova.

    The Vanko & Vankova team was led by Partner Viliam Vanko.