Category: Slovakia

  • Clifford Chance Advises Atrium on Sale of Optima Kosice

    Clifford Chance has advised Atrium European Real Estate on its divestment of the Optima shopping center in Kosice to the joint venture of two Slovak shopping center investors for EUR 118 million. Taylor Wessing and Krnac Koncok & Partners reportedly advised the buyers.

    Atrium European Real Estate is an owner and operator of shopping centers and residential rental properties in Central Europe and a member of the G City group. Atrium owns 26 income-producing properties and has a total market value of approximately EUR 2.3 billion.

    Clifford Chance’s team included Partner Emil Holub, Counsel Milan Rakosnik, Senior Associate Stanislav Holec, Associates Josef Lysonek and Andrej Havko, and Junior Lawyer Simon Dusek.

    Editor’s Note: After this article was published, Taylor Wessing announced it had indeed advised one of the unidentified Slovak investors. The firm’s team included Partners Juraj Frindrich and Silvia Hlavackova, Senior Associate Milan Cervenka, and Associates Barbora Bartovicova, Eva Smolenova, and Zoltan Nagy.

  • Wolf Theiss Advises Lookout on Acquisition of SaferPass

    Wolf Theiss, working alongside NautaDutilh and lead counsel WilmerHale, has advised Lookout on the acquisition of SaferPass.

    Lookout, Inc. is a cybersecurity provider of endpoint-to-cloud security, established in 2007. The company secures data for enterprises and ensures they comply with regulations. SaferPass focuses on data security, password management, and encryption and is headquartered in Bratislava.

    The Wolf Theiss team included Bratislava-based Counsel Bruno Stefanik and Associates Dalibor Palaticky, Jozef Vircik, Stanislav Bojnansky, and Vladimir Simkovic.

    Wolf Theiss did not respond to our inquiry on the matter.

  • ESG – Risk or Opportunity for Slovakian Real Estate?

    The trend towards ESG issues has increased markedly on the Slovakian commercial real estate market. More and more Slovak companies are behaving responsibly and sustainably – under pressure from tenants, employees, contractors, customers, regulators, and investors who involve ESG in their decision-making.

    It is already clear that ESG is having an impact on the value of real estate portfolios. Originally, real estate placed more emphasis on the E (environmental) element in ESG than on the S (social) or G (governance) elements.  However, the COVID-19 pandemic has shown the increasing importance of the social element of ESG in terms of risk management, resilience, transparent and inclusive governance, and social engagement.

    Constructing ESG buildings is in fashion. Certificates such as LEED and BREEAM are the most widely used value drivers in Slovakia, where most commercial office real estate is in Bratislava. According to surveys published by CBRE, Bratislava has 798,041 square meters of office space with a valid green building certificate. This means that, in 2021, around 41% of all office space in Bratislava had a green building certificate, with 68% of those holding a BREEAM certificate and 32% a LEED certificate. By contrast, there are no public administration buildings with a green certificate.

    The popularity of ESG buildings is further being enhanced by the generational shift of wealth to millennials, who are much more concerned about climate change and social issues than older generations. By 2030, millennials will be the largest segment of the workforce. They will create and own the majority of assets and pressure employers to reflect their values. Public image concerns are also a driver, as ESG commitments typically lead to an improved reputation and customer and employee loyalty.

    The regulatory landscape in Slovakia is also changing regarding ESG. Reform of construction waste management is expected in the near future. The concept of green public procurement is another tool for achieving the strategic objective of environmental sustainability.  Social and environmental criteria will be evaluated in certain public procurement tenders for the first time, thanks to legal changes that became effective in 2022.

    The ESG agenda is also driving responsible and sustainable business in the commercial real estate sector. Real estate players often develop their own sustainability policies to outperform competitors and increase the resilience of their assets.  ESG implementation is their strategy for increasing financial returns, part of a broader approach to risk management, and a means of protecting investments.

    As for property leases, ESG buildings are expected to gain momentum in terms of tenant demand and market rents. Tenants, especially large corporate tenants, indicate that they are particularly interested in green certification. Many tenants are changing their strategy towards ESG and renting in a green building in order to achieve their own sustainability goals.

    Green leases are not yet regulated by a specific law in the Slovak Republic. Landlords, instead, develop their own set of guidelines regarding sustainable asset management, energy savings, green cleaning, indoor air cleaning, quality, sustainable purchasing, solid waste management, and water protection.

    In practice, the term green lease is used to refer to any type of provision that aims to reduce the ecological footprint, save natural resources, or ensure the use and management of the property in a sustainable manner. In reality, the terms and conditions of a green lease are often not detailed in the lease agreement – only being summarized in the building’s operating rules. Thus, enforceability of ESG commitments depends on the validity of contractual arrangements.

    There is no one-size-fits-all approach for companies’ ESG strategies. This is evidenced by the variety of ESG projects that Slovak companies present to the public. Many companies proactively go “above and beyond the minimum,” using ESG as a tool for creating the long-term value of a real estate project. In addition to legal and financial due diligence, ESG due diligence has become an important part of real estate opportunity investment assessment.

    By Sona Hankova, Partner, CMS Slovakia

    This Article was originally published in Issue 9.3 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Taylor Wessing Represents Slovakia’s President in Libel Dispute

    Taylor Wessing has represented Slovakia’s President Zuzana Caputova in a libel dispute with Member of Parliament Lubos Blaha.

    According to the firm, the Bratislava I District Court ordered Blaha, who is a member of the Direction – Slovak Social Democracy party, to stop spreading claims that Caputova is a traitor, an agent of foreign countries, or a puppet of the United States and remove such statements from several posts on his social network platforms.

    The Taylor Wessing team representing Caputova included Managing Partner Radovan Pala, Partner Jan Lazur, and Senior Associates Zoltan Nagy and Tomas Pazmany.

  • The Buzz in Slovakia: Interview with Jan Lazur of Taylor Wessing

    The potential EU ban on Russian oil and gas, the Penta Investments split, and the new construction law in Slovakia are currently the major debate, the biggest transaction, and the greatest legal update, respectively, according to Taylor Wessing Partner Jan Lazur.

    The biggest debate in Slovakia at the moment, according to Lazur, concerns the planned EU ban on Russia’s oil and gas. “Because of its heavy dependency on oil and gas, with most of the stuff coming from Russia,” he says, “any drastic measure by the EU will have a massive impact in Slovakia.” Most discussions, Lazur notes, focus on two key issues:

    One – whether Slovakia will try to pay for Russian resources in rubles. He says that Poland “refused to do just that, with their supplies now being shut off. By contrast, Slovakia is completely dependent on Russian gas, and Minister of Economy Richard Sulik announced the country was willing to pay in rubles.” Otherwise, Lazur says, “we could be facing a risk of gas supply stoppage.”

    Two – what exceptions could be made for Slovakia, within the broader EU ban? Lazur says the ban is “obviously a big issue throughout the EU. But if the EU bans Russian oil and gas, it seems that there could be certain exceptions made for Slovakia, Hungary, or other countries in a similar position. It also seems that there could be a preliminary period to phase out the stuff, over several years.” Even that will impact Slovakia’s economy heavily, he believes. “Unfortunately, Slovakia has no easy route to finding alternatives for bringing in oil and gas into Slovakia.”

    The biggest deal in Slovakia, on the other hand, was the recent split of the Penta Investments group, according to Lazur. “One of the founders of the group, Jozef Oravkin, announced a couple of months ago – to both partners and shareholders – that he would like to leave the venture.” They recently announced “they have agreed to a swap: his 10% stake in Penta for the Sky Park and Digital Park developments in Bratislava, worth about EUR 400 million, with the remaining 50% to be paid out in cash, over the next couple of years.” Still, that would make the new operation, Alto Real Estate, according to Lazur, “one of the significant names on the Slovakian real estate market, with further plans to focus on developing real estate mainly in Bratislava and Kosice.”

    Staying on the topic of real estate, Lazur says Slovakia’s new construction law was just passed. “After almost 50 years, we have a brand-new construction law, which will significantly change how the market works and what it looks like – I think – for the better.” The new law follows the idea of a digital permitting process, he notes, “significantly reducing the number of steps – there should be just 13 basic steps for permissions – so it’s an accelerated process.” If that still seems like a long time to wait, Lazur points out that, under the current regulation, “you have about 83 steps to go through, before starting a construction project. It is really complicated, and investors had to wait for years. Especially nowadays, with the huge price increases in construction, it’s unrealistic to have to commit to projects and then have to wait for another three-to-four years.” 

    So, everyone is eagerly waiting for the new law and streamlined procedure to come into force in April 2024, Lazur says, but also points out there is much preparation work ahead: “during these two years, the new IT system will have to be prepared and refined, to have everything in place logistically when the time comes.”

  • Know Your Lawyer: Michal Simunic of Cechova & Partners

    An in-depth look at Michal Simunic of Cechova & Partners covering his career path, education, and top projects as a lawyer as well as a few insights about him as a manager at work and as a person outside the office.

    Career:

    • Cechova & Partners, Attorney, 2011-Present
    • Cechova & Partners, Associate, 2008-2011
    • Dovera Health Insurance Company, Manager of Debt Collection Department, 2005-2007
    • Valko & Partners Legal Office, Paralegal, 2003-2004
    • Vseobecna zdravotna poistovna a.s. (The General Health Insurance Company), Debt Collection Department, 1999-2005

    Education:

    • Faculty of Law of Comenius University in Bratislava, Mgr., 2007
    • Pan-European University, JUDr., 2007

    Favorites:

    Favorite out of office activity: Bicycle, Hunting

    Favorite quote: “Things are never so bad they can’t be made worse.” – Humphrey Bogart

    Favorite book: The Witcher by Andrzej Sapkowski

    Favorite movie: The Last Boy Scout

    Top 5 Projects:

    • Advising Just Eat Takeaway.com, a leading online food delivery marketplace in Continental Europe, in its acquisition of Bistro.sk from Ringier Axel Springer Media AG. Bistro.sk is the largest food delivery service in Slovakia;
    • Assisting Macquarie/MEIF4, a global provider of banking, financial, advisory, investment and funds management services, in its acquisition of Towercom, a.s., the main national provider of the broadcasting services throughout the whole territory of Slovakia;
    • Advising AFS Technologies Inc. on the purchase of 100% shares of the leading Slovak software company Visicom;
    • Assisting Cinema Holding/Cinema City with the group reorganization – structuring of the transaction, including completion and relevant registrations;
    • Assisting ABB Optical Group, America’s leading authorized distributor of all major soft contact lens manufacturers and a leading provider of optical products, services, and business solutions in the eye care industry, in its acquisition of business from Mindent Solutions, Inc. of Affinity Analytics.

    What would you say was the most challenging project you ever worked on and why?

    Simunic: The acquisition of Towercom a.s. by Macquarie/MEIF4. The target is a national provider of terrestrial and satellite television and radio broadcasting services in the whole territory of Slovakia, the project included complex legal due diligence, the establishment of the SPV for the purchase, analysis of the regulatory aspects related to the business, assistance with transaction documents and with the closing of the transaction, and post-closing matters. It was one of the first projects of this size and complexity that I worked on at the beginning of my career as a lawyer – and that was a big challenge for me.

    And what was your main takeaway from it?

    Simunic: I’ve participated in this project in the first years of my career as a lawyer. At the beginning, I was quite scared by the volume of work required. However, the main takeaway for me was that, with the right team, everything is doable, even when things seem to be difficult and complicated in the beginning, and that with good teamwork and the right approach, obstacles can be overcome and great results can be achieved.   

    What is one thing clients likely don’t know about you?

    Simunic: Most likely it will be the fact that I am a hunter in my free time. This hobby is not very common.

    Name one mentor who played a big role in your career and how they impacted you.

    Simunic: Our Managing Partner Katarina Cechova played a big role in my career. First, she gave me the opportunity to be part of our team in our law firm. More importantly, she has been providing her continuing support and sharing her knowledge and great experience with younger colleagues. She is always ready to provide her opinion and her view on the matter as a brilliant lawyer with so many years of practice. I admire her commitment to the profession. I hope that I will also have so much energy and enthusiasm for the legal profession after so many years of legal practice as she has.

    Name one mentee you are particularly proud of.

    Simunic: I don’t have any mentees within a formalized mentor-mentee program but I work closely with our junior colleagues and try to help them to develop professionally and to make progress in their careers. I hope that they can benefit from my advice and the experience that I gladly share with them. 

    What is the one piece off advice you’d give yourself fresh out of law school?

    Simunic: Don’t be scared, everything is doable with the right approach and the right people around. Practice will teach you how to cope with difficult situations.

    This article was written before the advent of the war in Ukraine and was originally published in Issue 9.2 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine on March 1, 2022. More current articles on developments in Ukraine can be found in our #StandWithUkraine section. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • New Slovak Act on Screening of Foreign Direct Investments

    The planned legislation will introduce a screening of foreign direct investments to Slovakia from third countries. The aim of the screening mechanism should be the protection of Slovakia’s security and public order, whereas security and public order in the EU shall also be considered.

    The competent Slovak public authority, the Ministry of Economy (MoE), states that despite the generally positive impact of foreign investments, it is necessary to pay closer attention to them and identify their capability to negatively impact security or public order.

    The basis for the new legislation stems from EU law, namely from EU Regulation 2019/452, which entered into force on October 11, 2020 (FDI Regulation). However, the FDI Regulation as such (deliberately) does not set out, in every detail, what the form and content of the EU member state FDI screening mechanisms should be. The FDI Regulation, among other things, merely sets out certain key elements to be reflected in any national FDI screening mechanism.

    The introduction of the FDI screening mechanism as such remains at the discretion of each EU member state. It follows from the European Commission’s First Annual Report on the screening of foreign direct investments into the Union, dated November 23, 2021, that (as of August 1, 2021) Croatia, Bulgaria, and Cyprus were the only three EU member states that do not have an FDI screening mechanism in place and, at the same time, do not contemplate setting up one. However, according to the report, it remains the European Commission’s strong expectation that all EU member states will put national FDI screening mechanisms in place.

    When preparing the Slovak legislation, the MoE was inspired by the legislation and practical experiences from selected EU member states but also by the legislation and experiences of non-EU countries (e.g., the US, where the national security implications of foreign investments into US companies or operations are reviewed by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States).

    Initially, the MoE anticipated that the new legislation will come into effect on January 1, 2022. The legislative process has been delayed, however. The MoE submitted the draft legislation to the intradepartmental consultation process on June 2, 2021 (the process lasted until June 22, 2021). The draft has drawn substantial attention and 311 comments were submitted overall. Out of these, 116 are classified as essential.

    The MoE is now trying to reflect the submitted comments and is preparing a revised draft of the new legislation. Therefore, the effectiveness of the new legislation will be shifted. Initially, our understanding was that the MoE envisaged July 1, 2022, to be the effective date, however, even this date might not be feasible.

    Despite the expectation that the draft legislation submitted by the MoE in summer 2021 will be substantially changed, once the comments are reflected, it nevertheless provides a good indication of what the nature of the Slovak FDI screening mechanism will be, once adopted. The draft introduces a wide definition of foreign investments from third countries that fall under the screening regime. The MoE will be the screening authority, however, it will consult other Slovak public authorities as well as other EU Member States and the European Commission on the investments. In addition to direct investments, indirect investments should also be affected. In the case of a share deal, as the most common form of acquisition of an entity in the Slovak M&A environment, the threshold is set at 10% for new acquisitions. The draft legislation stipulates that so-called critical foreign investments (e.g., investments in military technology and materiel, dual-use items, digital services, etc.) cannot be effected without the MoE’s permit or conditional permit. The MoE should also have the competence to ban a foreign investment, screen past foreign investments, and order their divestment.

    It will be interesting to see how the MoE deals with some of the submitted comments and what the final wording of the legislation will be. Some of the comments, for example, aim to increase the above-mentioned threshold to 25% or 33%. In any case, FDI screening will very soon become a new element to be considered within M&A transactions in Slovakia. Currently and until then, a sector-specific and very limited investment screening under the Slovak Critical Infrastructure Act applies.

    By Michaela Stessl, Country Managing Partner, and Andrej Liska, Associate, DLA Piper

    This article was written before the advent of the war in Ukraine and was originally published in Issue 9.2 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine on March 1, 2022. More current articles on developments in Ukraine can be found in our #StandWithUkraine section. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Is Slovakia Ready for a Hybrid Work Model?

    Since the onset of the COVID-19 crisis, the Slovak Labor Code has changed several times. In 2021, five amendments were adopted, and new changes are expected in 2022. Although we observe progressive changes, the labor code remains quite rigid. Its provisions on remote work do not distinguish between blue-collar and white-collar jobs, which makes their implementation more demanding. Remote working, constant changes to COVID-19 pandemic rules, vaccination, health and safety, data protection, and employment termination rules – these have been the most pressing issues that have led employers to turn to their legal advisors.

    Employers continued to analyze the benefits of working from home for their operating model. They have been updating their employment documents to comply with new requirements. In particular, the labor code amendment effective as of March 1, 2021, established better working conditions for digital nomads. However, remote work still raises a host of legal and administrative challenges. Many practical questions have arisen concerning the manner and extent to which employees’ costs should be reimbursed for working remotely, as well as the tax aspects of working remotely from abroad (the risk of becoming a permanent establishment and the obligation to pay income tax and contributions to social insurance schemes abroad).

    At the same time, many employers have postponed updating their remote working documentation templates due to legal uncertainties. They rely on temporary measures introduced by lawmakers in response to the pandemic. These rules currently allow employers to order home-working, and employees to request it. However, when the pandemic retreats, an important question will remain: does the labor code allow remote working without the employee’s consent? After the pandemic measures expire, remote working will not be possible without reaching an agreement with the employee.

    In 2021, the new topic of vaccination and testing arose, which kept employers busy. Slovakia has a low vaccination rate of only about 48%. Lawmakers required employers to ensure their unvaccinated employees are regularly tested prior to entering the workplace. This rule left many open practical questions for employers to resolve and has been abolished only recently.

    The pandemic also encouraged employers to consider means for reducing work-related health problems in the workforce. In Slovakia, employers must ensure that the workplace (including remote workspaces) complies with national health and safety regulations. Employers often asked what health and safety standards applied to remote workers. Some employers went beyond the mandatory minimum as regards mental health: they put more emphasis on implementing adequate systems to support the healthy work practices, training, life balance, and mental well-being of their employees.

    Remote working has also been associated with an increased risk of cyberattacks, data leaks, and employee fraud. As part of their ESG programs, employers are increasingly addressing issues such as transparency, risk governance, compliance and ethics, fair working conditions, and diversity and inclusion.

    What to Expect in 2022

    The legislator has introduced a new legal instrument – short-time work (Kurzarbeit) – into Slovak law, following the Austrian model. It will enter into force on March 1, 2022 (later than originally planned), and will be available for employers even after the pandemic.

    By August 1, 2022, the Slovak Republic must transpose into law the EU Directives on transparent and predictable working conditions and on work-life balance for persons with caring responsibilities. At the time of writing, the amendments to the labor code are still in the early legislative stages. What can be expected? New provisions are proposed to ensure a minimum of work predictability and employees’ right to request transfer to another form of employment. A welcome change is that the employer will be allowed to provide written information on working conditions in electronic form. However, certain communications between employers and employees still cannot be conducted electronically (e.g., delivery of a termination notice). Many other issues that both employers and employees are struggling with in practice are also to be addressed.

    The COVID-19 pandemic has forced employers and employees to adopt a new vision for work. The pandemic showed the importance of the social element of ESG. It is now clear that many employers wish to continue with remote working, or at least a hybrid model of remote and onsite working, even after the COVID-19 interim measures expire.

    By Sona Hankova, Partner, CMS Slovakia

    This article was written before the advent of the war in Ukraine and was originally published in Issue 9.2 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine on March 1, 2022. More current articles on developments in Ukraine can be found in our #StandWithUkraine section. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • International Firms’ Presence in Slovakia – Not a Passing Trend

    The Slovakian legal market has, for quite some time, been a vibrant landscape of international law firms. Given the positioning of the central European country, and the proximity of major markets such as Austria, Poland, and Ukraine, Slovakia has been able to maintain the high number of international law firms, especially relative to other CEE jurisdictions. Taking a deeper dive into the reasons behind the persistence of such a high number of major international law firms, we reached out to legal professionals who work in Slovakia to get their insights.

    Origins of Internationals – How Did Slovakia Become Attractive …

    Location, Location, Location

    “Thanks to its strategic location and close links to other CEE markets, Slovakia is consistently a natural target jurisdiction for businesses with interests across the CEE region,” shares Wolf Theiss Counsel Rudolf Pfeffer. According to him, both international clients, as well as major local players, need “high-quality legal work, deep local insights, and the ability to coordinate transactions across different jurisdictions.” In Pfeffer’s opinion, Slovakia has a synergetic quality of being “a small but vibrant legal market which generates a steady flow of legal business in most of the practice areas that international law firms typically cover.”

    And, Pfeffer is not lonesome in his opinion – Taylor Wessing Partner Andrej Leontiev shares the view that Slovakia’s central location is a contributing factor: “The extraordinary proximity of Slovakia to other significant CEE markets, such as Austria, the Czech Republic, Poland, and Hungary plays a role.”

    CMS Partner Michal Hutan agrees with the point. “[Slovakia’s] geographical position – right in the center of Europe and bordering Austria, Hungary, Czech Republic, and Poland – certainly makes it very appealing to an impressive range of international, CEE and European clients to base their operations in,” he says. Following that fact, Hutan believes that a high number of international law firms is a natural consequence. “This is particularly the case with major e-Commerce players, many of whom have set up logistics and distribution centers here in recent years.”

    Strong Economy and the Euro

    Still, it’s not just geography. Slovakia, or the ’Tatra Tiger’ as the country was called as a result of the 2002 and 2007 strong economic growth, offers a developed market for international businesses.

    “After joining the EU in 2004, Slovakia experienced a period of strong economic growth and became a more attractive destination for foreign direct investment,” Pfeffer says, on the one hand. “This development was further accelerated after 2009 when Slovakia joined the Eurozone and adopted the euro as its currency, becoming the only country from the Visegrad Group to do so.”

    On the other hand, Bird & Bird Managing Partner Ivan Sagal does not feel there is a sole reason for Slovakia’s allure. “There does not seem to be one universal answer applicable to all the firms with a footprint in Slovakia. Instead, each of these firms follows their own strategy in terms of international expansion, and for those who are present here, the Slovak market simply fits into that strategy,” he says.

    “Of course, the strategic reasons are not rigid and may change over time, so while some firms might have initially come in the first wave of the ‘privatization harvest’ in the nineties, they have since established a sustainable local client base and are staying because their Slovak operations contribute to the success of their global business,” Sagal continues. “These later entrants sometimes paired up with or even absorbed existing local law firms whom they found appropriately large or reputable.”

    Additionally, Sagal thinks that the relatively early adoption of the euro in Slovakia, compared to “most CEE jurisdictions, might have also played the role in clients’ decision to set up here and consequently in creating the client base for international law firms.”

    Transnational Business

    And Slovakia’s strong economy generated a diversified market with many transnational businesses present.

    “Slovakia is a significant production hub for the automotive and electronics industries in the region,” Leontiev says. “International production facilities often use group subcontractors as well as group legal and tax advisors.” Leontiev believes that this nature of the businesses themselves is a reason international law firms are present. “If a law firm does not ‘follow’ its major clients into new territories, its long-lasting relationship in its original market can be endangered,” he explains.

    “Slovakia is a leader when it comes to automotive manufacturers, which value not only the country’s geography but also the green-field investment opportunities and state support Slovakia offers when choosing where to base their plants,” Hutan chimes in. “This, coupled with the stable and moderate political climate, EU membership, and relatively low labor costs, has made the country a hub for this sector and its suppliers.”

    Allen & Overy Managing Partner Martin Magal agrees with the point. “Slovakia has a small but very open economy,” he says. “Most of its GDP is generated by local subsidiaries of multinational corporations rather than by local champions. This generated a demand for sophisticated international-style legal services at a time when local law firms did not yet have the required expertise and size,” Magal explains. “International firms, therefore, found quite attractive conditions for setting up their operations in Slovakia.”

    … and How Come Firms Are Not Leaving?

    While many international firms have slowly pulled out of several CEE markets, Slovakia does not seem to have had experienced a considerable exodus. There are several potential reasons for that.

    Firstly, there’s the aforementioned overall economic strength of the Slovak market. “If I had to name one common denominator which makes the Slovak market interesting for any international law firm, it would be the overall economic landscape,” Pfeffer says. “The country is an inherent part of the region that is their natural ecosystem and strategic focus.”

    Secondly, there’s the calm political climate coupled with a well-diversified market. “Due to political developments and separation from the Czech Republic – a much larger market – Slovakia has never been considered to be a major market, so there was no significant pullback after most important privatization deals were concluded,” Leontiev explains. “Being a small market has some advantages. Among others, the expectations of an international law firm vis-a-vis its subsidiary on a small market are rather moderate. This gives the local management considerable ‘freedom’ in doing business.”

    Thirdly, there’s the legal expertise of local lawyers. “For CMS, Slovakia is considered a dynamic and growing market, and we are seeing more instructions from local clients seeking a high level of service and legal support, especially as they grow,” Hutan reports. “Another factor is that the best local lawyers are more than happy to work for international law firms rather than setting up their own boutique firms,” Magal adds. “That trend may not last forever but it is certainly bound to continue for at least another decade.”

    Fourthly, there is a strongly developing business habitat. “ I would emphasize our ever more transparent business environment – there is a real commitment from companies and our government to fight corruption and ease the processes for international businesses that wish to operate and invest in the country,” Hutan says.

    That said, “to be fair, over the years, Slovakia had its fair share of exits,” Sagal notes, adding “but I would agree that there was no significant exodus and in fact, international law firms successfully dealt with multiple spin-offs, former regulatory challenges, initial distrust of some client segments and growing sophistication of clients’ management of external legal budgets.”

    Sagal trusts that global law firms each have their own strategy and that they are “regularly evaluating whether their presence at certain markets fits into that strategy. Similar to other jurisdictions’ exits, those firms that pulled out of Slovakia each had their own different reasons, often purely internal, rather than collectively reacting to some adverse market change.”

    Of course, Sagal too considers there to be advantages of the Slovakian economy that sets it apart, if only just: “Cost of labor, geographic location, and strength in certain industrial segments are among the factors that are sometimes considered as advantages of the Slovak market – but specifically in the market of legal services, none of them has a sufficiently significant impact to be the driver behind strategic decisions. The fact that some firms that closed their offices in other CEE jurisdictions still stayed in Slovakia is, in my view, therefore driven by their internal reasons rather than some uniqueness of the Slovak market.”

    Local Spin-Offs

    After the privatization waves that saw international firms come in, many international offices saw a lot of spin-offs that strengthened the offering of local firms across the region. But has this been a case in Slovakia as well?

    “The ‘privatization’ time required for the development of deep-rooted international firms leaving Slovakia was relatively short, and that has also reflected on the spin-offs,” Leontiev explains. “Our experience is that if an international firm trusts the local management, which often manages the office as ‘its own,’ self-sufficient in business development and commercial strategy, the spin-off intentions are less frequent.”

    “Spin-offs are an inevitable feature of any maturing legal market, and Slovakia is no exception in this respect,” Pfeffer adds. “Many of these spin-offs are well-run, adhere to high professional standards, and possess a solid portfolio of clients. I believe they are a welcome complement to the local service offering, although, for big, complex or multijurisdictional mandates, the clients may still prefer international law firms.”

    Magal, on the one hand, believes that there were fewer spin-offs in Slovakia. “It is true that local spin-offs are a less frequent phenomenon than in other CEE countries,” he says. “This could be down to people looking for more stability – something an international platform can provide – as well as local lawyers being given more managerial responsibilities early on.”

    Sagal, on the other hand, believes there were more spin-offs. “Actually, there might have been more spin-offs in Slovakia than in some other CEE jurisdictions, but given the size of the market, they have been less visible. It has been a typical feature at the Slovak market for quite some time that experienced individuals or mini teams were leaving their original firms to either set up their own boutique operations or team up with other ‘leavers’ to do so at a larger scale, often initially serving predominantly one big client or a client group and then later evolving into more established local firms,” he explains. “As opposed to some other (bigger) markets, such departures often involved individuals below the partner level (i.e. early career moves), and that might be why they sometimes have not been recognized as traditional spin-offs.”

    With so Many Internationals – Is there Enough Work for All?

    Traditionally, international firms usually position themselves as targeting complex, big-ticket work. Given the size of the Slovak market, a logical question begs to be asked: Is there enough such work in the country to sustain the current number of international firms present?

    “If big-ticket work is a synonym for cross-border and multi-jurisdiction work then Slovakia is not and will never be very attractive,” Leontiev says. “However, many local businesses, mainly because of their commercial ties to foreign markets or foreign partners, appreciate international law firms’ standard of work. Acquiring this higher standard of legal services is often considered key to international success or attractive divesture of the shareholding.”

    Magal, too, believes that, while there isn’t a growth in these types of engagements – there are enough of them for the time being. “There is enough work to keep the firms that are already on the ground reasonably busy. Plus, there is a growing appetite from purely local clients to instruct international firms with their cross-border transactions,” he says. “I can even imagine existing international firms expanding further. See the example of Eversheds [Sutherland] opening an office last year, Dentons and Bird & Bird hiring more lawyers, and Allen & Overy and White & Case continue to record impressive results.”

    Hutan, as well, thinks that, while there might not necessarily be a lot of big-ticket work, this is not an issue. “In my view, a good international law firm should, as we do, care about more than just the complex/big-ticket work and invest time and energy into working for a range of clients and across a range of practice areas,” he says. “A lot depends on the market in terms of the number of these types of deals we might see. However, if an international firm solely chases big-ticket work and only focuses on those projects that will attract attention rather than taking a client-centric approach, they could potentially struggle,” he explains.

    Building on this view, Sagal shares his opinion that there isn’t, really, any work within the exclusive purview of international firms. “Given the development of the Slovak market over the last decade, there is hardly any area of service that would be reserved exclusively for international law firms, but equally, hardly any area that would be reserved exclusively for local firms either,” he argues. “The question, therefore, is no longer whether there is enough big-ticket work on the market for the internationals to sustain, but rather whether the particular firm’s quality of service and the ability to cultivate its base of clients and contacts is strong enough to maintain a healthy business operation. This applies equally to international as well as to local firms.”

    Looking Ahead

    Looking into the future, “on the one hand, the Slovak market of legal services is certainly more saturated than it was, let’s say, ten years ago,” Sagal comments, adding: “However, this statement was also true ten, 15, and 20 years ago – and in each case, it was followed by a trickle of further arrivals. Therefore, the straight answer is that it could go either way: it largely depends on a combination of the future performance of the Slovak economy and the degree of success of individual law firms in executing their international strategy with respect to Slovakia. There is definitely no universal factor present at the current Slovak legal market that would give an indication either way.”

    “I do not have a crystal ball, but there may be, as there often are, changes in the legal market,” Hutan adds. “Some firms with smaller offices dependent on doing the Slovak part of regional transactions could think at some future point that they do not need a presence here or others that are less established in the market or may struggle due to the competition.” Still, he does believe that Slovakia has many attractive qualities and is a dynamic market. For this reason, Hutan says that “CMS is certainly very committed to Slovakia and our clients here and is investing in our office due to a growing volume of work we are seeing, so we are without a doubt here to stay”

    “In my opinion, the legal market in Slovakia is relatively stable,” Pfeffer says, with a note of optimism. “Therefore, in the absence of any significant unforeseen circumstances, I don’t expect any major developments in this regard in the short to medium-term.”

    Finally, Leontiev is confident that Slovakia will continue on the path of being an attractive destination among international investors. “The geographical location, skilled workforce, and euro currency provide a fair comparative advantage to other similar jurisdictions,” he concludes, while remaining conscious of “larger geopolitical factors at play as well.”

    This article was written before the advent of the war in Ukraine and was originally published in Issue 9.2 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine on March 1, 2022. More current articles on developments in Ukraine can be found in our #StandWithUkraine section. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Kinstellar, Majernik & Mihalikova, Dentons, and AG Legal Advise on NN Group’s Acquisition of Majority Share in Finportal

    Kinstellar has advised NN Group on the acquisition of a majority share in Finportal from Arca Investment and Rudolf Adam. Majernik & Mihalikova advised Rudolf Adam on the deal. Dentons advised Arca Investment and AG Legal advised Finportal.

    NN Group is a group of financial services companies providing insurance, retirement services, pensions, banking, and investments in 11 countries.

    Finportal is the number-three financial intermediation service provider in Slovakia in terms of turnover.

    According to Kinstellar, “through its investment, NN intends to further strengthen its long-term cooperation with Finportal and is seeking areas for the mutual exchange of know-how, for example in digital solutions.”

    Kinstellar’s team in Bratislava included Partner Roman Oleksik, Managing Associate Dominika Bajzathova, and Associates Katarina Sowada and Erik Neupaver.

    Majernik & Mihalikova’s team included Partners Katarína Mihalikova and Ivan Kormaník, Of Counsel Michal Ranostaj, Senior Associate Michaela Lipkova, and Associate David Kozak.

    Dentons’ team included Bratislava-based Partners Juraj Gyarfas and Patricia Gossanyiova and Prague-based Partners Pavel Bogusky and Jiri Tomola.

    AG Legal’s team was led by Partner Andrej Galik.

    Editorial Note: This article originally erroneously stated that AG Legal had advised Arca Investments. The article has been corrected.