Category: Russia

  • White & Case Advises EN+ on Largest Russian IPO Since 2012

    White & Case Advises EN+ on Largest Russian IPO Since 2012

    White & Case LLP has advised EN+, an aluminium and power producer with core assets located in Russia, on the offering of global depositary receipts admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange and the Moscow Exchange.

    According to White & Case, the total size of the transaction, which the firm describes as “the largest Russian IPO globally since 2012,” amounts to USD 1.5 billion at the offer price, of which USD 1 billion is primary proceeds and USD .5 billion is a secondary component, excluding the over-allotment option.

    The White & Case team advising on the transaction was led by Partners Darina Lozovsky (Moscow & London) and Jonathan Parry (London), with support from London-based Counsel Doron Loewinger and Associate Alexander Underwood and Moscow Associates Renat Akhmetzyanov, Amulang Povaeva, Yulia Akulinina, and Anastasia Sheyndlina.

    White & Case did not reply to a request for more information about the matter.

  • Goltsblat BLP Advises Lenders on Hydro Power Plant Financing

    Goltsblat BLP Advises Lenders on Hydro Power Plant Financing

    Goltsblat BLP has advised the Eurasian Development Bank and the International Investment Bank on financing provided for the construction of two hydro-power plants with a total capacity of 49.8 MW in the Russian Republic of Karelia.

    The team of lawyers from Goltsblat BLP and law firms from the Cayman Islands, the Netherlands, the Republic of Cyprus and Saudi Arabia was led by GBLP Banking & Finance Partner Oleg Khokhlov and Senior Associate Igor Zhivotov. The Banking & Finance team also included Head of Group Tatiana Parshak and Associate Artemiy Bondarev. The deal was supported by a BLP Goltsblat Corporate team led by Partner Ian Ivory and Senior Associate Dmitry Antipin. Real Estate and Construction support was provided by Heads of Group Dmitry Ilyin and Dmitry Maltsev.

    Editor’s Note: After this article was published CEE Legal Matters learned that the borrower was Nord Hydro – Belyi Porog and that the loan totaling RUB 8.15 million, was extended for twelve years. The total project value is RUB 11.8 billion. The financial investors in the project are the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) and its foreign partners, including leading Near East sovereign funds and SINOMEC, China’s state-owned corporation. The Federal Corporation for the Development of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SME Corporation) will provided a RUB 4.07 billion guarantee as security for NHBP’s loan of RUB 8.15 billion. 

  • Three New Partners Join Trubor’s Dispute Resolution Practice

    Three New Partners Join Trubor’s Dispute Resolution Practice

    The Trubor Law Office has announced the strengthening of its Dispute Resolution Practice through the accession of new partners Varvara Knutova, Dmitry Savochkin, and Vadim Kodol.

    Prior to joining the Trubor, Varvara Knutova headed the International Arbitration Group of the Pepeliaev Group for six years, and then she was the head of the Dispute Resolution Group at Goltsblat BLP. She has extensive experience working with large Russian and international companies and specializes in conflict of law issues, regulating international trade, resolving domestic litigation and arbitration disputes, international commercial arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, and bankruptcy procedures.

    Before moving to Trubor, Dmitry Savochkin successfully represented the interests of large Russian and foreign companies in complex property and corporate disputes as part of Monastyrsky, Zyuba, Stepanov & Partners and Goltsblat BLP. His experience includes judicial protection of the business from attempts to seize and protect the interests of investors in disputes over obtaining and retaining control over business, disputes in international commercial arbitration in the field of construction contracts, as well as complex support for bankruptcies.

    Vadim Kodol previously worked in private practice, heading the Dispute Resolution groups at major Russian law firms. With 21 years of legal experience, he represented the interests of Russian and foreign companies and private individuals in litigation over insolvency cases, corporate disputes, and disputes over rights to immovable property. He is also specialized in the criminal legal protection of business for economic crimes. “Partners of the bureau are leading Russian lawyers, whose knowledge and experience enable them to successfully solve the most complex and extraordinary tasks of clients,” said Kodol.

  • Anti-Corruption Developments in Russia in the First Half of 2017

    In 2016, Russian law enforcement authorities had some success in investigating and combatting bribery. For the first time in several years, the majority of cases involved bribe-taking, rather than bribe-giving, and involved significant bribe amounts. The number of cases against bribe-takers increased by 19.7% from 2015, while the number of cases against bribe-givers increased by only 4.4%. This trend continued in the first half of 2017; the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs and law enforcement authorities registered 3,362 cases of bribery, of which 2015 cases concerned bribe-taking and 1,347 cases concerned bribe-giving. 

    Though the average amount of a bribe remains rather low (RUB 326,000 in 2016 (approximately USD 5,566)), in the first half of 2017 several major bribery cases were commenced. For example, in April 2017, the governor of one of Russia’s constituent entities was charged with taking a bribe in amount of RUB 236 million (approximately USD 4 million) for entering into a conspiracy aimed at the preferential provision of state subsidies to a company owned by a regional parliament member. The bribe was transferred by means of a sale of shares in an entity controlled by the governor. Several persons involved in the case were taken into custody, including the governor and intermediaries in the transaction. This case follows another investigation against a governor, who earlier this year was accused of taking RUB 140 million (approximately USD 2.4 million) from several construction firms for preference in getting payments from the state budget and granting subsoil use licenses. The governor was arrested. Both cases are under investigation. 

    In 2017, the State Duma adopted a law that introduced a register of persons dismissed from office due to loss of trust. This register, which will start operating on January 1, 2018, will include state and municipal officials as well as officers of certain companies (in particular, state corporations and organizations established to fulfill assignments given to a federal state authority) who were terminated for committing corruption-related crimes. Though the law currently does not directly provide any consequences for being entered onto the register, in practice inclusion will prevent individuals from further employment in state and municipal authorities and institutions and companies rendering public functions and cause major reputational damage. 

    Effective enforcement of anticorruption measures and prevention of corruption crimes depends significantly on international cooperation, as proceeds from corruption offences as well as transactions aimed at their “laundering” often reside outside Russia. Russia’s National Plan on Counteracting Corruption for 2016-17 declared international cooperation in this field to be one of its main aims, stating that such cooperation would assist with the discovery, seizure, and return of ill-gotten assets. Moreover, it stated that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs should actively participate in international anticorruption events, such as the anticorruption working groupsof APEC, G-20, and BRICS. 

    One of the first examples of international anticorruption investigation involving the participation of Russian law enforcement authorities was the Teva Pharmaceuticals case. In December 2016, Teva, a leading pharmaceutical manufacturer, agreed to pay USD 519 million in penalties in a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission as a result of an FCPA investigation against the company. Teva was accused of entering into a conspiracy to win state tenders for the supply of pharmaceuticals and increasing the sales of its drugs to the state with a high-ranking Russian state official who controlled the company’s Russian distributor. The Israeli and U.S. law enforcement authorities that carried out the investigation applied to the Russian Investigative Committee for the provision of documents and materials required to push the case forward. The Investigative Committee, in its turn, cooperated with the Russian Ministry of Healthcare in collecting evidence. However, it is yet to be seen whether a criminal and/or administrative illegal remuneration case against Teva and its officers will be commenced in Russia.

    By Dmitri Nikiforov, Partner, Anna Maximenko, International Counsel, and Elena Klutchareva, Associate, Debevoise & Plimpton

    This Article was originally published in Issue 4.9 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Liniya Prava Supports Obuv Rossii on IPO

    Liniya Prava Supports Obuv Rossii on IPO

    Liniya Prava has supported Obuv Rossii PJSC in its September 2017 RUB 6 billion IPO on the Moscow Exchange. 

    The IPO of Obuv Rossii — Russia’s second largest footwear retailer — is only the second on the Moscow market this year, following Detsky Mir’s in February (as reported by CEE Legal Matters on February 20, 2018).

    According to Liniya Prava, “bookbuilding was closed on October 19, at 19:00. On October 20, securities were admitted to trading. The total offering amounts to approximately RUB 6.2 billion in case of full exercise of the over-allotment option or approximately RUB 5.9 billion without such option. As of November 22, 2017, the market capitalization of Obuv Rossii amounted to approximately RUB 15.24 billion.” 

    Liniya Prava advised Obuv Rossii on Russian law matters. The firm’s team was led by Partner Oleg Bychkov and Associate Irina Laier.

    Liniya Prava did not reply to an inquiry on the matter.

    Editor’s Note: After this article was published Liniya Prava informed CEE Legal Matters that the VIC Global Markets, Citigroup, Renaissance Capital, and Sberbank CIB were the global coordinators and joint book-runners, and that White & Case and Latham & Watkins were involved as well. White & Case did not reply to an inquiry on the matter. 

  • Cleary Gottlieb Obtains Approval in Court of Arbitration for Sport for Settlement Between Russian Star and International Ice Hockey Federation

    Cleary Gottlieb Obtains Approval in Court of Arbitration for Sport for Settlement Between Russian Star and International Ice Hockey Federation

    The Court of Arbitration for Sport has approved what Cleary Gottlieb is calling “a highly favorable settlement agreement” involving Cleary client and Russian ice hockey player Danis Zaripov, resolving his appeal of the two-year ineligibility period imposed on him by the IIHF Disciplinary Board in July 2017, and permitting him to resume playing professional ice hockey. 

    Zaripov is a three-time winner of the IIHF World Championship with the Russian national team and four-time winner of the Kontinental Hockey League’s (KHL) Gagarin Cup.  

    According to Cleary Gottlieb, “on November 21, 2017, the Court of Arbitration for Sport issued a Consent Award approving the settlement agreement between the IIHF and Mr. Zaripov, reducing the previously imposed ineligibility period to six months, ending on November 23, 2017. Accordingly, as of November 23, 2017, Mr. Zaripov is cleared to participate in all competitions or activities authorized or organized by the IIHF or any IIHF Member National Association. The Consent Award issued by CAS embodies the parties’ settlement agreement, and, based upon extensive documentary and expert evidence that was unavailable to the IIHF Disciplinary Board when it rendered its prior decision, confirms, inter alia, that (i) Danis Zaripov did not engage in intentional doping and had no intention to cheat; and (ii) the source of the substance that was the subject of the challenged IIHF Disciplinary Board decision was a contaminated product.  Accordingly, the Consent Award provides that the July 2017 decision of the IIHF Disciplinary Board shall be set aside and that pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement Mr. Zaripov is cleared to participate in all competitions or activities authorized or organized by the IIHF or any IIHF Member National Association as of November 23, 2017.”

    Earlier this year Cleary Gottlieb also represented Zaripov in his successful application to North America’s National Hockey League to be declared eligible to play in the league.

    The Cleary Gottlieb core team win this most recent matter was led by Partners Murat Akuyev in Moscow and Christopher Moore in London, with the support in London of Associates Rikki Stern and Marina Zarubin and in Moscow of Associate Alexander Golovkin. Partner Jeffrey Rosenthal, in New York, led the team in connection with Zaripov’s application and presentation to the NHL to determine his eligibility.

  • The Buzz in Russia: Interview with Alexei Roudiak of Herbert Smith Freehills

    The Buzz in Russia: Interview with Alexei Roudiak of Herbert Smith Freehills

    “We’ve been living through crisis days since the first wave of sanctions in 2014,” says Alexei Roudiak, the Managing Partner of Herbert Smith Freehills in Russia, “but looking back 12-18 months or even 12-24 months, things started to pick up, and we’ve noticed a greater amount of activity across the board, but primarily in the energy sector.” Not only energy (primarily hydrocarbons and hard rock mining), he says after reflecting, “but also pharma, retail, financial institutions, litigation (both domestic and cross-border) … we have been busy across all areas for the last 18 months.”

    He hesitates when it’s suggested that it sounds like things are going very well. “Being busy and things going very well are two different things,” he notes after pausing. “It’s not correct to say things are going really well. Saying that would be a bit of a stretch. It’s become more difficult to make money in a depressed market like this, where there’s pressure on fees, higher competition for a smaller amount of work, and so on.” So why is there’s a greater level of activity than one would expect? “First of all,” he says, “nobody knows what to expect in a situation like this, with Western sanctions, depressed oil prices, and so on. And indeed, there was a slowdown in activity at first … but people got used to it. And the sanctions are only affecting particular sectors and areas, but there’s a great deal of activity in other areas and sectors – once valuations in non-affected sectors got adjusted downwards (which they did over the last three years), people started pricing all sorts of risks in and that creates greater levels of activity. There is always appetite for Russian assets if the price is right” In addition, he suggests, “people also develop a kind of resilience to changing circumstances. The market adapts, people adapt.” Finally, he says, “as an example of a somewhat unexpected outcome, the counter-sanctions which ban the import of agricultural products from the EU, boosted the domestic agri-sector.” Taken together, he says, “although the growth is not as steep as before, it’s still there.”

    In addition, Roudiak points out, much of the investment previously coming from the West is now coming from other sources. “There’s been a tangible, really visible swap, in the foreign investor base,” he says. “After the introduction of sanctions the Western funding pipeline effectively dried up — there was a period where you wouldn’t see any Western money coming into the country.” This is still more or less true, he says, “which is not great for Western and American companies that are missing opportunities — but this vacuum is being filled in by Japanese and other Asian investors in various industries and sectors.” And in terms of a new inflow of foreign capital there’s generally been a tangible shift to the East. And we’ve started doing more work for Asian companies: our offices in Asia helped immediately. We had always been doing a lot of work for our Asian clients but with Western sanctions we doubled — if not tripled — our efforts to drum up more business from Asia.”

    Still, the sanctions and economic problems undeniably had an effect on law firm business in the country. “It effected everyone,” Roudiak concedes. “And most international firms downsized” — especially the smaller international firms which focused on one or two primary practices; those “putting all their eggs in one basket,” as he puts it “or those who did not have time to develop into a more diversified fully-fledged business.” His office, Roudiak says, chose a different path. “I’ve always thought that the key of success of an ILF in a national market is to build up a solid local client base, so we’ve always placed our bets on the quality of Russian clientele, so that helped. We’ve held on to our best Russian clients — Western clients with established business operations in Russia did not pack their bags and leave; new investors didn’t come in, but the established investors stayed.”

    Turning to a rosier subject, Roudiak commented to the ongoing reform of Russia’s commercial legislation and the overhaul of the Russian Civil Code which started about six or seven years ago. In his opinion, these reforms “make the country more business friendly and introduce more tools and instruments to promote Russian law.”  The biggest M&A deals are still structured under English law, he says, “which is one of the reasons why our firm maintains fully-fledged English law capabilities here on the ground,” but the reforms “are a sign of Russia’s ambitions to promote its own code and legislation.” The Herbert Smith Freehills Managing Partner isn’t naive about the process. “It’s not going to happen overnight,” he concedes, “and it’s going to be a long and sometimes bumpy road. But the general trend is there, and we’re seeing more and more deals with a greater number of documents governed by Russian law.” He says, “we welcome this — this is a great thing to see. I’m a Russian lawyer, and I‘ve been doing deals under English law as long as I’ve been practicing, but a country like mine deserves a well-developed functioning commercial legislation.”

    The European Union, where the GDPR will be implemented in spring of 2018, is not alone in its concern for data privacy, Roudiak says. “Data protection is a big topic here too, and there’s been a major overhaul of data protection regulation, with more strict requirements.” LinkedIn, for instance, was famously banned in the country after it failed to base its servers in Russia to maintain the data of Russian users. Roudiak pauses to try the LinkedIn app on his phone before reporting that it still doesn’t work. “So I guess they still haven’t sorted it out,” he says. “I haven’t heard of any other prominent examples like LinkedIn right now, but there are articles or posts on social networks on an almost daily basis about how Facebook is going to be shut down, or twitter, but fortunately that has not happened yet.” Still, he points out, “that sort of theme or topic is always in the air in Russian media.”

    Finally, Roudiak is asked what new legislation is on the horizon. “Things often come unexpectedly from our legislator,” he says, “so it can be difficult to predict. But as a general observation — and this is not unique to Russia — people are becoming more protectionist when it comes to foreign ownership of strategic interests in the country.” As a result, he says, “Russia began introducing legislation on this point seven or eight years ago to require special approval from a commission headed by the Prime Minister for deals involving such investments, and there have been recent amendments to this, tightening, closing loopholes, etc. It’s only natural of the government to keep an eye on this.”

    Another important initiative that is underway, he says, is a major overhaul of the regulations and qualification requirements for the legal profession that will affect the entire industry. And while most of the long-awaited changes are aimed at better regulating professional conduct and the way lawyers conduct their business, some of them, “driven by a narrow-sighted protectionist sentiment, are aimed at banning international law firms from the market.” Roudiak expresses his displeasure: “This is not a model that I would want my country to follow.”      

  • Partner Vasilii Markov Joins Dentons from Deloitte with Team of Tax Practitioners

    Partner Vasilii Markov Joins Dentons from Deloitte with Team of Tax Practitioners

    Partner Vasilii Markov has joined Dentons as Head of the Tax group in St. Petersburg, bringing with him a team of seven additional tax practitioners.

    Markov comes to Dentons from Deloitte, where he was Head of the Technology, Media and Telecommunications practice in the Tax and Legal department. He has more than 11 years of experience advising Russian and international clients on tax matters, with a primary focus on the technology sector. He holds a Ph.D. in economics.

    Victor Naumov, Managing Partner of Dentons’ St. Petersburg office, said, “I am delighted to welcome Vasilii and his high-powered team to our firm. His experience of successfully implementing large, complex projects for both businesses and government authorities in the CIS and his unique knowledge of tax incentives in Russia will certainly strengthen our Tax practice. Vasilii will also help expand our tax offering in innovation, digital economy and public-private partnerships.”

    Partner Dzhangar Dzhalchinov, Head of Dentons’ Tax practice in Russia, said, “Vasilii Markov’s team will considerably strengthen our expertise in the area of tax benefits and will add a new line: state support services. We have long sought a practitioner to address the growing client demand in technology, media and telecommunications projects, and Vasilii is a market leader in this area.”

    Commenting on his appointment, Vasilii Markov said, “I am very glad to join such a dynamically developing Tax practice and can’t wait to start working as part of this professional team.”

    This is the second team to join Dentons’ Tax practice in Russia in 2017, following the move earlier in the year by a team of five tax professionals from Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners. The firm’s Tax practice has now grown to 29 practitioners in Russia. Dentons also recently strengthened its Europe Tax group with the recruitment of several new partners in the Netherlands, Italy, and Benelux.

  • Russian Elena Stepanenko Promoted to Partner at Baker Botts

    Russian Elena Stepanenko Promoted to Partner at Baker Botts

    Moscow-based lawyer Elena Stepanenko is one of eleven lawyers promoted to partner worldwide by Baker Botts.

    According to Baker Botts, Stepanenko, whose promotion becomes effective on January 1, 2018, “has experience in cross-border and domestic mergers, acquisitions, and corporate restructurings, as well as finance and asset finance (including aircraft financing and leasing).” The firm reports that she “advises clients on a broad range of regulatory issues, including securities regulations, bankruptcy, antimonopoly, privatization and banking law, currency regulation, and corporate matters,” and that she “also has significant experience advising on regulations on power and electricity markets in the Russian Federation.”

    “This is an outstanding class of lawyers, who are key to our success, as they represent the future leadership of our firm,” said Baker Botts Managing Partner Andrew Baker. “They showcase our diversity, represent the communities in which we work and live, and highlight our ongoing commitment to providing our clients with the highest level of service.”

  • Goltsblat BLP Announces New Head of Group for Arbitration and White Collar Defense

    Goltsblat BLP Announces New Head of Group for Arbitration and White Collar Defense

    Goltsblat BLP has announced that Julia Romanova has joined the team as Head of Group, International Arbitration, White Collar Criminal Defense.

    Before joining Goltsblat BLP, Romanova was Head of the Litigation/Arbitration Practice of the Moscow Office of Chadbourne & Parke. Her practice focuses on litigation, arbitration, bankruptcy, and white collar criminal cases. She has over 20 years’ experience of representing clients’ interests before Russian courts and various state authorities.

    According to BLP Goltsblat, “over the past 13 years, Julia has prepared expert evidence on Russian law for international arbitration tribunals and foreign courts (England, the USA, the Netherlands, Cyprus, and the BVI) and has assisted clients participating in such proceedings. Julia is also involved in providing legal assistance in criminal cases, acting as defense attorney or representing injured parties and civil claimants and civil defendants in criminal cases. She has extensive experience with international, multilateral lending institutions on recovery and restructuring matters and has participated in general due diligence reviews of numerous Russian companies.”

    Over the last few years, Goltsblat BLP reports, its Dispute Resolution Practice —which consists of 40 associates and advocates, including nine partners — has become “one of the firm’s key practice areas, enjoying the greatest demand.”

    Andrey Goltsblat, Managing Partner, Head of Dispute Resolution, Goltsblat BLP, says: “We are happy to have Julia Romanova on our team. Her expertise fits perfectly with our firm’s development strategy in this respect and will strengthen our leading positions on the market so that our clients’ needs and expectations are met most effectively.”

    Julia Romanova says: “I am happy to join such a strong Goltsblat BLP team and become part of one of the most distinguished litigation teams on the market. The firm’s growth tempo and the level of its projects are both impressive and inspiring.”