Category: Russia

  • YUST Advises Rusgazdobycha on Gas Plant Construction Partnership with Gazprom

    YUST has advised Rusgazdobycha JSC on the preliminary stage of an agreement with Gazprom to build a gas plant in the Leningrad region of Russia.

    The capacity of the production complex, which will be in the Ust-Luga District of Leningrad Oblast, will be up to 45 billion cubic meters of gas per year. The project is valued at approximately USD 20 billion.

    According to YUST, gas purification will be performed at the gas plant and the resulting methane will be delivered to Baltic LNG for liquefaction. It is expected that of some of the gas will be exported along the Nord Stream-2 line — a new export gas pipeline running from Russia to Europe across the Baltic Sea.

    The YUST team consisted of Associated Partners Roman Cherlenyak and Alexander Rudyakov.

  • EPAM Successful for St. Petersburg Bank in English High Court Against Vitaly Arkhangelsky and Oslo Marine Group Ports

    Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners has successfully represented Bank Saint Petersburg in a case against Russian entrepreneur Vitaly Arkhangelsky and Oslo Marine Group Ports LLC before the High Court of Justice. The Court ordered Oslo Marine Group Ports to pay St. Petersburg Bank over RUB 1.5 billion and dismissed the counterclaim of Arkhangelsky and OMG.

    From 2006 to 2008 OMG Ports and Arkhangelsky borrowed more than RUB 14 billion from eight Russian banks, including Bank St. Petersburg. However, in 2009 OMG Ports defaulted on its loans, and Arkhangelsky fled Russia to seek asylum in France.

    Subsequently, Bank St. Petersburg became involved in a long-running dispute with Arkhangelsky including over 20 claims in Russia, Bulgaria, and the British Virgin Islands. Arkhangelsky also made a counterclaim against the bank, alleging that its actions against OMG constituted a “fraudulent raiding” scheme on OMG’s assets, worth USD 500 million.

    In 2011 the parties agreed to refer the dispute to the High Court of Justice for resolution. As a result, the Court dismissed Arkhangelsky’s USD 500 million claim against Bank St. Petersburg and granted the bank’s claim to recover RUB 1.8 billion from Arkhangelsky under various loan and suretyship agreements.

    According to the High Court of Justice, Arkhangelsky remains in debt not only to Bank St. Petersburg, but also to Vnesheconombank, VTB, Bank Vozrozhdenie, Sviaz-Bank, Master Bank, Marine Joint-Stock Bank, Energomashbank, and Lipetskcombank.

    The EPAM team consisted of Saint Petersburg Office Managing Partner Ivan Smirnov, Senior Associate Evgeny Gurchenko, and Associate Ays Lidjanova.

  • Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Successful for Prosveshcheniye Publishing House in Trademark Litigation

    The Moscow office of Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner has successfully represented the Prosveshcheniye publishing house in an intellectual property rights dispute against Russian publishing house Ventana-Graf, part of the Russkiy Uchebnik Corporation. The Court ordered Ventana-Graf to pay Prosvescheniye RUB 3.7 billion as compensation for trademark infringement.

    Ventana-Graf produces around 600 types of printed materials containing a logo similar to Prosveshcheniye’s trademark. According to the Russian Public Opinion Research Center, 80% of customers confused the brands. In the course of the litigation, Ventana-Graf admitted that its brand logo was based on Prosveshcheniye’s trademark.

    The Court ruled that the Ventana-Graf products are counterfeit and subject to liquidation.  

    The Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner team consisted of Partner Elena Trusova and Senior Associate Anton Nefedev.

  • White & Case Advises VTB Bank on Financing for M.video Acquisition of Eldorado

    White & Case has advised VTB Bank on a secured term loan provided to Russian retail chain PJSC M.video for the acquisition of shares in the Russian retail chain Eldorado.

    PJSC M.video is a member of the SAFMAR Group, which White & Case reports intends to consolidate its retail assets by the first quarter of 2019 and become a key player in the Russian consumer electronics retail market.

    “Given the current environment, this important deal is a landmark financing in the Russian market,” says Moscow-based White & Case Local Partner Ekaterina Logvinova, who co-led the firm’s team with Partner Natalia Nikitina. They were supported by Associates Natalia Tsimbalova, Adel Shageev, Ilyana Scherbakova, and Maria Kulmukhametova.

    White & Case did not reply to our inquires.

  • Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner and S&K Vertical Engaged in Dispute Over Big Data Rights Between Double and VKontakte

    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner has represented the interests of Double LLC, a software developer for searching, storing, and analyzing large amounts of data, in a dispute with the social network VKontakte over the use of open data from a social network on the principle of a search engine. VKontakte was represented by S&K Vertical.

    According to Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, “this case is unprecedented and innovative for Russian court practice, since for the first time the Intellectual Property Court (SIP) considers whether public data on users in a social network is a database, and their use by universal and specialized search engines is a violation of intellectual property rights.” The firm has also stated that this case can become decisive for the growing industry working in the field of Big Data, as well as for search engines such as Yandex, Google, etc., which also use open data on the Internet.

    The court of first instance recognized Double’s activity as legal, but the second instance court sided with VKontakte and recognized Double’s actions as violating the intellectual rights of VKontakte on the social network. Double then asked SIP to keep in force the decision of the court of first instance, which concluded that VKontakte did not have exclusive rights to the user database and that Double did not extract or use data of users in violation of the law. 

    On May 22, 2018, the Intellectual Property Court ordered a new consideration of the case on the merits. 

    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner’s team included Partner Elena Trusova and Counsels Evgeny Oreshin and Natalia Belomestnova. Trusova commented on the case: “The significance of this dispute for Russian practice goes far beyond the dispute about the rights to the database; the decision can influence the fate of the possibility of analyzing open data on the Internet. In fact, the decision will determine whether user data will be considered as the unconditional property of social networks and social networks can dispose of them at their own discretion without being interested in the opinions of users, or users can decide for themselves who may analyze their data. Foreign judicial practice assumes that it is unacceptable for private companies to be authorized to prohibit access to information posted on their website – this can pose a dangerous threat to guaranteed free information exchange on the Internet. Bigap’s monopolization on the Internet is not permissible.”

    “According to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, in the opinion of the largest Russian and foreign scientists, in foreign and international practice, the right to the database arises only when the database was the result of targeted investment, rather than a by-product,” added Oreshin. “In addition, the activities of search engines, which include Double software (archiving information from sites, preparing an index for search based on such an archive, issuing hyperlinks for search queries with fragments of information from sites), should not be considered as improper extraction and use of materials from sites on the Internet, otherwise users will not be able to search the Internet.” 

    S&K Vertical’s team included Partner Andrey Mikonin, with Attorneys at Law Alena Bachinskaya and Lidiya Brezgulevskaya.

  • The Buzz in Russia: Interview with Andrei Gusev of Borenius

    The Buzz in Russia: Interview with Andrei Gusev of Borenius

    “The biggest challenge for companies in Russia today is the serious administrative burden,” says Andrei Gusev, Managing Partner at Borenius Russia. “There are a huge number of outdated conglomerate regulations in various sectors, applied since the Soviet times, that leads to contradictions among requirements and regulations.”

    According to Gusev, authorities strictly monitor compliance with corporate regulations and conduct numerous checks, which, as a consequence, creates tension in companies, forcing them to commit considerable time and energy into ensuring compliance. “This distracts from the development of business,” he says.

    Yet some efforts have been made to lessen that burden on companies, according to Gusev, including, most notably, amendments made in 2016 to the law of December 26, 2008 No. 294-FZ “On the Protection of the Rights of Legal Entities and Individual Entrepreneurs During State Control (Supervision) and Municipal Control,” which, among other things, imposes a moratorium on inspections of small and medium-sized businesses. “This has had a positive effect on small and medium enterprises,” he says, adding that, although the moratorium is set to expire in December 2018, expectations are that it will be extended. 

    At the end of 2017, Gusev says, Russia’s tax law underwent major changes as well, clarifying how the tax base is calculated. Earlier, the concept of tax evasion resulting from the use of artificial structures was based only on judicial practice, whereas today there is a norm of direct action, which, he says, means that “liability is imposed on taxpayers who use formal ways to escape payments of taxes.” According to Gusev, the new approach is seen as a game changer because it crossed over the massive court practice built over years.

    Going forward, Gusev reports that Russia’s plan to impose counter-sanctions on the West is an important issue in the country and will bring some legal challenges and, hence, lawyers’ work. According to him, the first reading of a draft law on counter-sanctions is scheduled for May 15, 2018. The draft law allows the Government to impose new measures against the US and its allies. “I think it’s quite a firm draft bill, with a mechanism that mandates the government to establish concrete measures.” 

    Russia’s Federal Law No. 214-FZ on the Participation in Shared Construction of Apartment Houses and Other Immovable Property Units comes into force in July 2018. “On the one hand,” Gusev says, “shared construction has had a positive social effect by providing an opportunity for young families to buy apartments.” On the other hand, he explains, a lot of people were lured to invest in infrastructure and cooperated directly with construction companies, without having insurance that the property would be transferred to them. Thus “shared construction led to a high level of bankruptcy and hoodwinked investors in the country.” The new law is promising, he reports, as shared construction will be substituted by project financing, providing more control over the process. However, he says, “The change restricts market growth and raises the costs of living.”

    Finally, Gusev mentions the ongoing discussion on reforms in the legal profession. “Some proposed changes were quite controversial,” he says, “from the introduction of advocates’ monopoly to the ban for international law firms to operate in the Russian market.” None of those proposals have been adopted so far, but according to him, “if those changes happen in the form they are currently proposed in, it will change the entire market, and the quality of legal services in the market may drop.”

     

  • EPAM Successful for Beluga Group in Trademark Dispute with Shampanskiye Vina

    EPAM Successful for Beluga Group in Trademark Dispute with Shampanskiye Vina

    Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners has represented publicly owned joint-stock company Alviz, subsidiary to the Beluga Group, in an intellectual property rights dispute against LLC Shampanskiye Vina.

    According to EPAM, Arkhangelsk-based liquor factory Alviz had already been producing vodka under the “Arkhangelskaya” brand when, in 2010, its competitor Shampanskiye Vina registered the brand name “Arkhangelsk”. In 2017 Shampanskiye Vina applied to the Artbitral Court of Arkhangelsk region with a claim for trade mark infringement, seeking to liquidate the counterfeit, and obtain compensation for damages.  

    EPAM proved to the Arbitral Court that the two brands were dissimilar, and that the statute of limitations had expired. As a result of the court’s decision, Alviz retained the right to manufacture products under the “Arkhangelskaya” brand. In addition, Russia’s Federal Anti-Monopoly Service issued a decision that the Shampanskiye Vina registration and use of the brand name “Arkhangelsk” constituted an act of unfair competition and ruled that the official authorization of the brand “Arkhangelsk” was invalid.

    On appeal, the Intellectual Property Group upheld the Arbitral Court’s judgment.

    The EPAM team consisted of Partner Dmitry Dyakin, Counsels Denis Gavrilov and Pavel Sadovsky, Senior Associate Irina Kosovskaya, Associate Alexander Balyberdin, and Junior Associate Stepan Abramov.vza.

     

  • Russian Lawyer Alexander Rymko Joins Harneys in Cyprus

    Russian Lawyer Alexander Rymko Joins Harneys in Cyprus

    Former Hogan Lovells Partner Alexander Rymko has joined the Harneys law firm in Cyprus as International Senior Counsel in the firm’s banking and finance and investment funds and regulatory practices.

    Rymko has practiced law in the financial services sector for more than 20 years, and he represents lenders and borrowers in cross-border financings across a variety of industry sectors. Prior to Harneys, Rymko spent 10 and a half years at Hogan Lovells (where he headed the Banking/Finance practice) and 18 months at Dentons Wilde Sapte (now Dentons), both in Moscow. He also has previous experience as the Head of Legal at HSBC Bank in Russia as a Legal Advisor at Credit Lyonnais Rusbank.

    Rymko joins Harneys along with new Partner George Apostolou. “The combined experience of George and Alexander greatly enhances our service offering and strengthens our market-leading position as one of the top law firms in Cyprus. We are very pleased to see our firm go from strength to strength,” said Pavlos Aristodemou, Managing Partner of Harneys in Cyprus.

    “Harneys has an excellent reputation,” Rymko said, “and I am extremely pleased to be cooperating with the firm during an exciting period of international growth and expansion.”

    Harneys’ Cyprus office was founded in 2006 as Aristodemou Loizides Yiolitis & Co and in 2009 merged with Harneys to become the first international law firm in Cyprus. According to a Harneys’ press release, the office now has “more than 20 qualified lawyers including six partners.”

     

  • Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Successfully for VimpelCom Against Russian Federal Antimonopoly Service over SMS tariffs

    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Successfully for VimpelCom Against Russian Federal Antimonopoly Service over SMS tariffs

    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner has successfully represented mobile operator VimpelCom in a dispute with the Russian Federal Antimonopoly Service over changes to B2B SMS service tariffs. 

    Nikolay Voznesenskiy, Partner at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, commented: “We have been pleased to act for VimpelCom in this intricate dispute and are grateful for the trust they put in our firm. FAS of Russia decisions are becoming better and better in quality as time goes on, making it increasingly difficult to challenge the competition watchdog’s conclusions in court. This win was made possible by the valuable efforts of the entire team and the effective defense strategy we developed together with the client’s in-house legal function.” 

    The Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner team was led by Partner and Head of Antitrust and Competition Nikolay Voznesenskiy. The project task force included Antitrust and Competition Associates Anna Bakhaeva and Alexander Biryukov, with Partner Vitaly Dianov.

     

  • Pepeliaev Group Gets Appointed to Advise Gazprom PJSC on Tax Issues

    Pepeliaev Group Gets Appointed to Advise Gazprom PJSC on Tax Issues

    The Pepeliaev Group has won three tenders to provide Gazprom PJSC legal and consulting services, audits in relation to taxes and social security contributions, and representation of Gazprom before state and judicial authorities.

    According to the Pepeliaev Group, the services will be supplied for the benefit of a number of Gazprom subsidiaries, including Gazprom Dobycha Astrakhan, Gazprom Dobycha Krasnodar, Gazprom Transgaz Stavropol, Gazprom Transgaz Krasnodar, Gazprom Transgaz Makhachkala, Gazprom Dobycha Orenburg, Gazprom Pererabotka, Gazprom PHG, Gazprom Transgaz Moscow, Gazprom Transgaz Nizhny Novgorod, Gazprom Transgaz Samara, Gazprom Transgaz Saratov, Gazprom Transgaz Ufa, Gazprom Dobycha Noyabrsk, Gazprom Dobycha Urengoy, Gazprom Dobycha Yamburg, Gazprom Transgaz Surgut, Gazprom Transgaz Tomsk, and Gazprom Transgaz Ukhta.