Category: Russia

  • Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Advises ESN Group on Sale of First OFD to VTB Group

    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Advises ESN Group on Sale of First OFD to VTB Group

    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Russia has advised Orion LLC, an ESN Group company, on its sale of a 100% stake in fiscal data operator First OFD to the VTB Group.

    According to Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, “First OFD processes and transfers fiscal data in near-real-time mode from cash registers to the Federal Tax Service of Russia. The company serves about 400,000 cash registers and is one of the three largest fiscal data operators in Russia, with a market share of approximately 16%.”

    The Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner team was directed by Partner Anton Sitnikov and included Senior Associates Oksana Orlovskaya, Kseniya Shevchenko, and Anastasia Kudryashova, Counsel Anton Nefedev, Junior Associates Mikhail Erokhin, Gleb Liubochko, and Igor Saprykin, and Head of Tax Advisory Anna Zelenskaya.

    Editor’s Note: This article was updated to correctly identify Orion LLC’s parent company and to correct the names of the Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner team.

  • Dentons Advises Raffeisenbank on First Built-to-Suit Deal in Russian Office Market

    Dentons Advises Raffeisenbank on First Built-to-Suit Deal in Russian Office Market

    Dentons has advised Raiffeisenbank on its agreement with the Etalon Group regarding the construction of an office center at the Nagatino I-Land business park in Moscow.

    The transaction, which involves the construction of a 16-story office building with a total area of 34,000 square meters, is structured as a built-to-suit deal. According to Dentons, “it is expected that the project will take around three years to implement, during which time the Etalon Group has committed to form the land plot, obtain the building permits, and procure the design and construction of the office center with all necessary utilities and adjacent infrastructure. The building will be subject to high-tech requirements to ensure that it confirms to international standards.”

    The Dentons team was led by Partner Florian Schneider and Counsel Olga Popel and included, among others, Senior Associate Konstantin Nazarov and Associates Olga Utkina, Vitaly Nazimov, Tatiana Shadrina, and Anna Nekhodtseva.

  • Slava Yugai Moves from EPAM to Noerr in Moscow

    Slava Yugai Moves from EPAM to Noerr in Moscow

    Former Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners lawyer Vyacheslav Yugai has left that firm after eight years to become a local partner in Noerr’s Moscow office.

    Yugai’s core practice area is corporate law and M&A. According to Noerr, “he advises Russian and foreign companies on the establishment and implementation of joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions and the structuring of international transactions.” In addition, the firm reports, “Vyacheslav also advises companies regarding investment projects (including greenfield and brownfield investments and concluding and negotiating investment contracts, contract manufacturing agreements and distribution agreements) in the Russian Federation and abroad.”

    In addition to being licensed to practice law in Russia, Yugai is qualified as a solicitor of England and Wales and as an attorney in New York. In 2016-2017, he worked as a foreign attorney at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen and Katz in New York.

    “We are very pleased that with Slava Yugai we have been able to get a very active, internationally experienced transaction lawyer on board,” said Christian Pleister, co-head of Noerr’s Private Equity practice. Bjorn Paulsen, Partner in Charge of Noerr’s Moscow office, addedthat: “Slava Yugai’s good contact with Russian companies combined with his international approach will allow us to expand our consulting portfolio in Moscow. This not only applies to the field of mergers and acquisitions in its narrow sense, but also to projects in other areas of legal practice.“

    “Noerr is a top European law firm with an impressive track record,” said Yugai. “I am delighted to be given a chance to contribute to the firm’s success.”

  • Enforcement of Pharmaceutical Patent Rights in Russia: New Opportunities?

    The enforcement of pharmaceutical patent rights in Russia is a multi-aspect issue. One such aspect, well known to the industry and patent owners, is the attempt to prevent pharmaceuticals that may infringe on prior patent rights from being registered by the Russian healthcare authorities.

    At present, the patent protection system and the pharmaceutical state registration system are two totally distinct worlds with little inter-connection.

    In Russia, patent rights are granted to IP owners by the Russian Patent Office (“Rospatent”) following an examination on the merits and subsequent registration. In line with most countries, Russian affords patent protection to substances, including pharmaceutical substances. A patent to an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) of a pharmaceutical, once granted, allows the patent owner to use the API and legally prevent other parties from using products bearing features of the protected API. Under the Russian Civil Code, infringing use includes such actions as importing the products to Russia and manufacturing, offering for sale, and sale.

    However, what if an alleged infringer has not yet started to actually produce or commercialize the conflicting product but has undertaken actions to apply for the state registration of a pharmaceutical that bears features of a registered patent of a senior patent owner? Can the patent owner prevent this?

    The current system for registering pharmaceuticals with the Russian Ministry of Healthcare (the “Ministry”) does not envisage the verification of prior patent rights. This has led in the past to numerous discussions and disputes.

    Court Rulings

    The courts have tended to refuse to recognize actions involving the registration of a disputed pharmaceutical as constituting patent infringement. One of the examples is the Novartis AG vs. Pharm-Syntez dispute. Courts of several instances ruled in favor of Novartis, but the Higher Arbitrazh Court, in its ruling of June 16, 2009 (No. 2578/09), reversed the earlier decisions and ruled that, while the manufacture by Pharm-Syntez of the conflicting pharmaceutical was an infringement and must be prohibited, the registration of the same pharmaceutical is per se not infringing, as it is not an infringing use and is not prohibited under patent legislation.

    Over time the situation has gradually begun to change.

    For example, in the Novartis AG vs. Nativa dispute, dated September 27, 2017 (No. A41-85807/2016), the Arbitrazh Court of the Moscow Region recognized actions involving the registration of a conflicting pharmaceutical with the Ministry as creating the threat of a patent infringement.

    Furthermore, in the Astra Zeneca vs. Jodas Expoim dispute the Court on Intellectual Property Rights, in its ruling of February 28, 2019 (No. A40-106405/2018), ordered the defendant to file an application with the Ministry to withdraw the registration of the conflicting pharmaceutical, as well as an application to remove from the state register marginal sales prices applicable to “essential” pharmaceuticals. The court also prohibited the defendant from performing actions aimed at the registration of the pharmaceutical for as long as the claimant’s patent remains valid. The reasoning for this ruling was the qualification of the defendant’s actions as creating preparatory actions for an infringement.

    One Step Further

    Patent owners are now more actively trying to influence the Ministry into improving the state registration system of pharmaceuticals.

    As a result, Rospatent, supported by representatives of the industry, has recently come up with the idea of creating a state register of APIs protected by Russian patents for inventions. As proposed by Rospatent, this register should contain information on the patents for APIs and details on the owners.

    The Ministry, in its turn, will update this register with relevant information about the registration of potentially conflicting pharmaceuticals, introducing, where applicable, restrictions on their use (e.g. only allowing such pharmaceuticals to be released into circulation upon the expiry of the patent rights of the original pharmaceutical manufacturer).

    The mechanism of interaction between Rospatent and the Ministry and many other details still need to be developed and, if this process is successful, the concept will proceed to the draft law stage. It is intended that the register will be implemented before the end of 2019.

    The register, if implemented, may help prevent the state registration of pharmaceuticals that infringe on existing patents and combat patent infringers, which, at the moment, wastes enormous time and effort and sometimes allows infringing pharmaceuticals to enter the market and be supplied to state entities and pharmacies. 

    By Julien Hansen, Partner, Pavel Arievich, Legal Director, and Julianna Tabastajewa, Counsel DLA Piper

    This Article was originally published in Issue 6.6 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Pepeliaev Group Advises Cupol Ventures Limited on Tax Aspects of Acquisition of Chulbatkan Gold Project from N-Mining

    Pepeliaev Group Advises Cupol Ventures Limited on Tax Aspects of Acquisition of Chulbatkan Gold Project from N-Mining

    The Pepeliaev Group has advised the Netherlands’ Cupol Ventures Limited — a member of Canadian gold-mining group Kinross Gold — on tax matters related to its USD 283 million acquisition of the Chulbatkan gold project in Russia from N-Mining.

    The deal includes approximately USD 113 million in cash and nearly USD 170 million in Kinross shares. N-Mining will also have the right to economic participation equivalent to a 1.5% net smelter return payment and contingent consideration linked to future additions in a production capacity.

    Kinross Gold president and CEO Paul Rollinson said: “Chulbatkan is an exciting high-quality development project with significant upside potential and low relative execution risk located in a country where we have had extensive experience and success, and maintain a strategic and competitive operating advantage. This acquisition is an excellent fit for Kinross as it enables us to leverage our expertise as a world-class cold climate heap leach operator. With a large estimated mineral resource, Chulbatkan has the potential to be a significant low-cost, low-strip, high-return operation that will strengthen our longer-term production and cash-flow profile.”

    “Our team helped the client analyze the tax aspects of the transaction in detail,” commented Pepeliaev Group Senior Partner Rustem Ahmetshin, who led the firm’s team on the deal, “bearing in mind the constantly changing rules of tax legislation and practice of applying it.” Ahmetshin was assisted by Pepeliaev Group Senior Associate Andrey Kirillov and Head of Tax Audit and Accounting Olga Baranova.

  • Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Russia Successful for Prosveshcheniye Publishers in Dispute with Rospatent

    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Russia Successful for Prosveshcheniye Publishers in Dispute with Rospatent

    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Russia has successfully challenged Russia’s Rospatent’s decision to cancel the trademarks of Prosveshcheniye Publishers, which consist of a stylized depiction of a globe and the acronym ФГОС (standing for Federal State Educational Standards).

    According to BCLP, “the case was initiated following a major trademark dispute between Prosveshcheniye and Ventana-Graf publishers, which went on for more than a year. The court satisfied all the claims by Prosveshcheniye Publishers (the claimant), recovering from the defendant RUB 3.7 billion in compensation for breach of trademark rights. The defendant then cancelled the Rospatent registration of the trademarks it had infringed on and for which it had paid compensation. The BCLP Russia team managed, however, to have the trademarks promptly restored.”

    The Prosveshcheniye case was argued by Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Dispute Resolution/IP Partner Elena Trusova, Counsel Anton Nefedev, and Junior Associate Gleb Liubochko.

  • Ekaterina Larens Moves from Clifford Chance to VK Partners in Moscow

    Ekaterina Larens Moves from Clifford Chance to VK Partners in Moscow

    Ekaterina Larens has left Clifford Chance Moscow to join VK Partners as a partner.

    Larens specializes in Corporate and M&A transactions, and VK Partners describes her as having “broad experience in various real estate and pharmaceutical projects.”

    VK Partners Founding Partner Vadim Konyushkevich stated that “with Ekaterina on board we further strengthen one of our key practices.” He added that he believes that this makes VK Partners “capable in providing highly qualified advice on M&A and JV deals.”

    She joins VK Partners after almost fourteen years at Clifford Chance, which she joined fresh out of the Lomonosov Moscow State University in 2005.

  • Stuarts Legal Advises French Company on Cheese Plant Establishment in Bashkortostan

    Stuarts Legal Advises French Company on Cheese Plant Establishment in Bashkortostan

    Stuarts Legal has advised France’s Savencia Fromage & Dairy on the construction of a soft cheese factory in the Russian Republic of Bashkortostan.

    Sevencia Fromage & Dairy, formerly known as Bongrain, is the second largest cheese producer in France and the fourth largest in the world.

  • EPAM Advises Toshiba Global Commerce Solutions Holdings Corporation on Corporate Law Issues

    EPAM Advises Toshiba Global Commerce Solutions Holdings Corporation on Corporate Law Issues

    Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners has advised Toshiba Global Commerce Solutions Holdings Corporation on corporate issues related to the maintenance of its Russian subsidiary.

    Toshiba Global Commerce Solutions is the Russian subsidiary of Toshiba Global Commerce Solutions Holdings, Tokyo. 

    The Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners team included Counsel Elena Agaeva and Associate Elena Kvartnikova.

  • Alrud Advises VTB on Acquisition of Majority Stake in Russian Grain Trading Company

    Alrud Advises VTB on Acquisition of Majority Stake in Russian Grain Trading Company

    Alrud has advised Russia’s state-owned VTB bank on the acquisition of more than 70% of shares in grain trading company Mirogroup Resources.

    Financial details of the deal, which closed in August 2019, were not disclosed.   

    Mirogroup Resources is a Russian grain trading company that exports grain, oleaginous plants, and beans. “Mirogroup has an extensive network of regional representative offices, long-term partnerships with agricultural producers and infrastructure enterprises,” VTB said in its statement.

    The Alrud team included Partner Anton Dzhuplin, Associates Alexander Kleschev and Dina Kravchenko, Senior Attorney Ekaterina Boeva, and Attorneys Anna Derbak and Evgeny Lobanovsky.