Category: Russia

  • DLA Piper Advises Sberbank Investments on Financing Avtoban’s Infrastructure Project in Russia

    DLA Piper’s Moscow office has advised Sberbank Investments on its provision of a RUB 2 billion secured mezzanine loan to a Russian construction company Avtoban to finance the construction of Startup Facilities No 3 and No 4 of the Central Ring Road in the Moscow Region. 

    According to DLA Piper, the CRR is an infrastructure project which consists of five startup facilities, with each of them able to be put into operation as an independent investment project.  According to the firm, “the construction of Startup Facilities No 3 and No 4 is implemented under a concession agreement concluded by the state-owned Avtodor.” The construction is carried out by special purpose entities that are part of the Avtoban Group. 

    DLA Piper’s team consisted of Partner Leo Batalov, Legal Director Ivan Sezin, Senior Associate Georgy Vinogradov, and Associates Anna Litovchenko, Daria Vasilieva, and Roman Abu Salekh.

  • BCLP Advises Teva on Sale of Pharmaceutical Company to R-Pharm Group

    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner’s Moscow office has advised Teva on the sale of a pharmaceutical company located in the Yaroslavl Industrial Park to Russia’s R-Pharm Group.

    Teva is an American-Israeli producer of pharmaceuticals that was founded in 1901. The company operates facilities across Europe, North and South America, and Australia.

    According to BCLP, “the plant produces drugs intended for the treatment of diseases in the field of cardiology and neurology, as well as diseases of the endocrine system.” BCLP also stated that the terms of the sale, “include a five-year agreement during which R-Pharm will act as Teva’s manufacturing partner to ensure patient access to Teva’s drugs.”

    BCLP’s team consisted of Partners Vitaly Mozharovsky and Matvey Kaploukhoy, Counsels Oksana Orlovskaya, Inna Firsova, and Vladislav Vdovin, Associate Mikhail Erokhin, and Junior Associate Elena Naumova.

    BCLP could not disclose further information about the deal.

  • Russian Countersanctions: Regulation of Asset Freeze Regime

    Since 22 October 2018, the assets of several hundred mostly Ukrainian persons which are located in Russia have been frozen based on Presidential Decree 592 of 22 October 2018 (“Presidential Decree 592”) and Governmental Order 1300 of 1 November 2018 (“Governmental Order 1300”). To date, these and other sanctions against Ukraine are the only measures which have been taken under Federal Law 127-FZ “On measures (counter-measures) in response to unfriendly actions of the United States […]” of 4 June 2018.

    On 23 October 2020, the State Duma adopted Draft Law 996800-7 at its first reading (the “Draft Law”), which regulates the practical implementation of the sanctions:

    • The Draft Law introduces changes to Federal Law 281-FZ “On special economic measures” of 30 December 2006 and extends the application of these changes to the sanctions which have been in place against Ukraine since 22 October 2018. That means the new rules also regulate the freezing of the assets of currently over 600 individuals and 75 companies on the basis of Presidential Decree 592 and Governmental Order 1300.
    • Governmental Order 1300 provides that not only the assets (non-cash funds, non-documentary securities, other property) of the sanctioned persons but also those of the organizations controlled by them are frozen. The Draft Law now clarifies what control means – the right to control directly or indirectly, based on shareholding or an agreement, more than 25% of the votes in the controlled organization’s supreme management body.
    • Under the Draft Law, asset freezing is defined very broadly as a ban on performing any operations with monetary funds, securities or other property belonging to the sanctioned persons or any other operations in the interest or for the benefit of the sanctioned person. Exceptions are made only for operations aimed at the receipt or spending of statutory pensions, scholarships, allowances, social payments, taxes and fines.
    • This ban must be implemented by organizations performing operations with monetary funds, securities or other property in accordance with Russian legislation. These organizations are listed in the Draft Law and include financial institutions and various other financial services providers, such as insurance companies, payment processors and securities brokers. They will have to provide the Bank of Russia or their relevant other supervisory authority regular reports on how they implemented the sanctions.
    • Neither Presidential Decree 592 nor Governmental Order 1300 nor the Draft Law contains a general ban on providing resources or assistance to the sanctioned persons. Neither do they contain secondary sanctions for non-Russian persons. To what extent business relations with the sanctioned persons can be maintained irrespective of the asset freeze regime should be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

    The Draft Law is likely to become law in this form before the end of this year. To enter into force, the Draft Law must be adopted by the State Duma in three readings, approved by the Federation Council and signed by the Russian President.

    By Hannes Lubitzsch, Associated Partner, and Tatiana Dovgan, Senior Associate, Noerr

  • The Buzz in Russia: Interview with Torsten Syrbe of Clifford Chance

    Already suffering from the Covid-19 pandemic, Russia has been heavily affected by the volatility of the ruble, Western sanctions, and the price of oil, notes Torsten Syrbe, Partner at Clifford Chance in Moscow.

    All these hurdles notwithstanding, he says, “Life Sciences, IT, and E&NR are the cross-border sectors that keep us busy, in particular, because transactions are often complex and require non-standard legal solutions.” In addition, he reports that “most major national projects, such as the construction of LNG infrastructure, petrochemical plants, and infrastructure projects for ports, roads, and other facilities, are still moving forward as planned.” 

    Russia also seems keen to attract foreign investment, Syrbe says, which is complicated “by many multinational [companies] being in ‘wait and see’ mode, focusing on their core businesses and markets during the pandemic.”

    One of the ways the Russian government is compensating he says, is by enhancing the “localization” process, which “is intended to promote local production of different goods such as medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, and construction equipment, among others.” The process is several years old, he says, but it has picked up pace recently, and he reports that “laws here have been put in place to establish quotas for locally manufactured products in public procurement.” According to him, the newest localization law went into effect this summer, although he says that the specific quota levels for different goods have yet to be defined by the government. 

    Another new law, Syrbe says, relates to the certification of medicines for Covid-19. “The law is aimed at simplifying and accelerating the process for registering pharmaceuticals for the treatment of the Covid-19 infection,” he says. Efforts to combat the virus are present on the local level as well, and he says that “there has recently also been a push in Moscow to begin monitoring people’s interactions with infected persons through a mobile app.”

    Despite economic ups and downs and the struggle with the pandemic, Syrbe reports that the political landscape is fairly stable, with the only notable change involving the head of the Federal Antimonopoly Service. “The change of the FAS’s leadership – the first in fifteen years – will see the former Vice-Governor of St. Petersburg, Maxim Shaskolsky, assume office,” he says. “Most observers expect him to maintain continuity with the good practices of the system formed by [former head] Igor Artemyev, but also to bring a breath of fresh air.” 

    Speaking of things fresh, Syrbe reveals that Clifford Chance’s team in Moscow is soon to undergo significant changes. “We decided with our lead litigation partner that our Litigation practice will function as an independent law firm under a separate brand,” he says. He notes that Clifford Chance will continue to advise on cross-border disputes involving Russian parties through the firm’s global arbitration and litigation practice. The decision to spin the practice off — which follows similar decisions made by several other international firms — was influenced by a combination of factors, he explains. “The legal market has faced challenges for quite some time and demand for legal advice has been shifting between industry sectors. It is important that our office focuses on those sectors where our clients expect us to assist them in the coming years.”

  • Deal 5: STEP Head of Legal Yulia Nikolaeva on Dispute with Pharmasintez-Nord

    On October 15, 2020, CEE Legal Matters reported that Kachkin & Partners had successfully helped Russian general contractor STEP LLC reach a settlement with Pharmasintez-Nord JSC in a dispute regarding payment for work and related claims worth over RUR 100 million. CEEIHM spoke with Yulia Nikolaeva, Head of Legal Service at STEP LLC, to learn more.

    CEEIHM: To start please tell us a few words about STEP LLC.

    Yulia: STEP is a Russian general contracting company carrying out the construction of large industrial facilities. We have been working in the construction market since 1993, providing services in several industrial construction areas. Each direction has its own team, which has unique experience in building objects for its industry and knows its specifics and nuances.

    CEEIHM: What was the dispute with Pharmasintez-Nord JSC about?

    Yulia: STEP’s policy is focused on creating a caring attitude towards our customers and their needs. We have been cooperating with many customers for several years and have worked on several projects together. It is not customary for us to bring a dispute with a customer to court – we always try to resolve our disagreements through negotiations.

    With Pharmasintez-Nord we were realizing our first joint project. The situation began to escalate in January 2020 with the customer delaying the acceptance of our work and making payment. Unofficially, the customer’s management reported that it expected to receive an additional discount from us, which was not agreed. The attempts to negotiate weren’t bringing clarity. We made the decision that it was time to solve the matter.

    CEEIHM: How did the dispute play out from your perspective? At what point did you involve Kachkin & Partners in the process – and what work did it entail for your internal teams to prepare for it?

    Yulia: Kachkin & Partners had helped us with previous complex disputes, so we turned straight to them. At stake was a significant amount for us – about 100 million rubles. Dmitry Nekrestyanov and Lyudmila Stepanova of Kachkin & Partners quickly connected to the issue; the work was done jointly by them and the lawyers of STEP. The lawyers of STEP were responsible for the pre-trial phase, and the preparation and filing of the claim was the responsibility of the specialists from Kachkin and Partners. As it turned out, the customer was not prepared for the fact that we would quickly file a claim with a court. This interfered with their plans. For this reason, Pharmasintez-Nord came to us with a proposal to negotiate.

    CEEIHM: What was the final outcome – what concessions did you have to agree to and what aspects were you particularly happy with that led to you accepting the settlement?

    Yulia: I would like to note that Dmitry Nekrestyanov elaborated a strong strategy for reaching agreements with Pharmasintez-Nord: first, documents for all work on which there was no dispute should be signed, and payment for that work should be made. And only after that would we sit down and discuss the issues on which the parties opinions differed. This strategy helped to get most of the debt even before the first court session. After that, it was easier to move towards each other and conclude a settlement agreement: we agreed to reduce our fee by 2.6 million rubles, and the customer returned the guarantee retention of 11 million rubles to us. And the settlement agreement has been implemented by both parties. 

    CEEIHM: Finally, why did you choose Kachkin & Partners to represent you on this matter?

    Yulia: As I said earlier, this is not the first time we have used their services. Thanks to their extensive experience in construction disputes, cooperation with them is always a strong support for us and a good result was achieved.

    Originally reported by CEE In-House Matters.

  • Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Advises HeadHunter Group on Acquisition of Zarplata.ru Recruiting Platform

    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner has advised the HeadHunter Group, which operates Russian online recruiting platform hh.ru, on the acquisition of the Zarplata.ru online recruiting platform from Hearst Shkulev Digital Regional Network B.V. The transaction, which is valued at RUB 3.5 billion, has already been given the requisite regulatory approval and is expected to close in January 2021.

    According to BCLP, “Zarplata.ru is one of the largest players in the Russian online recruitment market. The company holds leading positions in a number of regions of the Urals and Siberia. In 2019, the company’s total revenue was RUB 854 million.”

    BCLP’s team included Partners Ekaterina Dedova and Evgeny Timofeev, Associate Director Anastasia Speranskaya, Counsels Alexey Koshelev, Anna Zelenskaya, Yury Babichev, Igor Zhivotov, and Andrey Neminuschiy, Senior Associate Denis Khramkin, Associates Ruslan Nurullaev and Tuyana Molokhoeva, and Junior Associate Elena Naumova.

    BCLP did not reply to our inquiry on the matter.

  • Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Helps Gazprom Neft Establish Joint Venture with Tsifra Group

    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner has advised Gazprom Neft PJSC on the creaion of  Digital Industrial Platform, a joint venture with the Tsifra Group. Dentons reportedly advised the Tsifra Group on the deal.

    Tsifra Group is a developer of AI solutions and robotic mining equipment for heavy industry. The company’s primary areas of focus are machinery, mining, metals, oil & gas, and chemical sectors.

    Gazprom Neft is a Russian energy company which focuses on exploration and development of oil and gas fields, as well as the production and marketing of oil products.

    According to BCLP, “the joint venture plans to launch a digital production management platform for the oil and gas industry in 2021. The company’s new digital products will be aimed at solving problems in the field of centralization of operational management and creation of digital twins using artificial intelligence technologies.” According to the firm, the joint venture will employ 100 people and will be headquartered in St. Petersburg, Russia.

    The firm reported that, “the technological base for the joint venture will be the ZIIoT industrial IoT platform and digital services for oil refining developed by the Tsifra Group, as well as Gazprom Neft’s developments related to process control in the oil and gas industry.”

    BCLP’s team consisted of Partner Anton Sitnikov, Counsels Nikolay Kholoshev and Anton Nefediev, Lawyers Ruslan Nurullaev, Egor Salmov, Andrey Neminuschiy, and Artemiy Bondarev, Junior Lawyers Elena Naumova and Daniil Betuganov, and Assistant Lawyers Alexey Perminov and Gleb Aleksandrov.

  • Latham & Watkins and Debevoise Advise on Ozon Holdings IPO

    Latham & Watkins has advised the underwriters on the USD 1.1 billion initial public offering of Russian e-commerce platform Ozon Holdings PLC on Nasdaq. Debevoise & Plimpton advised Ozon Holdings on the deal.

    The underwriters included Morgan Stanley & Co. and Goldman Sachs & Co. as joint lead book-running managers, Citigroup Global Markets Inc, UBS Securities LLC, Sberbank CIB Limited, and VTB Capital plc as joint bookrunners, and Renaissance Securities Limited as co-lead manager.

    The offering consisted of 37,950,000 American Depositary Shares representing 37,950,000 ordinary shares at a price to the public of USD 30 per share.

    Latham & Watkins’s team included, in Moscow, Partners David Stewart and Olga Ponomarenko and Associate Ekaterina Pavlyuchenko; and in London, Associates Jennifer Gascoyne, Sarah Youssefi, and Emily Simons.

    Debevoise & Plimpton’s team included London-based Partners James Scoville and Cecile Beurrier, International Counsel Vera Losonci, Moscow-based Partner Alan Kartashkin and Associates Evgenii Lebedev, Charles Low, Timur Ochkhaev, and Yilong Luo, and New York-baed Counsel Huey-Fun Lee and Associate Sabrina Hsieh.

     

  • Tax Changes for Small and Medium Enterprises in Russia – Benefits for Foreign Businesses with Russian Subsidiaries

    As in other countries, business in Russia has been heavily affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and small and medium enterprises, which do not have enough reserves to survive in the unfavorable economic situation, have suffered the most. In order to support SMEs, the State, in addition to temporary support measures, has introduced a considerable decrease in the tax burden related to the remuneration of employees above the minimum monthly wage. Cumulative social contributions were lowered to 15% from the previous rate (which could reach 30%, with certain exceptions), and may be applied by SMEs.

    In order to qualify as an SME, a company must be included in the relevant state register of small and medium enterprises and meet the following criteria: (1) the amount of annual income for the previous calendar year does not exceed RUB 2 billion (approximately EUR 23 million), and (2) the average number of employees should not exceed 250. Also, there are some limitations to the shareholding structure, including that the cumulative foreign shareholding should not exceed 49% of the Russian company (except for certain specific cases, i.e.,  when the shares of the Russian company are traded on a regulated market and are in the innovation sector).

    In addition, companies with more than 49% of foreign shareholders may be recognized as SMEs where the foreign participants satisfy the requirements for an SME, with annual incomes and the average number of employees that fall within the previously-mentioned thresholds. This exception is not available for companies with foreign participants registered in black-listed offshore jurisdictions (e.g.,  the British Virgin Islands) irrespective of their income and number of employees.

    Usually Russian companies without foreign shareholders are included in the register automatically when their total annual incomes and average number of employees fall within the mandatory thresholds. Information about their incomes and employees is gathered from data in their submitted tax returns as well as on the separately submitted report on the average number of employees, assuming the reporting is submitted to the tax authorities properly and on time.

    A company with foreign participation usually needs to take additional steps to be included in the register. In particular, a company with foreign shareholders needs to initiate a separate external audit in order to determine whether its foreign participation meets all of the criteria for an SME. The auditor issues a compliance statement and submits the relevant confirmation to the tax authorities based on the analysis of the financial statements or tax returns of the foreign participant for the previous calendar year. The statement must be submitted annually between July 1 and July 5. Inclusion in the register takes place on August 10.

    At the current stage, Russian legislation focuses strictly on the entity holding the shares rather than the entire group of companies. This could be the ground for abuse, were foreign groups with a considerable amount of revenue to split up a business and artificially create a special foreign holding company with low income and few employees. As a result, it is possible that that state authorities will try to adjust the criteria or audit procedure, in particular by providing a more precise specification of the legislative requirements for foreign participants.

    We believe that the relevant tax liberalization is a quite important tool for decreasing the tax burden and may be applied by a significant number of foreign investors as well as taken into account when planning on entering the Russian market or for joint venture projects.

    By Anna Zaitseva, Head of Tax, Peterka & Partners Russia

    This Article was originally published in Issue 7.9 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Oleg Todua Promoted to Local Partner at White & Case Moscow

    Former Senior Associate Oleg Todua has been promoted to Local Partner at White & Case’s Moscow office as part of a global promotions round.

    Todua’s promotion, like that of the other 38 new partners, local partners, and counsel included in the round world wide, will come into effect on January 1, 2021.

    Todua advises clients on International Arbitration and Commercial Litigation matters including investor-state arbitration, construction arbitration, Russian litigation, and Russian law-governed domestic arbitration.”

    Todua is a graduate of the Lomonosov Moscow State University and the Moscow State Institute of International Relations. He joined White & Case in 2011.

    “These 39 promotions across 22 offices and nine global practices demonstrate how truly global and diverse White & Case is,” said White & Case Chair Hugh Verrier. “These lawyers have achieved success in their careers because they demonstrate exceptional ability, a consistent dedication to providing our clients with the highest standards of service, and the commitment and energy to drive our firm forward.”