Category: Lithuania

  • Tvins Advises Finansu Bite Verslui on Entrance into Public List of Lithuanian Crowdfunding Platform Operators

    Tvins Advises Finansu Bite Verslui on Entrance into Public List of Lithuanian Crowdfunding Platform Operators

    The Tvins law firm in Lithuania has advised UAB Finansu Bite Verslui on becoming the first member of the public list of crowdfunding platform operators in Lithuania.

    According to Tvins, according to the Law on Crowdfunding of the Republic of Lithuania, which entered into force on December 1, 2016, operators wishing to engage in crowdfunding activities must first be included in the public list of crowdfunding platform operators by the Bank of Lithuania. According to the firm, “we are glad that our clients managed to be the first in the row.”

    Tvins advised Finansu Bite Verslui “on procedures related to entering into the list of crowdfunding platforms operators [and] drafted legal documents for licensing.” The firm’s team was led by Partner Vytautas Senavicius.

  • Ellex Valiunas Advises on Integration of Omnitel and Baltic Data Center into Telia Lietuva

    Ellex Valiunas Advises on Integration of Omnitel and Baltic Data Center into Telia Lietuva

    Ellex Valiunas has assisted in integrating Omnitel and Baltic Data Center into Telia Lietuva (former Teo Lt).

    According to Ellex Valiunas, in 2015, Telia Company started integrating the business operations of Teo Lt, Omnitel and Baltic Data Center. In 2016, the Telia Company’s sale of its shares of Omnitel to Teo, which Ellex Valiunas advised on, closed (as reported first in October 9, 2015). This deal, which Ellex Valiunas describes as “one of the biggest transactions in Lithuania’s telecoms market,” was followed, the firm now reports, by the second step of the integration: the 2017 merger of Omnitel and Baltic Data Center with Teo Lt and the change of the latter’s name into Telia Lietuva.

  • Motieka & Audzevicius Advises on Creation of Pan-Baltic Media Services Holding Company

    Motieka & Audzevicius Advises on Creation of Pan-Baltic Media Services Holding Company

    Motieka & Audzevicius has advised the Publicum Group, a Lithuanian communication services provider, on its pan-Baltic merger with the Idea Group.

    According to Motieka & Audzevicius, the firm’s team “advised the client in all stages of the merger: participated in hard negotiations, drafted merger documents, including the acquisition agreements and reorganization documents, and afterwards structured the joint venture. Furthermore, our team represented the client regarding the acquisition of Adcom (renamed as Arena Media) which is soon to be transferred under the holding company finalizing the pan-Baltic media services group. Our team structured the transaction and was responsible for swift implementation, including the application to the Competition Council.”

    According to the firm, the Publicum Group “expanded the volume of its activity and is going to engage the industry segment with a wider set of communication services.” The firm reports that “the transaction will allow the client to consolidate its leading position in communication services and enhance their quality,” and that “the transaction shall benefit the consumers as the client may provide a wider range of services.”

  • Sorainen Advises Taurapolis on Acquisition of Vilnius Complex From Aludariu Development

    Sorainen Advises Taurapolis on Acquisition of Vilnius Complex From Aludariu Development

    Sorainen has advised Taurapolis on the acquisition of a building complex on Aludariu street in the territory of the former Vilniaus Tauro brewery in Vilnius from Aludariu Development. The sellers were advised by boutique firm Advokatu Kontora Gostautas ir Partneriai Advokatas.

    Taurapolis intends to develop offices, apartments, and a hotel as well as the biggest spa in Vilnius. According to Taurapolis’ CEO, Linas Stankus, developement should be initiated by the end of 2017.

    “The total area of the acquired buildings is approximately 7,000 square meters, said Stankus. “Most of the buildings are cultural heritage sites, some of them represent unique architecture of 19th century – spacious basements and a high arc-shaped ceiling. The total basement area covers 1,500 square meters. These characteristics suggest a theme of a hotel with a large spa center in antique basements.”

    The Sorainen team was led by Partner Ausra Mudenaite, supported by Senior Associate Julija Kirkiliene. 

  • Glimstedt and Ellex Valiunas Advise on IKEA Group Acquisition of Lithuanian Wind Farms

    Glimstedt and Ellex Valiunas Advise on IKEA Group Acquisition of Lithuanian Wind Farms

    Glimstedt has advised the IKEA Group on its acquisition of a 45 MW capacity wind farm in the Lithuanian district of Mazeikiai by purchasing the shares of the investment fund Orion Alternative Energy Fund (managed by the company Orion Asset Management) and the shares of Pamario Jegainiu Energija held by the investment fund Energy Investment Fund. The sellers were advised by Ellex Valiunas. 

    According to Glimstedt, “the wind park acquired by IKEA Group is one of the largest wind farms in terms of installed capacity and was recognized as one of the most efficient wind farms in Lithuania last year. The wind turbines are 120 meters in height and 350 tonnes in weight, with a rotor diameter of 117 meters and an installed capacity of 2.4 MW.

    The Glimstedt team was led by Partner Paulius Gruodis, assisted by Associate Michailas Molis, Senior Associate Asta Macijauskiene, and other lawyers. 

    The Ellex Valiunas team was led by Partner Zilvinas Zinkevicius, supported by Senior Associates Ruta Besusparyte and Gabriele Vazniokaite and Associate Edvinas Beikauskas.

  • Tark Grunte Sutkiene Successful for Senojo Boksto Klinika in Unfair Competition Claim

    Tark Grunte Sutkiene Successful for Senojo Boksto Klinika in Unfair Competition Claim

    Tark Grunte Sutkiene has successfully represented UAB Senojo Boksto Klinika in the court of first instance and in the appellate court in an unfair competition dispute with Svalbono Klinika UAB, V.S. and UAB Valdimara.

    According to TGS, “the dispute between two heath care institutions arose regarding actions of unfair competition, which were performed by Svalbono Klinika UAB together with V.S., the former head of UAB Senojo Boksto Klinika who headed it for many years, and by reason of which UAB Senojo Boksto Klinika lost most of its patients, a part of financing from a Territorial Health Insurance Fund, and had to search for new employees and to develop services of the secondary level from the beginning.”

    The court of first instance satisfied 2/3 of the claimant’s claims. The court concluded that the respondents had unlawfully solicited most of the employees and patients of UAB Senojo Boksto Klinika by using a misleadingly similar name and ruled that data about patients is to be treated as the claimant’s trade secret. 

    The appellate court upheld the conclusions of the court of first instance regarding the unlawful actions and causal relationship and partially reversed the judgement of the court of first instance for the benefit of the claimant regarding assessment of the incurred damages, satisfying the claimant’s statement of claim almost in full.

    According to TGS, “the complexity of the case was determined by the fact that the case involved settlement of complicated competition law, health care and personal data protection, indemnification and tax law issues. The court of first instance had ordered an expert examination for establishing the damage and its causes. The conclusion of the court expert examination was very unfavorable for the claimant as the court expert in fact made a conclusion that the claimant did not have any right to indemnification. The claimant, in turn, presented two private expert examinations performed by auditors and additional conclusions, refuting conclusions of the expert appointed by the court and confirming that UAB Senojo Boksto Klinika suffered damages caused by the respondents’ actions. Both the court of first instance and the appellate court, in assessing damages suffered by the claimant, referred to evidence presented by the claimant. The appellate court admitted that the court expert examination had no stronger proving power than any other evidence presented by the parties and it had to be evaluated in the context of all evidence. In addition, the court indicated that the court expert could not pronounce on circumstances that made the merits of the case, evaluation of which belonged only to the court competence.”

    The Tark Grunte Sutkiene team consisted of Partner Robertas Degesys, Associate Partner Rasa Zasciurinskaite, and Senior Associate Dovile Armalyte.

  • The Buzz in Lithuania: Interview with Eugenija Sutkiene of Tark Grunte Sutkiene

    “We don’t have any big news in Lithuania at the moment,” says Eugenija Sutkiene, Partner at Tark Grunte Sutkiene. “Except for the general trends that are affecting legal markets everywhere, of course: Commoditization, dropping legal fees, and growing in-house legal markets — the same as all legal markets.” She laughs, saying, “we’re running quickly to stay in the same space.”

    When asked about the dropping fees, Sutkiene reports that “we’ve been feeling this pressure for three or four years now because of the fierce pressure in the markets.” According to Sutkiene, “Law firms here are stronger than ever and competition has increased, with increased capabilities and competencies.” In addition, she reports, referring to the global crisis, “the legal market got spoiled, and it’s hard to get back to those billing rates.” Indeed, she says, hourly rates are essentially disappearing, and are primarily relevant at this point for internal budgeting purposes. “Most work is done on fixed budgets or with capped fees,” she says. Still, she emphasizes, the problem is hardly exclusive to Lithuania: “It’s a general trend across all markets.”

    Still, this pressure reflects the fact that the Lithuanian legal market, according to Sutkiene, is “consolidating, and getting stronger,” as the larger full-service firms are “matching competencies.” As a result, with little else distinguishing the top players, “we’re competing primarily for price now.”

    There’s little news on the legislative front either at the moment in Lithuania, Sutkiene reports, although as the Peasant & Greens Union — an Agrarian political party in the country — won last fall’s parliamentary elections, she says, “we’ll see what they do, and if they live up to their promises.” 

    The highly-anticipated Labor Law adopted by the old Parliament to introduce a long-awaited new employment scheme was supposed to come into effect on January 1st, but has now been postponed until July 1st, and Sutkiene reports that changes are likely to be introduced to it in that time. The previous employment scheme was considered “very rigid”, she reports, and “one of the least attractive in Europe.” The new version is expected to “increase competitiveness,” and she describes it as “the most controversial and widely-discussed in recent years.” Indeed, it should provide substantial work to law firms in Lithuania, and Sutkiene reports that Tark Grunte Sutkiene has “already started to work with clients in preparation.”

  • Cobalt Advises PVA European Refreshments on Acquisition of Half the Shares in UAB Neptuno Vandenys from UAB Coca-Cola HBC Lietuva

    Cobalt Advises PVA European Refreshments on Acquisition of Half the Shares in UAB Neptuno Vandenys from UAB Coca-Cola HBC Lietuva

    Cobalt Lithuania has advised PVA European Refreshments, a company operating in the Republic of Ireland, on its acquisition of half of the shares in UAB Neptuno Vandenys from the soft drinks producer UAB Coca-Cola HBC Lietuva. The deal, valued at almost EUR 10 million, was subject to merger clearance from the EU Commission.

    UAB Coca-Cola HBC Lietuva has owned shares in UAB Neptuno Vandenys since the end of 2015. 

    Cobalt drafted the transaction documents, provided legal support in connection with the filing of the notification of a concentration with the EU Commission (together with Cleary Gottlieb), and assisted the client with other transaction-related matters. The Vilnius-based team was lead by Managing Associate Maksimas Saveljevas, with significant contributions by Managing Associate Ieva Sodeikate and Associate Mantas Juska.

  • Sorainen Advises Gasum on Sale of Shareholding of GET Baltic to Amber Grid

    Sorainen Advises Gasum on Sale of Shareholding of GET Baltic to Amber Grid

    Sorainen Lithuania has advised Finnish energy company Gasum on the sale of its shares in GET Baltic to Amber Grid, a Lithuanian gas transmission system operator. The transaction closed at the end of 2016.

    Gasum is a natural gas, LNG, and biogas expert that operates and delivers gas to customers in Finland, Sweden, and Norway. Sorainen assisted the company on negotiations between the parties, drafting the share purchase agreement (and other agreements), consulting on assessment of GET Baltic value, and closing of the deal, among other things.

    The Sorainen team was led by Partner Daivis Svirinas and included Specialist Counsel Paulius Koverovas, Senior Associate Evaldas Dudonis, and Associate Stasys Zelenekas.

  • Andrius Ivanauskas Becomes New Glimstedt Partner

    Andrius Ivanauskas Becomes New Glimstedt Partner

    Competition expert Andrius Ivanauskas has been promoted to Partner in the Vilnius office of Glimstedt, making him the office’s eighth.

    Ivanauskas, who has been working for Glimstedt for the past 12 years, heads the firm’s Lithuanian Competition and EU Law, Venture Capital, and Private Equity practices, while also advising on M&A and banking and finance transactions.

    Ivanauskas is a current member and former Chairman of the Legal and Regulatory Committee of the Lithuanian Private Equity and Venture Capital Association. He holds a MA degree in Law from the University of Vilnius, and a LL.M degree in European Private Law from the University of Amsterdam.

    “The appointment of Andrius as a Partner gives us an additional edge in contributing to the building of lasting partnerships with our clients and serves as an indicator that we are developing strong leaders within our firm,” said Egidijus Bernotas, Managing Partner of Glimstedt, “because it was our firm that provided Andrius with an environment to grow to become a legal professional and expert recognized by Lithuanian and international clients and the world’s largest legal referral guides.”