Category: Hungary

  • The Conditions of Lawfulness of Warning Strike in Hungary

    The Conditions of Lawfulness of Warning Strike in Hungary

    In September 2019, the Hungarian Supreme Court (Curia) stated in its decision that even in case of a warning strike, the employer must be notified on the strike at a time that allows the exercise of its right to prevent damages caused by the stop of operations, and also to perform its obligation to protect life and property and to perform any organisational work related to these rights and obligations.

    If a strike does not meet the aforementioned conditions, it can be considered as unlawful.

    By Rita Párkányi, Founding Partner, KCG Partners Law Firm

  • The ECJ Has Decided: Taxpayers Have Six Months to Reclaim VAT

    The ECJ Has Decided: Taxpayers Have Six Months to Reclaim VAT

    It has long been a problem that the tax authority refuses to refund to a supplier the VAT that has already paid by him, even if the customer has not paid the gross purchase price at all. However, in a recent ruling, the European Court of Justice has clearly ruled that if the claim has become definitively unrecoverable, the Hungarian tax authority NAV is also required to refund the VAT on that claim to the seller. This decision now also allows other affected taxpayers to request a refund of the VAT on their unrecoverable receivables within a maximum of six months.

    For many years, Hungarian taxpayers have been struggling with the fact that if their customer is definitively unable or unwilling to pay the consideration for a product or service, the seller will not only lose the net amount of the consideration, but also the VAT that he or she has correctly paid to the state treasury. It only takes a bit of common sense to see how unfair this is, since the state pockets VAT that is ultimately funded not by the customer but by the supplier. 

    NAV remains unrelenting

    In the past, taxpayers have, in many cases, tried to fight for their rights in court and recover the VAT on their unrecoverable receivables – to no avail. However, at the end of 2017, the ECJ issued a ruling in an Italian case that suggested that the Hungarian practice so far could not be upheld. This ruling states that the VAT must be refunded to the taxpayer if it’s almost certain that the customer will never pay the purchase price – usually because it is unable to do so. This is most common when the customer is under liquidation, but there may be other, similar situations, such as when the customer is subject to foreclosure.

    However, in spite of the seemingly clear ruling in the Italian case, the Hungarian tax authority continued to refuse to refund the VAT: there have been several recent court decisions upholding the earlier Hungarian position and refusing to allow the refunding of VAT on claims that have become permanently unrecoverable.

    A fresh ruling of the ECJ in a Hungarian case

    In a radical change to the foregoing, the ECJ recently issued a ruling in a case initiated by a Hungarian taxpayer, making it clear that once a claim has become permanently unrecoverable, the Member State cannot decide not to refund the VAT. That would be incompatible with the principle of VAT neutrality.

    Were they anticipating this?

    An interesting twist in this story is that in 2019, when the above case had already been awaiting a decision from the ECJ, the Hungarian legislator probably realised that it was no longer possible to uphold the previous position of out-and-out refusal. At the same time, as in the famous Hungarian folk tale, they managed to bring a gift while not bringing one: on the one hand, they allowed VAT refunds from 1 January 2020, under very strict conditions, but this option would not extend to sales made before 2016. And this despite the fact that for most VAT-subjects, the year 2015 as a whole and the end of the year 2014 will only expire at the end of 2020. 

    You can now still reclaim the VAT if you’re quick

    Therefore, despite the changes in the VAT Act, the recently issued ruling can be of great help to taxpayers. By referring to this decision, businesses will be able to reclaim millions or even billions of forints from the tax authority, which even the new rules coming into effect next year will not allow. From now taxpayers have 180 days to claim back the VAT on their unrecoverable claims related to sales made before 2016 by referring to this decision. However, it’s also important to see that for transactions prior to the end of 2014, this can only be done until the end of this year, due to the limitation period. So the clock is already ticking

    By Tamás Fehér, Partner, Jalsovszky

  • Change in Access of Company Data in Hungary

    Change in Access of Company Data in Hungary

    Company information was available without any restriction in the database of the Hungarian Ministry of Justice. As of 1 October 2019, there was a change in the recognition of company information, since the electronic company register was replaced by a so called online real-time company information.

    One of the major difference is in the range of company information that may be requested for free of charge. It will be more complicated to find out the “other” activities of the company (in addition to its main activity), the share capital, members of the supervisory board or the type of the ownership of a company.

    After the change, any request may only be settled if the applicant has successfully verified his/her identity. Also, an important modification is that only a limited number of data requests will be available per month.

    By Gabriella Gálik, Founding Partner, KCG Partners Law Firm

  • Corporate Taxpayer Groups Can Be Established from 1 November 2019 in Hungary

    The provisions of the corporate taxpayer group is applicable from 1 January 2019, and despite the short preparatory period, more than 200 company groups have so far taken advantage of this opportunity in 2019. This possibility will be open again from 1 November to 20 November 2019.

    The corporate taxpayer groups provide certain tax benefits. One of the most important advantages is that the losses of group members will become usable within the group: the tax base (i.e. the amount of the positive tax bases of the group members) may be reduced by the amount of the loss carried forward from negative tax bases of the group members up to 50% of the current year profit, which represents a potential tax saving opportunity. Furthermore, transfer pricing rules are generally not applicable to the group members’ internal transactions, the related transfer pricing documentation is not required, and individual tax allowances can be utilized at the group level.

    By Eszter Kamocsay-Berta, Founding and Managing Partner, KCG Partners Law Firm

  • Peremiczki & Turi and Jalsovszky Advise on Invest Befekteto’s Sale of Terracotta and Terra Tozeg

    Peremiczki & Turi and Jalsovszky Advise on Invest Befekteto’s Sale of Terracotta and Terra Tozeg

    Peremiczki & Turi has advised LV Invest Befekteto and Terracotta on the sale of Terracotta Kfr and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Terra-Tozeg Kft, to a group of unidentified private investors. The buyers were advised by Jaslovszky.

    Terracotta has been engaged in the manufacturing and distribution of potting soil, fertilizers, and garden accessories for 20 years. 

    The Peremiczki & Turi team included Partners Peter Peremiczki and Melinda Turi and Trainee Mate Valer.

    The Jalsovszky team was led by Senior Associate Agnes Bejo and included Associate Boglarka Zsibrita and Junior Associate Zoltan Dobos.  

  • Magdolna Csider Becomes Head of Real Estate and Construction Law at Deloitte Legal in Budapest

    Magdolna Csider Becomes Head of Real Estate and Construction Law at Deloitte Legal in Budapest

    Former Lakatos, Koves & Partners Associate Magdolna Csider has joined Deloitte Legal in Budapest as an Associate Partner and Head of Real Estate and Construction Law.

    According to Deloitte Legal, “Magdolna has over ten years of experience in real estate and M&A taking part in major acquisitions of significant office buildings, shopping centers, hotels and manufacturing plants. She has wide experience in large volume project financing, real estate and M&A transactions, development and operations.”

    She spent the past years at Lakatos, Koves & Partners. She is fluent in Japanese and has a law degree from the Kobe University of Law in Japan. She obtained her Hungarian law degree from the Eotvos Lorand University in Budapest in 1999.

  • Magdolna Csider Becomes Head of Real Estate and Construction Law at Deloitte Legal in Budapest

    Magdolna Csider Becomes Head of Real Estate and Construction Law at Deloitte Legal in Budapest

    Former Lakatos, Koves & Partners Associate Magdolna Csider has joined Deloitte Legal in Budapest as an Associate Partner and Head of Real Estate and Construction Law.

    According to Deloitte Legal, “Magdolna has over ten years of experience in real estate and M&A taking part in major acquisitions of significant office buildings, shopping centers, hotels and manufacturing plants. She has wide experience in large volume project financing, real estate and M&A transactions, development and operations.”

    She spent the past years at Lakatos, Koves & Partners. She is fluent in Japanese and has a law degree from the Kobe University of Law in Japan. She obtained her Hungarian law degree from the Eotvos Lorand University in Budapest in 1999.

  • Balazs Fazakas Appointed Head of Litigation and Dispute Resolution at Lakatos, Koves & Partners

    Balazs Fazakas Appointed Head of Litigation and Dispute Resolution at Lakatos, Koves & Partners

    Balazs Fazakas has been appointed the new Head of Litigation and Dispute Resolution at Lakatos, Koves & Partners in Budapest.

    LKT describes Fazakas as “a well-known and successful lawyer before the Hungarian courts and international fora.” According to the firm, “he is experienced in arbitration, litigation, mediation, and regulatory investigations as well, [and he] takes the lead in the vast majority of our dispute resolution mandates and numerous M&A transactions.”

    “The LKT Litigation and Dispute Resolution Group was enlarged and restructured due to an increasing number of mandates,” noted Managing Partner Peter Lakatos, “as a positive response to our recent efforts to distinguish ourselves with an offering that combines our leading general dispute resolution expertise with sector- or practice area-specific knowledge. The new rules of Civil Procedure and Investment Protection in Hungary raised demand for highly-qualified professionals having a thorough understanding of the new system and a considerable routine in litigation planning and winner tactics. Therefore, we enlarged and reformed our team in line with these requirements and promoted Balazs Fazakas to be the head of the team, who started his career here at LKT.”

    “We pride ourselves in the training and promotion system we provide for our lawyers,” added Senior Partner Peter Koves, “and Balazs is another successful example of this LKT idea.”

    Fazakas has spent his entire career at Lakatos, Koves & Partners, having joined the firm in 2010 after graduating from the ELTE Faculty of Law in Budapest. 

  • Paroczi Leaves Budapest to Head Compliance at QAFCO in Qatar

    Paroczi Leaves Budapest to Head Compliance at QAFCO in Qatar

    Peter Paroczi, the former Director Counsel for Harman International, has left the Budapest office of the US-based consumer electronics company toa become the Compliance Officer of the Qatar Fertiliser Company in Doha, Qatar.

    Paroczi had been with Harman since 2017, after spending four years in private practice and then another seven in-house, first with Samsung Electronics, then at E.On.

    Commenting on his move, Paroczi told CEE Legal Matters: “The reason why I took the position is that the size, complexity and the impact of the business that we are doing here is unparalleled. I am currently heading the compliance department at QAFCO, a petrochemical and energy giant, founded by the State of Qatar in 1969. The neck-breaking speed of the economic growth and global importance of Qatar is making this country a highly competitive and challenging destination for the lawyers from all around the globe. The unique blend of the international and GCC laws that is being used in the business here is making Qatar even more compelling. The high cultural diversity and witnessing this enormous economic growth from a front-row seat was a plus to me when I joined to QAFCO.”

    In August 2017, Paroczi was interviewed by CEE Legal Matters shortly after he joining Harman

  • Andras Levai Moves from Tesco to Market Epito in Hungary

    Andras Levai Moves from Tesco to Market Epito in Hungary

    Andras Levai has become Legal Director at the Market Epito construction company in Hungary.

    Prior to joining Market Epito, Levai was Head of Legal – CE Ethics & Compliance for Tesco, responsible for the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, and Poland. 

    Levai was a speaker at the 2017 Hungary GC Summit. He was also a member of the In-House Advisory Panel for the Summit and was a part of the CEE Legal Matters round table discussing the challenges faced by in-house counsel and the strategies they employ in dealing with external counsel. More recently, Levai was interviewed by CEELM for the 2019 Corporate Counsel Handbook (The Cherry on Top: The Compliance Culture).