Category: Estonia

  • Ellex Advises Infotark on Share Reacquisition

    Ellex has advised Infotark on reacquiring 14% of its shares from Finnish shareholders.

    Infotark operates under the brand Buroomaailm.

    According to Ellex, Infotark is Estonia’s largest seller of office supplies, equipment, and furniture, and has been operating in the market for 32 years. The company is a third-generation family business, with its majority stake of 23.76% owned by CEO Juri Ross.

    In 2016, Ellex advised the management on the acquisition of a majority stake in Infotark (as reported by CEE Legal Matters on December 19, 2016).

    The Ellex team included Partner Risto Vahimets, Counsel Dmitri Rozenblat, and Lawyer Carmen Linda Plats.

    Ellex did not respond to our inquiry on the matter.

  • Pohla & Hallmagi Advises Karmsund Group on Acquisition of Industrial Property

    Pohla & Hallmagi has advised Karmsund Group on its acquisition of industrial property in an industrial park close to Tallinn airport.

    Norway-based Karmsund Group specializes in developing and producing time-, cost-, and safety-efficient solutions and products, serving both onshore and offshore industries worldwide.

    The Pohla & Hallmagi team included Partner Juri Ploom and Attorney at Law Elena Lass.

  • Pohla & Hallmagi Advises Restate on Sale of Industrial Real Estate to EfTEN

    Pohla & Hallmagi has advised Restate on its sale of industrial real estate to EfTEN for approximately EUR 5.9 million.

    Restate is a commercial real estate development company.

    EfTEN is an asset management company.

    The Pohla & Hallmagi team was led by Partner Toivo Viilup.

  • What to Expect When an Investigator Calls for Questioning?

    People, as individual sources of evidence, are crucial in criminal cases. In more complex cases, even hundreds of people may be interrogated. So it is not uncommon in Widen’s practice to receive a concerned phone call from a client who has been called in for questioning. What to expect in such a case?

    First, it is important to distinguish between whether you are being called to testify as a suspect or as a witness, that is, as a person who is likely to know facts relevant to the resolution of the criminal case. If it is unclear in which role the procedure is intended to be conducted, it is important to specify this as your rights and obligations will depend on it.

    Giving testimony as a witness

    When you are called to give testimony as a witness, you will usually begin by explaining the specific event to which the questioning relates. However, the investigator is not obliged to answer all the questions that may be of interest to you. At this stage, the criminal investigation is still in progress and no information is given to third parties.

    It is important to take the investigator’s invite seriously. According to the Code of Criminal Procedure, a witness is obliged to appear at the investigator’s request to give testimony. If you do not have a valid reason for failing to appear, you may be fined or subjected to compelled attendance. Generally, investigators can also give you a rough estimate of how long the procedure may take. Only in exceptional cases is the questioning carried out in written form.

    During the questioning, you will be asked specific questions to which you will be expected to give specific answers. The questions may relate to your knowledge of a person or event you witnessed. You may be asked to recall past conversations or to identify someone from pictures; you may also be asked to explain the context of evidence already collected (e.g., e-mails). If you do not know the answer to a question, or if you do not remember a fact, you should answer accordingly – speculation cannot be relied on by investigators or defence lawyers in later proceedings, and inaccurate details can lead to wrong conclusions. Your statements must be true. Perjury is a criminal offence punishable by a fine or up to three years’ imprisonment.

    A witness has the right to request a lawyer, but this does not mean that your right to a lawyer is as absolute as that of the suspect. If the witness fails to appear with a suitable representative within two working days of the questioning, the procedure will be carried out without one.

    As a witness, you have the right to refuse to testify if doing so could incriminate you or your close relatives. A relative is defined as a person close to you who is your spouse, registered partner, parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, sister, brother, half-sister, half-brother or half-sister, as well as a parent, child or grandchild of your spouse or registered partner. In case law, a close relative can also be, for example, a former spouse.

    All your answers will be written down and you will have the opportunity to read them before the end of the procedure. If anything has been taken down incorrectly, or if you feel that the meaning of your statements has been distorted, it is worth informing the investigator and correcting your statements accordingly. Finally, you sign the statement to confirm that it is correct, and this document remains solely at the disposal of the investigator. You will not receive a copy of your statements.

    If you suspect that events of interest to the investigator may relate to your or a loved one’s activities and that your statements may incriminate you or your family member, we advise you to consult a lawyer first. If your suspicions are well founded, it may be more advisable to (initially) refuse to testify.

    Giving testimony as a suspect

    If you are called to testify as a suspect, the situation is much more serious. At the beginning of the procedure, the investigator will inform you of all your rights as a suspect, and your signature will be taken. You will then be shown the content of the suspicion – a description of the behaviour you are suspected of – and an explanation of what the offence is. The investigator is under no obligation to answer your questions about the motives for starting the criminal proceedings or what evidence they have already obtained – you will only be given this information once the criminal proceedings have been fully completed and the case file is made available to your lawyer.

    A suspect has the right to:

    • know the content of the suspicion and give or refuse to give testimony with regard to the content of the suspicion;
    • know that his or her testimony may be used in order to bring charges against him or her;
    • the assistance of an interpreter or translator;
    • the assistance of a counsel;
    • confer with the counsel without the presence of other persons;
    • be interrogated and participate in confrontation, comparison of testimony to circumstances and presentation for identification in the presence of a counsel;
    • participate in the hearing of an application for an arrest warrant in court;
    • submit evidence;
    • submit requests and complaints;
    • examine the minutes of procedural acts and give statements on the conditions, course, results and minutes of the procedural acts, whereas such statements are recorded in the minutes;
    • give consent to the application of settlement proceedings, participate in the negotiations for settlement proceedings, make proposals concerning the type and term of punishment and enter or decline to enter into an agreement concerning settlement proceedings.

    As with the witness, the suspect is obligated to appear at the request of the investigating officer. If you do not have a valid reason for failing to appear, you may be fined, subjected to compelled attendance, or declared wanted.

    In the case of minor offences, the presence of a lawyer is not mandatory, but if you do decide to give testimony, we recommend that you consult a lawyer before doing so. All your statements will be written down and, once you have read them, you will sign them to confirm their accuracy. Any statement you give may be used against you in subsequent legal proceedings. Although the obligation to give only truthful statements is also explained to the suspect, giving false statements as a suspect is not a criminal offence.

    All in all, an invite to questioning can seem daunting, but the act itself is fairly straightforward.

    By Elise Altroff, Associate, Widen Legal Estonia

  • Cobalt Advises Change Ventures on Investment in Certific

    Cobalt has advised Change Ventures on co-leading a EUR 700,000 round for Certific, alongside Firstpick and Heartfelt VC.

    Change Ventures is a venture capital fund.

    Certific is an Estonia-based doctor-patient communication and clinical data capture platform servicing more than 115 clinics, over 900 clinicians, and 300,000 patients since its launch in January 2023.

    According to Cobalt, “this new financing round allows Certific to expand to new markets and continue growing in Estonia.”

    The Cobalt team included Managing Associate Greete-Kristiine Kuru.

    Cobalt did not respond to our inquiry on the matter.

  • TGS Baltic Advises 2C Ventures and AS SmartCap on Investment in AIO

    TGS Baltic has advised 2C Ventures and AS SmartCap on a EUR 6.1 million investment round for AIO that also saw Nordic Foodtech VC and Voima Ventures participate. Triniti reportedly advised AIO.

    2C Ventures is a cleantech venture fund launched in 2024 in Estonia.

    SmartCap provides cornerstone investments for private fund managers.

    Nordic Foodtech VC and Voima Ventures are Finnish deeptech-focused venture capital funds.

    According to TGS Baltic, AIO tech is a “research-heavy deeptech startup founded in 2022 with a mission to replace palm oil, coconut oil, and animal fats with sustainable and healthier alternatives. By introducing environmentally friendly microbial lipid products to the market, they aim to evoke a turn of mind toward more responsible production and consumption.”

    The TGS Baltic team Partner Kadri Kallas, Counsels Mirko Kikkamagi and Silvia Urgas, and Senior Associates Liisa Levandi and Mari Anne Rohtla.

  • TGS Baltic Successful For Elering in Renewable Energy Support Cases Before ECJ

    TGS Baltic has successfully represented Elering in two renewable energy support cases before the European Court of Justice and the Estonian Administrative Court.

    According to TGS Baltic, “the disputes concerned renewable energy support, which, according to the European Commission’s state aid permit, can be given without a lower offer. The explanations of the European Court in the decisions made provide legal clarity regarding which producers Elering AS may grant renewable energy support in this so-called simplified procedure.”

    Moreover, the firm reports that the “European Court found that in each case it is necessary to assess whether the project was at such a stage of development at the end of 2016 that it was very likely to be completed, and that the project is at such a stage of development that allows the developer to be considered an existing producer of renewable energy. In essence, this means that projects that did not have the necessary legitimate expectation to receive renewable energy support as of the end of 2016 cannot receive support under the simplified procedure.”

    The TGS Baltic team included Partner Triinu Jarviste and Senior Associate Vitali Sipilov.

  • Cobalt Advises Karma Ventures on Leading the Series A for Patchstack

    Cobalt has advised Karma Ventures on leading the USD 5 million series A investment round for Estonian cybersecurity startup Patchstack which also saw the participation of G+D Ventures and Emilia Capital. Triniti reportedly advised Patchstack.

    Karma Ventures is a venture capital fund specializing in late-stage seed and A-round investments,

    Patchstack is an Estonian-based cybersecurity company that enables digital agencies and web developers to monitor and protect websites and applications from third-party code vulnerabilities. 

    G+D Ventures is a German investor.

    Emilia Capital is the investment firm of Yoast founders Marieke van de Rakt and Joost de Valk.

    The Cobalt team included Managing Associate Greete-Kristiine Kuru and Assistant Lawyer Paul Schifrin.

    Editor’s Note: After this article was published, Ellex announced that it advised Giesecke+Devrient Ventures on its participation. The firm’s team included Partner Antti Perli.

  • Energizing Estonia (and Its Defense Budget): A Buzz Interview with Triinu Hiob of Njord

    In Estonia, the push toward renewable energy, particularly offshore projects, is gaining momentum, with recent developments in grid connections and government support schemes, according to Njord Partner Triinu Hiob who also reports on tax changes and judicial reforms on the horizon.

    “Estonia is striving to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy, and offshore energy is gaining momentum,” Hiob begins. While there have been some limitations, particularly with grid connections, progress is happening, she says. “Just recently, the initial connection for a major offshore energy project was announced.” The government is also discussing support schemes for large-scale energy projects, which will have significant implications for legal professionals, she reports.

    “We’re seeing a surge in construction, planning, and zoning projects related to renewable energy,” Hiob continues.”Dispute resolution is another area that’s evolving, especially with renewables-related projects involving international investors, where arbitration is becoming more common.”

    In addition to the renewable energy boom, Hiob mentions recent as well as still pending tax changes. “The government’s core aim is to improve the balance of the state budget, and that involves new taxes and tax increases. For example, VAT was increased from January this year, and another hike is scheduled for July 2025. Starting in January 2026, we will see the introduction of a new tax – corporate profit tax,” Hiob explains. “What’s unique about our system is that reinvested profits haven’t been taxed over the past two decades, which has been a competitive advantage for our country. The amendment that is planned as a temporary measure for 2026 and 2027, will introduce a 2% tax on all profits to support defense spending.” According to her, this will keep tax lawyers and advisors busy as, due to the temporary nature of the new tax, companies may wish to adjust the timing of realizing the profit.

    Continuing, Hiob shares her insights on how the government is balancing its efforts to increase revenue with cost reductions, which does not leave the judicial system unaffected. “This is where things get a bit tricky – the Ministry of Justice recently canceled an application process for new judges, despite the courts experiencing heavy workloads in recent years,” Hiob says. “On the background, the ministry plans to address the workload of the courts with some minor measures, but one change with significant practical effect for parties is a contemplated amendment to the procedural code, which will affect interim relief measures. Currently, judges must decide on interim relief requests within a day, but the proposed amendment will extend that to three days. This might seem like a small change, but it will have a notable impact on how efficient those decisions are, which affects both lawyers and clients,” Hiob explains.

    Finally, Hiob concludes by stating that, “apart from the tax law amendments, there haven’t been any major changes in the past few months. However, the upcoming profit tax and the procedural changes in the courts are certainly areas to watch. Legal professionals in Estonia are bracing for a busy period as these new laws take effect and we begin to see their real-world implications.”

  • Cobalt Advises BonVenture on Investment in Fairown

    Cobalt has advised BonVenture on its investment into Fairown as part of a EUR 5.7 million seed extension round.

    BonVenture is a provider of social venture capital in German-speaking countries.

    Fairown is an Estonia-based multi-category B2C subscription service provider.

    According to Cobalt, “this funding round, led by BonVenture and supported by existing investors such as Neosfer (the early-stage investment arm of the Commerzbank Group), STIHL Ventures (the corporate venture capital arm of STIHL), and Gateway Ventures, is set to drive Fairown’s expansion into the German market.”

    The Cobalt team included Managing Associate Greete-Kristiine Kuru and Assistant Lawyer Paul Schifrin.

    Cobalt did not respond to our inquiry on the matter.