Category: Bulgaria

  • DGKV Successful for CEZ Razpredelenie Bulgaria Before Bulgaria’s Commission for Protection Against Discrimination

    DGKV Successful for CEZ Razpredelenie Bulgaria Before Bulgaria’s Commission for Protection Against Discrimination

    DGKV has successfully represented the interests of CEZ Razpredelenie Bulgaria AD in several cases before Bulgaria’s Commission for Protection against Discrimination.

    CEZ Razpredelenie is one of three public electricity suppliers in Bulgaria. According to DGKV, the cases involved allegations that the company had committed “ethnic discrimination” by installing commercial metering devices at an inaccessible height.

    Two of the cases required to requests from preliminary rulings by the Court of Justice of the European Union to clarify the meaning of the Race Directive (Directive 2000/43/EC), with DGKV representing CEZ before the EU Court of Justice on both occasions. One of the cases, DGKV reports “was decided by the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice, a confirmation of the matter’s legal complexity.”

    Subsequently, “the Commission for Protection against Discrimination has now decided two cases in CEZ Razpredelenie’s favour. The commission determined that the installation of metering devices at an inaccessible height in certain neighborhoods is not an act which leads to direct or indirect discrimination, but an objectively justified and lawful practice under CEZ’s obligations to society and clients in accordance with Art. 69 of the Energy Act, namely: guaranteeing citizens’ lives and health, ownership, quality of electricity, the continuity of electricity supply, and the security and reliability of the country’s energy system.” According to DGKV, three similar cases are still pending before the anti-discrimination commission.

    The DGKV team included Partner Angel Ganev and Senior Associates Elena Ivanova and Valentin Bojilov.  

  • DGKV Successful for Engineering Consultancies in Arbitration Against Bulgarian Ministry of Environment and Waters

    DGKV Successful for Engineering Consultancies in Arbitration Against Bulgarian Ministry of Environment and Waters

    DGKV acted for a consortium consisting of German engineering consultancy companies CDM Smith Consult GmbH, Fichtner GmbH & Co KG, and C&E Consulting und Engineering GmbH in arbitration proceedings before the Arbitration Court at the Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce against the Bulgarian Ministry of Environment and Waters.

    According to DGKV, the dispute was related to a procurement contract awarded under the ISPA programme – the EU pre-accession instrument that supported activities in the field of environment and transport. “The ministry contracted the consortium in 2008 to prepare remediation plans, organize tenders for construction works, and exercise engineering supervision in order to ensure the implementation of remedial measures for 18 dumpsites situated in five regions in Bulgaria: Montana, Rousse, Sevlievo, Silistra, and Sozopol. In 2010 the ministry terminated the contract at the design phase, alleging low service quality and also refusing to provide full payment for the work delivered by the Consortium.”

    The firm reports that on August 9, 2017, “the arbitrators ruled that at the time of termination of the procurement contract the consortium had already delivered approximately half of all required services. Accordingly, the arbitrators decided to partially uphold the original claim awarding to the consortium a sum exceeding EUR 161,000, representing the remuneration due but unpaid by the ministry. Furthermore, the consortium is awarded default interest in accordance with the Bulgarian statutory rules, which shall continue to accrue until final repayment by the Ministry. The arbitral award is final and cannot be appealed.”

    The DGKV team on the case included Partners Angel Ganev and Violetta Kunze, Senior Associates Anton Petrov and Elena Ivanova, and Associate Simeon Vachev.

  • Bulgaria: On the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Over Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs in the EU

    In general the protection of intellectual property rights over products related to or originating in a defined geographical area is based on the legal concept of a “geographical indication.” According to both legal theory and practice a geographical indication (GI) is a sign used on products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities or a reputation related to that origin.

    In order to function as a GI, the sign must identify the product (an agricultural product or a foodstuff for the purposes of this article) as originating in a given place or at least that the qualities, characteristics, or reputation of the product are essentially due to the place of its origin. GIs were established to enable those who have the right to use the indication for their products to prevent its use by third parties whose products do not conform to the standards. For example, producers who have the right to use the protected sign “Gornooryahovski Sudzhuk” can exclude the use of that sign for any raw dried sausage not produced according to their standards and thus prevent the misuse of the indication by those who want to unlawfully benefit from the reputation of this traditional Bulgarian sausage.

    On the territory of the EU three types of quality schemes for the protection of quality agricultural products and foodstuffs were introduced by Regulation (EU) No. 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of November 21, 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs: The protected geographical indications (PGI), the protected designation of origin (PDO), and the traditional specialties guaranteed (TSG). While these quality schemes vary in the degree of requirements needed for qualifying for protection (the requirements for obtaining a PGI being less strict than those for obtaining a PDO), the purpose of their protection remains virtually identical: to benefit rural economies by giving markets the tools to identify and promote quality products which have specific characteristics due to their place of origin, to protect producers against unfair practices, and to benefit the consumers by providing clear information on these products. A characteristic of this protective framework is that geographical indications and designations of origin can only be protected at the European Union level to ensure uniform and thus more effective protection of intellectual property rights obtained with regards to agricultural products and foodstuffs. 

    Over the years a wide variety of practical issues have arisen with regards to the schemes for protection of agricultural products and foodstuffs. The main topics of ECJ case law with regards to Regulation 1151/2012 (and its predecessors – Regulation 506/2006 and Regulation 509/2006) has focused on the issues of labeling of quality products (Case C-446/07, Alberto Severi), comparing the requirements for PGIs and PDOs and their registration (Case C-120/08, Bavaria NV), and on the scope of the framework of quality schemes for protection for agricultural products and foodstuffs established at EU level (Case C-478/07, Budejovicky Budvar). In these cases the ECJ has found that the EU system for protection is uniform and exhaustive and does not allow Member States to apply other schemes on a national or a regional level – thus national systems can only exist for the purpose of regulating the first stage of the process of submitting an application for registration. The inconsistent case law of the national courts, the number of requests for preliminary rulings pending for review before the ECJ, and the insufficient number of academic articles in this area however only demonstrate the lack of popularity of this highly significant topic, especially among the newer Member States of the Union. 

    Regardless of the different types of practical issues Member States encounter in the process of applying the Community regulations in the area of intellectual property rights related to agricultural products and foodstuffs, the EU framework for protection comprehensively organizes three types of quality schemes: protected designations of origin, protected geographical indications, and traditional specialties guaranteed. While the main purpose of the quality schemes framework established under Regulation 1151/2012 at Union level is to benefit the rural economy by giving producers the proper tools to promote their quality products and prevent third parties from unlawfully profiting from their reputation, it should be born in mind that the added value of the different types of quality schemes for protection is – as always – based on consumer trust.

    By Yoanna Ivanova, Head of Intellectual Property Department, Gugushev & Partners Law Offices

    This Article was originally published in Issue 4.5 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Schoenherr Advises Bulgarian Eagle Airline on Bulgarian Expansion and AOC Certification

    Schoenherr Advises Bulgarian Eagle Airline on Bulgarian Expansion and AOC Certification

    Schoenherr has advised Bulgarian Eagle airlines, the ACMI (Aircraft, Crew, Maintenance, and Insurance) carrier recently founded by the Germania Group, on its expansion into Bulgaria and on obtaining an official air operator certificate from the Bulgarian authorities, which allows the airline to use aircraft for commercial purposes. After all the necessary licenses were issued and a demonstration flight was successfully completed, the Bulgarian aviation authority cleared the new airline for take-off.

    Germania is an independent German airline which was established over 30 years ago. The airline carries more than 3 million passengers each year on short and medium-haul flights. Germania offers connections from 20 departure airports in Europe to over 55 destinations within the continent, North Africa, and the Middle East. Germania’s subsidiary, Bulgarian Eagle, was founded in November 2016.

    “We are very excited to have been part of the Germania Group’s expansion into Bulgaria,” said Schoenherr Sofia Regulatory Partner Stefana Tsekova, who led the firm’s team on the matter, “and to have supported Bulgarian Eagle in obtaining its community air carrier operating license.” 

    In addition to Tsekova, the Schoenherr team included Attorney at Law Ivelina Vassileva.

    Image Source: flygermania.com

  • CHSH Bulgaria Advises Hewlett Packard Enterprise in Bulgaria on Merger of Its Enterprise Business with Computer Science Corporation

    CHSH Bulgaria Advises Hewlett Packard Enterprise in Bulgaria on Merger of Its Enterprise Business with Computer Science Corporation

    CHSH Gerginov Aehrenthal Zivny has advised Hewlett Packard Enterprise in Bulgaria on the merger of its Enterprise business segment with Computer Science Corporation.

    CHSH reports that its advice “included designing the structure of the ‘spin-merger’ at the local level and advising the client on all aspects of the transaction, including with regard to corporate, commercial and employment law, as well as on IP separation matters and implementing a local demerger, a business asset transaction and drafting all transaction documents. The local transaction included the demerger of one of the local subsidiaries, involving the transfer of over 3000 employees and significant assets and contracts, as well as a business asset transaction in relation to the second HPE local entity. CHSH also advised HPE on the incorporation of new entities, data protection issues and regulatory matters.”

    In addition, according to CHSH Bulgaria, “the transaction was not a simple demerger or sale of a business unit, but a global separation of part of the entire business of HPE, which meant that for each entity in every jurisdiction the Enterprise business had to be carved out and transferred to a completely new company structure. In the end, two completely separated HPE company structures were established, one of which was merged with CSC, which subsequently became what is now known as DXC.technology.”

  • Boyanov & Co. Advises on Acquisition of Second Largest Shopping Center in Bulgaria

    Boyanov & Co. Advises on Acquisition of Second Largest Shopping Center in Bulgaria

    Boyanov & Co. has advised UK Hystead Limited on its EUR 156 million acquisition of The Mall — the second biggest shopping center in Bulgaria. In particular, UK Hystead Limited acquires 100% of Bulgarian company AP Retail I Limited from Cypros Fortone Holdings Limited, which is ultimately owned by Greece’s Assos Capital (85%) and Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs (a combined 15%). Dinova Rusev & Partners Law Office advised the sellers on the deal.

    UK Hystead Limited is a subsidiary of South African Hyprop Investments Limited (60%) and PDI Investment Holdings Limited (40%), and the purchase represents Hyprop Investments Limited’s first investment in the European Union. 

    The deal does not include the hypermarket in the shopping center which is owned by UniCredit Bulbank. A second deal for the hypermarket was secured for a price of around EUR 20 million. Upon completion of that deal the shopping center will increase its leasable area to above 66,000 square meters. According to Boyanov & Co., management reports that 99.7% of the current leasable area is leased and that “there is a huge interest of tenants for the lease of the new 14,000 square meters to be further developed.”

    The Boyanov & Co. team advising UK Hystead Limited was led by M&A Partner Yordan Naydenov and by Real Estate Partner Nickolay Nickolov.  

    Image Source: bulgarianproperties.com

  • CMS Advises on Largest Renewable Energy Refinancing in Bulgaria

    CMS Advises on Largest Renewable Energy Refinancing in Bulgaria

    Acting for borrowers RES Techonogy JSCo and ASM-BG Investicii JSCo., both jointly owned by the Korean South East Energy Company (a subsidiary of KEPCO) and SDN Company Ltd., CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang has advised on the largest renewable energy refinancing in Bulgaria to date with the completion of UniCredit’s EUR 62 million facility. CMS Reich Rohrwig Hainz advised UniCredit on the refinancing.

    According to CMS, “both borrowers have been CMS clients since 2009 and operate two photovoltaic power plants of 42MWp in northern Bulgaria. CMS originally assisted with the initial EUR 110 million loan from the Korean Development Bank back in 2012.”

    The original EUR 152 million investment in the two photovoltaic projects remains the largest Korean investment in Bulgaria to date and marks the first successful foreign investment from the Korean South East Energy Company. According to CMS, “this landmark transaction allows Korean South East Energy Company to start looking for new investments in the region.”

    The CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang team was led by Partner and Head of Energy in CEE Kostadin Sirleshtov, assisted by Partner Elitsa Ivanova and lawyers Borislava Pokrass, Dimitar Dimitrov, Jenia Dimitrova, Raya Maneva, Zornitsa Stoykova, Desislava Vasileva, Plamena Kostadinova, Borislava Piperkova, Alexander Rangelov, and Angel Naydenov.

    The CMS Reich Rohrwig-Hainz team representing the lenders was led by Managing Partner Gentscho Pavlov, supported by Associates Dimitar Zwiatkow, Ivan Gergovm and Marin Drinov.

    A team from Korea’s Kim & Chang law firm led by Senior Attorney Young Kyun Cho represented Korean Development Bank.

  • Schoenherr and Deloitte Legal Advise on Kronberg International Acquisition of Mall Varna

    Schoenherr and Deloitte Legal Advise on Kronberg International Acquisition of Mall Varna

    Schoenherr has advised Kronberg International on the acquisition of Mall Varna EAD from Raiffeisen Bank International AG. Deloitte Legal advised RBI on the deal, which closed in Q2, 2017. The purchase price was not disclosed.

    Mall Varna EAD is the sole owner of Mall Varna, which is located in the center of Varna, the third largest city and seaside resort in Bulgaria. Mall Varna is a shopping center with 32 thousand square meters of gross lettable area. The total built-up area is 65 thousand square meters, with around 150 retail stores, international food chains, multiple cinemas, a popular family entertainment center, and a fitness club. The shopping center features five above-ground floors, including one floor with office spaces and three underground levels with a total of 600 parking spaces.

    According to Schoenherr, Kronberg International, which was founded in 1989, “invests alone or with national and international investment partners in real estate projects. The investments entail individual properties, real estate portfolios, real estate companies in the residential and commercial markets, as well as on non-performing loans.”

    “We were excited to support Kronberg International on this highlight transaction,” commented Schoenherr Bulgaria Managing Partner Alexandra Doytchinova, who led the firm’s team on the deal. “Mall Varna is a landmark property, not only in the region, but also on the Bulgarian retail market.” Doytchinova was assisted by Attorneys at Law Elena Todorova, Ivelina Vassileva, and Stela Pavlova.

    The Deloitte Legal team consisted of Managing Partner Reneta Petkova, Senior Associate Kaloyan Yordanov, and Attorney at Law Yoana Zhechkova.

  • DGKV Successful for CEZ in a Multimillion Dispute with NEK

    DGKV Successful for CEZ in a Multimillion Dispute with NEK

    DGKV has successfully assisted CEZ Electro Bulgaria AD, one of the three public electricity suppliers in Bulgaria, in settling a multimillion commercial dispute with state-owned power utility National Electricity Company EAD (NEK).

    According to DGKV, the dispute revolved around CEZ’s claim that NEK was required to pay it (at preferential prices) for electricity from renewable energy sources and high efficiency cogeneration CEZ had provided to the state from July 1st, 2012 to July 31, 2013, and NEK’s counterclaim that CEZ owed NEK for electricity CEZ had purchased from the state from January-February 2014 (CEZ made partial payments, but then notified NEK that it would deduct the amounts due since it had outstanding receivables from NEK). In other words, according to DGKV, “the main matter in dispute in the commercial litigation proceedings was the … set-off objection of CEZ Electro.”

    DGKV reports that it “successfully defended CEZ Electro before [the court of] first instance, and after the pending proceedings before the second instance court, our lawyers assisted the parties to reach a mutually beneficial out-of-court settlement. On 12th July 2017 a contract was signed upon which the relations between the parties in relation to the existing legal dispute were finally settled.”

    DGKV’s team on the project included Partner Angel Ganev and Senior Associates Anton Krustev and Gergana Monovska. 

  • Boyanov and PM&P Advise on Silver Star Group Acquisition of Mercedes Distribution Business from Vienna Real Estate

    Boyanov and PM&P Advise on Silver Star Group Acquisition of Mercedes Distribution Business from Vienna Real Estate

    Boyanov & Co. has advised Silver Star Group on its acquisition of a group of assets and services related to the Mercedes distribution business in Bulgaria from Vienna Real Estate / Balkan Star Group. Penkov, Markov & Partners advised Balkan Star on the deal.

    Silver Star Group is owned by Saudi businessman Sheikh Khaled al Juffali, the Managing Director of Ebrahim A. Juffali and Brothers – which Boyanov & Co. describes as “Saudi Arabia’s largest commercial enterprise.”

    According to Boyanov & Co., in April, Silver Star Motors EAD was appointed by Daimler AG as General Distributor for the sale of Mercedes-Benz trucks, cars, commercial vans, Evobus, Fuso trucks, Maybach and Unimog in Bulgaria. In the process of setting-up its distribution network in Bulgaria, and in a series of separate transactions, Silver Star acquired two showrooms in Varna and Plovdiv and certain movable assets and inventory from Vienna Real Estate and Balkan Star Group (the former Mercedes distributor in Bulgaria). The parties also agreed on the rent of showroom in Sofia and the provision of certain services by Vienna Group to Silver Star Group.

    The Boyanov & Co. team was led by Partners Nikolay Zisov and Nickolay Nickolov, with Senior Associate Georgi Drenski advising on the bank financing aspects of the transactions.

    The Penkov, Markov & Partners team included Partners Milena Gaidarska, Svetlin Adrianov, and Svetoslav Dimitrov, supported by lawyers Maria Pashalieva, Radost Georgieva, Yura Mincheva, Assen Apostolov, and Lora Georgieva. The team worked under the general supervision of Chairman and Senior Partner Vladimir Penkov.