Category: Bulgaria

  • Bulgaria: New Purchaser, New Rules. CPC Clears the Acquisition of Nova TV by Domuschievi Brothers in “fast-track” Proceeding

    In July 2018, following an in-depth investigation and in a rather hasty and controversial decision, the Commission on the Protection of Competition (“CPC”) prohibited the acquisition of the largest media conglomerate in Bulgaria, Nova Broadcasting Group AD (“Nova TV” or “Nova”), by PPF, owned by Czech businessman Petr Kellner.

    The decision came under fire for its lack of valid economic arguments. It was not clear how the CPC concluded that the acquisition of Nova would lead to a strengthening of PPF’s dominant position on the relevant markets. The CPC claimed that the transaction would impede effective competition, but the acquiring entity had only a negligible presence on the market where their activities overlapped (0–5%). Also, in its prohibition decision the CPC underlined the significant power of Nova, but failed to explain how this position would change if the acquisition by an insignificant market player is cleared.

    Different purchaser and merger clearance in 2019

    Less than a year later, a new merger filing for Nova’s acquisition was submitted, this time by Advance Media Group EAD, owned by the popular Bulgarian businessmen Kiril and Georgi Domuschievi, who operate multiple businesses ranging from construction to football clubs. This time, the CPC cleared the transaction unconditionally. Thus, the previous owner – Swedish entertainment company Modern Times Group – was finally able to sell the TV network and exit the Bulgarian market. 

    In contrast with the previous CPC proceedings, the clearance decisions came in approximately two weeks only. This time the CPC was adamant that the planned acquisition of Nova would not lead to anti-competitive effects on the market. This is because the two companies, namely the target company Nova and the acquirer Advance Media Group, are not direct competitors on the TV distribution market but are in a de facto vertical relationship, as the former is a purchaser and the latter a producer of TV content. This is evidenced by the fact that Advance Media Group, through its subsidiary Football Media Group, is the exclusive producer and rightsholder of the Bulgarian Football League, the rights of which are bought and broadcasted by the sports channels of Nova TV since 2016. Although this was mentioned and assessed in the decision, the CPC found no evidence to have any anti-competitive concerns.

    Also, in the clearance decision, the CPC discusses a “partial overlap” between the activities of the participants in the concentration, but such overlap seems unproblematic. This is surprising given that in the prohibition decision the CPC discusses the “partial overlap” combined with the “significant experience” of Nova on the Bulgarian market as reasons to prohibit Nova’s acquisition by PPF.

    Furthermore, in the 2018 decision which prohibited the transaction, the CPC concluded that there are “significant barriers to entry on the media markets”, among others the licence to operate as a TV operator. In its new decision concerning Nova TV, however, the CPC states that the media market has barriers to entry which may be overcome and is therefore “accessible” to new market participants.

    Another important difference between the two decisions is that the 2018 analysis starts with an assessment of Nova TV’s “leading” position on the media market, with explicit reference to its market shares on the relevant markets, while in the new decision the company’s leading position is not discussed at all, the analysis instead focusing only on the partial (and insignificant) overlap, even though the CPC does not quote exact or approximate market shares.

    Significance of the clearance decision

    Many Bulgarian outlets commented that this decision is of huge political significance. Ultimately, it remains to be seen how the Bulgarian market for the provision and distribution of TV services will shape up following that concentration.

    By Galina Petkova, Attorney at Law Schoenherr

  • CEE Attorneys Adds Bulgarian Arm in Sazdov & Petrov

    CEE Attorneys Adds Bulgarian Arm in Sazdov & Petrov

    Bulgaria’s Sazdov & Petrov law firm has become a member of the CEE Attorneys network of law firms.

    Sazdov & Petrov was established in Sofia in 2005 by Partners Alexander Sazdov and Blagovest Petrov. The firm focuses on advisory work in the fields of corporate law, mergers and acquisitions, real estate, intellectual property rights, and tax law.

  • Kostadin Sirleshtov Takes Over as Managing Partner of CMS Bulgaria

    Kostadin Sirleshtov Takes Over as Managing Partner of CMS Bulgaria

    CMS has announced that Kostadin Sirleshtov has taken over as Managing Partner of the firm’s Bulgarian office from David Butts, who is stepping down after almost ten years in the role and retiring from the CMS partnership.

    Sirleshtov has been a leader of the Energy practice of CMS in Bulgaria for over 13 years and has been Head of the CMS Energy practice for Central and Eastern Europe since 2014. According to CMS, “his area of expertise spans across oil and gas, conventional power, underground resources, nuclear energy, electricity, renewables, infrastructure, projects, PPP, public procurement. He has advised on all offshore oil & gas production concessions in Bulgaria and was involved in all recent tenders in the sector. He has advised a multitude of energy clients on their oil & gas exploration and production activities in Bulgaria.”

    Butts moved to Europe from his native Canada in 2001 to join Hayhurst Robinson as a partner in Budapest and Sofia. Five years later, in January 2006, the firm merged with CMS McKenna.

  • Data Privacy, Cybersecurity, and Anti-Money Laundering in the Spotlight

    2018 was an eventful year from a compliance perspective, with data privacy, cyber security, and anti-money laundering among the key areas. Like other countries in the EU, Bulgaria has made steps to harmonize its legislation and follow the major legal trends in Europe.

    Some of the new provisions extend the protections for vulnerable consumers; others concern companies’ overall approaches to risk management. Along with the positive aspects of increased focus and protection, businesses faced and continue to face many challenges in adapting to the new legal requirements.

    GDPR Enforcement

    2018 will definitely be remembered by compliance officers as the year in which Regulation 2016/679 (the GDPR) became operational.  

    Starting from 2016, when no one paid much attention to the GDPR, then in 2017 and in the first quarter of 2018, businesses in Bulgaria struggled to properly understand the new rules, identify their gaps, and comply with the GDPR. A February 2018 survey conducted of its members by the Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry showed that four months before the GDPR’s May 25, 2018 applicability date only 14% of the businesses were even somewhat ready to meet its requirements. 

    Most of the companies reported that the principle of accountability was one of the biggest challenges. This principle required that a large amount of policies be prepared and implemented, data subjects be notified, and projects be planned from a GDPR perspective, all of which involved significant costs. Another challenge was the IT angle of each GDPR project. The requirements for “appropriate technical and organizational measures” involved improving mechanisms for physical, technical, and software protection, and data breach registration, reporting, and remedial actions. 

    Today, GDPR awareness among business has risen, but many companies still have a long way to go to ensure compliance.

    On January 24, 2019, the Bulgarian parliament voted to amend and supplement the Personal Data Protection Act to transpose and localize, where possible, the GDPR rules.  It is yet to be seen how the sub-legislative acts and the practice will shape the implementation of the new rules in Bulgaria.  

    The New Cybersecurity Act

    On November 13, 2018, the Bulgarian Cybersecurity Act (CSA) entered into force to implement the NIS Directive (EU Directive 2016/1148).  

    The new requirements apply to the administrative authorities and providers of public services online; operators of essential services that rely heavily on network and information systems in key sectors such as energy, water, transport, banking, and healthcare; and digital service operators such as e-commerce platforms, online search engines, and cloud computing services.

    The CSA imposes new cybersecurity standards on those affected businesses that use network and information systems in their activity and where a cyber incident may significantly affect the provision of their services. As with the GDPR, compliance is time- and resource-consuming, as affected entities must deploy state-of-the-art technologies, policies, and processes in order to mitigate the risk of incidents and to be able to report them.  

    The full implementation of the CSA by authorities and businesses is pending the adoption of sub-legislative acts to further detail the requirements.  

    New Anti-Money Laundering Approach

    In March 2018, the Bulgarian parliament adopted a new AML Act which transposes the EU’s 4th AMLD and introduces some major changes, including a new risk-based approach, enhanced customer due diligence, establishment of ultimate beneficial owner register, definition of politically exposed persons, etc. This was followed by a new AML Regulation at the end of 2018 providing further guidance and specifics.

    Bulgaria is also in the process of performing the comprehensive national risk assessment envisaged by the 4th AMLD to identify the AML/CFT risks at a national level, which will be used as a basis for risk assessments for the different sectors and individually for the obliged entities.

    There are 35 categories of obliged entities, including private businesses, authorities, and political parties, that are required to apply the AML measures, which include customer due diligence (including the identification of clients, beneficial owners, and origins of funds), the collection of data and documents, assessment of money laundering risks, and reporting obligations with regard to any doubtful transactions and customers. 

    Obliged entities under the AML Act will need to register their ultimate beneficial owners before the end of May 2019 in the Bulgarian Commercial Register and Register of NPLE.

    By Nevena Radlova, Head of IP and Competition, and Tatyana Yosifova, Junior Associate, CMS Sofia

    This Article was originally published in Issue 6.2 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Energy Sector in the Spotlight

    Legislation and Strategic Changes in the Bulgarian Energy Sector: Several amendments were made to Bulgaria’s energy laws in 2018 facilitating the further liberalization of the energy market. Renewable energy producers exceeding 4 MW installed capacity that enjoyed offtake of their energy at Feed-In Tariff (FiT) were introduced to a different support scheme: Contracts for Premium (CfP), which became effective on January 1, 2019. Under CfP, renewables sell their electricity to the free market – either to the Independent Bulgarian Energy Exchange (IBEX) or to their balancing group coordinators.

    Latest Changes to the Bulgarian Energy Strategy to 2020

    Bulgaria’s Parliament included the construction of the Balkan Gas Hub as a priority project in the National Energy Strategy Until 2020 by amendments and supplements introduced in late 2018. The amendments were necessitated by the changing gas flows in South-Eastern Europe and the desire to preserve and develop Bulgaria’s role as a leading transit center in the region.

    Large-Scale Energy Projects

    Nuclear Energy in Focus

    The re-start of the Belene Nuclear Power Plant (the “Belene NPP”) was announced in late 2018, and Bulgaria’s Government has approved the draft framework for the selection process of a strategic investor for the power plant. It is anticipated that the investor selection process will start sometime in February 2019 and will take up to 12 months. According to the Energy Minister, investors willing to acquire a minority share or industrial consumers interested in power supply will also be given the opportunity to take part in the procedure. The terms of disposal will include a blocking quota for the state and participation of local companies in the construction. According to the Bulgarian Government, companies from China, Korea, and France have demonstrated interest in the Belene NPP.

    Balkan Gas Hub Project 

    The ambitious Balkan Gas Hub project, which is a Project of Common Interest for the EU, involves expanding the country’s gas transit network and using part of the Trans-Balkan Pipeline, currently delivering Russian gas to the Balkans through Ukraine, in reverse mode to transport gas volumes from the second string of TurkStream to Serbia and on to Central Europe. 

    In January 2019, Bulgartransgaz EAD registered a subsidiary company, Gas Hub Balkan EAD, to construct a long-awaited gas distribution center on the territory of Bulgaria. This distribution center has all the potential to become a major contributor to energy security in South-Eastern Europe, due to the country’s advantageous geographic location. The new subsidiary company is designed to create a gas-trading platform – a gas exchange with an additional segment for bilateral trade – but it will be mostly involved in developing the hub.

    Green Light for the Interconnector Greece-Bulgaria

    On November 8, 2018, after declaring them in line with EU state aid rules, the European Commission gave the green light to Bulgarian and Greek plans to support the construction and operation of a 182km cross-border gas interconnector between Komotini in Greece and Stara Zagora in Bulgaria. The interconnector will contribute to the objectives of security of supply, diversification of energy sources, and increased competition in EU energy markets. The project, which was originally scheduled for completion by 2020, will have a key year in 2019, involving EPC contractor selection and the commencement of construction.

    Start of the Sofia EfW Project 

    The Bulgarian Government approved the installation of RDF technology in the Sofia Thermal Power Plant in November 2018 after debate lasting over several years. The RDF installation is the last stage of the largest waste treatment system for Bulgaria. It will produce electrical and thermal energy for use by the Sofia District Heating company. 

    Offshore Exploration in the Black Sea 

    In late 2018 Bulgaria’s Government approved the transfer of 30% of the exploration rights on offshore Block 1-14 Khan Kubrat from the current sole holder, Shell, to the local branch of Woodside Energy.

    The third deep-water exploration well in Bulgarian offshore block, 1-21 Han Asparuh in the Black Sea, which is being carried out by Total E&P Bulgaria (40% for Total, and 30% for each OMV and Repsol), started in December 2018. 

    The launch of the tender procedure for oil and gas exploration in the Tervel offshore block is expected to take place in 2019, thus completing the tendering of the three major offshore blocks in Bulgaria.

    By Kostadin Sirleshtov, Partner, and Elena Yotova-Yordanova, Associate, CMS Bulgaria

    This Article was originally published in Issue 6.2 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • A Moderate Success: Cautious Growth in the Land of Roses

    Bulgaria, it seems, is in good shape. Fueled by a buoyant tech sector, the country’s economy is registering impressive growth, incomes are rising, and unemployment is down. Still, with corruption still a problem and the prospect of a global slowdown around the corner, few are willing to bet on the good times sticking around long. As always, in the Land of Roses, the thorns are not far away.

    Lifting Off from the Airport

    The ongoing privatization of the Sofia International Airport is the primary subject du jour for Bulgaria’s leading commercial lawyers. Valued by many experts as worth well over EUR 3.5 billion over 35 years, the concession should result in a long-overdue upgrade to one of Europe’s most outdated and least attractive airports. 

    The airport is, obviously, the gateway into the country for an ever-increasing number of investors and tourists, as the arrivals – which exceeded six million for the first time in 2016 – continue to grow. It is thus both politically and symbolically important, as well as being a source of significant income to the Bulgarian state and to the firms advising various bidders. As a result, the announcement of the successful bid – the initial February 4, 2019 deadline for submitting bids was, at the urging of the IFC, pushed back to April 3d – remains highly anticipated.

    “There is huge interest in the airport concession,” reports Pavel Hristov, Managing Partner of Sofia’s Hristov & Partners. “Especially in light of the successful concession of the Belgrade airport in Serbia in 2018 [which went to French infrastructure group Vinci for EUR 1.5 billion and 25 years], it seems like investors are looking for similar opportunities.” Indeed, referring to “all-year round tourism and the previously-successful concessions of the two airports by the seaside,” Hristov believes that the potential for the airport concession in Bulgaria’s capital is even greater than it was last year in its Serbian counterpart. 

    Optimism is, happily, not emanating solely from the airport. Diana Dimova, the Managing Partner of Kinstellar’s Sofia office, agrees that “these are very interesting times because of the privatization process,” which she describes as “the biggest project the country has seen in recent years,” but she insists that her confidence extends beyond that particular project. According to Dimova, she and her colleagues at Kinstellar Sofia “had a great 2018, and 2019 will be even better.” She points in particular to “the many transactions in the real estate, TMT, financial services, and manufacturing sectors.”

    Separating spin from the truth in this context is as difficult as separating toadstools from mushrooms, but many lawyers appear to share Dimova’s confidence. “I’m positive on the market generally,” says Richard Clegg, the Managing Partner at Wolf Theiss Sofia. “There’s lots of development in the tech sector, and lots of institutional and alternative funds coming in, particularly at the early venture capital end.” He continues, smiling. “There are lots of larger international tech companies coming, providing a lot of outsourcing and back office work. That’s good for wage growth and career prospects. It’s a very exciting tech ecosystem in Bulgaria, and a reason for young people to stay in the country.”

    Indeed, if there’s one thing everyone agrees on, it’s that Bulgaria’s tech sector is doing extremely well. Borislav Boyanov, the Managing Partner at Boyanov & Co., claims the tech sector is especially advanced in the country, describing it as a good ten years ahead of many of its CEE peers, and he describes the FinTech sector in particular as “the most advanced in the region.”

    And Pavel Hristov says, “IT is booming in Bulgaria and it has excellent potential, because the most important resource – human capital, in the form of capable engineers and developers – are here in the market.” Indeed, he says, “they are still here despite the brain drain, because they are a particular breed, looking for quality of life.”

    But technology is not the only source of growth. Hristov says that he is “hearing from Turkish law firms that they are hearing more and more interest from Turkish companies to invest here, and Richard Clegg reports that investors wanting to avoid problems in both Turkey and Greece are increasingly looking at their shared neighbor to the north. In addition, he says, “in some ways, Trump’s position on global trade has had a positive impact for Eastern Europe – threats of a trade war between Asia and the United States have made companies look again at the comparative security, low-cost, and ease of business in Eastern Europe.”

    Boyanov, however, is less convinced. Although he agrees that “from Greece we have investors, particularly in the southwest part of the country,” he is less optimistic about business coming from Turkey. “We expected that on joining the EU lots of Turkish investors would come,” he says, shaking his head. “A few did, but not many. Not many.” 

    Either way, Pavel Hristov is enthusiastic about the commitment of Bulgaria’s government to investing in the country and supporting business. “The government has been running the show for ten years now and has a clear focus on EU-funds-related investments,” he says. “We were underdeveloped in infrastructure for many years, and although it’s still not enough, we have made huge investments in roads, rails, concessions and also logistically in some of the industrial centers.” As a result, he says, the current government is “pro-business for sure.”

    Indeed, Hristov notes that the concessions offered for the airport and recently for the ports “helps business and we can now export easier.” For him, the next step is to ensure a “consistent and uniform application of the rules.” He explains: “We have good quality laws and most are completely aligned with EU legislation. This gives an opportunity to all business from the EU to come here and feel comfortable. The next step is that we need to enforce these rules consistently. Not just in the courts, but also by enforcement bodies, municipalities, and so on.” Simply put, he says, “the state, after investing in infrastructure, needs to invest in the people to develop the capacity of enforcement – so that the investors feel more secure here.”

    Boyanov too believes that providing foreign investors with increased transparency, predictability, and confidence in the security of their investments is key. “The main problem is a non-functioning judiciary. This provides no reliability for investors. This is the most important part. Of course, there are other reasons, but that’s the main one.”

    The Future: Whistling Past the Graveyard?

    Nobody believes the current good times (whether extremely or only sort-of) will last forever, but there seems to be little anxiety that the well will dry anytime soon. “A recession is probable, given the economic cycle,” says Wolf Theiss’s Richard Clegg. “But Bulgaria is still growing from a comparatively low base and I don’t expect a significant slow-down in the next two years.” He cites his firm’s recent advice to the Soravia Group on a financial lease of some three million square meters of land on the site of the former Kremikovtzi steel mill to the south of Sofia as a source of optimism, noting that “the development plan is to build for large logistics, commercial, and infrastructure companies, which would provide a significant employment boost.”

    Kinstellar’s Dimova says “when you hear the government boasting of lower unemployment, greater investments, and salaries and incomes going up, you have to believe it – the economy is growing.” And like Clegg, she cites a major deal her firm worked on in 2018 – the acquisition of Old Mutual Property and its Bulgarian partner AG Capital of Megapark, a 75,000-square-meter office building in Sofia, which she describes as “the largest office acquisition in Bulgaria since 2008” – as underscoring her confidence. 

    And Borislav Boyanov believes that, even if the anticipated slowdown in the global economy does occur, Bulgaria is unlikely to be immediately affected. “Usually the crisis comes a year or two later here,” he says. Still, he’s alert to the likelihood it will come, in some form or another. “Nobody knows what form it will take, exactly, and when,” he says. “Maybe this year, maybe next year. Everybody says the next crisis that’s coming will be different – but nobody knows how. But something’s coming.”

    More critical, for him, at least in the short-term, are the country’s internal problems. “There’s political tension,” he says. “Too much is going on in a bad direction here. Many foreign investors have left the country.” He notes that in the past decade the country has slipped from 6th or 7th in FDI per capita to 58th, and that, over the past two decades, the population in the country has shrunk by 30%.

    Damiam Simeonov, at Boyanov & Co., expresses disappointment that Bulgaria has failed to take better advantage of the opportunities it has had in recent years. Still, his colleague Boyanov is quick to insist that he and his colleagues “remain optimists, as the civil society and the new generation of business people are growing and becoming stronger.”

    The Only Thing Constant is … No Change

    Bulgaria’s legal marketplace is characterized by a remarkable stability, with the same four or five firms remaining atop it for many years, and few successful mergers or split-offs of note. Richard Clegg, commenting from his position at regional Wolf Theiss, says the current situation can not last forever. “There will be a generational change at the largest Bulgarian law firms over the next few years,” he says, “which will present an opportunity for the next generation of leaders, but also a challenge as firms make that transition.” 

    According to Clegg, “despite general optimism, the legal market is challenging as work-quality, technology, and sophistication demands increase together with a pressure for fees to decrease.” He notes that “like other sectors, the best talent is in demand,” which means “there is a great opportunity at the moment for entrepreneurial mid-level lawyers to spin-out and do good work.”

    Borislav Boyanov, whose Boyanov & Co is among the long-time kings of the market, expresses weariness at the continued pressure on fees in the country, which he says are already the lowest in CEE. Lawyers aren’t the only one affected, he says, describing it as also “not good for clients.”

    And Pavel Hristov expresses some frustration that several of the biggest deals in the private sector in Bulgaria last year had only limited local Bulgarian elements. He points to the acquisition by OTP Bank of Societe Generale’s Albanian and Bulgarian subsidiaries as being “initiated, done, and completed outside of Bulgaria mostly,” and says “only a few law firms had a chance to participate on that.” 

    Hristov adds that “the silver lining is the Sofia airport concession.”

    Editor’s Note: After this article was published Borislav Boyanov contacted CEE Legal Matters to point out that it is incorrect to describe the concession of the Sofia Airport as a “privatization,” as, in his words, “in Bulgaria [this] is a different legal concept.” We appreciate the correction, and we apologize for the error.   

    This Article was originally published in Issue 6.2 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Bye to Britain: Schoenherr Sofia Draws Bulgarian Lawyers Home

    Unimpressed by Picadilly Circus and Trafalgar Square, Stela Pavlova and Katerina Kaloyanova have, in recent years, left positions with high-powered international law firms in London to return to their native Bulgaria and join Schoenherr’s office in Sofia. Both insist the trade-offs were less dramatic than many assume … and both credit Schoenherr Bulgaria’s Managing Partner Alexandra Doytchinova with making them feel right at home. 

    Stela Pavlova

    After obtaining her Master’s from the University of Oxford in 2013, Stela Pavlova completed Linklaters’ Legal Practice Course and worked under a training contract at Linklaters in London from 2015-2017, meanwhile also qualifying as a solicitor in the UK. “I think my plan was to return to Bulgaria at some point,” she says, “but I didn’t have a clear plan when. The idea was to gain as much experience as possible, then to return.”

    Pavlova reports that the deals she worked on in London were “complex and interesting,” but ironically, she insists that that very complexity limited her professional growth. “To be honest, it’s the partners and the managing associates that do the challenging work, because those deals are so big. The junior associates and trainees don’t get as much client contact, and don’t get to do as much deal-structuring work.” Accordingly, she says, “from a timing perspective it’s easier to progress in a career in Bulgaria than in the UK, where the career path of a solicitor is sort of set in stone.”

    And she says the opportunity to work in a smaller office, and on a more intimate team, was attractive as well. “In London, we worked on larger transactions with really large teams, sometimes of 15 people or more. I wanted to work on smaller teams, to get more client contact and experience, become more closely involved, and get more responsibility, sooner.” 

    In addition, she says, the differences in remuneration are less significant than many believe. “Definitely, the money is better in London,” she says, “but the expenses are higher as well.”

    Having decided to return to Bulgaria, Pavlova says, she applied to and interviewed with a number of firms, but she says that a meeting with the Schoenherr Managing Partner gave her all the information she needed. “The interview itself was really helpful, because it gave me a real sense of who Alexandra was, and I felt a massive difference between here and the other firms. In my particular case, in comparison to the partners from other firms, who tried to show off the achievements of their firms, Alexandra took an interest in me and my achievements and asked me what my plans were. That impressed me quite a bit. Once I came here I knew it was right.”

    And she insists that, back in Sofia, she’s able to get the kind of challenging work she wanted. At Schoenherr Sofia, she says, “most of the M&A work we do is new for the market, and requires new ways of structuring deals to meet our clients’ needs. In Bulgaria there are lots of bespoke transactions, with sophisticated and intellectual clients.” Thus, she insists, “it’s not true that the deals here are less interesting.” 

    All that, plus an attractive and welcoming atmosphere. “The culture of this particular firm is amazing, friendly, and supportive, which makes a lot of difference,” she says, “because I have friends at other firms in Sofia – purely Bulgarian/local firms – and they do not always have the same laid-back culture, and rarely have the same trainings and events where you get to know your colleagues better, and so on.” 

    Katerina Kaloyanova 

    Unlike Pavolova, Kaloyanova started her career in Bulgaria, working at a local firm before moving to London in 2006. After concluding her studies at the BBP Law School in London in 2008, she discovered she had four months to fill before her training contract with Hogan Lovells began. “I emailed a friend who was working at Schoenherr,” she recalls, “to ask if they would take me for four months or so, because I didn’t have anything to do. She told me to write to Alexandra and I did, and I asked if she would take me for four months, and she said yes. I was very happy, because – this was in 2008 – at that time, not many Bulgarian law firms would do something like that, because they would think ‘oh, we don’t want to invest for four months, and then you leave.’ Alexandra was very open-minded, to take me for just four months.”

    She acclimated quickly, and when the time came to move to London, Kaloyanova recalls, she left Schoenherr with some reluctance. “I was so sorry that I had to go back to England after the four months because I became such good friends with so many people. The atmosphere was so nice, we had so many events outside of the office, that it was amazing.”

    Still, moving to the UK was the right thing to do, Kaloyanova believes. “I didn’t feel I could learn as much as I wanted in Bulgaria. Especially because I wanted to focus on M&A work, and I wasn’t in the right environment in Bulgaria, so I decided to go to London, which is the hub for that kind of work. In London, the experience you can get is brilliant – I would say exceptional. I also spent six months in a secondment with SAB Miller – a client of Hogan Lovells – where I was able to see a transaction all the way from beginning to end.” 

    Still, she says, “if I had stayed in the UK I would – as Stella said – have gone through this career path very slowly, like an associate doing not such interesting work, then an associate doing slightly more interesting work, and so on.” 

    Happily, upon returning to Bulgaria, she discovered that her experience was even more useful than she had expected. “In two years I managed to learn so much that when I came back here I started working directly on projects like organizing due diligence work and managing transactions – I would say more senior work, rather than junior work.” And she notes that very few lawyers in the country have that kind of training and experience. “There aren’t very many UK-qualified lawyers in Bulgaria, so it gives us some kind of advantage. We’re able to do some English law transactions, and we can pass on our knowledge to other lawyers at the firm, and the clients – especially English-speaking clients – are very happy, because we talk the same and use the same concepts and understand the language.” 

    Of course, Kaloyanova also recognizes the other, more familiar benefits of working in CEE. “It’s not just the work and the quality of work we do here – we have all we could have in the UK as lawyers – but we also have a work-life balance. The lifestyle here is very different than it is for lawyers in the UK. We have lives outside the office.”  And, like Pavlova, she insists the financial trade-off is less severe than traditionally assumed. “I would say the standard of living is much higher here. Because the UK has become so expensive that you must be a top lawyer to afford a good standard of living in the UK.”

    Nonetheless, she says, “if it wasn’t Schoenherr, I don’t know if I would have come back.” And, like Pavlova, Kaloyanova credits her enthusiasm for the firm to one person above all others. “I liked particularly Alexandra’s open-mindedness,” she says, smiling. “The freedom she gives people, my colleagues, is amazing. I think you can give as much freedom to people as you have yourself.” 

    Alexandra Doytchinova

    For her part, Doytchinova waves away the compliments, insisting that hiring the two lawyers was a no-brainer. About hiring Kaloyanova for a short four-month period, she says, “this was at the time when work was pouring in, and we were happy for any quality support.” More importantly, she says, “we knew she was going away to get very good training, so this allowed us to get to know her and to decide if we’d want her if she came back. And even if she didn’t come back we knew we’d stay in contact and cooperate. So it was worth it anyway. You have to invest in people to get a return. You always have to do it.”

    “To hire someone who is trained in the UK, in the UK system, with the big London firms – the additional training and know-how they gained is hardly comparable on the market,” Doytchinova says. “It gives us a huge advantage on the local market in terms of M&A transactions, to actually perform up to international standards, and not just to claim that in pitches.”

    Although Doytchinova notes that her office does not offer English-law advice, she insists that the two associates provide significant value in other ways. “A huge value is their education and the training they received on the ground,” she says, as well as “the culture and working attitudes they bring.” According to her, “It’s otherwise difficult to get on this market. They manage to be efficient at the very highest standards. Clients appreciate that.”

    The Right Choice

    Both Kaloyanova and Pavlova are asked if they made the right choice in returning to Bulgaria, and in joining Schoenherr. “Absolutely,” they both laugh, in unison. Pavlova gets the last word: “I’m a British citizen, and even that doesn’t make me think about going back to England. I’m quite happy where I am.” 

    This Article was originally published in Issue 6.2 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Inside Insight: Interview with Hristina Burdasheva, Chief Counsel Legal and Compliance for South Central Europe at Mondelez International

    Hristina Burdasheva is the Chief Counsel Legal and Compliance of Mondelez International for South Central Europe and Deputy Chairman of the Management Board of Mondelez Bugaria Holding. She is based in Bulgaria.

    CEELM: You have spent your entire career in-house, with Rompetrol, Kraft Food, and now Mondelez International. Why did you decide to pursue that path instead of heading into private practice? 

    Hristina: It was indeed a very conscious choice and it took me a while before I started my in-house lawyer career. Being a business counsel covers all I am and what I want – having a higher purpose and cause, living with values and principles I truly share, raising myself professionally and personally surrounded by great professionals, being part of beloved corporate brands, in 150 countries around the world. There is no private practice that can give me access to the entire legal world at the tip of my fingers. Today, I am working on projects with colleagues from North America, Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East, which gives me a perspective I truly cherish.

    CEELM: Your role covers the South Central European hub (Romania, Bulgaria and East Adriatic Markets) for Mondelez International. Can you give us some insight into the different challenges presented by the various jurisdictions you cover for the company? In what ways are those jurisdictions different, for the purposes of your role? 

    Hristina: There are ten markets in the SCE hub – four of them are EU members and six are non-EU. We have nine languages and eight currencies. Sometimes it is difficult to define if we have more similarities rather than differences. This makes us deal with complexity every day. However, in Mondelez International we share the same values, like keep it simple and tell it like it is, regardless of where we are located, which helps us deliver the best possible legal service to the business under difficult conditions. I am happy my team and I have developed a world-class partnership with the business and our trusted counsels make every challenging case an opportunity to grow.

    CEELM: At Mondelez International you are in charge of both legal and compliance matters. Obviously, some companies prefer to separate those two roles. How do you divide your time between the two roles?

    Hristina: In fact, these two roles are also separated within Mondelez International. Business Integrity – our compliance function – is chaired globally by the VP & Chief of Global Governance and Corporate Secretary, to whom the regional Business Integrity Officer reports. They are fully dedicated to creating the framework and dealing with all compliance matters at a regional level, supported in the country by the legal counsels and where appropriate by other functions in their daily activities. 

    Our company structure supports our business strategy and the way we are structured reflects both the importance of compliance and legal services. Time allocation is not how we define priorities. 

    CEELM: What is your typical day at work like? 

    Hristina: I find myself well-organized with a common corporate life challenge: to follow my daily agenda. It can be explained with two main factors playing a big role: Mondelez International is in the FMCG industry, where speed rules. The other driver of this dynamic is specific for our region – the political and economic environments of South Central European markets are intensively shifting paths, making it necessary to adapt quickly to new trends and legislative changes. I live a dynamic and challenging work life full with projects and issues, and I am surrounded by young and talented professionals. This makes me happy and keeps me motivated.

    CEELM: What skills do you have, personally, that are most useful to you in your position?

    Hristina: Managing diversity and dealing with ambiguity are critical when you have many stakeholders to deal with – geographically and covering different professional areas in the commercial units. In addition, I have found out that being authentic, giving all your energy to understanding others and their challenges is what makes us trustworthy and powerful. 

    CEELM: What would you describe as your biggest success or greatest achievement as a lawyer?

    Hristina: I always strive for more. Therefore, I believe that my biggest success is ahead of me. My latest challenge was to lead the legal team in Mondelez Europe to design and implement the requirements of the GDPR. Our main objective was and still is to raise awareness and to train the entire organization to embrace data privacy in our daily life and operations.

    CEELM:  Tell us about the legal department at Mondelez International in its South Central European hub. 

    Hristina: The SCE Legal function is a boutique – but very impactful – team of great legal professionals, located in three countries: Romania, Serbia, and Bulgaria. I am amazed every day by the quality of this team, by their dedication, passion and creativity. It is a privilege to lead the South Central European Legal hub. Furthermore, we choose to partner with excellent outside counsels in the market where Mondelez International is not directly presented. The SCE Legal department is integrated with the Central Europe Legal family, where I report to the CE Chief Counsel.

    CEELM: In an ideal world, what would you like to see changed, professionally, either in the context of the legal environment you work in, or internally in Mondelez International?

    Hristina: In an ideal world, I would enjoy a legal environment where we are mature enough to trust self-regulation rather than restrictive regulations in all aspects. 

    CEELM: On a personal level, tell us a bit about yourself?

    Hristina: It is a blessing to do what you like and to love your job. I do. I am extremely lucky with the most loving family and desire to explore and travel – to get together. I am truly committed to start skiing and mountain biking and enjoying more time with my gorgeous teen-aged son.

    CEELM: And finally, on a lighter note: What do you think Bulgaria gets right that you would like the rest of the world to know more about? 

    Hristina: Hospitality. Tolerance. Adaptability. Authenticity. A unique language and culture. 

    This Article was originally published in Issue 6.2 of the CEE Legal Matters Magazine. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

  • Dimitrov Petrov & Co Helps Telenor Bulgaria Register as Insurance Agent

    Dimitrov Petrov & Co Helps Telenor Bulgaria Register as Insurance Agent

    Dimitrov Petrov & Co has helped Telenor Bulgaria obtain regulatory permission necessary for conducting the business of an insurance agent.

    The Dimitrov Petrov & Co team that prepared all of the necessary documentation for Telenor Bulgaria’s application for approval by the Financial Supervision Commission consisted of Partner Hristo Nihrizov, Senior Associate Dimitar Karabelov, and Associate Polya Donkova.

  • Boyanov & Co., Allen & Overy, Go2Law, and Spasov & Bratanov Advise on Financing of and Nova Bulgaria Sale

    Boyanov & Co., Allen & Overy, Go2Law, and Spasov & Bratanov Advise on Financing of and Nova Bulgaria Sale

    Boyanov & Co. has advised the lenders on a EUR 100 million syndicated financing of the Advance Media Group EAD’s EUR 185 million acquisition of the Nova Broadcasting Group from MTG Broadcasting AB and Eastern European Media Holdings S.A. Advance Media was reportedly assisted by O’Melveny & Myers in London and Kambourov & Partners in Sofia. MTG Broadcasting was advised by Allen & Overy, Go2Law, and Spasov & Bratanov, and Eastern European Media Holdings was reportedly advised by Mayer Brown.

    MTG disposed of its 95% stake in the Nova Broadcasting Group and Eastern European Media Holdings sold its 5%. Bulgaria’s UniCredit Bulbank, DSK Bank, and United Bulgarian Bank served as the original lenders in the deal, along with BNP Paribas Bank in Belgium, and UniCredit Bulbank and BNP Paribas were the Mandated Lead Arrangers. UniCredit Bulbank also served as an Escrow, Facility, and Security Agent.

    The Advance Media Group is a subsidiary of Advance Properties OOD, a Bulgaria-based business that owns 117 companies across 23 countries. Advance Properties’ portfolio companies operate in more than ten industries including pharmaceuticals, shipping, port operation, real estate, and power generation. The group is jointly owned by Bulgarian businessmen Kiril Domuschiev and Georgi Domuschiev.

    The Boyanov & Co. team consisted of Partner Damian Simeonov and Senior Associate Georgi Drenski.

    Allen & Overy’s team consisted of London-based Partner Lisa Goransson and Prague-based Partner Prokop Verner and Associate Jakub Cech. GO2Law’s Hugh Owen served as an external consultant and English law counsel.

    The Spasov & Bratanov team was led by Managing Partner Georgi Spasov and included Associates Nayden Raychinov, Vladimir Tashev, and Kremena Yaneva-Ivanova.

    Editor’s Note: After this article was published Kambourov & Partners confirmed that it advised the Advance Media Group on the acquisition. The firm’s team consisted of Managing Partner Vladimir Rangeloff, Partners Veronika Hadjieva, Margarita Guigova, and Nikolay Vasilchev, Senior Associates Christian Dimitrov and Ivo Alexandrov, and Associate Yana Todorova.

    Subsequently, Tsvetkova Bebov Komarevski announced that it acted Eastern European Media Holdings on Bulgarian legal aspects of the transaction. The firm’s team consisted of Partner Venelin Dimitrov and Senior Associate Iva Georgieva.