Author: admin

  • Sayenko Kharenko Backs Pro Bono Project Setting Ukrainian Defenders’ Poetry to Music

    Sayenko Kharenko has provided pro bono support for a cultural initiative that aims to set war-time poems, written by Ukrainian defenders, to music. 

    The Sayenko Kharenko team is led by Partner Bohdan Nazarenko who, according to the firm, is a National Guard serviceman and poet who has published two collections of poems penned by himself and fellow soldiers, many of whom have either fallen or been severely affected by the conflict. 

    The Sayenko Kharenko team also included Partner Oleg Klymchuk and Associates Anastasia Finko and Ihor Korohod.

  • Linklaters and DLA Piper Advise on Qualitas Energy’s Acquisition of Solar Farm Portfolio from Ib Vogt

    Linklaters has advised Qualitas Energy on its acquisition of a 117-megawatt-peak solar farm portfolio from Ib Vogt in Poland. DLA Piper advised Ib Vogt.

    Qualitas Energy is an investment and management platform focused on renewable energy, energy transition, and sustainable infrastructure investment.

    Ib Vogt is a renewable energy development platform.

    According to Linklaters, “the portfolio consists of two photovoltaic solar farms, both in a ‘ready-to-build’ phase, with construction scheduled to commence in the second and third quarters of 2025. The plants, located in central Poland, are expected to achieve commercial operation by the second half of 2026, generating over 125 gigawatt-hours of clean energy annually. This is sufficient to supply electricity to approximately 65,000 households.”

    The Linklaters team included Managing Partner Marcin Schulz, Partner Patryk Figiel, Counsel Jakub Dabrowski, Managing Associate Michal Nocon, Senior Associates Adam Usiadek, Jan Jurga, and Lukasz Czerepak, Associates Aleksandra Kurecka and Dominik Piechowiak, and Junior Associate Maria Majchrzak.

    The DLA Piper team included Partner Jacek Gizinski, Counsels Mateusz Koszel and Klaudia Lorent, Senior Associates Maciej Rafalowski and Wojciech Sulimierski, Associates Pawel Szostek, Karol Wasyluk, and Michal Gizewski, and Junior Associates Marcelina Dembinska and Zofia Waszczykowska.

  • KPS, Vukina & Partners, Tus and Grzic, and Mamic, Grgic, Vinter Advise on Mlin i Pekare’s Reverse Takeover of Cakovecki Mlinovi

    Kovacevic Prpic Simeunovic has advised Mlin i Pekare on its reverse takeover of Cakovecki Mlinovi. Vukina & Partners advised OTP Bank, which financed the transaction. Tus and Grzic advised PBZ Croatia Osiguranje on the sale of its stake. Mamic, Grgic, Vinter advised the management board of Cakovecki Mlinovi. Pesut, Matic, Galekovic, and Zgombic reportedly advised the sellers of the initial stake in Cakovecki Mlinovi. Gugic, Kovacic & Krivic reportedly advised AZ, a pension management company that sold its stake in Cakovecki Mlinovi.

    According to KPS, as a result of this transaction, Mlin i Pekare has merged with Cakovecki Mlinovi, with the goal of strengthening both companies’ positions in Croatia’s food and retail industries.

    In 2024, Kovacevic Prpic Simeunovic advised on the mandatory takeover bid for Cakovecki Mlinovi (as reported by CEE Legal Matters on October 28, 2024)

    The KPS team included Partners Dinka Kovacevic and Martina Prpic and Associates Valentina Plantic and Martina Visnjic.

    The Vukina & Partners team included Partners Fran Vukina, Mislav Vukina, and Dora Turalija and Senior Associate Martin Labas.

    The Tus & Grzic team included Senior Partner Tomislav Tus and Associates Ivana Busic and Lorena Basic.

    The Mamic, Grgic, Vinter team included Partners Jakov Mamic and Martina Vinter and Attorney at Law Anita Grabar.

    Editor’s Note: After this article was published, Pesut, Matic, Galekovic, and Zgombic confirmed it advised Stjepan and Ruzica Varga. The firm’s team included Partners Edita Matic and Kresimir Galekovic.

  • Aksan Advises APY Ventures on Investment in Minted Connect

    Aksan has advised APY Ventures on its investment in Minted Connect.

    Minted Connect is an embedded finance platform that seeks to make investing in precious metals more accessible.

    In 2023, Aksan advised APY Ventures on investment in Gamester Kids (as reported by CEE Legal Matters on October 20, 2023).

    The Aksan team included Partner Sevki Ozgur Altindas and Associate Oguz Madran. 

    Aksan did not respond to our inquiry on the matter.

  • Ukrainian Parliament Approves Revolutionary Law Changing Grid Connection of Renewables and Certain Other Related Key Rules

    A new law that will significantly improve the grid connection of renewables was approved by the Ukraine’s parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, on January 14, 2025.

    The Law on Amendments to Certain Laws of Ukraine in the Field of Energy and in the Field of Heat Supply to Clarify Provisions Related to the Martial Law in Ukraine (the “Law”) on the basis of draft law No. 9381 dated June 13, 2023 also changes certain regulatory aspects related to the renewables projects. On January 17, 2025 the Law was signed by the chairman of Verkhovna Rada and submitted for the president’s signature. Unless vetoed by the president, the majority of the Law’s provisions will enter into force on the date following its official publication by the president.

    Once the Law takes effect the necessary secondary legislation must be adopted within the following timeframes:

    • By the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine – four months from the Law’s date of entry into force.
    • By the National Energy and Utilities Regulatory Commission (the “Regulator”) – six months from the date taking effect by the Law.

    Please find below an overview of the key changes introduced by the Law:

    1. Extension of the term of the grid connection agreement and technical conditions

    1. Technical conditions for the grid connection of power facilities to the distribution and transmission grids are valid for the term necessary to construct the power facilities but not more than three years from the date of its issuance. Please note that until the Law enters into force under the current rules, the term of the grid connection conditions for solar power plants are two years and for other renewable energy power plants – three years.If the design documentation for connection is approved (if required by the grid connection agreement), the grid connection fee is paid and the documents necessary to carry out construction works are obtained, the term of the technical conditions is extended for as much as six years from the date of the grid connection agreement.
    2. If the approved design is absent or the grid connection fee is not paid during the term of the technical conditions, the respective grid connection agreement is deemed terminated.

    2. New rules for payment of the grid connection for connecting to the transmission system

    1. When an applicant for the technical conditions to the transmission grid obtains the technical conditions, it is obliged to pay the grid connection fee in an amount of UAH equivalent to €10 for each kW of the requested capacity for connection. It is paid as follows:
      1. 50 percent within 30 days after obtaining the technical conditions
      2. 50 percent within 12 months after obtaining the technical conditions unless otherwise determined by the grid connection agreement or earlier termination of the agreement by the connecting company
    2. The company entitled to connect its facilities under the grid connection agreement (the “Connecting Company”) is entitled to request return of the paid grid connection fee if it initiates the grid connection agreement termination within six months after obtaining the technical conditions.
    3. The Connecting Company must prepare the design documentation for grid connection and have it approved by transmission system operator within 12 months after obtaining the technical conditions. If it fails to do so, the grid connection agreement is deemed terminated and the paid grid connection fee is retained by the transmission system operator.
    4. Connecting Companies that currently hold technical conditions for connecting to the transmission system must bring their grid connection agreements in line with the rules discussed above within three months after the Law has taken effect and pay the grid connection fee indicated above as follows:
      1. 50 percent within 30 days after obtaining the invoice that is issued by the transmission system operator (the “TSO”) not later than 100 days after the Law has taken effect
      2. 50 percent within six months after making the first payment
    5. If Connecting Companies with current technical conditions make the above payments, they are obliged to prepare the design for the grid connection and have it approved within nine months after the Law takes effect or initiate the termination of the grid connection agreement (and request already paid fees). Otherwise, the grid connection agreement is deemed terminated.

    3. Special rules for extending existing grid connection agreements for RES Producers

    If RES Producers entered into grid connection agreements (either TSO or DSO) before the entry into force by the Law, the grid connection agreement and technical conditions are deemed extended for three years from the date when the Law takes effect if the following conditions are satisfied:

    • The grid connection agreement was valid as of the date of the Martial Law introduction (24 February 2022)
    • On the date of entry into force by the Law the RES Producer:
      • Prepared the design for the grid connection and have it approved by the respective operator
      • Handed over such design documentation to the respective operator
      • Paid the grid connection fee in accordance with the grid connection agreement

    4. The electricity producers connected to the transmission grid will be entitled to connect other electricity producers to their grid according to the conditions in the transmission system code; before the Law this was not possible

    5. Cable pooling rules

    1. The RES Producer and another electricity producer are entitled to connect in one connection point generational installations producing electricity from any energy source which was not possible before the Law.
    2. Installed capacity of such installations may exceed the amount of the allowed (contractual) capacity but the capacity of output to the grid must not exceed the allowed (contractual) capacity.
    3. The RES Producers and other electricity producers may connect installations of other producers to their grid as per the procedure to be established by the Regulator subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:
      1. The total installed capacity of installations for production of electricity may exceed the amount of the allowed (contractual) capacity but the capacity of output to the grid must not exceed the allowed (contractual) capacity.
      2. Separate metering of electricity by installations owned by different producers.

    6. Grid capacity booking for wind projects

    1. Companies willing to connect wind farms with the installed capacity 20 MW and more (the “WPP Developers”) may enter into the capacity booking agreement with the TSO on the basis of the standard form to be approved by the Regulator and in accordance with the procedure established by the transmission system code.
    2. Under the booking reservation agreement, the TSO books technical solutions for the connection scheme of the generating facilities of the WPP Developer, and the WPP Developer must submit applications for connection of electrical installations and conclude a grid connection agreement within two years from the date of the agreement.
    3. Within 20 calendar days from the date of the agreement, the WPP Developer must deposit to the escrow account the capacity booking fee in an amount equivalent to €5 per 1 kW of capacity booked under the capacity reservation agreement in accordance with the official exchange rate set by the National Bank of Ukraine. If it fails to pay the capacity booking fee within the specified period, the capacity booking agreement will be terminated.
    4. The connection scheme under which the capacity booking agreement is made is determined by the TSO. The WPP Developer must develop the relevant design documentation in order to determine the final scope of work required for the implementation of the capacity delivery scheme, and the TSO must prepare a technical solution based on the approved design documentation.
    5. If the WPP Developer applies to the TSP within the period specified in such agreement with an application for connection of the electrical installations booked under the capacity booking agreement, the capacity booking fee paid under the capacity booking agreement is credited towards the payment for connection of such electrical installations. If it fails to do so, the funds deposited in the escrow account are transferred to the transmission system operator and the capacity booking agreement is deemed terminated.

    7. More flexible rules to use battery energy storage facilities (BESS) connected to generation facilities

    1. RES Producers have been expressly allowed to withdraw electricity from the grid by the BESS connected to their generation facilities if they don’t have established “green” tariff, or even if the “green” tariff has been established, but respective RES Producers have left the balancing group of the guaranteed buyer, provided that
      1. At any time, the total capacity of the electricity that is supplied from the producer’s networks to the grid or withdrawn from the grid and supplied to the electricity producer’s networks does not exceed the capacity ordered for connection, taking into account the permitted (contractual) capacity of electricity production and consumption (respectively) of the electricity producer’s installations at the place of licensed activity
      2. There is a separate commercial metering of electricity flowing to/from the BESS
    2. RES Producers with an established “green” tariff and remaining in the balancing group of the guaranteed buyer may use BESS only for withdrawing electricity from the generation facilities and not from the grid (the effective rules remain unchanged for them).

    8. Improvements in the CFD auctions procedure for renewables

    The quota of annual support that may be distributed to the companies controlled by one ultimate beneficial owner was increased from 25 percent to 50 percent.

    9. Municipalities are allowed to additionally stimulate deployment of renewables in their territories

    Local self-government authorities are expressly authorized to provide additional incentives for deployment of renewables upon approval of the program to incentivize development of the distributed generation in their territories. Express rules for connecting renewable power plants to the grid of state and municipal entities

    10. Lease of state and municipal lands and other property to producers of electricity from renewables (RES Producers) with the offtake by the property owner/holder

    1. The Law expressly allows the leasing out of municipal and state-owned lands or other property to RES Produces to install the respective renewables installation and BESS with the obligation of the property owner or authorized holder to offtake all electricity of RES Producers produced on such lands that will simplify contractual framework and procurement procedures for relevant agreements.
    2. The respective power purchase agreements are executed for the term of the lease agreement.
    3. Land and property owner/holder is entitled to become a prosumer with all rights under the Law of Ukraine on Electricity Market

    11. Contest procedures for the construction of new generation capacity, which among other things envisage the capacity payment support mechanism, expressly cover generation facilities with BESS

    12. Settlement of the debts in the power market

    1. The Law allocates the excess income from activities of the dispatch (operational and technological) department in 2023 and 2024 for the following purposes:
      1. 45 percent to repay the TSO’s debt generated in the balancing market
      2. 45 percent to cover costs and repay the TSO’s debt to the guaranteed buyer under the service agreement for increasing the share of electricity generation from alternative energy sources with the guaranteed buyer
      3. 10 percent to cover costs and repay debts of TSOs to universal service providers under service agreements to ensure an increase in the share of electricity production from alternative sources with the universal service provider for the purpose of further payment by universal service providers for electricity produced by private households’ generating facilities using alternative energy sources

    13. Suspension of certain enforcement procedures

    1. Temporarily, for the duration of Martial Law, enforcement actions concerning the following debts of electricity market participants arising February 24, 2022 to September 1, 2024 have been suspended this includes:
      1. The inflation index for the entire period of delay in the monetary obligation
      2. 3 percent per annum of the overdue amount of the monetary obligation or other interest rate established by contract or law
    2. The list of debtors and their debts, which include the guaranteed buyer and its debts to RES Producers, with the indication of court case numbers will be published on the Regulator’s official website.

    This information does not constitute legal advice and is merely the opinion of the author.

    By Maksym Sysoiev, Partner, Dentons

  • Cytowski & Partners Advises Axoflow on USD 7 Million Seed Series

    Cytowski & Partners has advised Hungary-based Axoflow on its USD 7 million seed series with the participation of the EBRD, Credo Ventures, and E2.VC. Dentons reportedly advised the EBRD.

    In 2023, Cytowski & Partners advised Axoflow on its USD 2.5 million seed round (as reported by CEE Legal Matters on July 31, 2023).

    The Cytowski & Partners team included Partner Tytus Cytowski and Associates Eresi Uche, Heidi Fang, and Fabiana Morales Centurion. 

  • Vlasceanu and Partners Advises Premier Energy Group on Acquisition of Development Power Solar Energy

    Vlasceanu and Partners has advised Premier Energy subsidiary Alive Renewable Holding Limited on its acquisition of Development Power Solar Energy.

    According to Vlasceanu and Partners, the transaction will facilitate the development of a 49-megawatt DC solar park and a 16-megawatt-hour energy storage facility in Buzau County, Romania, with commercial operations targeted for the second half of 2025.

    The Vlasceanu and Partners team included Partner Loredana Vlasceanu, Managing Associate Dan Oltean, and Senior Associates Laura Panait and Stefania-Gabriela David.

    Vlasceanu and Partners did not respond to our inquiry on the matter.

  • Akcan Yavuz Attorney Partnership Opens For Business

    Former Ozok Law Office Partners Zeynep Yavuz and Sule Akcan have come together to launch the Akcan Yavuz Attorney Partnership.

    According to Akcan Yavuz Attorney Partnership, “this milestone in our career marks the culmination of years of hard work and growth. We are deeply grateful to everyone who has supported us throughout this journey. Your trust and encouragement have been invaluable. We remain committed to delivering top-quality service and focusing on an effective, solution-oriented approach.”

    Before setting up the new firm, Yavuz was with Ozok Law Office as a Partner between 2019 and 2025. Earlier, she was a Partner with Akol, Ozok, Namli between 2015 and 2019. Earlier still, she was an Associate with ASC Law Firm between 2011 and 2015 and a Lawyer with the Garanti Bank between 2007 and 2011.

    Before teaming up with Yavuz, Akcan was also a part of Ozok Law Office – first as a Senior Associate between 2019 and 2021 and then as a Partner between 2022 and 2025. Earlier, she was with Akol, Ozok, Namli as well, as an Associate between 2015 and 2019. Earlier still, she worked for Aksu, Caliskan, Beygo as an Intern Lawyer between 2012 and 2013 and as an Associate between 2013 and 2015.

  • Serbian Competition Commission Submits Four Draft Proposals to Government for Block Exemption Regulations

    On 21 January 2025, the Serbian Commission for Protection of Competition submitted draft proposals to the Government for four new regulations concerning the exemption of certain categories of agreements from the prohibition of restrictive agreements.

    The drafts were finalised following a public consultation and subsequent legal and technical revisions, which took place after their initial publication in July 2024.

    The package includes an updated draft of the Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (“VBER”), along with new regulations addressing vertical agreements in the motor vehicle sector, agreements in the railway and road transport sectors, as well as technology transfer agreements.

    These proposals aim to further align the Serbian antitrust regime with the EU, specifically the new Vertical Block Exemption Regulation and accompanying Vertical Guidelines issued by the European Commission. They also reflect recent market developments, particularly the growth of e-commerce and digital platforms, which have introduced novel forms of vertical relationships.

    The final drafts incorporate several amendments stemming from the public consultation. A key revision involves the market share threshold for group exemptions in vertical agreements. The initial draft set this threshold at 25 % for both suppliers and buyers in their respective relevant markets but is now increased to 30 % to align with EU and regional rules. Still, certain discrepancies between the local and EU regime persist. For example, the new Serbian VBER introduces the concept of “shared exclusivity”, allowing a supplier to appoint up to three distributors per exclusive territory or customer group. In contrast, the EU regime provides for a limit of up to five distributors per exclusive territory or customer group.

    The proposed regulations await Government approval. Once approved, market participants will have six months to align their agreements with the new requirements.

    By Srdjana Petronijevic, Danijel Stevanovic, and Zoran Soljaga, Partners, and Nina Rasljanin, Attorney at Law, Schoenherr

  • Czech Act on Digitalization of the Financial Market

    On December 6, 2024, the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic approved the Act on Digitalisation of the Financial Market (ZDFT), which represents an important step in adapting the Czech legal framework to European regulations in the area of digital financial markets.

    The Act responds to the challenges associated with the application of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 of the European Parliament, the Council on the Digital Operational Resilience of the Financial Sector (DORA), Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament, and of the Council on Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA). The aim of the ZDFT is to create a solid foundation for the application of these regulations in the Czech context, and thus ensure the stability and security of digital financial transactions.

    Here, we present the main features of the new law, its practical implications, and the specifics of Czech regulation in the area of digital finance and crypto assets – including the role of the Czech National Bank (CNB) as a key regulator in this rapidly developing sector.

    Position of the Czech National Bank on sanctions

    One of the key aspects of this legislation is the role of the CNB, which will become the sole and common authority under both regulations. The CNB will not only oversee compliance with the new rules, but also supervise service providers in the field of crypto-assets and other digital finance. Further, all incidents under DORA are to be reported to the CNB, as the Czech Republic did not make use of the discretion to create Computer Security Incident Response (CSIRT) teams.

    Czech legislators ensured that the CNB is equipped with relevant powers (such as those based on Articles 94 and 111 MiCA) by either specifically listing them in the ZDFT, or relying on the powers that CNB has already been granted. The legislature grants additional powers to the CNB, including:

    • The power to impose specific interim measures in cases concerning the prevention of market abuse (Title VI MiCA). The CNB may order, by way of a preliminary measure, that no transfers of the assets or funds in question be carried out if a person is the subject of sanction proceedings. This applies to the person holding the individual’s crypto-assets, the crypto-assets that have been transferred by the individual, and the bank or credit union holding the individual’s account or the account to which they have transferred funds.
    • Enforcement fines. Compliance with corrective measures is enforced by the CNB through the successive imposition of enforcement fines. The amount of each fine may not exceed approximately EUR 200,000 (CZK 5,000,000), and the aggregate amount may not exceed approximately EUR 800,000 (CZK 20,000,000).
    • The CNB’s ability to maintain its own registers under MiCA. In other words, registries of white papers, stablecoin issuers, cryptocurrency-related service providers, among others. However, these lists will be informative only, and the primary information will always be the information contained in the registers maintained by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) pursuant to Articles 109 and 110 MiCA.

    Furthermore, the CNB is authorized to impose a range of sanctions for offences, which may consist of violations of DORA or MiCA, as well as violations of the ZDFT. The Czech legislation has not used the possibility of imposing criminal sanctions for violations of the regulation either in the case of DORA (Article 52) or MiCA (Article 111(1)). At the same time, however, the addressees of these regulations may still commit offences generally related to their activities, eg, the offence of unauthorized business.

    The obligation to sanction offences by a financial entity consisting of a breach of DORA derives directly from this regulation, but the level of sanctions has been left to the individual states. While the standard fines in EU financial services legislation are often millions of euros, the amounts in the case of the ZDFT are of lower magnitude, particularly due to the fact that DORA also applies to much smaller entities, such as banks. The maximum fine for breaches of DORA is up to CZK 50,000,000 (approximately EUR 2,000,000 as of January 2025), which may be imposed for failure to comply with the risk management framework, failure to implement an information and communication technology business continuity policy, failure to comply with the notification obligation under Article 19 of DORA, or failure to comply with the digital resilience testing obligation.

    With respect to the offenses and penalties for MiCA violations, the legislature was required to follow the requirements set forth in the MiCA. In all cases, the ZDFT provides for the lowest possible penalties allowed by the regulation. The penalties have been expressed in CZK in the Czech law, based on the exchange rates from December 29, 2023. However, it is worth noting that due to the movement of the exchange rate between CZK and EUR from June 29, 2023 to January 2025, when the Czech koruna appreciated against the EUR, the penalties as of January 2025, when converted into EUR, are even lower than the EUR amounts otherwise provided for in the MiCA Regulation.

    For natural persons, the maximum penalty is CZK 118,475,000 (approximately EUR 4,700,000 as of January 2025) or three times the amount of the undue benefit. For legal persons, the maximum penalty is CZK 355,425,000 (approximately EUR 14,100,000 as of January 2025), or 15 percent of the total annual turnover of the offender, or three times the amount of the undue benefit.

    Provision of services related to crypto-assets

    The Czech Republic has not exercised its discretion to shorten or exclude this grandfather clause (143(3) MiCA), but specified that it would only apply to providers who operated on the basis of the free trade “provision of services related to virtual assets” under Act No. 455/1991 Coll, Trade Licensing Act, as of December 30, 2024.

    In terms of the specifics of the performance of activities related to crypto-assets markets, the ZDFT first specifies the application of the requirements arising from MiCA in the Czech legal order, in particular its connection to other applicable Czech acts, such as Act No. 370/2017 Coll. on payment transactions (Payment Transactions Act) regarding stablecoins, or Act No. 182/2006 Coll., the Insolvency Act, regarding the protection of asset reserves at stablecoins and any funds collected from holders.

    The obligation of service providers to periodically inform the competent supervisory authority (ie, the CNB) of the facts listed in Article 67 MiCA will be fulfilled in the Czech legal environment by submitting officially audited financial statements four months prior to the end of the accounting period.

    Further, individual Member States have been given the power to set requirements for the competence of service providers under MiCA (81(7) MiCA). In the context of the ZDFT, this includes knowledge of the regulation and provision of services related to crypto-assets, as well as the ability to properly explain the nature of crypto-assets and information relating to crypto-assets or crypto-related services to the customer, and to provide recommendations. The legislator further states that as the crypto-asset market has a large variability of assets, a basic understanding of the structure, entities, and functioning of this market is required. They state that the provider should have a sufficient overview of the basic investment and payment assets offered in the market, particularly in the EU market.

    In addition to MiCA, the ZDFT introduces an obligation for service providers to have the adequacy of the measures taken to protect assets, in particular entrusted funds, verified by the law governing auditing activities, with a report on this verification to be provided to the CNB without delay.

    By Tomas Scerba, Partner, and Jan Metelka, Senior Associate, DLA Piper